A Systemwide Strategy to Embed Equity into Patient Safety Event Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of framework to incorporate equity into event analysis. This quality improvement initiative involved the development of equity tools that were introduced in a two-hour interactive, case-based training across 11 acute care facilities at the largest municipal health care system in the United States. A pre and post survey (which included analysis of a clinical vignette) was also conducted to assess for knowledge and comfort embedding equity in patient safety event analysis, and to measure discomfort or distress during the training. A separate assessment was used to evaluate the tools. EQUITY TOOLS: A visual aid, the Patient Equity Wheel, was created to facilitate more comprehensive and robust health equity discussions by compiling a comprehensive list of equity categories, including internal, external, and organizational dimensions of equity. The Wheel was designed for use during each phase of event analysis. An Embedding Equity in Root Cause Analysis Worksheet was developed to aid in assessing considerations of equitable care in the investigation process and includes questions to ask staff to further assess bias or equitable care factors. INITIATIVE OUTCOME AND KEY INSIGHTS: Participant knowledge and level of comfort increased after training. The most commonly unrecognized categories of bias were Training/Competencies, Structural Workflow, and Culture/Norms. Most participants responded that they had no discomfort or distress during the training. Post-training feedback noted that the tools were being used across the system in various stages of event analysis and have been reported to improve health equity conversations.

Reducing Overuse of 3-Day Repeat Type and Screen Testing across an 11-Hospital Safety Net System.

BACKGROUND: According to the American Association of Blood Banks, a Type and Screen (T&S) is valid for up to three calendar days. Beyond a limited number of clinical indications such as a transfusion reaction, repeat T&S testing within 3 days is not warranted. Inappropriate repeat T&S testing is a costly medical waste and can lead to patient harm. OBJECTIVE: To reduce inappropriate duplicate T&S testing across a large, multihospital setting. SETTING: The largest urban safety net health system in the USA, with 11 acute care hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: Our first intervention involved adding the time elapsed since the last T&S order into the order and the process instructions that described when a T&S was indicated. The second intervention was a best practice advisory that triggered when T&S was ordered before the expiration of an active T&S. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the number of duplicate inpatient T&S per 1000 patient days. KEY RESULTS: Across all hospitals, the weekly average rate of duplicate T&S ordering decreased from 8.42 to 7.37 per 1000 patient days (12.5% reduction, p < 0.001) after the first intervention and to 4.32 per 1000 patient days (48.7% reduction, p < 0.001) after the second intervention. Using linear regression to compare pre-intervention to post-intervention 1, the level difference was - 2.46 (9.17 to 6.70, p < 0.001) and slope difference was 0.0001 (0.0282 to 0.0283, p = 1). For post-intervention 1 to post-intervention 2, the level difference was - 3.49 (8.06 to 4.58, p < 0.001) and slope difference was - 0.0428 (0.0283 to - 0.0145, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our intervention successfully reduced duplicate T&S testing using a two-pronged electronic health record intervention. The success of this low effort intervention across a diverse health system provides a framework for similar interventions in various clinical settings.

Imaging Wisely Campaign: Initiative to Reduce Imaging for Low Back Pain Across a Large Safety Net System.

OBJECTIVES: Low back pain is a common clinical presentation that often results in expensive and unnecessary imaging that may lead to undue patient harm, including unnecessary procedures. We present an initiative in a safety net system to reduce imaging for low back pain. METHODS: This quality improvement study was conducted across 70 ambulatory clinics and 11 teaching hospitals. Three electronic health record changes, using the concept of a nudge, were introduced into orders for lumbar radiography (x-ray), lumbar CT, and lumbar MRI. The primary outcome was the number of orders per 1,000 patient-days or encounters for each imaging test in the inpatient, ambulatory, and emergency department (ED) settings. Variation across facilities was assessed, along with selected indications. RESULTS: Across all clinical environments, there were statistically significant decreases in level differences pre- and postintervention for lumbar x-ray (-52.9% for inpatient encounters, P < .001; -23.7% for ambulatory encounters, P < .001; and -17.3% for ED only encounters, P < .01). There was no decrease in ordering of lumbar CTs in the inpatient and ambulatory settings, although there was an increase in lumbar CTs in ED-only encounters. There was no difference in lumbar MRI ordering. Variation was seen across all hospitals and clinics. DISCUSSION: Our intervention successfully decreased lumbar radiography across all clinical settings, with a reduction in lumbar CTs in the inpatient and ambulatory settings. There were no changes for lumbar MRI orders.

Reducing 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Testing in a Large, Urban Safety Net System.

BACKGROUND: 25-Hydroxyvitamin D testing is increasing despite national guidelines and Choosing Wisely recommendations against routine screening. Overuse can lead to misdiagnosis and unnecessary downstream testing and treatment. Repeat testing within 3 months is a unique area of overuse. OBJECTIVE: To reduce 25-hydroxyvitamin D testing in a large safety net system comprising 11 hospitals and 70 ambulatory centers. DESIGN: This was a quality improvement initiative with a quasi-experimental interrupted time series design with segmented regression. PARTICIPANTS: All patients in the inpatient and outpatient settings with at least one order for 25-hydroxyvitamin D were included in the analysis. INTERVENTIONS: An electronic health record clinical decision support tool was designed for inpatient and outpatient orders and involved two components: a mandatory prompt requiring appropriate indications and a best practice advisory (BPA) focused on repeat testing within 3 months. MAIN MEASURES: The pre-intervention period (6/17/2020-6/13/2021) was compared to the post-intervention period (6/14/2021-8/28/2022) for total 25-hydroxyvitamin D testing, as well as 3-month repeat testing. Hospital and clinic variation in testing was assessed. Additionally, best practice advisory action rates were analyzed, separated by clinician type and specialty. KEY RESULTS: There were 44% and 46% reductions in inpatient and outpatient orders, respectively (p < 0.001). Inpatient and outpatient 3-month repeat testing decreased by 61% and 48%, respectively (p < 0.001). The best practice advisory true accept rate was 13%. CONCLUSION: This initiative successfully reduced 25-hydroxyvitamin D testing through the use of mandatory appropriate indications and a best practice advisory focusing on a unique area of overuse: the repeat testing within a 3-month interval. There was wide variation among hospitals and clinics and variation among clinician types and specialties regarding actions to the best practice advisory.

Reduction of Intravenous Antihypertensives through Clinical Decision Support in a Large Safety Net System.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic severe hypertension (also known as hypertensive urgency) is frequently encountered in the hospital. Previous evidence suggests that management with one-time doses of intravenous (IV) antihypertensives may increase adverse events. Despite this, single-dose treatment remains common in the emergency department and inpatient settings. METHODS: This quality initiative was launched at New York City Health + Hospitals, the largest safety net hospital system in the United States. The initiative involved two changes to electronic orders for IV hydralazine and IV labetalol: a nonintrusive advisory statement within the order instructions and a mandatory requirement to document the indication for IV antihypertensive use. RESULTS: This initiative took place from November 2021 to October 2022. Of the indications selected for IV antihypertensive orders, 60.7% were for hypertensive emergency, 15.3% were for patients who were strictly NPO, 21.2% were for other, and 2.8% selected more than one indication. For ED-only encounters, aggregate IV hydralazine and IV labetalol orders per 1,000 patient encounters were 2.53 preintervention and 1.55 postintervention (38.7% reduction, p < 0.001). For inpatient encounters, aggregate IV hydralazine and IV labetalol orders per 1,000 patient-days were 18.25 preintervention and 15.81 postintervention (13.4% reduction, p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for individual orders of IV hydralazine and IV labetalol. There were significant reductions in 7 of the 11 hospitals in inpatient administration of aggregate IV hydralazine and labetalol orders per 1,000 patient-days. CONCLUSION: This quality improvement initiative successfully reduced unnecessary IV antihypertensive use in an 11-hospital safety net system.

Diarrhea don'ts: Reducing inappropriate stool cultures and ova and parasite testing for nosocomial diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea that develops in patients after 72 hours of hospitalization is likely to have a nosocomial or iatrogenic etiology. Testing with stool cultures and stool ova and parasites (O&P) is not recommended. Our goal was to reduce this inappropriate testing within a large, urban safety-net hospital system. METHODS: This was a quality improvement project. We created a best practice advisory (BPA) within the electronic medical record that fires when a stool culture or O&P order is placed 72 hours after admission for any immunocompetent patient. It states that stool testing is low yield and offers the option to remove the order. We measured weekly counts of stool culture and stool O&P orders pre- and postintervention. We also measured the BPA acceptance rate, the 24-hour stool testing reorder rate, and Clostridioides difficile infection rates. Data were analyzed using Welch tests as well as a quasi-experimental pre- and postintervention interrupted time series regression analysis. RESULTS: Stool culture orders decreased by 24.4% (P < .001). There was a significant level difference and slope difference with linear regression. Five of the 11 hospitals had a significant reduction in stool culture orders. Stool O&P orders decreased by 18.2% (P < .01). Three of the 11 hospitals had a significant reduction in stool O&P orders. CONCLUSIONS: Our intervention successfully reduced inappropriate stool testing within a large safety-net hospital system.