Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Rev Med Interne ; 41(10): 653-660, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32660857

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Medsounds™ software allows to create an auscultation learning platform, by providing real pre-recorded cardiopulmonary sounds on virtual chests. The study aimed at comparing the skills in cardiopulmonary auscultation between students who benefited from this platform and students who did not have access to it. METHODS: A controlled trial was conducted with 2nd year medical students randomised into three groups. Groups A, B and C received 10 h of cardiopulmonary clinical training. In addition, group B benefited from an online access to the educative platform, and group C had a demonstration of the platform during their clinical training, then an online access. The main outcome was a 3-point multiple-choice questionnaire based on 2 original case vignettes about the description of cardiopulmonary sounds. The secondary outcome was the faculty exam on high-fidelity cardiopulmonary simulator. RESULTS: Groups A and B included 127 students, and group C 117. Students in group C had a significantly higher score than those in group A (1.72/3 versus 1.48/3; p = 0.02), without difference between the groups B and C. Students who actually had a demonstration of the platform and used it at home had a higher score than those who did not use it (1.87 versus 1.51; p = 0.01). Students who had a demonstration of the platform before using it performed a better pulmonary examination on high-fidelity simulators. CONCLUSION: The supervised use of an online auscultation simulation software in addition to the traditional clinical training seems to improve the auscultation performances of undergraduated medical students.


Assuntos
Auscultação , Instrução por Computador , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Treinamento por Simulação , Software , Adulto , Auscultação/métodos , Auscultação/normas , Competência Clínica , Instrução por Computador/métodos , Instrução por Computador/normas , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/normas , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Respiratório/normas , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/normas , Avaliação Educacional , Feminino , Ruídos Cardíacos/fisiologia , Humanos , Aprendizagem , Masculino , Satisfação Pessoal , Sons Respiratórios/fisiologia , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Treinamento por Simulação/normas , Software/normas , Estudantes de Medicina , Adulto Jovem
2.
Rev Mal Respir ; 36(4): 468-476, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31010752

RESUMO

DEVELOPMENT OF THE GLORI-COPD SCORE: GLObal RIsk of severe outcomes in COPD patients. INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a commonly under-diagnosed disease. This study aimed to develop a screening tool for COPD patients with a high risk of complications, taking into account COPD severity and associated co-morbidity. METHODS: Two Delphi rounds were conducted to select the items for a preliminary score. Subsequently, this score was submitted to patients with a possible diagnosis of COPD attending for pulmonary function tests in hospital and primary care. Items associated with a diagnosis of COPD and its severity were examined with multivariate logistic regressions. Associated items in our analyses and in the literature were integrated into the score. The score was developed with a factorial analysis and optimized according to ROC curves. RESULTS: Fifteen items were selected with the Delphi method, of which six were retained after logistic regression. They were submitted to 64 patients (mean age: 59+/-13.6 years). Factors associated with COPD were smoking ≥10 pack-years and a history of acute exacerbations. Low levels of activity and coughing up sputum were associated with COPD severity. Age ≥40 years and co-morbidities were added to the score. According to the factorial analysis, a two-stage score was developed assessing first the diagnosis of COPD and then the risk of severe outcomes. It showed a sensitivity of 71 %, a specificity of 77 %. The positive and negative predictive value were respectively 28 % and 96 %. CONCLUSION: The score was an acceptable screening tool to identify COPD patients with high risk of complications. Nevertheless, validation needs be performed in a larger population to allow its use in primary care.


Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/patologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Testes de Função Respiratória/métodos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
3.
Rev Mal Respir ; 35(3): 347-352, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29602483

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a severe chronic disease and its prevalence is increasing. Nevertheless, mortality linked to moderate and mild COPD without comorbidities is low. The aim of the study is to create and validate a questionnaire in primary care to spot patients with undiagnosed COPD who are at high risk of severe complications considering the severity of their COPD and their comorbidities. METHODS: The development of the questionnaire has three steps. The first is the selection of the items which can be included in the questionnaire with a two-round Delphi method. The second step is a cross-sectional study to assess the link between spirometry and the selected items in the first step. The last step is the validation of the questionnaire in a prospective study in primary care. EXPECTED RESULTS: Identifying undiagnosed COPD patients with a high global risk of complications in primary care will help to establish which patients have to be diagnosed as a priority. This is particularly useful in general practice as the patient is considered globally and not just on the basis of respiratory criteria. It should allow better selection of patients who need specialised follow up.


Assuntos
Medicina Geral/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Medicina Geral/normas , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Prognóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/patologia , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia
4.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 36(9): 1559-1563, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28357510

RESUMO

About 7 million urinalyses are reimbursed yearly by the French public healthcare system, but the results of most of these tests are normal. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of negative urinalyses in ambulatory care, identify the associated factors and assess the relevance of prescriptions by general practitioners (GPs) according to French guidelines. A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients over 18 coming for urinalyses in two French ambulatory laboratories. Patients received a questionnaire on their symptoms, the reason for performing urinalysis and the use of urinary dipsticks. GP who prescribed urinalyses received a questionnaire assessing their practice. A total of 510 patients were included, and 71% of urinalyses were negative. Urinalyses were prescribed to 283 patients by GPs. Compared to those of specialists, GP prescriptions were associated with fewer negative urinalyses (59 vs 86%; p < 0.01). Among the negative urinalyses prescribed by GPs, the reasons of prescription were as follows: suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) (42.7%), control of bacteriological cure after UTI (24%), fever or abdominal pain (13%) and routine test (7%). About 35% of urinalyses were not indicated according to guidelines. Only 12% of patients used dipsticks before performing urinalysis although 87% of GPs were favourable to their use if they were provided by healthcare services. The annual cost of non-indicated urinalyses is estimated at 13 million euro. A systematic use of dipsticks provided by healthcare services could help to reduce health costs and the unnecessary use of antibiotics.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Urinálise , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Urinálise/métodos , Urinálise/normas , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 45(5): 459-66, 2016 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26964701

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study analysed how social disparities are built in the health process leading to the achievement of cervical smears. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study included women over 40 years eligible for cervical cancer screening and recruited randomly in the patient base of 52 volunteer general practitioners (GP). Judgement criteria were (1) the existence of a gynaecological follow up, (2) provided by a GP (versus gynaecologist), and (3) the "up to date" status for the cervical smear. Occupational class, education, and perceived financial condition evaluated social position. RESULTS: Among 1092 women (participation 74%), 86% had a gynaecological follow up. It was associated with a higher social position and to more "up to date" status. The follow up was performed by the GP for 10% of the patients who mainly had a lower social position. The "up to date" status was more prevalent when the follow up was done by the gynaecologist than by a GP but was socially differentiated. CONCLUSION: Having a gynaecological follow up, especially by a gynaecologist, improved cervical screening but social inequalities were linked to its achievement at every part of this process.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Teste de Papanicolaou/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos , Classe Social , Esfregaço Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Escolaridade , Feminino , França , Ginecologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocupações , Inquéritos e Questionários , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico
6.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 35(3): 447-51, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26740324

RESUMO

General practitioners often have to manage urinary tract infections (UTI) with probabilistic treatments, although bacterial resistances are increasing. Therefore, the French Society of Infectious Diseases published new guidelines in 2014. The aim of this study was to investigate the bacterial epidemiology of UTI in the general population in primary care and analyse risk factors for Escherichia coli resistance to antibiotics. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 12 ambulatory laboratories. Patients over 18 years of age coming for urinalysis were included. Risk factors for UTI were collected using a questionnaire and the laboratory records. Bacteria meeting criteria for UTI were analysed. A positive urinalysis was found in 1119 patients, corresponding to 1125 bacterial isolates. The bacterial species were: E. coli (73 %), Enterococcus spp. (7 %), Klebsiella spp. (6 %), Proteus spp. (4 %), Staphylococcus spp. (3 %) and Pseudomonas spp. (2 %). Regardless of the bacteria, the most common resistance was that to co-trimoxazole: 27 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] = [0.24; 0.30]), followed by ofloxacin resistance: 16 % [0.14; 0.18]. Escherichia coli resistances to co-trimoxazole, ofloxacin, cefixime, nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin were, respectively, 25.5 % [0.23; 0.28], 17 % [0.14; 0.20], 5.6 % [0.04; 0.07], 2.2 % [0.01; 0.03] and 1.2 % [0.005; 0.02]. Independent risk factors for E. coli resistance to ofloxacin were age over 85 years (odds ratio [OR] = 3.08; [1.61; 5.87]) and a history of UTI in the last 6 months (OR = 2.34; [1.54; 3.52]). Our findings support the guidelines recommending fluoroquinolone sparing. The scarcity of E. coli resistance to fosfomycin justifies its use as a first-line treatment in acute cystitis. These results should be reassessed in a few years to identify changes in the bacterial epidemiology of UTI.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA