Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 55(3): 180-186, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33487041

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may experiment neurologic deficits during the carotid cross-clamping due to secondary cerebral hypoperfusion. An associated risk of postoperative stroke incidence is also well established. This work aimed to assess the postoperative adverse events related to neurologic deficits in the awake test after clamping and to determine its predictive factors. Methods. From January 2012 to January 2018, 79 patients from a referral hospital that underwent CEA with regional anesthesia for carotid stenosis and manifested neurologic deficits were gathered. Consecutively selected controls (n = 85) were submitted to the same procedure without developing neurological changes. Postoperative complications such as stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and Clavien-Dindo classification were assessed 30 days after the procedure. Univariate and binary logistic regressions were performed for data assessment. Results. Patients with clamping associated neurologic deficits were significantly more obese than the control group (aOR = 9.30; 95% CI: 2.57-33.69; p = .01). Lower degree of ipsilateral stenosis and higher degree of contralateral stenosis were independently related to clamping intolerance (aOR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.49-0.99; p = .047 and aOR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.06-1.50; p = .009, respectively). Neurologic deficits were a main 30-day stroke predictor (aOR = 4.30; 95% CI: 1.10-16.71; p = .035). Conclusions. Neurologic deficits during carotid clamping are a predictor of perioperative stroke. Body mass index > 30 kg/m2, a lower degree of ipsilateral stenosis, and a higher degree of contralateral stenosis are independent predictors of neurologic deficits and, therefore, might play a role in the prevention of procedure-related stroke.


Assuntos
Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso , Anestesia por Condução , Constrição Patológica/cirurgia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia
2.
Vascular ; 28(5): 505-512, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32356684

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Carotid cross-clamping during endarterectomy exposes the patient to intraoperative neurological deficits due to embolism or cerebral hypoperfusion. To prevent further cerebrovascular incidents, resorting to shunt is frequently recommended. However, since this method is also considered a stroke risk factor, the use is still controversial. This study aims to shed some light on the best approach regarding the use of shunt in symptomatic cerebral malperfusion after carotid artery cross-clamping. METHODS: From January 2012 to January 2018, 79 patients from a tertiary referral hospital who underwent carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia for carotid artery stenosis and manifested post-clamping neurologic deficits were prospectively gathered. Shunt use was left to the decision of the surgeon and performed in 31.6% (25) of the patients. Demographics, comorbidities, imaging tests, and clinical/intraoperative features were evaluated. For data assessment, univariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: Regarding 30-day stroke, 30-day postoperative complications (stroke, surgical hematoma, hyperperfusion syndrome), and cranial nerve injury, no significant differences were found (P = 0.301, P = 0.460, and P = 0.301, respectively) between resource to shunt and non-shunt. Clamping and surgery times were significantly higher in the shunt group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Selective-shunting did not demonstrate superiority for patients who developed focal deficits regarding stroke or other postoperative complications. However, due to the limitations of this study, the benefit of shunting cannot be excluded. Further randomized trials are recommended for precise results on this matter with current sparse clinical evidence.


Assuntos
Anestesia por Condução , Estenose das Carótidas/cirurgia , Circulação Cerebrovascular , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/instrumentação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia por Condução/efeitos adversos , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose das Carótidas/mortalidade , Estenose das Carótidas/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos dos Nervos Cranianos/etiologia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA