Engagement Across Professions: A Mixed Methods Study of Debriefing After Interprofessional Team Training.

INTRODUCTION: Simulation is an ideal tool for interprofessional (IP) team training. Debriefing after simulation is key to IP learning, although engagement and participation may be adversely influenced by cultural and hierarchical barriers. This mixed-methods study explored factors influencing learner engagement and participation in IP debriefing and the experience of "silent but apparently engaged" participants. METHODS: Semistructured profession-specific focus groups were conducted with participants from a weekly IP pediatric simulation program. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Eligible participants were assigned to "silent" or "verbal" groups according to observed behavior and received a questionnaire. Participants' self-rated engagement scores were compared using a t test. RESULTS: Thirty-six of 81 eligible participants were included, 13 completed a questionnaire, and 23 (8 physicians, 10 nursing staff, 4 pharmacists, 1 respiratory therapist) participated in 13 focus groups. Twenty-two subthemes were grouped into 6 themes: psychological safety, realism, distractors, stress, group characteristics, and facilitator behavior, with differences in perspective according to profession. Of the 36 respondents, 18 were "silent" and 18 "verbal." Self-rated engagement scores differed between groups (3.65 vs. 4.17, P = 0.06); however, "silent" participants described themselves as engaged. CONCLUSIONS: Themes identified that influenced learner engagement in debriefing included aspects of prebriefing and the simulation. Some aligned with general simulation best practices, such as psychological safety, prebriefing, and facilitator behavior. Findings unique to IP simulation included importance of realism to nonphysician professions, protecting time for training, group composition, and direct probing by cofacilitators to decrease physician bias and emphasize IP contributions. Silent participants reported engagement.

Factors Correlated With Successful Pediatric Post-Discharge Phone Call Attempt and Connection.

OBJECTIVES: Postdischarge phone calls can identify discharge errors and gather information following hospital-to-home transitions. This study used the multisite Project IMPACT (Improving Pediatric Patient Centered Care Transitions) dataset to identify factors associated with postdischarge phone call attempt and connectivity. METHODS: This study included 0- to 18-year-old patients discharged from 4 sites between January 2014 and December 2017. We compared demographic and clinical factors between postdischarge call attempt and no-attempt and connectivity and no-connectivity subgroups and used mixed model logistic regression to identify significant independent predictors of call attempt and connectivity. RESULTS: Postdischarge calls were attempted for 5528 of 7725 (71.6%) discharges with successful connection for 3801 of 5528 (68.8%) calls. Connection rates varied significantly among sites (52% to 79%, P < .001). Age less than 30 days (P = .03; P = .01) and age 1 to 6 years (P = .04; P = .04) were independent positive predictors for both call attempt and connectivity, whereas English as preferred language (P < .001) and the chronic noncomplex clinical risk group (P = .02) were independent positive predictors for call attempt and connectivity, respectively. In contrast, readmission within 3 days (P = .004) and federal or state payor (P = .02) were negative independent predictors for call attempt and call connectivity, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that targeted interventions may improve postdischarge call attempt rates, such as investment in a reliable call model or improvement in interpreter use, and connectivity, such as enhanced population-based communication.

From Concept to Publication: Effectiveness of the International Network for Simulation-Based Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education Project Development Process at Generating Simulation Scholarship.

BACKGROUND: As simulation matures, it is critical to develop pathways for researchers. A recent analysis, however, demonstrates a low conversion rate between abstract and peer-reviewed journal publication in our field. The International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education has used the ALERT Presentation process for the past decade as a means of accelerating research. In this study, we analyze the scholarly products attributable to ALERT Presentations. METHODS: Surveys were distributed to all International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education Advanced Look Exploratory Research Template (ALERT) Presentation first authors from January 2011 through January 2020. Presenters were asked to provide information on abstracts, grants, journal publications, and book chapters related to their ALERT Presentation, as well as basic demographic information. A structured literature search was conducted for those ALERT Presentations whose authors did not return a survey. The resulting database was descriptively analyzed, and statistical correlations between demographic variables and scholarship were examined. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five new ALERT presentations were presented over 10 years. We identified 361 associated scholarly works (170 conference abstracts, 125 peer-reviewed journal publications, 65 grants, and 1 book chapter). Sixty-one percent (101 of 165) of ALERT Presentations produced at least 1 item of scholarship, and 59% (34 of 58) of ALERT Presentations that resulted in at least 1 abstract also led to at least 1 peer-reviewed journal article. Presenter gender was associated with likelihood of journal publication. CONCLUSIONS: The ALERT Presentation process is an effective approach for facilitating the development of projects that result in disseminated scholarship. Wider adoption may benefit other simulation and education research networks.

Addressing Transportation Insecurity Improves Attendance at Posthospitalization Appointments.

BACKGROUND: Transportation influences attendance at posthospitalization appointments (PHAs). In 2017, our pediatric hospital medicine group found that our patients missed 38% of their scheduled PHAs, with several being due to transportation insecurity. To address this, we implemented a quality improvement project to perform inpatient assessment of transportation insecurity and provide mitigation with the goal of improving attendance at PHAs. METHODS: The process measure was the percentage of patients with completed transportation insecurity screening, and the outcome measure was PHA attendance. An interprofessional team performed plan-do-study-act cycles. These included educating staff about the significance of transportation insecurity, its assessment, and documentation; embedding a list of local transportation resources in discharge instructions and coaching families on using these resources; notifying primary care providers of families with transportation insecurity; and auditing PHA attendance. RESULTS: Between July 2018 and December 2019, electronic health record documentation of transportation insecurity assessment among patients on the pediatric hospital medicine service and discharged from the hospital (n = 1731) increased from 1% to 94%, families identified with transportation insecurity increased from 1.2% to 5%, and attendance at PHAs improved for all patients (62%-81%) and for those with transportation insecurity (0%-57%). Our balance measure, proportion of discharges by 2 pm, remained steady at 53%. Plan-do-study-act cycles revealed that emphasizing PHA importance, educating staff about transportation insecurity, and helping families identify and learn to use transportation resources all contributed to improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions implemented during the inpatient stay to assess for and mitigate transportation insecurity led to improvement in pediatric PHA attendance.

A Decade Later-Progress and Next Steps for Pediatric Simulation Research.

SUMMARY STATEMENT: A decade ago, at the time of formation of the International Network for Pediatric Simulation-based Innovation, Research, and Education, the group embarked on a consensus building exercise. The goal was to forecast the facilitators and barriers to growth and maturity of science in the field of pediatric simulation-based research. This exercise produced 6 domains critical to progress in the field: (1) prioritization, (2) research methodology and outcomes, (3) academic collaboration, (4) integration/implementation/sustainability, (5) technology, and (6) resources/support/advocacy. This article reflects on and summarizes a decade of progress in the field of pediatric simulation research and suggests next steps in each domain as we look forward, including lessons learned by our collaborative grass roots network that can be used to accelerate research efforts in other domains within healthcare simulation science.

A Simulation Systems Testing Program Using HFMEA Methodology Can Effectively Identify and Mitigate Latent Safety Threats for a New On-Site Helipad.

BACKGROUND: Fundamental changes in critical systems within hospitals present safety risks. Some threats can be identified prospectively, others are only uncovered when the system goes live. Simulation and Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA) can be used together to prospectively test a system without endangering patients. The research team combined iterative simulations and HFMEA methodologies to conduct simulation-based clinical systems testing (SbCST) to detect and mitigate latent safety threats (LSTs) prior to opening a hospital helipad. METHODS: This study was conducted in three phases. In Phase I, an interprofessional team created a process map and conducted a tabletop exercise, identifying LSTs that could theoretically occur during patient transfer from the new helipad. Using HFMEA methodology, steps predicted to be affected by the new helipad were probed. Identified LSTs were assigned a hazard score. Mitigation solutions were proposed. Results from Phase I were used to plan Phase II, which used low-fidelity simulation to test communication processes and travel paths. High-fidelity simulation was used in Phase III to test previously identified LSTs. RESULTS: Over three testing phases, 31 LSTs were identified: 15 in Phase I, 7 in Phase II, and 9 in Phase III. LSTs fell under the categories of care coordination, facilities, and equipment, and devices. Eighteen (58.1%) were designated "critical" (hazard score ≥ 8). CONCLUSION: A three-phase SbCST program using HFMEA methodology was an effective tool to identify LSTs. An iterative approach, using results of each phase to inform the structure of the next, facilitated testing of proposed mitigation strategies.

The Acceptability of Avatar Patients for Teaching and Assessing Pediatric Residents in Communicating Medical Ambiguity.

Background: Simulation offers a means to assess resident competence in communication, but pediatric standardized patient simulation has limitations. A novel educational technology, avatar patients (APs), holds promise, but its acceptability to residents, educational relevance, and perception of realism have not been determined. Objective: To determine if APs are acceptable, provide a relevant educational experience, and are realistic for teaching and assessment of a complex communication topic. Methods: Pediatric residents at one academic institution participated in an AP experience from 2019 to 2021 consisting of 2 scenarios representing issues of medical ambiguity. After the experience, residents completed a survey on the emotional relevance, realism, and acceptability of the technology for assessment of their communication competence. Results: AP actor training required approximately 3 hours. Software and training was provided free of charge. Actors were paid $30/hour; the total estimated curricular cost is $50,000. Sixty-five of 89 (73%) pediatric residents participated in the AP experience; 61 (93.8%) completed the survey. Forty-eight (78.7%) were emotionally invested in the scenarios. The most cited emotions evoked were anxiety, uncertainty, concern, and empathy. The conversations were rated by 49 (80.3%) as realistic. APs were rated as beneficial for learning to communicate about medical ambiguity by 40 (65.5%), and 41 (66.7%) felt comfortable having APs used to assess their competence in this area. Conclusions: Pediatric residents were emotionally invested in the AP experience and found it to be realistic. The experience was rated as beneficial for learning and acceptable to be used for assessment of how to communicate medical ambiguity.

Factorial Analysis Quantifies the Effects of Pediatric Discharge Bundle on Hospital Readmission.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Factorial design of a natural experiment was used to quantify the benefit of individual and combined bundle elements from a 4-element discharge transition bundle (checklist, teach-back, handoff to outpatient providers, and postdischarge phone call) on 30-day readmission rates (RRs). METHODS: A 24 factorial design matrix of 4 bundle element combinations was developed by using patient data (N = 7725) collected from January 2014 to December 2017 from 4 hospitals. Patients were classified into 3 clinical risk groups (CRGs): no chronic disease (CRG1), single chronic condition (CRG2), and complex chronic condition (CRG3). Estimated main effects of each bundle element and their interactions were evaluated by using Study-It software. Because of variation in subgroup size, important effects from the factorial analysis were determined by using weighted effect estimates. RESULTS: RR in CRG1 was 3.5% (n = 4003), 4.1% in CRG2 (n = 1936), and 17.6% in CRG3 (n = 1786). Across the 3 CRGs, the number of subjects in the factorial groupings ranged from 16 to 674. The single most effective element in reducing RR was the checklist in CRG1 and CRG2 (reducing RR by 1.3% and 3.0%) and teach-back in CRG3 (by 4.7%) The combination of teach-back plus a checklist had the greatest effect on reducing RR in CRG3 by 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of bundle elements varied across risk groups, indicating that transition needs may vary on the basis of population. The combined use of teach-back plus a checklist had the greatest impact on reducing RR for medically complex patients.

Factors associated with interprofessional engagement in debriefing following pediatric simulation-based team training.

Simulation offers a high fidelity modality to deliver and study team-based interprofessional education. Debriefing the following simulated scenarios is a critical component of this training. Little data exist to inform best practices to optimize interprofessional engagement during debriefing. This pilot study analyzed interprofessional debriefing events following 20 pediatric simulation-based team trainings to identify associations between modifiable factors and learner engagement. Reviewers observed a total of 236 learners, using a previously published tool to assess learner engagement. Data related to the scenario, debriefing, learners, and facilitators were collected. Spearman's correlation was used to analyze the association between factors of interest and average learner engagement scores for each debriefing event. Mean engagement did not differ between physicians and nurses, but was lower for other professionals. Average learner engagement was inversely related to learner group size, but not to the proportion of learners in each profession. Oral participation differed significantly between professions for both learners and co-facilitators, with physicians speaking more in both groups. Students of all professions had lower engagement and spoke less frequently. This study identifies several modifiable factors, including total group size, learner level, and facilitator behavior that were associated with interprofessional engagement during debriefing following simulation-based team training.

Validation of a Modified Jefferson Scale of Empathy for Observers to Assess Trainees.

OBJECTIVE: "Demonstrate insight and understanding into emotion" is a competency amenable to simulation-based assessment. The Jefferson Scale of Patient Perceptions of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE) has validity evidence for patients to assess provider empathy. A version adapted for a third-party observers does not exist. Our aim was to modify the JSPPPE and use recorded standardized encounters to obtain validity evidence. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used video and data collected from 2 pediatric residencies. In 2018, 4 raters reviewed 24 videos of 12 interns communicating with standardized patients (SP) in 2 encounters and completed a modified JSPPE for observers (JSEO). Reliability between raters was established using Intraclass Correlations (ICC). JSEO mean scores were correlated to Essential Elements of Communication (EEC), JSPPPE, and faculty composite interpersonal communication (IC) scores using Spearman Rank. RESULTS: The mean ICC for all 4 raters was 0.573 (0.376-0.755). When ICC was calculated for pairs of raters, Rater 1 was an outlier. ICCs for mean scores for pairs among the 3 remaining raters was 0.81 to 0.84. Mean JSEO scores from the four raters correlated with the JSPPPE (rho = 0.45, P = .03) and IC (rho = 0.68, P < .001), but not the EEC (rho = 0.345, P = .1). CONCLUSIONS: We found validity evidence for the use of a modified JSPPPE for an observer to assess empathy in a recorded encounter with a SP. This may be useful as medical educators shift toward competency-based tracking. The brevity of this tool and potential assessment using video are also appealing.

Development of a Simulation-Based Interprofessional Teamwork Assessment Tool.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestone projects required each specialty to identify essential skills and develop means of assessment with supporting validity evidence for trainees. Several specialties rate trainees on a milestone subcompetency related to working in interprofessional teams. A tool to assess trainee competence in any role on an interprofessional team in a variety of scenarios would be valuable and suitable for simulation-based assessment. OBJECTIVE: We developed a tool for simulation settings that assesses interprofessional teamwork in trainees. METHODS: In 2015, existing tools that assess teamwork or interprofessionalism using direct observation were systematically reviewed for appropriateness, generalizability, adaptability, ease of use, and resources required. Items from these tools were included in a Delphi method with multidisciplinary pediatrics experts using an iterative process from June 2016 to January 2017 to develop an assessment tool. RESULTS: Thirty-one unique tools were identified. A 2-stage review narrowed this list to 5 tools, and 81 items were extracted. Twenty-two pediatrics experts participated in 4 rounds of Delphi surveys, with response rates ranging from 82% to 100%. Sixteen items reached consensus for inclusion in the final tool. A global 4-point rating scale from novice to proficient was developed. CONCLUSIONS: A novel tool to assess interprofessional teamwork for individual trainees in a simulated setting was developed using a systematic review and Delphi methodology. This is the first step to establish the validity evidence necessary to use this tool for competency-based assessment.

Foster Caregiver Experience of Pediatric Hospital-to-Home Transitions: A Qualitative Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Children entering foster care after discharge from the hospital are at risk for adverse events associated with the hospital-to-home transition. Education of foster caregivers regarding transitional care needs is key. However, little is known about the unique needs of foster caregivers as they transition from hospital to home with a new foster child or how hospital-based health care teams can better support foster caregivers. We aimed to examine the experiences and preferences of foster caregivers' regarding hospital-to-home transitions of children newly discharged into their care and to identify opportunities for inpatient providers to improve outcomes for these children. METHODS: We conducted semistructured telephone interviews of foster caregivers who newly assumed care of a child at the time of hospital discharge between May 2016 and June 2017. Interviews were continued until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to identify themes using a general inductive approach. RESULTS: Fifteen interviews were completed. All subjects were female, 87% were Caucasian, and 73% were first-time foster caregivers. Thirteen themes were identified and grouped into the following domains: 1) knowing the child, 2) medicolegal issues, 3) complexities of multistakeholder communication, and 4) postdischarge preparation and support. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers of children newly entering foster care following hospital discharge face unique challenges and may benefit from enhanced care processes to facilitate successful transitions. Hospitalization provides an opportunity for information gathering and sharing, clarification of custodial status, and facilitation of communication among multistakeholders, including child protective services and biological parents.

Improving Hospital-to-Home Transitions for Children Entering Foster Care.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hospital-to-home transitions present safety risks for patients. Children discharged with new foster caregivers may be especially vulnerable to poor discharge outcomes. With this study, our objective is to identify differences in discharge quality and outcomes for children discharged from the hospital with new foster caregivers compared with children discharged to their preadmission caregivers. METHODS: Pediatric patients discharged from the Barbara Bush Children's Hospital at Maine Medical Center between January 2014 and May 2017 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective cohort study. Chart review identified patients discharged with new foster caregivers. These patients were compared with a matched cohort of patients discharged with preadmission caregivers for 5 discharge quality process measures and 2 discharge outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-six index cases and 165 matched patients were identified. Index cases had worse performance on 4 of 5 discharge process measures, with significantly lower use of discharge readiness checklists (75% vs 92%; P = .004) and teach-back education of discharge instructions for caregivers (63% vs 79%; P = .02). Index cases had twice the odds of misunderstandings needing clarification at the postdischarge call; this difference was not statistically significant (26% vs 13%; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital-to-home transition quality measures were less often implemented for children discharged with new foster caregivers than for the cohort of patients discharged with preadmission caregivers. This may lead to increased morbidity, as suggested by more frequent caregiver misunderstandings. Better prospective identification of these patients and enhanced transition improvement efforts targeted at their new caregivers may be warranted.

Pediatric Patient-Centered Transitions From Hospital to Home: Improving the Discharge Medication Process.

OBJECTIVES: Medications prescribed at hospital discharge can lead to patient harm if there are access barriers or misunderstanding of instructions. Filling prescriptions before discharge can decrease these risks. We aimed to increase the percentage of patients leaving the hospital with new discharge medications in hand to 70% by 18 months. METHODS: We used sequential plan-do-study-act cycles from January 2015 to September 2016. We used statistical process control charts to track process measures, new medications filled before discharge, and rates of bedside delivery with pharmacist teaching to the inpatient pediatric unit. Outcome measures included national patient survey data, collected and displayed quarterly, as well as caregiver understanding, comparing inaccuracy of medication teach-back with and without medications in hand before discharge. RESULTS: Rates of patients leaving the hospital with medications in hand increased from a baseline of 2% to 85% over the study period. Bedside delivery reached 71%. Inaccuracy of caregiver report during a postdischarge phone call decreased from 3.3% to 0.7% (P < .05) when medications were in hand before discharge. Patient satisfaction with education of new medication side effects increased from 50% to 88%. CONCLUSIONS: By using an engaged interprofessional team, we optimized use of our on-site outpatient pharmacy and increased the percentage of pediatric patients leaving the hospital with new discharge medications in hand to >80%. This, accompanied by increased rates of bedside medication delivery and pharmacist teaching, was associated with improvements in caregiver discharge-medication related experience and understanding.

Autoimmune Voltage-Gated Potassium Channelopathy Presenting With Catecholamine Excess.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune voltage-gated potassium channelopathies have been associated with a range of neurological presenting symptoms, including central, peripheral, and autonomic dysfunction. PATIENT DESCRIPTION: We describe a 12-year-old boy who presented with nine months of pain, anxiety, and 30-pound weight loss. He was admitted for failure to thrive, then noted to be persistently hypertensive and tachycardic. Plasma metanephrines and urine metanephrines and catecholamines were elevated. Extensive investigation for causes of elevated catecholamines, such as hyperthyroidism or catecholamine-secreting tumor, was negative. A paraneoplastic panel was positive for voltage-gated potassium channel antibodies. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and pulse methylprednisolone led to complete resolution of symptoms, weight gain, and normalization of vital signs and plasma metanephrines. CONCLUSION: Voltage-gated potassium channel antibodies should be considered as part of the differential in patients presenting with elevated metanephrine and catecholamine secretion.

Project IMPACT Pilot Report: Feasibility of Implementing a Hospital-to-Home Transition Bundle.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To improve hospital to home transitions, a 4-element pediatric patient-centered transition bundle was developed, including: a transition readiness checklist; predischarge teach-back education; timely and complete written handoff to the primary care provider; and a postdischarge phone call. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of bundle implementation and report initial outcomes at 4 pilot sites. Outcome measures included postdischarge caregiver ability to teach-back key home management information and 30-day reuse rates. METHODS: A multisite, observational time series using multiple planned sequential interventions to implement bundle components with non-technology-supported and technology-supported patients. Data were collected via electronic health record reviews and during postdischarge phone calls. Statistical process control charts were used to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Four pilot sites implemented the bundle between January 2014 and May 2015 for 2601 patients, of whom 1394 had postdischarge telephone encounters. Improvement was noted in the implementation of all bundle elements with the transitions readiness checklist posing the greatest feasibility challenge. Phone contact connection rates were 69%. Caregiver ability to teach-back essential home management information postdischarge improved from 18% to 82%. No improvement was noted in reuse rates, which differed dramatically between technology-supported and non-technology-supported patients. CONCLUSIONS: A pediatric care transition bundle was successfully tested and implemented, as demonstrated by improvement in all process measures, as well as caregiver home management skills. Important considerations for successful implementation and evaluation of the discharge bundle include the role of local context, electronic health record integration, and subgroup analysis for technology-supported patients.

Targeting Simulation-Based Assessment for the Pediatric Milestones: A Survey of Simulation Experts and Program Directors.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which of the 21 general pediatrics milestone subcompetencies are most difficult to assess using traditional methodologies and which are best suited to simulation-based assessment. METHODS: We surveyed 2 samples: pediatric simulation experts and pediatric program directors. Respondents were asked about current use of simulation for assessment and to select 5 of the 21 pediatric subcompetencies most difficult to assess using traditional methods and the 5 best suited to simulation-based assessment. Spearman rank correlation was used to determine a correlation between how the 2 samples ranked the subcompetencies. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent (29 of 60) simulation experts and 20% (115 of 571) program directors completed the survey. Few respondents reported using simulation for summative assessment. There are clear differences across the pediatric subcompetencies in perceived difficulty of assessment and suitability to simulation-based assessment. The 3 most difficult to assess subcompetencies were "recognize ambiguity," "demonstrate emotional insight," and "identify one's own strengths and deficiencies." The subcompetencies most suitable to assessment using simulation were "interprofessional teamwork," "clinical decision making," and "effective communication." Program directors and simulation experts had high agreement for both questions: difficult to assess (rho = 0.76, P < .001) and suitable to simulation-based assessment (rho = 0.94, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Several general pediatrics milestone subcompetencies were identified by pediatric simulation experts and pediatric program directors as difficult to assess using current methodologies and as amenable to simulation-based assessment. The pediatric simulation community should target development of simulation-based assessment tools to these areas.

Pediatric primary care providers' perspectives regarding hospital discharge communication: a mixed methods analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Effective communication between inpatient and outpatient providers may mitigate risks of adverse events associated with hospital discharge. However, there is an absence of pediatric literature defining effective discharge communication strategies at both freestanding children's hospitals and general hospitals. The objectives of this study were to assess associations between pediatric primary care providers' (PCPs) reported receipt of discharge communication and referral hospital type, and to describe PCPs' perspectives regarding effective discharge communication and areas for improvement. METHODS: We administered a questionnaire to PCPs referring to 16 pediatric hospital medicine programs nationally. Multivariable models were developed to assess associations between referral hospital type and receipt and completeness of discharge communication. Open-ended questions asked respondents to describe effective strategies and areas requiring improvement regarding discharge communication. Conventional qualitative content analysis was performed to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: Responses were received from 201 PCPs, for a response rate of 63%. Although there were no differences between referral hospital type and PCP-reported receipt of discharge communication (relative risk 1.61, 95% confidence interval 0.97-2.67), PCPs referring to general hospitals more frequently reported completeness of discharge communication relative to those referring to freestanding children's hospitals (relative risk 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.51). Analysis of free text responses yielded 4 major themes: 1) structured discharge communication, 2) direct personal communication, 3) reliability and timeliness of communication, and 4) communication for effective postdischarge care. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights potential differences in the experiences of PCPs referring to general hospitals and freestanding children's hospitals, and presents valuable contextual data for future quality improvement initiatives.

Pediatric discharge content: a multisite assessment of physician preferences and experiences.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Professional medical societies endorse prompt, consistent discharge communication to primary care providers (PCPs) on discharge. However, evidence is limited about what clinical elements to communicate. Our main goal was to identify and compare the clinical elements considered by PCPs and pediatric hospitalists to be essential to communicate to PCPs within 2 days of pediatric hospital discharge. A secondary goal was to describe experiences of the PCPs and pediatric hospitalists regarding sending and receiving discharge information. METHODS: A survey of physician preferences and experiences regarding discharge communication was sent to 320 PCPs who refer patients to 16 hospitals, with an analogous survey sent to 147 hospitalists. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and χ² analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 201 PCPs (63%) and 71 hospitalists (48%) responded to the survey. Seven clinical elements were reported as essential by >75% of both PCPs and hospitalists: dates of admission and discharge; discharge diagnoses; brief hospital course; discharge medications; immunizations given during hospitalization; pending laboratory or test results; and follow-up appointments. PCPs reported reliably receiving discharge communication significantly less often than hospitalists reported sending it (71.8% vs 85.1%; P < .01), and PCPs considered this communication to be complete significantly less often than hospitalists did (64.9% vs 79.1%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: We identified 7 core clinical elements that PCPs and hospitalists consider essential in discharge communication. Consistently and promptly communicating at least these core elements after discharge may enhance PCP satisfaction and patient-level outcomes. Reported rates of transmission and receipt of this information were suboptimal and should be targeted for improvement.