[Guidelines on the urological management of the adult patient with spinal dysraphism (spina bifida)]. / Recommandations sur la gestion du risque et la prise en charge urologique du patient adulte atteint de dysraphisme spinal (spina bifida).

INTRODUCTION: Improved life expectancy and prenatal screening have changed the demographics of spina bifida (spinal dysraphism) which has presently become a disease of adulthood. Urinary disorders affect almost all patients with spinal dysraphism and are still the leading cause of mortality in these patients. The aim of this work was to establish recommendations for urological management that take into account the specificities of the spina bifida population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: National Diagnosis and Management Guidelines (PNDS) were drafted within the framework of the French Rare Diseases Plan at the initiative of the Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Spina Bifida - Dysraphismes of Rennes University Hospital. It is a collaborative work involving experts from different specialties, mainly urologists and rehabilitation physicians. We conducted a systematic search of the literature in French and English in the various fields covered by these recommendations in the MEDLINE database. In accordance with the methodology recommended by the authorities (Guide_methodologique_pnds.pdf, 2006), proposed recommendations were drafted on the basis of this literature review and then submitted to a review group until a consensus was reached. RESULTS: Bladder dysfunctions induced by spinal dysraphism are multiple and varied and evolve over time. Management must be individually adapted and take into account all the patient's problems, and is therefore necessarily multi-disciplinary. Self-catheterisation is the appropriate micturition method for more than half of the patients and must sometimes be combined with treatments aimed at suppressing any neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) or compliance alteration (anticholinergics, intra-detrusor botulinum toxin). Resort to surgery is sometimes necessary either after failure of non-invasive treatments (e.g. bladder augmentation in case of NDO resistant to pharmacological treatment), or as a first line treatment in the absence of other non-invasive alternatives (e.g. aponeurotic suburethral tape or artificial urinary sphincter for sphincter insufficiency; urinary diversion by ileal conduit if self-catheterisation is impossible). CONCLUSION: Spinal dysraphism is a complex pathology with multiple neurological, orthopedic, gastrointestinal and urological involvement. The management of bladder and bowel dysfunctions must continue throughout the life of these patients and must be integrated into a multidisciplinary context.

[Autologous fascia pubovaginal slings in women with stress urinary incontinence at high risk of mesh/device-related complications]. / Bandelette aponévrotique pubovaginale pour incontinence urinaire d'effort chez les femmes à risque de complications prothétiques.

INTRODUCTION: Very popular in many parts of the world, autologous fascial pubovaginal sling (AFPVS) remains marginally used in France. However, it may be of particular interest in patients carrying a high risk of mesh-related or device-related related complications. The aim of the present series was to report the outcomes of AFPVS in this high-risk population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The charts of all female patients who underwent a fascial sling for SUI at a single academic center between April 2019 and May 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Only patients deemed at high-risk of device/mesh related complications were included in the present analysis: female with a neurological condition who were doing clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), female with SUI after radical cystectomy and ileal neobladder, female with urethral/bladder extrusion of any synthetic material placed for SUI. Success was defined as complete resolution of SUI at 3 months. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in this study: 13 rectus fascia slings and 3 fascia lata slings. The success rate was 56.3% (9/16 patients). Four patients were improved but not completely dry (25%). Two patients had major postoperative complications (i.e. Clavien grade 3 or higher, 11.2%). Two patients had a persisting significant post-void residual (PVR) postoperatively, managed by self-catheterization (transition to self-catheterization at 3 months: 2/8, 25%). CONCLUSION: The use of autologous fascia pubovaginal sling is an interesting option in female SUI patients with high risk of device/mesh related complications with satisfactory functional outcomes. LEVEL OF PROOF: 4.

Prospective multicentre observational study assessing the tolerance and perception of patients using the Liquick Base catheter with an Ergothan tip.

INTRODUCTION: Intermittent self-catheterisation has revolutionised the management of neurogenic bladder-sphincter dysfunctions. The Liquick Base catheter is characterised by a streamlined Ergothan tip. The purpose of this study is to assess the tolerance and perception of patients using this catheter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A French prospective multicentre observational study was conducted on patients with neurogenic bladder-sphincter dysfunctions. Upon inclusion in the study, the doctor completed a questionnaire on the patient's pathology. After 3 and 6 months, the doctor checked for neurogenic developments or observations and looked for any complications relating to intermittent self-catheterisation. The patient completed a questionnaire to assess his or her perception of using the catheter. RESULTS: Out of 42 patients included in the study, two were excluded. Out of the 40 assessed patients (30 males, 10 females) with an average age of 50.1±14.9 years, there were no reported cases of false passage. Bleeding occurred at least once in 10 patients (25%) in the first three months and in three out of 20 patients (15%) between 3 and 6 months. Two (5%) patients sought medical attention in the first three months for complications related to the catheter and 4 patients sought medical attention (10%) between 3 and 6 months. After 3 months 90% of patients were still using the catheter and after 6 months 90% of patients were still using the catheter. CONCLUSION: The Liquick Base catheter is well tolerated. Patient perception is positive for all parameters being examined, leading to the continued use of the catheter in 90% of cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

[Urodynamics: All the nurse needs to know]. / Bilan urodynamique : tout ce que l'infirmier(e) doit savoir.

Urodynamic (UD) is an exam intended to explore the mechanisms underlying lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urinary incontinence (UI). It involves the measurement of bladder and sphincter pressures using uretrovesical and rectal catheters with pressure transducers, but also the measurement of urinary flow and bladder sensation during filling. UD is far from being systematic in the assessment of LUTS or UI and must seek to tackle a specific clinical or therapeutic question. Thus, history taking, physical examination, voiding diary and questionnaires are essential prerequisites to UD per se. UD steps include a free (unintubated) uroflowmetry, a cystometry, post-void residual measurement±an urethral profilometry, a pressure-flow study or sensitization tests. The pressures are set to zero before to start the study and the validity of the equipment is tested. This control is continued throughout the procedure to ensure the quality of the recording. Any event (e.g., urine leakage, change of position, urgency) is noted during the study. A final report is made by the doctor. The competence of the nurse ensures the reliability, reproducibility and interpretability of the UD study and the nurse's humanity guarantee f an atmosphere as favourable as possible for this uncomfortable and invasive test.

Prognostic factors after adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis.

PURPOSE: Very few studies have sought prognostic factors after adrenalectomy for metastasis. The aim of this study was to assess prognostic factors for oncological outcomes after adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis. METHODS: All adrenalectomies for metastases performed in seven centers between 2006 and 2016 were included in a retrospective study. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors for CSS and RFS were sought by Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: 106 patients were included. The primary tumors were mostly renal (47.7%) and pulmonary (32.3%). RFS and CSS estimated rates at 5 years were 20.7% and 63.7%, respectively. In univariate analysis, tumor size (HR 3.83; p = 0.04) and the metastasis timing (synchronous vs. metachronous; HR 0.47; p = 0.02) were associated with RFS. In multivariate analysis, tumor size (HR 8.28; p = 0.01) and metastasis timing (HR 18.60; p = 0.002) were significant factors for RFS. In univariate analysis, the renal origin of the primary tumor (HR 0.1; p < 0.001) and the disease-free interval (DFI; HR 0.12; p = 0.02) were associated with better CSS, positive surgical margins with poorer CSS (HR 3.4; p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, the renal origin of the primary tumor vs. pulmonary (HR 0.13; p = 0.03) and vs. other origins (HR 0.10; p = 00.4) and the DFI (HR 0.01; p = 0.009) were prognostic factors for CSS. CONCLUSION: In this study, tumor size and synchronous occurrence of the adrenal metastasis were associated with poorer RFS. Renal origin of the primary tumor and longer DFI were associated with better CSS. These prognostic factors might help for treatment decision in the management of adrenal metastasis.

[Outcomes of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in diabetic patients]. / Résultats de la neurostimulation tibiale postérieure transcutanée pour hyperactivité vésicale chez les patients diabétiques.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment with transcutaneous posterior tibial neurostimulation (NTPT) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), but its outcomes in diabetic patients have never been assessed. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of NTPT in diabetic OAB patients and in OAB patients without diabetes. METHODS: A single-center prospective study included all patients treated with NTPT for lower urinary tract storage symptoms between 2012 and 2016. The primary endpoint was symptoms improvement≥50% assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) two months after starting NTPT. Treatment consisted in a daily 20-minute NTPT single-session. The secondary endpoints were lower urinary tract symptoms reported by bladder diary, the Urinary Symptom Profile, the impact on mood and on daily activities. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included, 10 of whom were diabetic. The efficacy rate (EVA>50%) was not significantly different in the diabetic group (70% vs. 44.1%, P=0.17), like the mean EVA efficacy was similar in both groups (4/10 vs. 4/10, P=0.98). OAB USP sub-score diminished significantly in both groups at 2 months (-3 points in the diabetic group; -1.9 points in the non-diabetic group; P=0.03 and P<0.0001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups, except for the rate of patients who stopped treatment at 6 months, higher in diabetic patients (100% vs. 63.5%, P=0.04). CONCLUSION: The functional outcomes of NTPT appear to be similar in the treatment of OAB in diabetic patients and in non-diabetic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Safety and feasibility of outpatient flexible ureteroscopy for urinary stones: A retrospective single-center study]. / Faisabilité de l'urétéroscopie souple en ambulatoire pour la prise en charge des calculs urinaires : une étude rétrospective monocentrique.

AIM: Management of urolithiasis has changed over the past decades. Outpatient surgery has become a major issue for healthcare systems. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of outpatient flexible ureteroscopy. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study has been conducted including all patients who underwent an outpatient flexible ureteroscopy between January 2012 and December 2013. Failure of outpatient management was defined as length of hospital stay>12 hours or readmission within 48 hours after discharge. Univariate analysis was performed to seek for predictors of failure of outpatient management. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients who underwent a total of 174 procedures were included. They were mostly men (57.5 %), with a mean body mass index of 25.2kg/m2 (±4.3). The stones were mostly unique (64.3 %), with a mean size of 14.2mm (±11.2). Eighty patients had a double J stent preoperatively (46.5 %), and mean operative time was 64.2 minutes (±34.1). An ureteral access sheath was used in 39 procedures (22.4 %). A double J stent was left postoperatively in 103 patients (59.1 %). In total, 165 procedures (94.8 %) were performed successfully as outpatient surgery. On postoperative imaging, the stone-free rate was 69.5 %. Postoperative complications occurred in 3.4 % of cases and were mostly minor (i.e. Clavien 1-2; 83.3 %). Predictive factors of failed outpatient management were male gender (P=0.04), BMI (P=0.03), and anticoagulants intake (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Outpatient flexible ureteroscopy for urinary stones is feasible and its low failure and complications rate may allow a wider spread of its use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Routine enema before urodynamics has no impact on the quality of abdominal pressure curves: Results of a prospective controlled study.

AIMS: The presence of stools in the rectum might affect the quality of the abdominal pressure curve during filling cystometry, but, to date, no study has evaluated the impact of bowel preparation before urodynamics. We evaluated the influence of a sodium phosphate enema before urodynamics on the quality of the abdominal pressure curve. METHODS: A prospective, controlled, single-blind study was conducted in a single center from May to June 2013. The patients were divided into 2 consecutive groups: patients seen in outpatient clinics during the first 6 weeks (group A) who underwent urodynamics without bowel preparation and patients seen in outpatient clinics during the second 6 weeks (group B) who had a prescription of sodium phosphate enema before urodynamics. The primary endpoint was the quality of the abdominal pressure curve evaluated independently by three physicians who were blinded to the study group. The following data were also collected: age, gender, the presence of a neurological disorder, complicated nature of urodynamics and bother related to preparation for it, assessed using a Likert scale (0 to 10), and the equipment used. A per protocol analysis and an intent-to-treat analysis were conducted. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients were included: 54 in group A and 85 in group B. One-third of patients had neurological conditions. 14 patients in group B did not perform their scheduled enema. Thus, 68 patients performed an enema before urodynamics and 71 did not. There was no difference between groups A and B regarding the complicated nature of urodynamics (Likert scale: 3.12 vs. 3.18; P=0.91) or bother related to preparation for it (Likert scale: 3.46 vs. 2.97; P=0.43). In the per protocol analysis, the abdominal pressure curve was considered perfectly interpretable (PI) in 69% of patients who did not receive an enema before urodynamics and in 65% of patients who did (P=0.61). The between-group difference was not statistically significant in intent-to-treat analysis (P=0.99). In patients who did not receive an enema before urodynamics, the only factors statistically associated with better quality of abdominal pressure curves were age <60years (P=0.001) and the urodynamic equipment used (Dantec®>Laborie®; P=0.01). CONCLUSION: In this prospective study, routine enema before urodynamics did not improve the quality of the abdominal pressure curve and did not increase the complicated nature of urodynamics or the bother of preparation for it. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Oncologic and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: A single-center prospective series]. / Résultats oncologiques et périopératoires de la cystectomie totale robot-assistée pour cancer : une série prospective monocentrique.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to report perioperative and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) in a single-center series and to evaluate the impact of the experience on perioperative outcomes. METHODS: Between March 2012 and January 2016, 41 patients underwent RARC associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. All RARC included were performed by a single-surgeon in one center. Perioperative and oncological datas were collected prospectively. Recurrence-free (RFS), overall (OS) and cancer-specific survivals (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier Method. The impact of the experience on perioperative data was estimated using Spearman's correlation test. RESULTS: Mean age was 67,7years (±10.6). Most patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (73.2%). Mean operative time and mean estimated blood loss were respectively 319.5minutes (±85.3) and 662.5mL (±360.9). Eight patients needed perioperative blood transfusion (19.5%). Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 3 cases (7.3%). Ileal neobladder was performed in 26.8% of the cases (54.5% being performed intracorporeal), and non-continent urinary diversion in 73.2%. Mean nodal yield was 17.7 (±9.3). Positive surgical margins were observed in 1 patient (2.3%). Mean length of stay was 13.2 days (±9.8). Postoperative complication rate was 46,3%. After a median follow-up of 16months, estimated 2 year-OS and CSS were respectively 62 and 76.1%. Estimated 2-year RFS was 67.6%. Perioperative outcomes improved with experience with a significant decrease in operative time (P=0.04) and a significant increase of nodal yield (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: In this single-center prospective study, satisfactory perioperative and oncological outcomes after RARC were observed despite the learning curve. Perioperative outcomes improved with surgeon's experience. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Impact of robotic assistance on the use and the outcomes of nephron-sparing surgery: A single center experience]. / Impact de l'assistance robotique sur la pratique et les résultats de la chirurgie rénale conservatrice : une expérience monocentrique.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the acquisition of a Da Vinci® robot on the use and outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: It was a single center retrospective study including 280 patients who underwent PN from January 2006 to May 2013. The number of PN, tumors and patients' characteristics and perioperative outcomes have been assessed over 3 periods defined according to the main surgical approach: 2006-2008 (open PN), 2008-2010 (laparoscopic PN) and 2010-2013 (robotic PN). RESULTS: Over the study period, the surgical approach has changed significantly in favor of minimally-invasive surgery and especially robotic approach. The PN/nephrectomy rate has also evolved to a higher proportion of PN over radical nephrectomy (P=0.002). No significant difference was noted between the three periods in terms of tumor size but there was a higher rate of highly complex tumors (RENAL score≥10) during the last period (10.7%; 18.6% and 33.2%; P=0.04). Warm ischemia time increased from 2006-2008 to 2008-2010 (26 vs. 23minutes) but decreased thereafter during the robotic era (14.5minutes; P<0.001). Regarding postoperative outcomes, the only change was a decreased length of stay over time (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: In this single center series, the robotic approach was associated with a spread of PN and with an improvement of nephron-sparing surgery outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.