Cervical Spine Involvement among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated Actively with Treat-to-target Strategy: 10-year Results of the NEO-RACo Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the development of radiological changes of the cervical spine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the NEO-RACo trial treated with an intensive, remission-targeted combination of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) and additional infliximab (IFX) or placebo (PLA) for the first 6 months. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with early, DMARD-naive RA were treated with a triple combination of csDMARD and prednisolone, and randomized to double-blindly receive either IFX (FIN-RACo+IFX) or PLA (FIN-RACo+PLA) infusions during the first 6 months. After 2 years the treatment strategies became unrestricted, but the treatment goal was strict NEO-RACo remission. At the 10-year visit, radiographs of the cervical spine were taken of 85 patients (38 in the FIN-RACo+IFX group and 47 in the FIN-RACo+PLA group). The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00908089). RESULTS: There were 4/85 patients (4.7%) with cervical spine involvement (CSI) by 10 years. Atlantoaxial subluxation was found in 2/85 patients (2.4%), both in the FIN-RACo+IFX group, and none in the FIN-RACo+PLA group. Atlantoaxial impaction was found in 1/85 patients (1.2%) in the FIN-RACo+IFX group. Subaxial subluxation was found in 1/85 patients (1.2%). CONCLUSION: Early and intensive remission-targeted treatment has reduced the incidence of CSI and our results show that intensive treatment also prevents its development in the long run.

Early Targeted Combination Treatment With Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Long-Term Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Ten-Year Follow-Up Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The short-term outcomes of remission-targeted treatments of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are well-established, but the long-term success of such strategies is speculative, as is the role of early add-on biologics. We assessed the 10-year outcomes of patients with early RA treated with initial remission-targeted triple combination of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), 7.5-mg prednisolone, and additional infliximab (IFX) or placebo infusions. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with early, DMARD-naive RA were treated with a triple combination of csDMARDs and prednisolone and randomized to double-blind receipt of infusions of either IFX (the Finnish Rheumatoid Arthritis Combination Therapy Trial [FIN-RACo] + IFX) or placebo (FIN-RACo + placebo) during the first 6 months. After 2 years, the treatment strategies became unrestricted, but the treatment goal was strict remission in the TNF-Blocking Therapy in Combination With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (NEO-RACo) study. At 10 years, the clinical and radiographic outcomes and the drug treatments used between 5 and 10 years were assessed. RESULTS: Ninety patients (91%) were followed after 2 years, 43 in the FIN-RACo + IFX and 47 in the FIN-RACo + placebo group. At 10 years, the respective proportions of patients in strict NEO-RACo remission and in Disease Activity Score using 28 joints remission in the FIN-RACo + IFX and FIN-RACo + placebo groups were 46% and 38% (P = 0.46) and 82% and 72% (P = 0.29), respectively. The mean total Sharp/van der Heijde score was 9.8 in the FIN-RACo + IFX and 7.3 in the FIN-RACo + placebo group (P = 0.34). During the 10-year follow-up, 26% of the FIN-RACo + IFX group and 30% of the FIN-RACo + placebo group had received biologics (P = 0.74). CONCLUSION: In early RA, excellent results can be maintained up until 10 years in most patients treated with initial combination csDMARDs and remission-targeted strategy, regardless of initial IFX/placebo infusions.

High burden of adverse events is associated with reduced remission rates in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Adverse events (AEs) are common during disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment, but their influence on treatment results is unclear. We studied AEs in relation to disease activity in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Ninety-nine patients started intensive treatment with three conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) and oral prednisolone, and were randomized to a 6-month induction treatment with infliximab or placebo. All AEs during the first 12 months of treatment were recorded. We scored each AE based on severity (scale 1-4) and defined the burden of AEs as the sum of these scores. Patients were divided into tertiles according to the burden of AEs. As outcomes, we assessed 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) levels and remission rates at 12 and 24 months. Three hundred thirty-one AEs in 99 patients were reported, and 27 (8%) were categorized as severe or serious. Mean burden of AEs per patient was 5.4 ± 4.3. Seventy-nine AEs (24%) led to temporary (n = 52) or permanent (n = 27) csDMARD discontinuation. Of discontinuations, 1, 21, and 57 were detected in the first, second, and third tertiles, respectively. DAS28 remission rates decreased across tertiles at 12 months (94, 94, and 76%; p for linearity 0.029) and at 24 months (90, 86, and 70%; p for linearity 0.021). Mean DAS28 levels increased across tertiles at 12 months (1.5 ± 1.0, 1.7 ± 0.9, and 1.9 ± 1.2; p for linearity 0.021) and at 24 months (1.4 ± 0.8, 1.6 ± 1.0, and 1.9 ± 1.1; p for linearity 0.007). High burden of AEs is associated with higher disease activity and lower likelihood of remission in early RA.

Patient-reported outcomes as predictors of remission in early rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tight control treat-to-target approach.

Identifying prognostic factors for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) patients is of key clinical importance. We studied patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as predictors of remission in a clinical trial. We randomized 99 untreated ERA patients to receive remission-targeted treatment with three disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and prednisolone for 24 months, and infliximab or placebo for the initial 6 months. At baseline, we measured following PROs: eight Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) dimensions, patient's global assessment [PGA, visual analogue scale (VAS)], Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and pain VAS. We used multivariable-adjusted regression models to identify PROs that independently predicted modified American College of Rheumatology remission at 2 years. Follow-up data at 2 years were available for 93 patients (92%), and 58 patients (62%) were in remission. At baseline, patients who achieved remission had higher radiological score (p = 0.04), lower tender joint count (p = 0.001), lower PGA (p = 0.005) and physician's global assessment (p = 0.019), lower HAQ (p = 0.016), less morning stiffness (p = 0.009), and significantly higher scores in seven out of eight SF-36 dimensions compared with patients who did not. In multivariable models that included all PROs, remission was associated with SF-36 dimensions higher vitality (odds ratio 2.01; 95% confidence interval 1.19-3.39) and better emotional role functioning (odds ratio 1.64; 95% confidence interval 1.01-2.68). PGA, pain VAS, HAQ, and other SF-36 dimensions were not associated with remission. We conclude that self-reported vitality and better emotional role functioning are among the most important PROs for the prediction of remission in ERA.

Failure in longterm treatment is rare in actively treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but may be predicted by high health assessment score at baseline and by residual disease activity at 3 and 6 months: the 5-year followup results of the randomized clinical NEO-RACo trial.

OBJECTIVE: With modern initial aggressive combination treatments with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARD), most patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) achieve remission, have marginal radiographic progression, and sustain normal function. Here we aim to identify the patients failing these targets even after aggressive treatment. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with early, active RA were treated with a combination of 3 sDMARD and prednisolone (PRD), and either infliximab or placebo infusions during the first 6 months, aiming at strict remission. After 24 months, the treatments became unrestricted. At 60 months, 4 evident clinical features of treatment failure were defined: area under curve (AUC) between 6-60 months for disease activity score assessing 28 joints > 2.6; AUC 6-60 for health assessment questionnaire > 0.5; progression in total Sharp/van der Heijde score 0-60 months > 3 units; and need of PRD or biologic DMARD treatment at 60 months. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were followed up for 60 months. Of them, 45 had no features of treatment failure, 30 had 1, 10 had 2, 7 had 3, and 1 patient had all 4 features. Having 2-4 features of treatment failure at 5 years was predicted by the health assessment score at baseline, and by even low residual disease activity at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Only 20% of the patients with RA treated early with combination sDMARD and PRD have more than 1 clinical feature of treatment failure at 60 months. Residual clinical disease activity at 3-6 months was the most important predictor for identifying these patients. The study was registered at www.clintrials.gov (NCT00908089).