RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Previously in our unit, urodynamics were delayed after insertion of suprapubic (SP) lines. We postulated that performing urodynamics on the same day as SP line insertion would not result in increased morbidity. We retrospectively compared complications in those having urodynamics on the same day against those who had delayed urodynamics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Notes were reviewed for patients undergoing urodynamics via SP lines from May 2009 until December 2018. In 2014 we modified our practice to allow urodynamics on the same day as SP line insertion in some patients. Patients undergoing videourodynamics would have two 5 Fr (mini Paed) SP lines inserted under general anaesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups: those that had urodynamics on the same day as SP line insertion and those that had urodynamics after an interval of more than one day. The outcome measure was the number of problems affecting those in each group. The two groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests and Fisher's Exact tests. RESULTS: There were a total of 211 patients with a median age of 6.5 years (range three months to 15.9 years). Urodynamics were performed on the same day in 86. Delayed Urodynamics were performed at an interval of more than one day in 125. Adverse events included pain or difficulty with voiding, increased urinary frequency, urinary incontinence, leak from catheter site, extravasation, extension of in-patient stay, visible haematuria, urethral catheterisation, and urinary tract infection. Problems affected 43 (20.4%) children. In the same day group, 11 (13.3%) patients had problems, in the delayed group 32 (25.6%) had problems; this was statistically significant (p = 0.03). The difference in combined incidence of important problems (requiring urethral catheterisation, extended admission or abandonment of urodynamics) was not statistically significant between the two groups. CONCLUSION: When using suprapubic catheters for urodynamics there is no additional morbidity when catheters are inserted on the same day as the urodynamics study compared to when urodynamic are delayed.
Assuntos
Incontinência Urinária , Infecções Urinárias , Humanos , Criança , Lactente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Incontinência Urinária/complicações , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Micção , Morbidade , UrodinâmicaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Foreskin reconstruction (FR) is a recognised, yet debated, option for patients undergoing single-stage hypospadias repair (HR). METHODS: We evaluated the incidence of complications after single-stage HR in our institution. This is a retrospective review of all single-stage HR. Patients were classified into group 1 (circumcision) and group 2 foreskin reconstruction (FR). Urethroplasty and foreskin complications were recorded. Statistics used are as follows: Mann-Whitney test to compare age at operation and length of follow-up (FU); Chi-Square test to analyse the incidence of urethral complications and need for reoperation; Log rank test to compare the survival curves; p statistically significant < 0.05. Data are presented as median (range). RESULTS: 304 patients were identified, operated between January 2010 and December 2016, and 20 were excluded: 6 already circumcised at the time of the surgery, 3 with megameatus intact prepuce, 11 lost at FU. 284 patients were included: 161 circumcised and 123 FR. Median age at the operation was 17 months (8-179) (group 1) and 17 months (8-148) (group 2) (p = 0.71). Length of FU was 19 months (8-91) (group 1) and 17 months (4-87) (group 2) (p = 0.45). The survival curve was homogeneous (p = 0.28). Urethroplasty complications occurred in 32/161 (20%) (group 1) and in 21/123 (17%) (group 2) (p = 0.55). Foreskin complications occurred in 18/123 (15%). A second operation was required in 33 boys in each group, (20% group 1 and 27% group 2) (p = 0.21). CONCLUSION: FR does not increase the complication rate or the need for a reoperation after single-stage HR. Parents should be offered the option between the two procedures according to their personal preference.
Assuntos
Circuncisão Masculina/efeitos adversos , Prepúcio do Pênis , Hipospadia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Reoperação , Uretra , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/efeitos adversos , Circuncisão Masculina/métodos , Prepúcio do Pênis/patologia , Prepúcio do Pênis/cirurgia , Humanos , Hipospadia/diagnóstico , Hipospadia/cirurgia , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Reoperação/métodos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Uretra/patologia , Uretra/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodosRESUMO
AIMS: Hirschsprung disease (HD) is a chronic condition associated with long-term morbidity. We assessed the short and long-term functional outcomes of operated patients in a single institution over a 12-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all children operated for HD between 2002 and 2014. Postoperative functional outcomes were assessed using the Rintala Bowel Function Score (BFS, 0-20, 20=best score). We assessed hospital admissions, complications including Hirschsprung associated enterocolitis (HAEC) and the need for further surgical procedures. RESULTS: 72 (52 male) patients were studied, of whom, 6 (8%) had a positive family history, 5 (7%) had Trisomy 21 and 5 (7%) had total colonic HD. The median age at diagnosis was 6.5days (2 days-6.7 years) and median follow-up was 6years (1-12years). All patients except two underwent a Duhamel pull-through procedure. The median age at surgery was 4months (6days-90months). 37 (51%) procedures were performed single-stage and 7 (10%) were laparoscopically assisted. Our early complication rate was 15%; 11 (15%) patients were treated for HAEC and 43 (60%) did not require any further surgery. 12 (17%) underwent injection of botulinum toxin, 7 (10%) needed residual spur division and 4 (5%) required an unplanned, post pull-through enterostomy for obstructive defecation symptoms and HAEC. Two (3%) patients underwent an Antegrade Colonic Enema (ACE) stoma. The median BFS was 17 (5-20). There were two deaths both out of hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term functional outcomes following Duhamel Pull-Through surgery are satisfactory although 40% of patients needed some form of further surgical intervention. The management of anal sphincter achalasia has improved with the use of botulinum toxin and we advocate aggressive and early management of this condition for symptoms of obstructive defecation and HAEC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.