RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Individuals with esophageal atresia (EA) have lifelong increased risk for mucosal and structural pathology of the esophagus. The use of surveillance endoscopy to detect clinically meaningful pathology has been underexplored in pediatric EA. We hypothesized that surveillance endoscopy in pediatric EA has high clinical yield, even in the absence of symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of all patients with EA who underwent at least 1 surveillance endoscopy between March 2004 and March 2023 at an international EA referral center were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes were endoscopic identification of pathology leading to an escalation in medical, endoscopic, or surgical management. Logistic regression analysis examined predictors of actionable findings. Nelson-Aalen analysis estimated optimal endoscopic surveillance intervals. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-six children with EA underwent 1,473 surveillance endoscopies spanning 3,687 person-years of follow-up time. A total of 770 endoscopies (52.2%) in 394 unique patients (72.2%) had actionable pathology. Esophagitis leading to escalation of therapy was the most frequently encountered finding (484 endoscopies, 32.9%), with most esophagitis attributed to acid reflux. Barrett's esophagus (intestinal metaplasia) was identified in 7 unique patients (1.3%) at a median age of 11.3 years. No dysplastic lesions were identified. Actionable findings leading to surgical intervention were found in 55 children (30 refractory reflux and 25 tracheoesophageal fistulas). Significant predictors of actionable pathology included increasing age, long gap atresia, and hiatal hernia. Symptoms were not predictive of actionable findings, except dysphagia, which was associated with stricture. Nelson-Aalen analysis predicted occurrence of an actionable finding every 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance endoscopy uncovers high rates of actionable pathology even in asymptomatic children with EA. Based on the findings of the current study, a pediatric EA surveillance endoscopy algorithm is proposed.
Assuntos
Atresia Esofágica , Esofagite , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Humanos , Criança , Atresia Esofágica/diagnóstico , Atresia Esofágica/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esofagite/complicações , Esofagite/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/etiologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , EndoscopiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic strictures (AS) after esophageal atresia (EA) repair are common. While most respond to endoscopic therapy, some become refractory and require surgical intervention, for which the outcomes are not well established. METHODS: All EA children with AS who were treated surgically at two institutions (2011-2022) were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical repair was performed for those with AS that were either refractory to endoscopic therapy or clinically symptomatic and undergoing surgery for another indication. Anastomotic leak, need for repeat stricture resection, and esophageal replacement were considered poor outcomes. RESULTS: 139 patients (median age: 12 months, range 1.5 months-20 years; median weight: 8.1 kg) underwent 148 anastomotic stricture repairs (100 refractory, 48 non-refractory) in the form of stricturoplasty (n = 43), segmental stricture resection with primary anastomosis (n = 96), or stricture resection with a delayed anastomosis after traction-induced lengthening (n = 9). With a median follow-up of 38 months, most children (92%) preserved their esophagus, and the majority (83%) of stricture repairs were free of poor outcomes. Only one anastomotic leak occurred in a non-refractory stricture. Of the refractory stricture repairs (n = 100), 10% developed a leak, 9% required repeat stricture resection, and 13% required esophageal replacement. On multivariable analysis, significant risk factors for any type of poor outcome included anastomotic leak, stricture length, hiatal hernia, and patient's weight. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for refractory AS is associated with inherent yet low morbidity and high rates of esophageal preservation. Surgical repair of non-refractory symptomatic AS at the time of another thoracic operation is associated with excellent outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Assuntos
Atresia Esofágica , Estenose Esofágica , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Atresia Esofágica/cirurgia , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estenose Esofágica/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The endoscopist plays a critical role in the management of patients with congenital esophageal defects. This review focuses on esophageal atresia and congenital esophageal strictures and, in particular, the endoscopic management of comorbidities related to these conditions, including anastomotic strictures, tracheoesophageal fistulas, esophageal perforations, and esophagitis surveillance. Practical aspects of endoscopic techniques for stricture management are reviewed including dilation, intralesional steroid injection, stenting, and endoscopic incisional therapy. Endoscopic surveillance for mucosal pathology is essential in this population, as patients are at high risk of esophagitis and its late complications such as Barrett's esophagus.
Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett , Atresia Esofágica , Estenose Esofágica , Esofagite , Humanos , Constrição Patológica , Esôfago de Barrett/cirurgia , Esôfago de Barrett/complicações , Estenose Esofágica/etiologia , Estenose Esofágica/cirurgia , Esofagite/complicações , Esofagoscopia , Atresia Esofágica/cirurgia , Atresia Esofágica/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Left-sided repair for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) has been described for patients with a large leftward upper pouch, no thoracic tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) nor tracheobronchomalacia (TBM), or as salvage plan after prior failed right-sided repair. We describe our experience with left-sided MIS traction induced growth process. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent Foker process for LGEA at two institutions between December 2016 and November 2021. Patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: 71 patients underwent Foker process. Of 34 MIS cases, 28 patients (82%) underwent left-sided repair (median gap length 5 cm) at median age 4 months with median 3 (range 2-8) operations and median 13.5 (IQR 11-21) days on traction until esophageal anastomosis. 9 patients (32%) underwent completely MIS approach, whereas 5 patients (18%) converted to open at first operation and 14 patients (50%) converted to open later in the traction process. Traction was internal in 68%, external in 11%, and combination in 21%. Median follow-up was 15.4 (IQR 7.5-31.7) months after anastomosis. 14% had anastomotic leak managed with antibiotics and/or esophageal vacuum therapy. Median number of esophageal dilations was 3.5 (range 0-13). 18% required stricture resection. 39% underwent Nissen fundoplication. None have needed esophageal replacement. CONCLUSIONS: For multiple reasons including the tendency of both esophageal pouches to have a leftward bias, less tracheal compression by upper pouch, and clean field of surgery for reoperative cases, we now more commonly use left-sided approach for MIS LGEA repair compared to right side, regardless of left aortic arch. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Treatment Study.
Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica , Atresia Esofágica , Atresia Esofágica/cirurgia , Fístula Traqueoesofágica/cirurgia , Fístula Anastomótica , Resultado do Tratamento , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , ToracoscopiaRESUMO
Children with esophageal atresia (EA) may require enteral tube feedings in infancy and a subset experience ongoing feeding difficulties and enteral tube dependence. Predictors of enteral tube dependence have never been systematically explored in this population. We hypothesized that enteral tube dependence is multifactorial in nature, with likely important contributions from anastomotic stricture. Cross-sectional clinical, feeding, and endoscopic data were extracted from a prospectively collected database of endoscopies performed in EA patients between August 2019 and August 2021 at an international referral center for EA management. Clinical factors known or hypothesized to contribute to esophageal dysphagia, oropharyngeal dysphagia, or other difficulties in meeting caloric needs were incorporated into regression models for statistical analysis. Significant predictors of enteral tube dependence were statistically identified. Three-hundred thirty children with EA were eligible for analysis. Ninety-seven were dependent on enteral tube feeds. Younger age, lower weight Z scores, long gap atresia, neurodevelopmental risk factor(s), significant cardiac disease, vocal fold movement impairment, and smaller esophageal anastomotic diameter were significantly associated with enteral tube dependence in univariate analyses; only weight Z scores, vocal fold movement impairment, and anastomotic diameter retained significance in a multivariable logistic regression model. In the current study, anastomotic stricture is the only potentially modifiable significant predictor of enteral tube dependence that is identified.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição , Atresia Esofágica , Estenose Esofágica , Humanos , Criança , Atresia Esofágica/cirurgia , Constrição Patológica , Estudos Transversais , Nutrição Enteral , Intubação Gastrointestinal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estenose Esofágica/complicações , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Esophageal dilations in children are performed by several pediatric and adult professionals. We aim to summarize improvements in safety and new technology used for the treatment of complex and refractory strictures, including triamcinolone injection, endoscopic electro-incisional therapy, topical mitomycin-C application, stent placement, functional lumen imaging probe assisted dilation, and endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure in the pediatric population.
Assuntos
Estenose Esofágica , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Dilatação/métodos , Estenose Esofágica/etiologia , Estenose Esofágica/terapia , Esofagoscopia/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Estimation of the dimensions of endoscopic findings such as stricture diameter is largely subjective. Accurate assessment of stricture dimensions has multiple benefits including facilitating the choice of appropriately sized endoscopic therapies for treating stricture, properly tracking response to endoscopic therapies between procedures, and potentially even predicting outcomes of endoscopic therapy. METHODS: Endoscopies performed in children with repaired esophageal atresia between August 2019 and August 2021 for which both (1) an endoscopic estimate of esophageal stricture diameter obtained by visual comparison with the known dimensions of the biopsy forceps and (2) an intraoperative esophageal fluoroscopy study were performed were included for analysis. Fluoroscopic stricture diameter measurements were manually obtained using a software ruler tool calibrated to the known dimensions of the intraluminal endoscope. Statistical concordance was calculated between the visual diameter estimates and the standard fluoroscopic stricture measurements. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one endoscopies were included for analysis. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.89-0.94) between the visual diameter estimates and the fluoroscopic stricture measurements. Correlation was strongest for smaller to mid-sized stricture diameters. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the biopsy forceps as a visual reference of known dimensions enables accurate visual estimation of esophageal stricture diameter during endoscopy using commonly available tools, with high concordance with standard fluoroscopic measurement techniques.
Assuntos
Estenose Esofágica , Criança , Humanos , Estenose Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose Esofágica/etiologia , Estenose Esofágica/cirurgia , Constrição Patológica/diagnóstico por imagem , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Biópsia , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of magnets for the treatment of long gap esophageal atresia or "magnamosis" is associated with increased incidence of anastomotic strictures; however, little has been reported on other complications that may provide insight into refining selection criteria for appropriate use. METHODS: A single institution, retrospective review identified three cases referred for treatment after attempted magnamosis with significant complications. Their presentation, imaging, management, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: All three patients had prior cervical or thoracic surgery to close a tracheoesophageal fistula prior to magnamosis, creating scar tissue that can prevent magnet induced esophageal movement, leading to either magnets not attracting enough or erosion into surrounding structures. Two patients had a reported four centimeter esophageal gap prior to attempted magnamosis, both failing to achieve esophageal anastomosis, suggesting that these gaps were either measured on tension with variability in gap measurement technique, or that the esophageal segments were fixed in position from scar tissue and unable to elongate. One patient had severe tracheobronchomalacia requiring tracheostomy, with improvement in his airway after eventual tracheobronchopexies, highlighting that magnamosis does not address comorbidities often associated with this patient population. CONCLUSIONS: We propose the following inclusion criteria and considerations for magnamosis: an esophageal gap truly less than four centimeters off tension with standardized measurement across centers, cautious use with a history of prior thoracic or cervical esophageal surgery, no associated tracheobronchomalacia or great vessel anomaly that would benefit from concurrent repair, and ideally to be used in centers equipped to manage potential complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV treatment study.
Assuntos
Atresia Esofágica , Traqueobroncomalácia , Fístula Traqueoesofágica , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Cicatriz/etiologia , Atresia Esofágica/complicações , Atresia Esofágica/cirurgia , Humanos , Imãs , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traqueobroncomalácia/complicações , Fístula Traqueoesofágica/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Esophagitis is prevalent in patients with esophageal dysmotility despite acid suppression, likely related to poor esophageal clearance. Esophageal atresia (EA) is a classic model of dysmotility where this observation holds true. In adult non-dysmotility populations, failure of esophagitis to respond to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) has been linked to variants in CYP2C19 that influence the activity of the encoded enzyme. It is unknown if CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype contributes to PPI-refractory, non-allergic esophagitis in EA. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 314 children with (N = 188) and without (N = 126) EA who were on PPI therapy at the time of endoscopy to evaluate for possible gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients with eosinophilic esophagitis and/or fundoplication were excluded. Clinical and histology data were collected. Genomic DNA from biopsy samples was genotyped for polymorphisms in CYP2C19. RESULTS: CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotypes were not associated with presence or severity of esophagitis (P = 0.994). In a multivariate logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders, EA was the strongest and only significant predictor of esophagitis (odds ratio 2.72, P = 0.023). Using negative binomial regression, we found that CYP2C19 phenotype was not a significant predictor of eosinophil count in children with PPI-refractory esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EA are significantly more likely to experience PPI-refractory, non-allergic esophagitis than controls regardless of CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype, suggesting that factors other than CYP2C19 genetics, including dysmotility, are the primary drivers of esophagitis in EA. CYP2C19 genotype failed to predict PPI-refractory, non-allergic esophagitis in both EA and non-EA children.
Assuntos
Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Atresia Esofágica/tratamento farmacológico , Esofagite/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Atresia Esofágica/complicações , Atresia Esofágica/genética , Esofagite/etiologia , Esofagite/genética , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , FarmacogenéticaAssuntos
Estenose Esofágica , Criança , Constrição Patológica , Dilatação , Humanos , Atenção Terciária à SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Esophageal anastomoses are at risk for leak or stricture. Negative pressure vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy is used to treat leak. We hypothesized that a prophylactic VAC (pEVAC) at the time of new anastomosis may lead to fewer leaks and strictures. METHODS: Single center retrospective case-control study of patients undergoing high-risk esophageal anastomoses between July 2015 and January 2019. Outcomes of leak and long-term anastomotic failure (refractory stricture requiring surgery) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Sixteen patients had a pEVAC placed during LGEA repair (N = 10) or stricture resection (N = 6). Of pEVAC cases, 3 (N = 1 Foker, N = 2 stricture resections) experienced leak (18.8%). In comparison, leak occurred in 9/41 (22%) Foker patients and in 1/20 (5%) stricture resections without pEVAC, all p > 0.05. Long-term anastomotic failure was more common in the pEVAC cohort versus controls (56.3% versus 11.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic EVAC placement does not appear to reduce leak and is associated with significantly greater odds of long-term anastomotic failure. Further device refinement could improve its potential role in prophylaxis of high-risk anastomoses, but future research is needed to better understand optimal patient selection, device design, and duration of pEVAC therapy.
Assuntos
Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Anastomotic stricture is a common complication of esophageal atresia (EA) repair. Such strictures are managed with dilation or other therapeutic endoscopic techniques such as steroid injections, stenting, or endoscopic incisional therapy (EIT). In situations where endoscopic therapy is unsuccessful, patients with refractory strictures may require surgical stricture resection; however, the point at which endoscopic therapy should be abandoned in favor of repeat thoracotomy is unclear. We hypothesized that increasing numbers of therapeutic endoscopies are associated with increased likelihood of stricture resection. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with EA who had an initial surgery at our institution resulting in an esophago-esophageal anastomosis between August 2005 and May 2019. Up to 2 years of post-surgery endoscopy data were collected, including exposure to balloon dilation, intralesional steroid injection, stenting, and EIT. Primary outcome was need for stricture resection. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed. There were 171 patients who met inclusion criteria. The number of therapeutic endoscopies was a moderate predictor of stricture resection by ROC curve analysis (AUC = 0.720, 95% CI 0.617-0.823). With increasing number of therapeutic endoscopies, the probability of remaining free from stricture resection decreased. By Youden's J index, a cutoff of ≥7 therapeutic endoscopies was optimal for discriminating between patients who had versus did not have stricture resection, though an absolute majority of patients (≥50%) remained free of stricture resection at each number of therapeutic endoscopies through 12 endoscopies. Significant predictors of needing stricture resection by univariate regression included ≥7 therapeutic endoscopies, Foker surgery for long-gap EA, fundoplication, history of esophageal leak, and length of stricture ≥10 mm. Multivariate analysis identified only history of leak as statistically significant, though this regression was underpowered. The utility of repeated therapeutic endoscopies may diminish with increasing numbers of endoscopic therapeutic attempts, with a cutoff of ≥7 endoscopies identified by our single-center experience as our statistically optimal discriminator between having stricture resection versus not; however, a majority of patients remained free of stricture resection well beyond 7 therapeutic endoscopies. Though retrospective, this study supports that repeated therapeutic endoscopies may have clinical utility in sparing surgical stricture resection. Esophageal leak is identified as a significant predictor of needing subsequent stricture resection. Prospective study is needed.
Assuntos
Atresia Esofágica , Estenose Esofágica , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Criança , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Constrição Patológica/cirurgia , Endoscopia , Atresia Esofágica/cirurgia , Estenose Esofágica/etiologia , Estenose Esofágica/cirurgia , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The "rule of 3" is a 40-year-old expert opinion that suggests dilating an esophageal stricture more than 3âmm is unsafe. Few studies have evaluated this tenet, and do not specify how much larger than 3âmm is reasonable. Our aim was to determine the optimal point for maximum dilation diameter with acceptable risk in a pediatric population. METHODS: A retrospective review in pediatric patients with esophageal strictures was performed. The number of millimeters the stricture was dilated, defined as delta dilation diameter (ΔDD), was determined by subtracting the initial stricture diameter from the diameter of the largest balloon used. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminatory ability of ΔDD. Youden J index was used to identify optimal cut-point in predicting perforation. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-four patients underwent 1384 balloon dilations. Overall perforation rate was 1.66%. There were 8 perforations in 1075 dilations with ΔDD ≤5âmm (0.7%) and 15 perforations in 309 dilations with ΔDD >5âmm (4.9%). Youden J index found an optimal cutoff to be at a ΔDD of ≤5âmm. The cumulative rate of perforation for all dilations ≤5âmm was 0.74% whereas the cumulative risk of perforation for all dilations ≥6âmm was 4.85% (Pâ<â0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Balloon dilations that expand the initial esophageal anastomosis ≤5âmm in a pediatric population appear to not unduly increase the risk of perforation. Further prospective studies are needed to further investigate the potential for a new rule of 5 for balloon dilation.
Assuntos
Estenose Esofágica , Adulto , Criança , Constrição Patológica , Dilatação , Estenose Esofágica/etiologia , Estenose Esofágica/terapia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) is an inborn condition of the esophagus that can be refractory to endoscopic dilation. Surgical intervention is not curative, with patients experiencing frequent ongoing need for therapy for anastomotic stricture postoperatively. We hypothesized that novel methods of endoscopic CES management including endoscopic incisional therapy (EIT) would lead to less surgical intervention. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients with CES treated by our tertiary care center who had at least one endoscopy between July 2007 and July 2019. Statistical comparison of cohorts who underwent advanced endoscopic therapy involving EIT versus traditional endoscopic therapy with balloon dilation was performed. Primary outcome measure was need for surgical intervention. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with CES met inclusion criteria. Thirty-four ever had at least one endoscopic intervention such as balloon dilation, steroid injection, stenting, and/or endoscopic incisional therapy (EIT) at their CES. Esophageal vacuum assisted closure (EVAC) was used for treatment or prevention of esophageal leak. Odds of surgical intervention were significantly lower in the group who received therapeutic endoscopy with EIT (odds ratio (OR) 0.1; pâ¯=â¯0.007). Clinical feeding outcomes were similar in the endoscopic and surgical management groups. Odds of complications after therapeutic endoscopies involving EIT were significantly greater than those without EIT (odds ratio 6.39; 95% confidence interval (2.34, 17.44); pâ¯<â¯0.001), though our rates of esophageal leak significantly decreased over time as our use of EVAC increased (Spearman's ρâ¯=â¯-0.884; pâ¯=â¯0.004). CONCLUSION: Complementary endoscopic techniques such as EIT broaden the toolbox of the treating physician and may allow for avoidance of surgery in CES. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Assuntos
Endoscopia , Estenose Esofágica , Criança , Estenose Esofágica/congênito , Estenose Esofágica/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tracheoesophageal fistulae (TEF) are difficult to detect and require a high index of suspicion. We hypothesized that capnography to identify a spike in end-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2) during esophagoscopy with carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation would facilitate TEF diagnosis because of gas passage from the esophagus to the trachea. METHODS: Medical records of 42 consecutive cases of recurrent, acquired, or missed congenital TEF diagnosed between January 2015 and November 2019 that underwent esophagoscopy with CO2 insufflation were reviewed. A control cohort of 97 similarly endoscopically evaluated patients with surgical confirmation of absence of recurrent TEF (eg, patients undergoing posterior tracheopexy) was also collected. All patients underwent pre-operative esophagoscopy, bronchoscopy, and capnography; diagnostic abilities of various combinations of modalities for TEF identification were calculated. RESULTS: Statistical analysis identified a maximum intra-esophagoscopy end-tidal CO2 level of 68âmmHg as the optimal discriminator between cases and controls, though in practice, we anecdotally find that recurrent TEFs typically permit rapid rise ≥90âmmHg. Increasing numbers of diagnostic modalities increased diagnostic sensitivity to detect recurrent TEF; the highest diagnostic sensitivity for TEF identification was achieved by the combination of intra-esophagoscopy fluoroscopy with bronchoscopy and capnography ≥68âmmHg (sensitivityâ=â88.1%). There were multiple cases of TEF (Nâ=â7 for etCO2 ≥68âmmHg, Nâ=â3 for etCO2 ≥90âmmHg) identified by capnography that were missed by esophagoscopy. There were 5 (for etCO2 ≥68âmmHg) or 6 (for etCO2 ≥90âmmHg) cases of recurrent TEF that were missed by all nonsurgical methods. CONCLUSION: Attention to etCO2 during esophagoscopy with CO2 insufflation represents a simple, novel way to detect TEF. Identification of TEF remains challenging, though combinations of diagnostic modalities improve diagnostic sensitivity.
Assuntos
Insuflação , Fístula Traqueoesofágica , Capnografia , Dióxido de Carbono , Humanos , Traqueia , Fístula Traqueoesofágica/diagnóstico , Fístula Traqueoesofágica/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Fashioning a patent, watertight anastomosis in patients with esophageal atresia is a challenging task in pediatric surgery, particularly when performed under tension. A reproducible suture-less alternative would decrease operative time. We evaluated magnetic esophageal compression anastomoses in a novel bypass-loop swine model. METHODS: Eight-week-old piglets underwent thoracotomy to mobilize the esophagus at the carina to create a U-shaped loop. Custom-made 8â¯mm diameter Neodymium Magnets were inserted into the esophagus proximal and distal to the loop, then mated side-to-side at the future anastomosis site. Pigs were observed for 8 (nâ¯=â¯4), 10 (nâ¯=â¯6), and 12 (nâ¯=â¯2) days and then sacrificed. The magnetic compression anastomosis was evaluated macroscopically, by radiography, burst pressure testing, and histology. RESULTS: All 12 pigs survived until the endpoint. Separation of the magnets occurred at a median of 9â¯days. Contrast esophagrams showed patency and no leak. All anastomoses withstood pressures well over 13â¯kPa without leak. Histopathology showed epithelialized circular scar tissue. CONCLUSION: Magnetic compression anastomoses of the esophagus using our specially-designed magnets are formed between the 8th and 10th postoperative day, are patent and mechanically resistant to supraphysiologic intraluminal pressures. These data lay the basis for a potential clinical application in patients born with esophageal atresia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable (experimental animal study).
Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica , Atresia Esofágica/cirurgia , Imãs , Anastomose Cirúrgica/instrumentação , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Animais , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Esôfago/cirurgia , Feminino , Gravidez , SuínosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The role of intralesional steroid injection (ISI) in the treatment of anastomotic stricture in patients with esophageal atresia remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ISI. METHODS: A total of 158 patients with esophageal atresia with at least 1 ISI for the treatment of esophageal anastomotic stricture between 2010 and 2017 were identified. The change in stricture diameter (ΔD) was compared between procedures with dilation alone (ISI-) and dilation with steroid injection (ISI+). RESULTS: A total of 1055 balloon dilations were performed (452 ISI+). The median ΔD was significantly greater in the ISI+ group: 1âmm (interquartile range [IQR] 0, 3) versus 0âmm (IQR -1, 1.5) (Pâ<â0.0001). The ISI+ group had greater percentage of improved diameter (Pâ<â0.0001) and lesser percentages of unchanged and decreased diameters at subsequent endoscopy (Pâ=â0.0009, Pâ=â0.003). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed the significance of ISI on increasing the likelihood of improved stricture diameter with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.24 (95% confidence interval: 2.15-4.88) (Pâ<â0.001). The ΔD for the first 3 ISI+ procedures was greater than the ΔD for subsequent ISI+ procedures: 1âmm (IQR 0, 3) versus 0.5âmm (IQR-1.25, 2) (Pâ=â0.001). There was no difference in perforation incidence between ISI+ and ISI- groups (Pâ=â0.82). CONCLUSIONS: ISI with dilation was well tolerated and improved anastomotic stricture diameter more than dilation alone. The benefit of ISI over dilation alone was limited to the first 3 ISI procedures.
Assuntos
Atresia Esofágica , Estenose Esofágica , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Constrição Patológica/terapia , Atresia Esofágica/cirurgia , Estenose Esofágica/etiologia , Estenose Esofágica/terapia , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esteroides , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
A gastrointestinal (GI) transmural defect is defined as total rupture of the GI wall, and these defects can be divided into three categories: perforations, leaks, and fistulas. Surgical management of these defects is usually challenging and may be associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, several novel endoscopic techniques have been developed, and endoscopy has become a first-line approach for therapy of these conditions. The use of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is increasing with favorable results. This technique involves endoscopic placement of a sponge connected to a nasogastric tube into the defect cavity or lumen. This promotes healing via five mechanisms, including macrodeformation, microdeformation, changes in perfusion, exudate control, and bacterial clearance, which is similar to the mechanisms in which skin wounds are treated with commonly employed wound vacuums. EVT can be used in the upper GI tract, small bowel, biliopancreatic regions, and lower GI tract, with variable success rates and a satisfactory safety profile. In this article, we review and discuss the mechanism of action, materials, techniques, efficacy, and safety of EVT in the management of patients with GI transmural defects.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Esophagitis is highly prevalent in patients with esophageal atresia (EA). Peptic esophagitis has long been assumed to be the primary cause of esophagitis in this population, and prolonged acid suppressive medication usage is common; such treatment is of unknown benefit and carries potential risk. METHODS: To better understand the role of commonly used antireflux treatments in EA, we analyzed all patients with repaired EA who underwent endoscopy with biopsies at our institution between January 2016 and August 2018. Macroscopic erosive and histologic esophagitis on biopsy was graded per predefined criteria. Clinical characteristics including acid suppressive medication usage, type of EA and repair, presence of hiatal hernia, and history of fundoplication were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 310 unique patients (33.5% long gap EA) who underwent 576 endoscopies with biopsies during the study period. Median age at endoscopy was 3.7 years (interquartile range 21-78 months). Erosive esophagitis was found in 8.7% of patients (6.1% of endoscopies); any degree of histologic eosinophilia (≥1âeosinophil/high power field [HPF]) was seen in 56.8% of patients (48.8% of endoscopies), with >15âeosinophils/HPF seen in 15.2% of patients (12.3% of endoscopies). Acid suppression was common; 86.9% of endoscopies were preceded by acid suppressive medication use. Fundoplication had been performed in 78 patients (25.2%). Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and/or H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) use were the only significant predictors of reduced odds for abnormal esophageal biopsy (Pâ=â0.011 for PPI, Pâ=â0.048 for H2RA, and Pâ=â0.001 for PPI combined with H2RA therapy). However, change in intensity of acid suppressive therapy by either dosage or frequency was not significantly associated with change in macroscopic erosive or histologic esophagitis (Pâ>â0.437 and Pâ>â0.13, respectively). Presence or integrity of a fundoplication was not significantly associated with esophagitis (Pâ=â0.236). CONCLUSIONS: In EA patients, acid suppressive medication therapy is associated with reduced odds of abnormal esophageal biopsy, though histologic esophagitis is highly prevalent even with high rates of acid suppressive medication use. Esophagitis is likely multifactorial in EA patients, with peptic esophagitis as only one of multiple possible etiologies for esophageal inflammation. The clinical significance of histologic eosinophilia in this population warrants further investigation.
Assuntos
Atresia Esofágica , Esofagite Péptica/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Esofagite Péptica/patologia , Esofagite Péptica/cirurgia , Feminino , Fundoplicatura , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagemRESUMO
Posterior descending aortopexy can relieve posterior intrusion of the left mainstem bronchus that may limit the effectiveness of posterior tracheobronchopexy. We review outcomes of patients undergoing both descending aortopexy and posterior tracheopexy for severe tracheobronchomalacia with posterior intrusion and left mainstem compression to determine if there were resolution of clinical symptoms and bronchoscopic evidence of improvement in airway collapse. All patients who underwent both descending aortopexy and posterior tracheopexy from October 2012 to October 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical symptoms, tracheomalacia scores based on standardized dynamic airway evaluation by anatomical region, and persistent airway intrusion requiring reoperation were collected. Data were analyzed by Wald and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Thirty-two patients underwent descending aortopexy and posterior tracheopexy at median age of 18 months (interquartile range 6-40 months). Median follow-up was 3 months (interquartile range 1-7 months). There were statistically significant improvements in clinical symptoms postoperatively, including cough, noisy breathing, prolonged and recurrent respiratory infections, ventilator dependence, blue spells, and brief resolved unexplained events (all P < 0.001), as well as exercise intolerance (P = 0.033), transient respiratory distress requiring positive pressure (P = 0.003), and oxygen dependence (P = 0.007). Total tracheomalacia scores improved significantly (P < 0.001), with significant segmental improvements in the middle (P = 0.003) and lower (P < 0.001) trachea, and right (P = 0.011) and left (P < 0.001) mainstem bronchi. Two patients (6%) had persistent airway intrusion requiring reoperation with anterior aortopexy or tracheopexy. Descending aortopexy and posterior tracheopexy are effective in treating severe tracheobronchomalacia and left mainstem intrusion with significant improvements in clinical symptoms and degree of airway collapse on bronchoscopy.