Hemodynamic Management of Patients During Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Under Conscious Sedation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Anesthetic modality and hemodynamic management during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are potential contributors to the success of revascularization. The aims of our study were to review the hemodynamic management by anesthesiologists and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MT under conscious sedation. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with anterior circulation AIS from January 2012 to March 2016. Primary outcome was hemodynamic intervention, defined as administration of vasoactive drugs to maintain systolic blood pressure (BP) between 140 and 180 mm Hg. The secondary outcome was poor hemodynamic control, defined as BP outside target for >15 minutes despite hemodynamic intervention. We performed regression analysis to determine the predictors of hemodynamic intervention and poor hemodynamic control. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included in this study; 92% (116) receiving conscious sedation and 8% (10) no sedation. Upon arrival to the neuroradiology suite, systolic BP was <140 mm Hg in 30.2% of the patients and >180 mm Hg in 14.3%. Hemodynamic intervention was required in 38.9% of patients; 15.1% for hypotension and 19.8% for hypertension. In the multivariate analysis, systolic BP on hospital admission (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.04; P=0.019) constituted a predictor for hemodynamic intervention. Poor hemodynamic control occurred in 12.7% of patients, with lower baseline systolic BP being associated with higher risk of intraprocedural hypotension (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.96; P<0.001). In-hospital mortality was 13.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic intervention is frequent during MT under conscious sedation. The routine presence of anesthesiologists during MT may be helpful in maintaining hemodynamic stability and allow rapid treatment of emergent complications. An individualized approach with tailored hemodynamic targets is required during management of patients undergoing MT for AIS.

Hospital costs associated with inpatient versus outpatient awake craniotomy for resection of brain tumors.

BACKGROUND: With increasing fiscal restraints on health care systems, procedural cost-effectiveness has become an important metric for evaluating surgical procedures. While outpatient craniotomy has been shown to be safe and effective, the economic implications of this procedure has yet to be examined. Here, we present the first cost analysis comparing inpatient versus outpatient awake craniotomy for tumor resection/biopsy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review on consecutive patients undergoing awake craniotomy for tumor resection/biopsy at a publicly funded tertiary care center from Sept 2014 to Aug 2015. Patient demographics, comorbidities and surgical factors were recorded. Direct and indirect costs for each patient visit were calculated based on institutional records. RESULTS: A total of 50 consecutive patients undergoing awake craniotomy for tumor resection were included in this study (29 outpatients, 21 inpatients). Rates of complications and 30-day readmission were similar between groups. The total costs associated with inpatient surgery were nearly double that of outpatient surgery ($10649 versus $5242, P < 0.001). In-patient surgery resulted in a nearly 6-fold increase in unit/bed costs compared to out-patient surgery ($4142 versus $758, P < 0.001). There were no differences in the costs incurred from the operating room, laboratory, or anesthesia departments. CONCLUSIONS: Costs associated with outpatient craniotomy are nearly half compared to inpatient craniotomy and this is largely driven by reductions in bed resource utilization and allied health services. Outpatient neurosurgery for tumor resection is therefore a safe and feasible option for appropriately selected patients and confers an overall cost reduction.

Anesthesia for Same Day Discharge After Craniotomy: Review of a Single Center Experience.

Same day discharge or outpatient surgery for intracranial procedures has become possible with the advent of image-guided minimally invasive approaches to surgery and availability of short-acting anesthetic agents. In addition, patient satisfaction and the benefits of avoiding hospital stay have resulted in the evolution of neurosurgical day surgery. We reviewed our experience and the available literature to determine the perioperative factors involved which have promoted and will improve this concept in the future. Craniotomy and biopsy for supratentorial brain tumors and surgical clipping of intact cerebral aneurysms have been successfully performed as day surgeries. Patient perceptions and satisfaction surveys have helped in better understanding and delivery of care and successful outcomes. There are major differences in health care across the globe along with socioeconomic, medicolegal, and ethical disparities, which must be considered before widespread application of this approach. Nevertheless, collaborative effort by surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses can help in same day discharge of patients after cranial neurosurgery.

Airway Management With a Stereotactic Headframe In Situ-A Mannequin Study.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic headframe-based imaging is often needed for target localization during surgery for insertion of deep brain stimulators. A major concern during this surgery is the need for emergency airway management while an awake or sedated patient is in the stereotactic headframe. The aim of our study was to determine the ease of emergency airway management with a stereotactic headframe in situ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational study using a mannequin. A Leksell stereotactic headframe was placed on a mannequin in the operating room and the frame was fixed to the operating room table. Anesthesia personnel were asked to insert a #4 laryngeal mask and then to intubate the mannequin, using both direct (DL) and video laryngoscopy (VL). In addition, participants were asked to perform the same airway techniques in the mannequin without the headframe. Data were analyzed for time taken for airway management using different devices with and without the headframe. In addition, we compared the time taken to secure the airway between different participant groups. RESULTS: Thirty anesthesia personnel (7 residents, 12 fellows, and 11 consultants) participated in the study. With the headframe in situ, 97% of participants were able to insert a laryngeal mask on their first attempt; 93% and 97% of participants were able to intubate the mannequin using DL and VL respectively on their first attempt. Without the stereotactic headframe, all participants were able to insert the laryngeal mask and intubate on the first attempt. The average time taken to insert a laryngeal mask and intubate the mannequin using DL and VL with the headframe in situ was 39.3, 58.6, and 54.8 seconds, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that both laryngeal mask insertion and tracheal intubation can be performed with a stereotactic headframe in situ. A laryngeal mask is the quickest airway device to insert and can be inserted while the mannequin is in the standard surgical position. Further study is needed to validate the results in patients.

Comparison of General and Local Anesthesia for Deep Brain Stimulator Insertion: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) has become a standard treatment for many patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The reported clinical outcome measures for procedures done under general anesthesia (GA) compared to traditional local anesthetic (LA) technique are quite heterogeneous and difficult to compare. The aim of this systematic review and metaanalysis was to determine whether the clinical outcome after STN-DBS insertion under GA is comparable to that under LA in patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: The databases of Medline Embase, Cochrane library and Pubmed were searched for eligible studies (human trials, English language, published between 1946 and January of 2016). The primary outcome of this study was to assess the postoperative improvement in the symptoms, evaluated using either Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores or levodopa equivalent dosage (LEDD) requirement. RESULTS: The literature searches yielded 395 citations and six retrospective cohort studies with a sample size of 455 (194 in GA and 261 in LA) were included in the analysis. Regarding the clinical outcomes, there were no significant differences in the postoperative Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale and levodopa equivalent drug dosage between the GA and the LA groups. Similarly, the adverse events and target accuracy were also comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that currently there is no good quality data to suggest equivalence of GA to LA during STN-DBS insertion in patients with PD, with some factors trending towards LA. There is a need for a prospective randomized control trial to validate our results.

Airway adverse events following posterior occipito-cervical spinal fusion.

Management of the airway may be challenging in patients undergoing occipito-cervical spine fusions (OCF). Changes in the occipito-cervical angle (dOC2A) of fusion after surgery may result in acute airway obstruction, dyspnea and/or dysphagia. Objectives of the study were to review the airway management of patients during posterior OCF, determine the incidence, nature and risk factors for postoperative airway adverse events (AEs), and to determine the relationship between airway AEs and the change in dOC2A. In this retrospective cohort of 59 patients, following extubation in the operating room (OR), there were no complications in 43 (73%) patients (Group 1). Sixteen (27%) patients (Group 2) had airway complications; 4 requiring reintubation and 12 having delayed extubation. The number of vertebral levels fused (>6), presence of difficult intubation and duration of surgery (>5h) were significantly associated with AEs. There was no significant difference in the dOC2A between the groups (-1.070±5.527 versus -4.375±10.788, p=0.127). Airway management in patients undergoing OCF poses a challenge for the anesthesiology and surgical teams. The incidence of AEs was 27%. The decision to extubate immediately after surgery needs to be individualized. Factors such as difficult intubation, number of vertebral levels fused and duration of surgery have to be considered. A significant correlation between dOC2A and postoperative AEs could not be established. Risk factors for postoperative AEs are multifactorial and prospective evaluation of these factors is indicated.

Anesthesia considerations for patients with an implanted deep brain stimulator undergoing surgery: a review and update.

PURPOSE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be an effective treatment option for patients with essential tremor and Parkinson's disease. This review provides an overview on the functioning of neurostimulators and recent advances in this technology and presents an updated guide on the anesthetic management of patients with an implanted neurostimulator undergoing surgery or medical intervention. SOURCE: A search was conducted on MEDLINE®, EMBASE™, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases to identify studies published in English from 1974 to December 2015. Our search also included relevant and available incident reports from the manufacturers, Health Canada, the United States Food and Drug Administration, and the European Medicines Agency. Thirty of 232 articles identified were found to be relevant to this review. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Deep brain stimulation systems now offer a range of options, including pulse generators with dual-channel capabilities, rechargeable batteries, and current-control modes. Preoperatively, the anesthesiologist should ascertain the indications for DBS therapy, identify the type of device implanted, and consult a DBS specialist for specific precautions and device management. The major perioperative concern is the potential for interactions with the medical device resulting in patient morbidity. Neurostimulators should be turned off intraoperatively to minimize electromagnetic interference, and precautions should be taken when using electrosurgical equipment. Following surgery, the device should be turned on and checked by a DBS specialist. CONCLUSION: The anesthesiologist plays an important role to ensure a safe operating environment for patients with an implanted DBS device. Pertinent issues include identifying the type of device, involving a DBS-trained physician, turning off the device intraoperatively, implementing precautions when using electrosurgical equipment, and checking the device postoperatively.

Association Among Sociodemograhic Factors, Work Ability, Health Behavior, and Mental Health Status for Young People After Prolonged Unemployment.

The purpose of this study was to explore the associations of prolonged unemployment, health, and work ability among young workers using data from the 2008-2010 Occupational Health Counselling project in Kuopio, Eastern Finland. The total sample for this study was 190 young unemployed adults. The questionnaire included the Work Ability Index (WAI), the Beck Depression Inventory, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, and the Occupational Health Counselling Survey. Multivariate analyses revealed that men had a higher prevalence of prolonged unemployment than women. Using drugs for purposes other than treatment was associated independently with an increased prevalence of prolonged unemployment. Low WAI scores were associated with a higher prevalence of prolonged unemployment. This study showed that attention should be paid to male workers, those who have poor or moderate work ability and workers who use drugs. Young unemployed workers should be recognized at an early stage. A comprehensive, flexible network of community resources is essential to support young unemployed adults.

Same-day discharge after craniotomy for supratentorial tumour surgery: a retrospective observational single-centre study.

PURPOSE: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery is a multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to achieve early discharge in patients undergoing major surgery. Recent advances in neurosurgery allow for shorter duration of anesthesia and surgery, faster recovery, and earlier discharge from hospital. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to assess the incidence of early discharge from hospital in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumours as well as to explore the associated perioperative factors, anesthesia techniques, and complications. METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent craniotomy (less than four-hour duration) for supratentorial tumour over a five-year period were retrospectively reviewed. The data analyzed included the postoperative discharge destination, type of anesthesia-i.e., general anesthesia (GA) vs awake craniotomy (AC), and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Data from 329 patients [mean (SD) age 48 (12) yr; 164 male, 165 female] were analyzed, including 198 (AC, n = 157; GA, n = 41) patients who were preoperatively scheduled for same-day discharge. Successful same-day discharge occurred in 175/198 (88.4%) of these patients (AC, n = 139; GA, n = 36). Five (2.9%) of the 175 patients (4 AC, 1 GA) with same-day discharge required readmission to hospital within the first 12 hr after discharge. Six (1.8%) of the 329 total patients had a documented postoperative intracranial bleed, but none occurred after initial discharge from hospital. CONCLUSION: Same-day discharge from hospital is possible in carefully selected patients after both GA and AC for supratentorial tumour surgery.

The Effect of General Anesthesia on the Microelectrode Recordings From Pallidal Neurons in Patients With Dystonia.

BACKGROUND: The most common anesthetic technique for patients undergoing insertion of deep brain stimulators (DBS) is local anesthesia with or without conscious sedation as this facilitates intraoperative microelectrode recordings (MERs) for target localization. However, general anesthesia (GA) may be needed in some of the patients especially those with dystonia. The purpose of our study was to determine the effects of GA on MERs from pallidal neurons in patients with dystonia undergoing DBS implantation surgery. METHODS: After IRB approval, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who had insertion of DBS from January 2009 to December 2013. Data collected and analyzed included demographics, indications for DBS, targets of insertion, MER, and anesthetic management. From the records we identified patients with dystonia who received GA for DBS insertion. We then compared the MER data under GA with the data from patients who had surgery under local anesthesia only during the same time period. Because of the small sample size, the effects of various anesthetic regiments on MER and localization of target nuclei were compared qualitatively. RESULTS: Of the 435 patients who underwent DBS insertion during the study period, 20 (4.3%) patients had GA for the procedure. Dystonia was the most common indication for GA (16/20 patients, 80%). Good-quality MER data obtained from 10 patients with dystonia under GA was compared with 8 patients who had no sedation for the procedure. Administration of GA made target localization difficult due to suppression of both spontaneous and evoked neuronal discharges from internal globus pallidus. Although not studied systematically, propofol (>100 mcg/kg/min) seemed to suppress pallidal discharges more than GA with a lower dose of propofol (<75 mcg/kg/min), remifentanil, and 0.2% to 0.4% end-tidal sevoflurane or desflurane. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective review suggests that there was a difference in spontaneous and evoked neuronal discharges with MER performed under GA compared with no sedation. MER recordings during GA appeared most robust during a combination of anesthetics including low-dose propofol infusion, remifentanil, and a low concentration of either sevoflurane or desflurane. Our findings can inform a power analysis to determine the sample size that would be required to prospectively test the hypothesis that there is a difference in spontaneous and evoked neuronal discharges with MER performed under GA compared with no sedation.

Effect of superficial cervical plexus block on postoperative quality of recovery after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Spine surgeries are increasingly being performed as a day or short-stay surgery programs. Peripheral nerve block provide site-specific pain relief with few side effects, thereby reducing surgical stress and enhancing quality of recovery. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of a superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia in patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: After Research Ethics Board approval, we enrolled adults (> 18 yr) scheduled for elective single- or two-level ACDF in this randomized double-blind clinical trial. Participants were randomized to receive either a SCPB (0.25% bupivacaine, 10 mL) or No Block. The primary outcome measure was the quality of recovery at 24 hr, measured using the 40-item quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-40). In addition, comparisons between groups were also made for postoperative opioid consumption and discharge times. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were randomized to receive either a SCPB block (n = 23) or No Block (n = 23). Median [interquartile range] aggregated global QoR-40 scores at 24 hr were significantly greater in the SCPB group, indicating good quality of recovery compared with the No Block group (179 [116-195] vs 157 [97-196], respectively; median difference, 22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7 to 34; P = 0.002]. There were no differences between the SCPB and the No Block group with regard to mean (standard deviation) postoperative opioid consumption at 24 hr [22.9 (13.6) mg vs 24.6 (9.5) mg, respectively; mean difference 1.7; 95% CI, -5.2 to 8.7; P = 0.620] and the number of patients discharged within 24 hr (15 vs 12, respectively; P = 0.550). CONCLUSION: We showed that preoperative SCPB is an effective strategy for improving the early quality of recovery in patients undergoing single- or two-level ACDF. Nevertheless, there was no impact on opioid consumption or discharge times. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01662219).

Anesthetic management of patients undergoing intracranial bypass procedures.

Cerebral revascularization is used to augment or replace cerebral blood flow in patients at risk of developing cerebral ischemia. These include patients with moyamoya disease, occlusive cerebrovascular disease, skull base tumors, and complex aneurysms. Our aim in this review is to provide a comprehensive update of both surgical and anesthetic aspects of cerebral revascularization procedures. The anesthetic concerns for most patients presenting for different types of bypass procedures are similar and include the maintenance of adequate cerebral perfusion to prevent cerebral ischemia. Patients with complex aneurysms and tumors have additional considerations related to the surgical treatment of the underlying pathology.

Cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide under anesthesia: a qualitative systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Controlling the arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) to reduce the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and the intracranial pressure is a common practice in neuroanesthesia. A change in CBF in response to change in PaCO2 is termed as cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide (CVR-CO2). Studies have shown that, both inhalational and intravenous anesthetic agents have variable effects on CVR-CO2 and the effect of anesthetic agents on CVR also varies with many physiological and pathologic conditions. The objectives of this review were to evaluate the effect of anesthetic agents on the CVR-CO2 in adults and to determine how this response is modified by other physiological and pathologic factors. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the databases of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using related term components for both CVR-CO2 and anesthesia. Our primary outcome of this review was to determine whether the CVR-CO2 is maintained under anesthesia. The other endpoints of this review are to determine the effect of other factors (age, sex, medical comorbidities, and cerebrovascular pathology) on the CVR-CO2 under anesthesia. Because of the methodological heterogeneity in the primary studies, quantitative analysis of the data was not possible, and therefore, we have summarized the data qualitatively. RESULTS: Our search strategy yielded 1356 citations. After excluding nonpertinent papers, 38 studies were included for the systematic review. Nineteen randomized controlled trials and 19 observational studies met inclusion criteria and a total of 793 patients were studied. Transcranial Doppler was the most commonly used method for measuring CBF and changing the respiratory rate and/or minute ventilation were the most commonly used method to change the CO2 tension. CVR-CO2 is maintained with both inhalational and intravenous anesthetic agents within the range of concentrations used in clinical anesthesia. At doses leading to a broadly equivalent depth of anesthesia, the reactivity value was highest with isoflurane and the least with propofol. Individual agents differ in their degree of reactivity to hypercapnic and hypocapnic stimuli. CVR-CO2 is impaired in elderly patients when compared with young patients with both sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia. In patients with medical comorbidities, the CVR-CO2 impairment under anesthesia was associated with the severity of the underlying diseases and not the anesthetic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review showed that within the clinical anesthesia concentrations, CVR-CO2 is maintained under both propofol and inhalational agents. However, most of the information available is from non-neurosurgical patients and these studies also suffer from significant methodological heterogeneity. Therefore, we were limited by the amount and the quality of data available for this review.

Perioperative management and complications in patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing transsphenoidal surgery: Our institutional experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with endocrine diseases such as acromegaly and Cushing's disease have a high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). There is controversy regarding the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) following transsphenoidal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative management and complications, in patients with or without OSA undergoing transsphenoidal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After Research Ethics Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery in our institution from 2006 to 2011. Information collected included patients' demographics, pathology of lesion, history of OSA, anesthetic and perioperative management and incidence of perioperative complications. Patients with sleep study proven OSA were compared with a control group, matched for age, sex and pathology of patients without OSA. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test and Chi-square test and the P < 0.05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS: Out of a total 469 patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery, 105 patients were found to be at risk for OSA by a positive STOP-BANG scoring assessment. Preoperative sleep study testing was positive for OSA in 38 patients. Post-operative hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90) occurred in 10 (26%) patients with OSA and was treated with high-flow oxygen through face mask (n = 7) and by CPAP mask (n = 3). In the OSA-negative group, 2 patients had hypoxemia and were treated with low-flow oxygen using face mask. There were no differences between the groups with respect to post-operative opioid use, destination, hospital stay or other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative hypoxemia in patients with OSA following transsphenoidal surgery can be treated in most but not all patients with high flow oxygen using the face mask. We were able to safely use CPAP in a very small number of patients but caution is needed to prevent complications. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the safe use of CPAP in patients after transsphenoidal surgery.

Postoperative visual loss following cerebral arteriovenous malformation surgery: a case report.

We report the case of a 46 year-old woman presenting with unilateral postoperative visual loss after right frontal craniotomy for resection of an arteriovenous malformation in the supine position. The intraoperative course was uneventful with maintenance of hemodynamic stability. Blood loss was 300 ml; postoperative hemoglobin was 12.4 g/dl. In the recovery room, the patient reported loss of vision in her right eye. Ophthalmologic examination revealed decreased visual acuity, color vision, and visual field. Assessment of the retina was normal, but the patient showed a relative afferent pupillary defect consistent with the clinical diagnosis of ischemic optic neuropathy. Postoperative computer tomogram showed normal perfusion of ophthalmic artery and vein, no hemorrhage or signs of cerebral ischemia or edema. The patient recovered most of her vision 3 months after surgery. Anesthesiologists should be aware that this condition may follow uncomplicated intracranial surgeries in the supine position, and should obtain prompt ophthalmologic consultation when a patient develops postoperative visual loss.

Comparison of propofol and volatile agents for maintenance of anesthesia during elective craniotomy procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Both propofol and volatile anesthetics are commonly used for maintenance of anesthesia in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. The effects of these two classes of drugs on cerebral hemodynamics have been compared in many clinical trials The objectives of this review were to evaluate the cerebral hemodynamic effects, operative conditions, recovery profiles, postoperative complications, and neurological outcomes of propofol-based vs volatile-based anesthesia for craniotomy. METHODS: MEDLINE®, EMBASE™, Cochrane, and other relevant databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared propofol-maintained anesthesia with volatile-maintained anesthesia in adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy. The primary outcome measure was the intraoperative brain relaxation score. Secondary outcome measures included intraoperative cerebral hemodynamics (intracranial pressure [ICP], cerebral perfusion pressure [CPP]), cardiovascular changes, recovery profiles, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes (neurological morbidity, mortality, quality of life). A meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model to compare the outcomes of the two anesthetic techniques. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (1,819 patients) met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Brain relaxation scores were similar between the two groups after dural opening; however, ICP was lower (weighted mean difference of -5.2 mmHg; 95% confidence interval -6.81 to -3.6) and CPP was higher (weighted mean difference of 16.3 mmHg; 95% confidence interval 12.2 to 20.46) in patients receiving propofol-maintained anesthesia. Postoperative complications and recovery profiles were similar between the two groups, except for postoperative nausea and vomiting being less frequent with propofol-maintained anesthesia. There were inadequate data to perform a meta-analysis on clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Propofol-maintained and volatile-maintained anesthesia were associated with similar brain relaxation scores, although mean ICP values were lower and CPP values higher with propofol-maintained anesthesia. There are inadequate data to compare clinically significant outcomes such as neurological morbidity or mortality.

Direct comparison of the effect of desflurane and sevoflurane on intraoperative motor-evoked potentials monitoring.

BACKGROUND: During spinal surgery, intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) is a useful means of assessing the intraoperative integrity of corticospinal pathways. However, MEPs are known to be particularly sensitive to the suppressive effects of inhalational halogenated anesthetic agents. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of increasing end-tidal concentrations of desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia in a background of propofol and remifentanil with multipulse cortical stimulation on intraoperative monitoring of MEPs. METHODS: In this randomized crossover trial, 14 consecutive patients (7 in each arm) undergoing major spine surgery, under a background anesthetic of propofol (75 to 125 mcg/kg/min) and remifentanil (0.1 to 0.2 mcg/kg/min), were randomly assigned to receive the sequence of inhalational agents studied: either DES-SEVO (desflurane followed by sevoflurane); or SEVO-DES (sevoflurane followed by desflurane). Multiples (0.3, 0.5, and 0.7) of minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of desflurane and sevoflurane were administered. After a washout period of 15 minutes using high fresh oxygen/air flows, each of the patients then received the other gas as the second agent. Cortical stimulation was achieved with a train of 5 equivalent square pulses, each 0.05 ms in duration, delivered at 2 ms intervals. MEP recordings were made in the upper limb (UL) from first dorsal interosseus and lower limb (LL) from tibialis anterior with subdermal needle electrodes. RESULTS: At 0.3 MAC desflurane, there was no statistical significant difference in transcranial-evoked MEP amplitudes from the baseline in both UL and LL stimulation. However, this was not the case for sevoflurane for which even a low concentration at 0.3 MAC significantly depressed MEP amplitudes of LL (but not UL) from baseline value. Desflurane at 0.5 and 0.7 MAC depresses LL MEP to 58.4% and 59.9% of baseline, respectively (P<0.05), whereas sevoflurane at 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 MAC depresses LL MEP to 66.2%, 41.3%, and 25.3% of baseline, respectively (P<0.05). There was no difference in latency of the responses at any MAC. CONCLUSIONS: Inhalational anesthetic agents (sevoflurane >desflurane) suppress MEP amplitudes in a dose-dependent manner. The use of 0.3 MAC of desflurane (but not sevoflurane) provided good MEP recordings acceptable for clinical interpretation for both upper and LLs. The LL appears to be more sensitive to anesthetic-induced depression compared with the UL. All patients studied had normal neurological examination hence, these results may not be applicable to those with preexisting deficits.