Laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis: Factors associated with patient satisfaction.

PURPOSE: To examine the patient experience of laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis and factors that contributed to perceived difficulty with the process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 32-question anonymous survey was administered to individuals over 18 years old who reported a diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux. The survey contained questions regarding demographics and individuals' experiences during the diagnostic workup along with the generic short patient experiences questionnaire. Percentages were calculated for all variables. Kendall rank correlation coefficient was performed to measure the strength and direction of association between laryngopharyngeal reflux workup and perceived difficulty with diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 232 respondents, 59.9 % reported difficulty with the diagnostic process. Strong positive correlations were found between perceived difficulty with laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis and the following factors: total number of physicians seen (τb = 0.483, p < 0.001), time from symptom onset (τb = 0.300, p < 0.001), and time from first physician visit (τb = 0.479, p < 0.001). Results from the generic short patient experiences questionnaire showed moderate negative correlations between perceived difficulty with diagnosis and the following factors: perceived competence of physician (τb = -0.228, p < 0.001), perception that the physician cared for the patient (τb = -0.253, p < 0.001), perceived interest the physician had in the patient (τb = -0.259, p < 0.001), and time interacting with the physician (τb = -0.226, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Respondents report difficulty being diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux. This correlates with increased time to receive a diagnosis, increased number of physicians seen, and factors related to the patient-physician relationship. Physicians can improve patient experience by focusing on clear communication with interactive patient appointments, and scheduling high yield diagnostic tests.

Voice Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Bariatric surgery has been documented to improve comorbidities associated with obesity. Obesity can cause deposition of excess adipose tissue, narrowing of the vocal tract, and decreased lung capacity contributing to reduced vocal quality and increased vocal effort. Limited information is available regarding the impact of bariatric surgery on voice outcomes. This review seeks to examine the role of bariatric surgery on voice outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review was completed using PubMed and Embase for measures of vocal change before and after bariatric surgery. Studies were reviewed by three authors, and data related to acoustic, aerodynamic, auditory-perceptual, and patient-reported outcome measures were extracted. RESULTS: Forty-nine abstracts were identified with seven meeting criteria for analysis. Voice outcomes pre and postbariatric surgery were measured across 122 individuals. Results revealed increased fundamental frequency (F0) and increased maximum phonation time (MPT) during sustained vowel productions. Correlation coefficients for MPT for /a/ were -0.683 and -0.725 for F0, respectively, indicating a strong negative correlation between body mass index and MPT and F0. Trends toward improved auditory-perceptual ratings and improved patient-reported outcome measures were also noted. However, studies were limited by restricted patient demographics and limited use of standardized and/or comprehensive evaluation techniques. CONCLUSION: Weight loss associated with bariatric surgery can result in improved voice outcomes; however, the mechanism by which it helps is unclear. To better understand this, otolaryngologists and speech-language pathologists may consider advocating for pre- and postsurgery voice evaluation in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Anesthesia considerations during management of airway stenosis: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of ventilatory techniques by evaluating prevalence of technique failure and intraoperative hypoxia during endoscopic management of airway stenosis. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Embase for anesthesia techniques in endoscopic management of airway stenosis. REVIEW METHODS: The primary outcome measured was reports of partial and complete technique failure. The secondary outcome measured was intraoperative hypoxia. RESULTS: We identified 7704 abstracts with 17 meeting criteria for analysis. The reported partial and complete ventilatory technique failures were: 0 % Evone Flow-Controlled Ventilation with Tritube endotracheal tube, 0 % laryngeal mask airway, 0 % nonocclusive balloon dilator, 4.76 % spontaneous respiration using intravenous anesthesia and Hi-flow nasal oxygen, and 30.24 % jet ventilation. The reported rate of intraoperative hypoxia was: 0 % Evone Flow-Controlled Ventilation with Tritube endotracheal tube, 0 % spontaneous respiration using intravenous anesthesia and Hi-flow nasal oxygen, 2.18 % jet ventilation, 3.57 % laryngeal mask airway, and 5 % nonocclusive balloon dilator. CONCLUSION: Evone Flow-Controlled Ventilation with Tritube endotracheal tube had the lowest risk of technique failure and intraoperative hypoxia. Nonocclusive balloon dilator and laryngeal mask airway were also favorable techniques for ventilation. Jet ventilation showed a lower rate of intraoperative hypoxia, but a higher rate of failure. Newer techniques, such as Evone Flow-Controlled Ventilation with Tritube, nonocclusive balloon dilator and spontaneous respiration using intravenous anesthesia and Hi-flow nasal oxygen, may offer promise compared to older techniques like jet ventilation; however, larger studies with more uniform data are needed to determine their efficacy.

Beauty is in the eye of the follower: Facial aesthetics in the age of social media.

BACKGROUND: The advent of social media has influenced the relationship between aesthetic surgeons and their patients, as well as the motivations of such patients to seek cosmetic surgery. AIMS & OBJECTIVES: To determine how the cephalometric proportions of modern social media models fit with historical canons of beauty. MATERIALS & METHODS: Frontal and lateral photographs of 20 high-influence female Instagram models were obtained and evaluated for cephalometric measures. The means of these measures were compared with previous reports in the literature. RESULTS: Cephalometric measurements of social media models were in agreement with historical ideals of beauty for Nostril axis (120.7°), Goode's ratio (0.6), Nasofacial angle (35.7°), Nasofrontal angle (130.9°), and the horizontal thirds. Results were discrepant from historical ideals for the Nasolabial angle (82.6°) and the vertical facial fifths. CONCLUSION: Cephalometric measurements of social media models in the digital age closely resemble the ideal values proposed by previous authors. Due to a preference for larger or altered lip profiles, nostril axis is a more reliable measure of nasal tip rotation than nasolabial angle.