Sorafenib administered using a high-dose, pulsatile regimen in patients with advanced solid malignancies: a phase I exposure escalation study.

BACKGROUND: (Pre)clinical evidence is accumulating that intermittent exposure to increased doses of protein kinase inhibitors may improve their treatment benefit. In this phase I trial, the safety of high-dose, pulsatile sorafenib was studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: High-dose sorafenib was administered once weekly in exposure escalation cohorts according to a 3 + 3 design. Drug monitoring was performed in weeks 1-3 and doses were adjusted to achieve a predefined target plasma area under the curve (AUC)(0-12 h). The effect of low gastric pH on improving sorafenib exposure was investigated by intake of the acidic beverage cola. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with advanced malignancies without standard treatment options were included. Once weekly, high-dose sorafenib exposure was escalated up to a target AUC(0-12 h) of 125-150 mg/L/h, achieving a twofold higher Cmax compared to standard continuous dosing. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in three patients: grade 3 duodenal perforation (2800 mg sorafenib), grade 5 multiorgan failure (2800 mg sorafenib) and grade 5 biliary tract perforation (3600 mg sorafenib). The mean difference between observed and target AUC(0-12 h) was 45% (SD ± 56%) in week 1 using a fixed starting dose of sorafenib compared to 2% (SD ± 32%) in week 3 as a result of drug monitoring (P = 0.06). Dissolving sorafenib in cola, instead of water, did not improve sorafenib exposure. Clinical benefit with stable disease as the best response was observed in two patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment with high-dose, once weekly sorafenib administration resulted in dose-limiting toxicity precluding dose escalation above the exposure cohort of 125-150 mg/L/h. Drug monitoring was a successful strategy to pursue a target exposure.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine given by 24-h hepatic arterial infusion.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to assess the toxicities, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the pharmacokinetics and the anti-tumour activity of gemcitabine given by 24-h hepatic arterial infusion (HAI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with liver malignancies received gemcitabine by 24-h HAI, weekly x 3, every 4 weeks. On day 1 or day 8 of the first cycle, patients received one administration by 24-h intravenous infusion for pharmacokinetic comparison and to determine hepatic extraction. RESULTS: Thirteen patients received gemcitabine at the dose levels of 75, 135 and 180 mg/m(2). The MTD was 180 mg/m(2) with thrombocytopaenia as the dose-limiting toxicity. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a significantly lower maximum gemcitabine plasma concentration (C(max): HAI, 26, 80 and 128 nM, respectively; IV, 229, 264 and 293 nM, respectively) and area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curve (AUC(0-24h): HAI, 386, 1247 and 2033 nmol x h/L, respectively; IV, 3526, 4818 and 5363 nmol x h/L, respectively) during HAI, compared with intravenous infusion (both P<0.001). Additionally, the mean hepatic extraction ratios of gemcitabine at the 75, 135 and 180 mg/m(2) dose level were 0.89, 0.75 and 0.55, respectively. Hepatic extraction decreased linearly with increasing dose. The C(max) and AUC(0-24h) of 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxyuridine, the deaminated product of gemcitabine, were similar for HAI and intravenous infusion. Seven patients had stable disease for a median duration of 9 months (range: 2-11 months). CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine given by 24-h HAI was well tolerated and resulted in significantly lower systemic gemcitabine plasma concentrations than intravenous infusion due to a relatively high hepatic extraction.