RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To explore the activitystat hypothesis in primary school children by asking whether more physical activity (PA) in school time is compensated for by less PA at other times. STUDY DESIGN: Observational, repeated measures (four consecutive occasions over a 12-month period). SETTING: South-west England. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 206 children (115 boys, aged 8-10 years) from 3 primary schools (S1, S2 and S3), which recorded large differences in PA during school time. MEASUREMENTS: Total PA (TPA) and its moderate-and-vigorous component were recorded weekly by accelerometry, in school and out of school, and adjusted for local daily rainfall and daylight hours. Habitual PA was assessed by linear mixed-effects modelling on repeated measures. RESULTS: S1 children recorded 64% more in-school PA, but S2 and S3 children compensated with correspondingly more out-of-school PA, so that TPA between the three schools was no different: 35.6 (34.3-36.9), 37.3 (36.0-38.6) and 36.2 (34.9-37.5) Units, respectively (P=0.38). CONCLUSIONS: The PA of children seems to compensate in such a way that more activity at one time is met with less activity at another. The failure of PA programmes to reduce childhood obesity could be attributable to this compensation.
Assuntos
Ingestão de Energia , Metabolismo Energético , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Atividade Motora , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Instituições Acadêmicas , Índice de Massa Corporal , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Humanos , Atividades de Lazer , Masculino , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Educação Física e TreinamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There is currently wide interest in the physical activity of children, but little understanding of its control. Here, we use accelerometers to test the hypothesis that habitual activity in young children is centrally, rather than environmentally, regulated. By central regulation we mean a classic biological feedback loop, with a set-point individual to the child, which controls his/her activity independently of external factors. DESIGN: Non-intervention, observational and population-based, set in the home and at school. RESULTS: Girls were systematically less active than boys, and both weekday/weekend day and year-on-year activities were correlated (r=0.43-0.56). A fivefold variation in timetabled PE explained less than 1% of the total variation in physical activity. The activity cost of transport to school was only 2% of total activity, but over 90% of it was recovered elsewhere in the day. The weekly activity recorded by children in Plymouth was the same (to within <0.3%) as that recorded independently in Glasgow, 800 km away. Total daily activity was unrelated to time reportedly spent watching TV. INTERPRETATION: The correlations within groups and the similarities between them suggest that physical activity in children is under central biological regulation. There are implications both for public health planners and for the potentially novel signalling pathways involved.
Assuntos
Retroalimentação/fisiologia , Atividade Motora/fisiologia , Aceleração , Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Meio Ambiente , Feminino , Humanos , Atividades de Lazer , Masculino , Educação Física e Treinamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência , Instituições Acadêmicas , Caracteres Sexuais , Televisão , Meios de Transporte/métodos , Caminhada/fisiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: For a decade or more, poor nutrition during gestation, expressed as low weight at birth, was held to be the factor responsible for insulin resistance later in life. Birth weights, however, are rising and insulin-resistant states, such as diabetes, faster still. Alternative explanations are needed for insulin resistance in contemporary society. This review cites data from the EarlyBird study on the relationships of insulin resistance and metabolic disturbance in early childhood. DESIGN: EarlyBird is a nonintervention prospective cohort study that asks the question 'Which children develop insulin resistance, and why?' It is unique in taking serial blood samples from a young age with which to monitor the behaviour of insulin resistance and its metabolic correlates, and in its comprehensive assessment of factors known or thought to influence insulin resistance SUBJECTS: In all, 307 randomly selected healthy school children at school entry (mean age 4.9 y) and at 12 and 24 months later. MEASUREMENTS: In the children: Birth weight and, at each time point height, weight, body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)), skinfolds at five sites, circumferences, resting energy expenditure, physical activity, body composition, heart rate variability, diet, HOMA-IR and HOMA-ISC, blood pressure, full blood count, haemoglobin and haematocrit, HbA1C, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid, IGF-1, gonadotrophins and SHBG. In their parents: At baseline height, weight, BMI, waist circumference, HOMA-IR and HOMA-ISC, full blood count, haematocrit, HbA1C, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, calculated LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid, gonadotrophins and SHBG. RESULTS: Four observations are reported here: (1) There are clear correlations in contemporary children between insulin resistance and weight at 5 y, but none with birth weight. (2) Females throughout life are intrinsically more insulin resistant than males. (3) The substantial variation of physical activity among young children is attributable to the child, and not to his environment. (4) There is dissociation in young children between fatness and insulin resistance. CONCLUSION: There is much yet to be learned about the development of obesity and insulin resistance in children. The notions of overnutrition and underactivity alone are too simplistic.