Responsible Use of Oral Corticosteroids in People with Comorbid Diabetes: An Expert Consensus.

Globally, diabetes mellitus (DM) is a substantial contributor to morbidity and mortality. Comorbidities and intercurrent illnesses in people with diabetes may necessitate the use of steroids. Acute as well as chronic use of steroids contributes substantially to the development of various complications. Despite this, there are no standard guidelines or consensus to provide a unified approach for the rational use of steroids in people with diabetes. Also, there is scant harmonization among clinicians with the use of different steroids in routine practice. To address the inconsistencies in this clinical arena, the consensus working group (CWG) formulated a unified consensus for steroid use in people with diabetes. In people with diabetes, the use of steroids causes hyperglycemia and may precipitate diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). An increase in weight is directly related to the dose and duration of the steroid therapy. Steroid-related alterations in hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and hypertension (HTN) add to the increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. The risk of complications such as infections, osteoporosis, myopathy, acne, cataracts, and glaucoma may increase with the use of steroids. Appropriate and timely monitoring of these complications is necessary for early detection and treatment of such complications. Given the systemic effects of various antihyperglycemic drugs, there is a possibility of aggravating or diminishing the specific complications. Preference to a safer steroid is required matching the steroid dose equivalence and individualizing patient management. In conclusion, short-, intermediate-, or long-term use of steroids in people with diabetes demands their rational use and holistic approach to identify, monitor, and treat the complications induced or aggravated by the steroids.

Evolving Scope of Clinical Empathy in the Current Era of Medical Practice.

Clinical empathy is one of the most essential tools of medical practice, and it is an act of correctly acknowledging the emotional state of another without experiencing that state oneself. Empathy comprises four components. Mounting evidence exists to support the use of clinical empathy as a tactic for effective health care. Resolving the multi-fold barriers of clinical empathy is important. Clinical empathy is very important in the current era, and a trust-based relationship in patient care is a way to optimal clinical outcomes that can be achieved through better communication and treatment-compliance plans between health care professionals and patients.

Clinical Evidence and Practice-Based Guidelines on the Utility of Basal Insulin Combined Oral Therapy (Metformin and Glimepiride) in the Current Era.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Basal insulin combined oral therapy consisting of insulin and oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) is recommended for type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on OADs. There is a lack of clear evidence and recommendations on the combined use of basal insulin analogues to more than one OADs (glimepiride plus metformin) in effective control of glycemic parameters and its safety in terms of reduced hypoglycemic events, weight gain and cardiovascular risk. In this context, a group of clinical experts discussed the utility of basal insulin combined oral therapy with metformin and glimepiride in the current era. METHODS: The clinical experts discussed and provided their inputs virtually. The expert panel included clinical experts comprising endocrinologists and diabetologists from India and Nepal. RESULTS: The panel thoroughly reviewed existing literature on the subject and proposed clinical evidence and practice-based guidelines. CONCLUSION: These current clinical practice guidelines highlight the efficacy and safety of basal insulin combination therapy with various available basal insulins including neutral protamine hagedorn, detemir, glargine and degludec in addition to metformin and glimepiride therapy.

Assessment of determining factors for severity of NeoCOVIDiabetes in India: A pan India multicentric retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a bidirectional relationship between COVID-19 and diabetes. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of patients newly detected to have diabetes (NDD) who recovered from COVID-19 in India whilst comparing NDD with patients without diabetes (ND) and those who have known to have diabetes (KD) in terms of glycemic status pre- and post-COVID with disease severity. MATERIALS & METHODOLOGY: There were 2212 participants enrolled from 15 sites, with 1630 active participants after the respective execution of selection criteria. Data collection was done using a specialized Case Record Form (CRF). Planned statistical analysis and descriptive statistics were concluded for significance between patient groups on various parameters. RESULT: The differences in age between the study groups were statistically significant. The average blood glucose at COVID-19 onset was significantly higher in KD than in NDD. Significantly more proportion of NDD (83%) had been hospitalized for COVID management when compared to KD (45%) and ND (55%). The NDD group received higher doses of steroids than the other two groups. On average, patients in the NDD group who received at least one vaccination (one dose or two doses) had a higher High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) score. Patients who had not been vaccinated in ND and KD groups experienced a higher HRCT score. CONCLUSION: Prospective metabolism studies in post-acute COVID-19 will be required to understand the etiology, prognosis, and treatment opportunities.

Consensus on Current Landscape and Treatment Trends of Obesity in India for Primary Care Physicians.

Objectives: The objective of this consensus article was to form a list of expert recommendations and an easily adaptable algorithm for obesity management in India by primary care physicians (PCPs). Methods: A Delphi-based model was followed to form a list of the consensus recommendations. Consensus statements were created from the results of a literature review that were graded as per the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria. After being evaluated by an expert panel comprising diabetologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, bariatric surgeons, and gynecologists, the statements were revised and reevaluated by a larger group of practitioners, including PCPs and diabetologists, to arrive at a consensus. Results: The panel opined that obesity is increasing in prevalence in India and is projected to rise in the coming years. Body mass index and waist circumference were both recommended for better identification of people at risk of obesity-related comorbidities than either of them alone. The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) was suggested as being most suitable for the assessment (staging) of obesity. A multidisciplinary team was considered invaluable for assessing and managing patients with obesity. The use of once-a-week semaglutide (2.4 mg) via the subcutaneous route was suggested as the first-choice anti-obesity treatment when pharmacotherapy is deemed necessary. An algorithm considering all these aspects was proposed. Conclusion: Obesity needs to be recognized as a significant contributor to other comorbidities. The diagnosis and management of obesity should be comprehensive and consider patient psychology, the presence or absence of comorbidities, available pharmacologic agents, and long-term outcomes. The proposed algorithm could help clinicians in this aspect and improve the overall outcomes. How to cite this article: Deshpande NR, Kapoor N, Dalal JJ, et al. Consensus on Current Landscape and Treatment Trends of Obesity in India for Primary Care Physicians. J Assoc Physicians India 2023;71(10):69-77.

SGLT2i as a First-line Antihyperglycemic in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes in the Context of Indians: A Systematic Review and Consensus.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been used for almost a decade and have proven to be effective not only in managing Type 2 diabetes (T2D), but their cardio and renal protective features make them very useful in managing patients with risk of multiple comorbidities. This systematic review was undertaken by the authors because there is no evidence currently available in India that has studied the suitability of SGLT2i as a first-line agent in patients newly diagnosed with T2D in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, literature was searched to identify features that are considered important when deciding on a first-line agent for managing T2D. A total of 5 broad topics were identified-glycemic control, extra glycemic effects, antihyperglycemic combination therapy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. These domains had further subheadings, and a total of 16 domains were identified. Metformin is the drug of choice as a first-line agent in such situations and has been considered the gold standard for evaluating the effects of SGLT2i across these domains. A systematic literature review on each domain was conducted to compare SGLT2i with the gold standard in Indian patients newly diagnosed with T2D. Evidence was graded (levels of evidence (LoE)-A, B, and C), and recommendations (class of recommendation (CoR)-I, II, and III) were classified by the expert group as defined in the methodology. RESULTS: According to the systematic reviews conducted, 11 domains had Level A evidence, 2 domains (impact on lipids and gut microbiome) had Level B, and 3 domains had Level C (ß-cell function, renal protection, and glycemic variability) evidence. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the authors recommend SGLT2i as a first-line agent for managing newly diagnosed patients with T2D with a Class I recommendation for 13 domains and Class II for the remaining 3 (impact on lipids, gut microbiome, and ß-cell function). Although a poorer level of evidence (Level C) was available for the glycemic variability domain, the authors still reported this as Class I recommendations according to their expert opinion and consensus. CONCLUSION: This article advocates adopting SGLT2 inhibitors as the primary treatment choice for treating patients with newly diagnosed T2D in India.

Two Decades of Gla-100-Reflections from the Pivotal Clinical Trials.

The progressive nature of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) renders the shifting of patients from oral drugs to insulin therapy an inevitability in most patients especially in those with long duration of diabetes. At the turn of the last millennium, neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin was still the only long-acting insulin available for people with diabetes. The advent of the first truly long-acting basal insulin, i.e. insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) brought to the table a remarkably long duration of action and a very minimal risk of hypoglycemia by due to less pronounced peaks in their action profile. Further, in trying to achieve fasting normoglycemia, Gla-100 has demonstrated remarkably more holistic glucose-lowering efficacy in several pivotal trials compared to other insulin formulations, such as premixed insulin and coformulations-apart from NPH insulin. This article delineates clinical data on the effectiveness of Gla-100 vs. other insulin formulations in the context of T2DM.

Suboptimal glycemic control among subjects with diabetes mellitus in India: a subset analysis of cross-sectional wave-7 (2016) data from the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the real-world management practices of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in India. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted between 7 March 2016 and 15 May 2016 in India as part of the seventh wave (2016) of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Adult subjects with T1DM or T2DM visiting physicians during a 2-week recruitment period were included. RESULTS: A total of 55 physicians included 539 subjects who met eligibility criteria. Of 495 subjects with T2DM, 303 were treated with oral glucose lowering drugs (OGLDs) only, 158 were treated with OGLD + insulin, and 27 received insulin only. Among 44 subjects with T1DM receiving insulin, 13 (29.5%) were also treated with OGLD therapy. The most commonly used insulin regimens were basal alone (69/184; 37.5%) and premixed alone (63/184; 34.2%) in subjects with T2DM, and basal + prandial insulin (24/44; 54.5%) in subjects with T1DM. Proportions of subjects achieving glycemic targets were low [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <7%: T1DM = 7.3% (3/44), T2DM = 25.2% (106/495); as targeted by the treating physician: T1DM = 31.8% (14/44), T2DM = 32.1% (59/185); global target: T1DM = 4.8% (2/42) and T2DM = 1.7% (8/482)]. In subjects with T2DM, HbA1c <7% was noted in 11/22 subjects receiving insulin only and 76/260 receiving only OGLDs. Lack of experience in self-managing insulin dosing, poor diabetes education and failure to titrate insulin dosages were the main reasons for non-achievement of glycemic targets. CONCLUSION: Timely insulinization, education and empowerment of people with diabetes may help improve glycemic control in India.

Evidence-based recommendations for insulin intensification strategies after basal insulin in type 2 diabetes.

Over the time due to progressive nature of diabetes, proactive intensification of the existing insulin therapy becomes imminent as it minimizes patients' exposure to chronic hypo/hyperglycaemia and reduces weight gain while achieving individualized glycaemic targets. This review focuses on the strength of evidence behind various options for intensification, primarily the insulins as also the GLP-1 analogues. The recommendations presented here are meant to serve as a guide for the physician managing type 2 diabetes patients requiring insulin intensification upon failing of basal insulin therapy.

Management of anemia in patients with diabetic kidney disease: A consensus statement.

This consensus statement focuses on the window of opportunity, which exists while treating patients with diabetic kidney disease and anemia.

Consensus dietary guidelines for healthy living and prevention of obesity, the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and related disorders in Asian Indians.

India is undergoing rapid nutritional transition, resulting in excess consumption of calories, saturated fats, trans fatty acids, simple sugars, salt and low intake of fiber. Such dietary transition and a sedentary lifestyle have led to an increase in obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases (type 2 diabetes mellitus [T2DM], cardiovascular disease [CVD], etc.) predominantly in urban, but also in rural areas. In comparison with the previous guidelines, these consensus dietary guidelines include reduction in the intake of carbohydrates, preferential intake of complex carbohydrates and low glycemic index foods, higher intake of fiber, lower intake of saturated fats, optimal ratio of essential fatty acids, reduction in trans fatty acids, slightly higher protein intake, lower intake of salt, and restricted intake of sugar. While these guidelines are applicable to Asian Indians in any geographical setting, they are particularly applicable to those residing in urban and in semi-urban areas. Proper application of these guidelines will help curb the rising "epidemics" of obesity, the metabolic syndrome, hypertension, T2DM, and CVD in Asian Indians.