Florid diabetic retinopathy (FDR): a long-term follow-up study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy of laser photocoagulation and pars-plana vitrectomy in patients with FDR. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients (155 eyes) with FDR were retrospectively evaluated (mean age 27 +/- 6.0 years; proportion of females 66%; insulin-dependent diabetes 100%; mean duration of diabetes 16.5 +/- 5.8 years; poor metabolic control 83%). The eyes were divided in two groups: group I: 136 eyes amenable to laser photocoagulation and, when necessary, to vitrectomy afterwards (45/136); group II: 19 eyes subjected directly to vitrectomy. RESULTS: In group I (mean follow-up 54.2 +/- 38.7 months) the initial visual acuity (IVA) was 0.61 +/- 0.30 and the final visual acuity (FVA) was 0.47 +/- 0.34; in the 45 vitrectomized eyes IVA was 0.15 +/- 0.24 and FVA was 0.19 +/- 0.25. FDR regressed in 75% and worsened in 25% of the cases. In group II (mean follow-up 46.4 +/- 36.3 months) IVA was 0.1 +/- 0.14 and FVA 0.14 +/- 0.22. FDR regressed in 32% and worsened in 68% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: FDR remains a cause of severe visual impairment in diabetics. Patients at risk of FDR are young females with long-standing, poorly controlled insulin-dependent diabetes. Panretinal laser photocoagulation prior to vitrectomy is beneficial; information on this severe form of retinopathy is essential to ensure prompt diagnosis and improve its unfavorable clinical course.

Double-frequency Nd:YAG laser vs. argon-green laser in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: randomized study with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A randomized clinical trial using the argon-green (514 nm) and the double-frequency Nd:YAG (532 nm) lasers was carried out on 42 eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), with the aim of assessing the long-term effects of double-frequency Nd:YAG panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one eyes were randomized to argon laser treatment (ALT) and 21 to double-frequency Nd:YAG laser treatment (NdLT). The mean follow-up was 28.90 months (+/- 6.13) in the ALT group and 29.57 months (+/- 5.17) in the NdLT group. RESULTS: In the ALT group, 20 eyes (95.2%) showed regression of PDR and one eye (4.8%) enlargement of pre-existing new vessels. In the NdLT group, neovascularization regressed in 20 eyes (95.2%) and increased in one (4.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term efficacy of double-frequency Nd: YAG laser PRP in the treatment of PDR thus appears to be similar to that of argon-green.

Diode versus argon-green laser panretinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized study in 44 eyes with a long follow-up time.

A clinical randomized study using argon-green (532 nm) and diode (810 nm) lasers was carried out on 44 eyes (34 patients) affected by proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), with the aim of evaluating the long-term effects of diode panretinal photocoagulation. Of the total 44 eyes, 22 were randomized to argon laser treatment (ALT) and 22 to diode laser treatment (DLT). The mean follow-up time was 25 +/- 5 months in the ALT group versus 24 +/- 4 months in the DLT group. In the ALT group 20 eyes (91%) showed regression of PDR whereas 2 eyes (9%) deteriorated. In the DLT group regression of neovascularization was observed in 22 eyes (100%). These results show that the long-term efficacy of diode laser PRP in the treatment of PDR is similar to that of argon-green laser PRP.

Biomicroscopy versus fluorescein angiography of the iris in the detection of diabetic iridopathy.

Iris fluorescein angiography is not commonly employed in clinical practice, but it is the most sensitive technique for the evaluation of iris vessel abnormalities. We used iris fluorescein angiography as the gold standard against which to test the ability of iris biomicroscopy to demonstrate diabetic iridopathy (DI). One hundred and fourteen eyes of 63 diabetic patients affected by preproliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (DR) (the DR groups at high risk of developing DI) were considered. The DI fluorangiographic classification used was: (1) absence of DI; (2) nonproliferative DI; (3) proliferative DI. The sensitivity of biomicroscopy in detecting DI turned out to be 57%, while the specificity was 94%. The positive predictive value was 93% and the negative predictive value 50%. Our study proved that biomicroscopy can accurately judge when DI is absent. When it is present, however, there is a high probability that biomicroscopy will be less precise in the detection of iris lesions.