What are we missing? The quality of intraoperative handover before and after introduction of a checklist.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative handovers are common in anesthesia practice and are associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality. Checklists may improve transfer of information during handovers. This before-and-after study sought to examine the effect of a checklist on intraoperative handover. We hypothesized that introducing a handover checklist would improve our primary outcome of completeness of data transfer. METHODS: From February to August 2016, anesthesia providers (residents, fellows, and consultants) at a single tertiary academic center participated in a handover study. Baseline handovers between anesthesia care providers were videotaped, analyzed, and compared with anesthetic records. An intraoperative handover checklist was then introduced, and handovers completed with it were videotaped. The completeness of handovers was compared between the baseline routine and checklist groups. The primary outcome was completeness of information transfer. RESULTS: Sixty-seven anesthesia providers participated in the study. Use of the intraoperative handover checklist improved completeness of handover by 6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2 to 10; P < 0.01). There was no relationship observed between the provider (consultants/fellows vs resident) of the handovers and the degree of completeness (95% CI, 3 to 8; P = 0.33). Complexity had a significant impact on the handover completeness with low or high complexity cases more completely handed over than those of medium complexity both before and after the intervention-a 6% increase for low complexity (95% CI, 1 to 11; P = 0.02) and a 9% increase for high complexity (95% CI, 3 to 14; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Use of a checklist during intraoperative handovers improved completeness of data transfer. Handover checklists should be considered to improve handover completeness.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les transferts peropératoires sont fréquents dans la pratique de l'anesthésie et sont associés à une augmentation de la morbidité et de la mortalité des patients. Les listes de vérification pourraient améliorer le transfert d'informations pendant les transitions. Cette étude avant-après a cherché à examiner l'effet d'une liste de vérification sur les transferts peropératoires. Nous avons émis l'hypothèse que l'introduction d'une liste de vérification de transfert améliorerait notre critère d'évaluation principal, nommément la complétude du transfert des informations. MéTHODE: De février à août 2016, des prestataires d'anesthésie (résidents, fellows et consultants) d'un seul centre universitaire tertiaire ont participé à une étude sur les transferts. Les transferts de base entre les fournisseurs de soins d'anesthésie ont été filmés, analysés et comparés aux dossiers d'anesthésie. Une liste de contrôle de transfert peropératoire a ensuite été introduite, et les transferts réalisés avec celle-ci ont été filmés. La complétude des transferts a été comparée entre les groupes faisant un transfert normal de base et ceux utilisant la liste de vérification. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la complétude du transfert d'informations. RéSULTATS: Soixante-sept fournisseurs d'anesthésie ont participé à l'étude. L'utilisation de la liste de vérification de transfert peropératoire a amélioré la complétude du transfert de 6 % (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 2 à 10; P < 0,01). Aucune relation n'a été observée entre le fournisseur (consultants/fellows) vs résidents) responsable des transferts et le degré de complétude du transfert (IC 95 %, 3 à 8; P = 0,33). La complexité a eu un impact significatif sur la complétude du transfert, les cas de basse ou haute complexité étant transférés de manière plus complète que les cas de complexité moyenne, tant avant qu'après l'intervention ­ avec une augmentation de 6 % pour les cas de faible complexité (IC 95 %, 1 à 11; P = 0,02) et une augmentation de 9 % pour les cas de complexité élevée (IC 95 %, 3 à 14; P < 0,01). CONCLUSION: L'utilisation d'une liste de vérification lors des transferts peropératoires a amélioré la complétude du transfert des informations. Les listes de vérification de transfert devraient être envisagées pour améliorer la complétude des transferts.

Epidural electrical stimulation test versus local anesthetic test dose for thoracic epidural catheter placement: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: This study examined the concordance between epidural electrical stimulation test (EEST) and local anesthetic (LA) test dose to indicate correct thoracic epidural catheter position. The relationship between the test results and epidural postoperative analgesia was also assessed. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study was done in patients receiving thoracic epidural analgesia for abdominal surgery. After insertion, the epidural catheter was tested using a nerve stimulator to elicit a motor response. The LA test dose was then administered, and sensory block to ice and pinprick was assessed. The primary outcome was the presence/absence of motor response to EEST and sensory block to test dose. Concordance of responses was assessed using kappa statistics, and their predictive power of postoperative epidural analgesia was evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-eight thoracic epidural catheters were inserted, of which 62 were used perioperatively. The kappa agreement between EEST and LA test dose responses was moderate at 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.67). Positive responses to EEST and LA test dose were observed in 62 (100%) and 50 (81%) patients, respectively, while 52 patients (84%) showed adequate analgesia postoperatively. The sensitivity (95% CI) of EEST and LA test dose to predict adequate postoperative epidural analgesia was 1 (0.93 to 1) and 0.79 (0.65 to 0.89), respectively, and the positive predictive values (95% CI) of EEST and LA test dose were 0.84 (0.75 to 0.93) and 0.82 (0.71 to 0.92), respectively. CONCLUSION: Following thoracic epidural catheter insertion, the responses to the EEST and LA test dose showed "moderate" agreement. The EEST has a higher sensitivity than the LA test dose to predict adequate epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery, however, both tests have a comparable positive predictive value.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Cette étude a porté sur la concordance entre le test de stimulation électrique péridurale (EEST) et le test par une dose d'anesthésique local (AL) pour indiquer la position adéquate d'un cathéter thoracique. La relation entre les résultats des tests et l'analgésie péridurale postopératoire a également été évaluée. MéTHODES: Cette étude de cohorte observationnelle prospective a été menée chez des patients recevant une analgésie péridurale thoracique pour chirurgie abdominale. Après insertion, le cathéter épidural a été testé au moyen d'un stimulateur nerveux pour déclencher une réponse motrice. La dose test d'AL a alors été administrée et le blocage sensitif à la glace et aux piqûres a été évalué. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la présence ou l'absence de réponse motrice à l'EEST et au blocage sensitif à la dose test. La concordance des réponses a été évaluée au moyen de statistiques kappa et leur prédiction de l'efficacité de l'analgésie péridurale postopératoire a été évaluée. RéSULTATS: Soixante-huit cathéters périduraux thoraciques ont été insérés parmi lesquels 62 ont été utilisés en périopératoire. La concordance kappa entre les réponses à l'EEST et à la dose test d'AL a été modérée : 0,42 (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 0,18 à 0,67). Les réponses positives à l'EEST et à la dose test d'AL ont été observées chez respectivement 62 (100 %) et 50 (81 %) patients, tandis que 52 patients (84 %) ont présenté une analgésie postopératoire adéquate. La sensibilité (IC à 95 %) de l'EEST et de la dose test d'AL pour la prédiction de l'analgésie péridurale postopératoire a été, respectivement, de 1 (0,93 à 1) et 0,79 (0,65 à 0,89) et les valeurs prédictives positives (IC à 95 %) de l'EEST et de la dose test d'AL ont été, respectivement, de 0,84 (0,75 à 0,93) et 0,82 (0,71 à 0,92). CONCLUSION: Après insertion d'un cathéter péridural thoracique, la concordance entre l'EEST et la dose test d'AL s'est avérée « modérée ¼. La sensibilité de l'EEST pour la prédiction d'une analgésie péridurale adéquate après chirurgie abdominale est supérieure à celle de la dose test d'AL; toutefois les deux tests ont des valeurs prédictives positives comparables.

Challenging Authority During an Emergency-the Effect of a Teaching Intervention.

OBJECTIVES: Previous research has shown that residents were unable to effectively challenge a superior's wrong decision during a crisis situation, a problem that can contribute to preventable mortality. We aimed to assess whether a teaching intervention enabled residents to effectively challenge clearly wrong clinical decisions made by their staff. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTION: Following ethics board approval, second year residents were randomized to a teaching intervention targeting cognitive skills needed to challenge a superior's decision, or a control group receiving general crisis management instruction. Two weeks later, subjects participated in a simulated crisis that presented them with opportunities to challenge clearly wrong decisions in a can't-intubate-can't-ventilate scenario. It was only disclosed that the staff was a confederate during the debriefing. Performances were video recorded and assessed by two raters blinded to group allocation using the modified Advocacy-Inquiry Score. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty residents completed the study. The interrater reliability of the modified Advocacy-Inquiry Scores (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.87) was excellent. The median (interquartile range) best modified Advocacy-Inquiry Score was significantly better in the intervention group 5.0 (4.50-5.62 [4-6]) than in the control group 3.5 (3.0-4.75 [3-6]) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A short targeted teaching intervention was effective in significantly improving residents' ability to challenge a wrong decision by a superior. This suggests that residents are not given the proper tools to challenge authority during a life-threatening crisis situation. This educational gap can have significant implications for patients' safety.

Physician and Patient Survey of Taper Schedule and Family Physician Letters Following Discharged from the Acute Pain Service.

PURPOSE: Following discharge, patients requiring high opioid doses may be at risk for both under- and overdosing, posing a major challenge to community physicians. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness and degree of satisfaction with a personalized taper schedule and physician letter through interviews of patients and physicians. METHODS: This was a 1-year prospective study. Following ethics approval and informed written consent, patients admitted for elective surgery, 18 to 60 years of age, receiving opioid analgesics, were recruited. Prior to discharge, the acute pain service team provided patients with a taper schedule explained in detail. Individualized physician letters were faxed to treating family physicians. Patients were contacted by phone 2, 4, and 6 weeks after discharge. Physicians were contacted once, a month after discharge. Patients and physicians were asked to grade the taper schedule on a 1- to 5-point Likert scale. Questions pertained to clarity, usefulness, ability to follow the instructions, and general satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients and 21 physicians completed the study. Physicians were generally satisfied with both the taper schedule and letter and rated all aspects between 3.76 and 4.38 of 5. Similarly, patients were satisfied with the taper schedule and rated all aspects between 4.08 and 4.5. CONCLUSIONS: Both physicians and patients generally found the taper schedule and letter helpful in assisting them to taper off their opioid use. This is one way of bridging the gap in continuity of care between the acute and primary care providers while reducing the risk to patients during the transition period.