Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Treat Res Commun ; 38: 100783, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38184967

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is increasing. Its tumor characteristics and overall survival compared with those in nonpregnant patients remain controversial. While there have been suggestions that PABC patients have a 40 % increase in the risk of death compared to non-pregnant patients, other studies suggested similar disease outcomes. This study aims to review our local experience with PABC. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients diagnosed with PABC and twenty-eight patients diagnosed at premenopausal age randomly selected by a computer-generated system during the same period were recruited. Background characteristics, tumor features, and survival were compared. RESULTS: Among the twenty-eight pregnant patients, seventeen were diagnosed during pregnancy, and eleven were diagnosed in the postpartum period. Compared to the non-pregnant breast cancer patients, they presented with less progesterone receptor-positive tumor (35.7 % vs. 64.2 %, p = 0.03). Although there was no statistically significant difference in tumor size (p = 0.44) and nodal status (p = 0.16), the tumor tended to be larger in size (2.94 +/- 1.82 vs 2.40 +/- 1.69 cm) and with more nodal involvement (35.7 % vs 25.0 %). There was also a trend of delayed presentation to medical attention, with a mean duration of 13.1 weeks in the PABC group and 8.6 weeks in the control group. However, the overall survival did not differ (p = 0.63). CONCLUSION: PABC is increasing in incidence. They tend to have more aggressive features, but overall survival remains similar. A multidisciplinary approach is beneficial for providing the most appropriate care.


Assuntos
Azidas , Neoplasias da Mama , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez , Propanolaminas , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/patologia
2.
J Evid Based Med ; 14(2): 97-111, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33565274

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Recommendations for widespread use of face mask, including suggested type, should reflect the current published evidence and concurrently be studied. This review evaluates the preclinical and clinical evidence on use of cloth and surgical face masks in SARS-CoV-2 transmission and proposes a trial to gather further evidence. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Studies of SARS-CoV-2 and face masks and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of n ≥ 50 for other respiratory illnesses were included. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in this study. One preclinical and 1 observational cohort clinical study found significant benefit of masks in limiting SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Eleven RCTs in a meta-analysis studying other respiratory illnesses found no significant benefit of masks (±hand hygiene) for influenza-like-illness symptoms nor laboratory confirmed viruses. One RCT found a significant benefit of surgical masks compared with cloth masks. CONCLUSION: There is limited available preclinical and clinical evidence for face mask benefit in SARS-CoV-2. RCT evidence for other respiratory viral illnesses shows no significant benefit of masks in limiting transmission but is of poor quality and not SARS-CoV-2 specific. There is an urgent need for evidence from randomized controlled trials to investigate the efficacy of surgical and cloth masks on transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and user reported outcomes such as comfort and compliance.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Máscaras , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Têxteis , COVID-19/transmissão , Humanos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Infecções Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Infecções Respiratórias/transmissão , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 31(1): 51-7, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26245947

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Low anterior resection is commonly performed for carcinoma of the distal rectum. Diverting ileostomy has been used to decrease the septic consequence of anastomotic leakage and to reduce the re-operation rate. Nevertheless, subsequent closure of ileostomy can be associated with considerable morbidities. This study aimed to evaluate the morbidities after closure of ileostomy and to identify possible risk factors associated with the morbidities. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent closure of ileostomy, after a previous low anterior resection and defunctioning ileostomy for rectal cancer, was reviewed retrospectively. Patient's demographics, coexisting morbidities, operative details, and post-operative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: From January 2000 to September 2012, 213 patients who underwent ileostomy closure were included. Thirty-five patients developed post-operative complications. The overall complication rate was 16.4 %. The majority of complications could be managed by conservative treatment. Only one patient required re-operation due to intestinal obstruction. There was no 30-day mortality. Age >80 years was an independent risk factor for post-operative complications. Age >80 years was also an independent risk factor for developing urinary retention (p = 0.001) and prolonged ileus (p = 0.02). Closure of ileostomy with hand-sewn techniques showed a higher incidence of post-operative intestinal obstruction (p = 0.049) compared to closure using stapler. CONCLUSION: Closure of ileostomy following low anterior resection is associated with acceptable morbidities. Elderly patients tend to have a more complicated post-operative course and require more medical attention. The use of stapler is the preferred method for ileostomy closure as it is associated with less post-operative intestinal obstruction.


Assuntos
Ileostomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Morbidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Íleus/etiologia , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Retenção Urinária/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA