RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment options for Bromhidrosis include botulinum toxin therapy, microwave-based therapy, laser therapy, and surgical intervention. Limited studies compare their efficacies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this literature review is to compare the efficacy and safety of these treatments for bromhidrosis. METHODS: A PubMed search included terms bromhidrosis and bromhidrosis AND treatment. RESULTS: A total of 25 articles were reviewed. Botulinum toxin therapy shows consistent benefit but requires repeated therapies. Microwave therapies have shown promising results but require larger cohort sizes with bromhidrosis. Similarly, laser therapy has shown promise with biopsy-proven results, but long-lasting effects remain unknown. Surgery has the best long-term prognosis, but the ideal surgical method remains unknown. LIMITATIONS: Each study varied in their treatment interval and method of assessing bromhidrosis, making direct comparisons difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Managing bromhidrosis requires shared decision making with the patient. Mild-to-moderate symptoms may be treated initially with botulinum toxin therapy. In cases that are refractory, laser therapy should be considered, as it is better studied than microwave therapy currently. Lastly, if the condition is severe and refractory to other options, surgery can be considered, although the ideal method remains unknown.
Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas , Hiperidrose , Doenças das Glândulas Sudoríparas , Humanos , Hiperidrose/diagnóstico , Hiperidrose/terapia , Odor Corporal , Doenças das Glândulas Sudoríparas/diagnóstico , Doenças das Glândulas Sudoríparas/terapia , Toxinas Botulínicas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
In recent years, cannabinoid (CB) products have gained popularity among the public. The anti-inflammatory properties of CBs have piqued the interest of researchers and clinicians because they represent promising avenues for the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory skin disorders that may be refractory to conventional therapy. The objective of this study was to review the existing literature regarding CBs for dermatologic conditions. A primary literature search was conducted in October 2020, using the PubMed and Embase databases, for all articles published from 1965 to October 2020. Review articles, studies using animal models, and nondermatologic and pharmacologic studies were excluded. From 248 nonduplicated studies, 26 articles were included. There were 13 articles on systemic CBs and 14 reports on topical CBs. Selective CB receptor type 2 agonists were found to be effective in treating diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and dermatomyositis. Dronabinol showed efficacy for trichotillomania. Sublingual cannabidiol and Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol were successful in treating the pain associated with epidermolysis bullosa. Available evidence suggests that CBs may be effective for the treatment of various inflammatory skin disorders. Although promising, additional research is necessary to evaluate efficacy and to determine dosing, safety, and long-term treatment guidelines.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This case report calls attention to an alternative approach for management of a symptomatic facet joint synovial cyst. We describe a patient with a symptomatic facet joint synovial cyst who failed an attempted percutaneous rupture using a single-needle technique. This patient was subsequently successfully managed with percutaneous rupture using a 2-needle technique. CASE REPORT: A 60-year-old woman presented with low back pain, right lower extremity pain, and paresthesias. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a right L5-S1 facet joint cyst, which compressed the right L5 nerve root. Before presentation, the patient failed an attempted single-needle percutaneous rupture. The decision was made to proceed with percutaneous rupture using a 2-needle technique. A 22-gauge needle was inserted into the right L5-S1 facet joint, and a Tuohy needle was inserted directly into the cyst through an interlaminar approach. A solution of methylprednisolone and hyaluronidase was simultaneously injected through both needles, and the cyst was continuously distended until rupture was achieved. Rupture was confirmed by injecting contrast into the facet joint and visualizing a normal epidurogram. The patient reported significant pain relief immediately after the procedure. At 4-month follow-up, the patient reported continued pain relief and denied any radicular symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous rupture of a symptomatic facet joint synovial cyst using a single-needle technique has been validated as an efficacious form of management. In a select group of patients who fail single-needle percutaneous rupture, a 2-needle approach for percutaneous facet cyst rupture may be considered as an option for management.