Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Pancreas ; 50(6): 867-872, 2021 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34347731

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To validate the Modified Determinant-Based Classification (MDBC) system, and compare it with the Revised Atlanta Classification (RAC) and the Determinant-Based Classification (DBC). METHODS: Prospective observational research was conducted in 35 international intensive care units, on patients with acute pancreatitis, and at least 1 organ failure (OF). Patient classification according to the MDBC was as follows: group 1 (transient OF, without local complications [LCs]), group 2 (transient OF and LC), group 3 (persistent OF, without LC), and group 4 (persistent OF and LC). RESULTS: A total of 316 patients were enrolled (mortality of 25.6%). In group 1, patients presented with low mortality (3.31%) and low morbidity (13.68%); in group 2, low mortality (5.26%) and moderate morbidity (55.56%); in group 3, high mortality (32.18%) and moderate morbidity (54.24%); and in group 4, high mortality (53.93%) and high morbidity (97.56%). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for mortality was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.84), with significant differences in comparison to RAC (0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80) and DBC (0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.83) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The MDBC identified 4 groups with differentiated clinical evolutions. Its tiered mortality rating provided it with better discriminatory power than the DBC and the RAC.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/terapia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Cuidados Críticos/classificação , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite/classificação , Patologia Clínica/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
Pancreas ; 47(8): 1027-1032, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30045171

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To establish incidence, risk factors, and prognostic implications of abdominal hemorrhage (AH) among critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). METHODS: Prospective cohort study in 46 intensive care units aimed at describing the characteristics of critically ill patients with AP (Epidemiología de la Pancreatitis Aguda en Medicina Intensiva Study). Adult patients with AP and at least 1 organ failure were included. The presence of AH was established either by using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or by direct visualization during surgery. Statistical analyses were carried out using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-four patients were studied. Most were men (62.6%), with a mean (standard deviation) age of 60.4 (15.6) years. Most episodes (56.4%) of AP were severe, and 28.9% died during their hospital stay. Thirty-eight patients (10.2%; 95% confidence interval, 7.3%-13.7%) developed AH. The odds of presenting AH was influenced by age, the underlying cause of pancreatitis, and the presence of shock or respiratory failure on admission. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal hemorrhages were common among critically ill patients with pancreatitis. These early predictors may be of use in detecting patients at risk of developing them.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal/epidemiologia , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Abdome/irrigação sanguínea , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia
3.
Pancreatology ; 18(2): 161-167, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29395619

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Development and validation of a multivariate prediction model for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) admitted in Intensive Care Units (ICU). METHODS: A prospective multicenter observational study, in 1 year period, in 46 international ICUs (EPAMI study). PATIENTS: adults admitted to an ICU with AP and at least one organ failure. INTERVENTIONS: Development of a multivariate prediction model, using the worst data of the stay in ICU, based in multivariate analysis, simple imputation in a development cohort. The model was validated in another cohort. RESULTS: 374 patients were included (mortality of 28.9%). Variables with statistical significance in multivariate analysis were age, no alcoholic and no biliary etiology, development of shock, development of respiratory failure, need of continuous renal replacement therapy, and intra-abdominal pressure. The model created with these variables presented an AUC of ROC curve of 0.90 (CI 95% 0.81-0.94) in the validation cohort. We developed a multivariable prediction model, and AP cases could be classified as low mortality risk (between 2 and 9.5 points, mortality of 1.35%), moderate mortality risk (between 10 and 12.5 points, 28.92% of mortality), and high mortality risk (13 points of more, mortality of 88.37%). Our model presented better AUC of ROC curve than APACHE II (0.91 vs 0.80) and SOFA in the first 24 h (0.91 vs 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a multivariate prediction model, which can be applied in any moment of the stay in ICU, with better discriminatory power than APACHE II and SOFA in the first 24 h.


Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pancreatite/patologia , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/terapia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , América do Sul , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica
4.
Crit Care Med ; 44(5): 910-7, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26783860

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the classification performance of the Revised Atlanta Classification, the Determinant-Based Classification, and a new modified Determinant-Based Classification according to observed mortality and morbidity. DESIGN: A prospective multicenter observational study conducted in 1-year period. SETTING: Forty-six international ICUs (Epidemiology of Acute Pancreatitis in Intensive Care Medicine study). PATIENTS: Admitted to an ICU with acute pancreatitis and at least one organ failure. INTERVENTIONS: Modified Determinant-Based Classification included four categories: In group 1, patients with transient organ failure and without local complications; in group 2, patients with transient organ failure and local complications; in group 3, patients with persistent organ failure and without local complications; and in group 4, patients with persistent organ failure and local complications. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 374 patients were included (mortality rate of 28.9%). When modified Determinant-Based Classification was applied, patients in group 1 presented low mortality (2.26%) and morbidity (5.38%), patients in group 2 presented low mortality (6.67%) and high morbidity (60.71%), patients in group 3 presented high mortality (41.46%) and low morbidity (8.33%), and patients in group 4 presented high mortality (59.09%) and morbidity (88.89%). The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of modified Determinant-Based Classification for mortality was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.85), with significant differences in comparison to Revised Atlanta Classification (0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.81; p < 0.01), and Determinant-Based Classification (0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.81; p < 0.01). For morbidity, the area under the curve of modified Determinant-Based Classification was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73-0.86), with significant differences in comparison to Revised Atlanta Classification (0.63, 95% CI, 0.57-0.70; p < 0.01), but not in comparison to Determinant-Based Classification (0.81, 95% CI, 0.74-0.88; nonsignificant). CONCLUSION: Modified Determinant-Based Classification identified four groups with different clinical presentation in patients with acute pancreatitis in ICU, with better discriminatory power in comparison to Determinant-Based Classification and Revised Atlanta Classification.


Assuntos
Pancreatite/complicações , Pancreatite/fisiopatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , APACHE , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Pancreatite/mortalidade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos
5.
Ann Surg ; 256(6): 875-80, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22735715

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To develop a new international classification of acute pancreatitis severity on the basis of a sound conceptual framework, comprehensive review of published evidence, and worldwide consultation. BACKGROUND: The Atlanta definitions of acute pancreatitis severity are ingrained in the lexicon of pancreatologists but suboptimal because these definitions are based on empiric description of occurrences that are merely associated with severity. METHODS: A personal invitation to contribute to the development of a new international classification of acute pancreatitis severity was sent to all surgeons, gastroenterologists, internists, intensivists, and radiologists who are currently active in clinical research on acute pancreatitis. The invitation was not limited to members of certain associations or residents of certain countries. A global Web-based survey was conducted and a dedicated international symposium was organized to bring contributors from different disciplines together and discuss the concept and definitions. RESULT: The new international classification is based on the actual local and systemic determinants of severity, rather than description of events that are correlated with severity. The local determinant relates to whether there is (peri)pancreatic necrosis or not, and if present, whether it is sterile or infected. The systemic determinant relates to whether there is organ failure or not, and if present, whether it is transient or persistent. The presence of one determinant can modify the effect of another such that the presence of both infected (peri)pancreatic necrosis and persistent organ failure have a greater effect on severity than either determinant alone. The derivation of a classification based on the above principles results in 4 categories of severity-mild, moderate, severe, and critical. CONCLUSIONS: This classification is the result of a consultative process amongst pancreatologists from 49 countries spanning North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Oceania, and Africa. It provides a set of concise up-to-date definitions of all the main entities pertinent to classifying the severity of acute pancreatitis in clinical practice and research. This ensures that the determinant-based classification can be used in a uniform manner throughout the world.


Assuntos
Pancreatite/classificação , Doença Aguda , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Cooperação Internacional , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
6.
Crit Care Med ; 39(5): 945-51, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21263317

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe the severity of the 2009 influenza A/H1N1v illness among pregnant women admitted to Spanish intensive care units. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Prospective, observational, multicenter study conducted in 148 Spanish intensive care units. We reviewed demographic and clinical data from the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine database reported from April 23, 2009, to February 15, 2010. We included women of reproductive age (15-44 yrs) with confirmed A/H1N1v infection admitted to intensive care units. MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-four women of reproductive age were admitted to intensive care units, 50 (21.4%) of them pregnant. Seven deaths were recorded in pregnant and 22 in nonpregnant women. Among intensive care unit admissions, there were no statistically significant differences between pregnant women and nonpregnant in Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores, chest x-rays, inotrope requirement, or need for mechanical ventilation or steroid therapy. Mortality risk was significantly associated with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and obesity. Viral pneumonia was more frequent in pregnant women than in nonpregnant women, with an odds ratio (adjusted for asthma, time from onset influenza symptoms to hospital admission and obesity) of 4.9 (95% confidence interval: 1.4-17.2). The development of primary viral pneumonia in women of reproductive age appeared to be related to the time of commencement of antiviral treatment, the lowest rates being reported with initiation of antiviral therapy within 48 hrs of symptom onset (63.6% vs. 82.6%, p = .03). However, antiviral therapy was started within this time span in only 14% of pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: More than 20% of women of reproductive age admitted to intensive care unit for pH1N1 infection were pregnant. Pregnancy was significantly associated with primary viral pneumonia. Pregnant women should receive prompt treatment with oseltamivir within 48 hrs of the onset of influenza symptoms.


Assuntos
Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/isolamento & purificação , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Intervalos de Confiança , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Modelos Lineares , Oseltamivir/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/virologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Espanha/epidemiologia , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
7.
Crit Care ; 13(5): R148, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19747383

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patients with influenza A (H1N1)v infection have developed rapidly progressive lower respiratory tract disease resulting in respiratory failure. We describe the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of the first 32 persons reported to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to influenza A (H1N1)v infection in Spain. METHODS: We used medical chart reviews to collect data on ICU adult patients reported in a standardized form. Influenza A (H1N1)v infection was confirmed in specimens using real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT PCR) assay. RESULTS: Illness onset of the 32 patients occurred between 23 June and 31 July, 2009. The median age was 36 years (IQR = 31 - 52). Ten (31.2%) were obese, 2 (6.3%) pregnant and 16 (50%) had pre-existing medical complications. Twenty-nine (90.6%) had primary viral pneumonitis, 2 (6.3%) exacerbation of structural respiratory disease and 1 (3.1%) secondary bacterial pneumonia. Twenty-four patients (75.0%) developed multiorgan dysfunction, 7 (21.9%) received renal replacement techniques and 24 (75.0%) required mechanical ventilation. Six patients died within 28 days, with two additional late deaths. Oseltamivir administration delay ranged from 2 to 8 days after illness onset, 31.2% received high-dose (300 mg/day), and treatment duration ranged from 5 to 10 days (mean 8.0 +/- 3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Over a 5-week period, influenza A (H1N1)v infection led to ICU admission in 32 adult patients, with frequently observed severe hypoxemia and a relatively high case-fatality rate. Clinicians should be aware of pulmonary complications of influenza A (H1N1)v infection, particularly in pregnant and young obese but previously healthy persons.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/genética , Influenza Humana/complicações , Insuficiência Respiratória/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Oseltamivir/administração & dosagem , Oseltamivir/farmacologia , Gravidez , Insuficiência Respiratória/mortalidade , Insuficiência Respiratória/fisiopatologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Espanha/epidemiologia
8.
Ann Surg ; 245(5): 674-83, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17457158

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In patients with severe, necrotizing pancreatitis, it is common to administer early, broad-spectrum antibiotics, often a carbapenem, in the hope of reducing the incidence of pancreatic and peripancreatic infections, although the benefits of doing so have not been proved. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study set in 32 centers within North America and Europe. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred patients with clinically severe, confirmed necrotizing pancreatitis: 50 received meropenem and 50 received placebo. INTERVENTIONS: Meropenem (1 g intravenously every 8 hours) or placebo within 5 days of the onset of symptoms for 7 to 21 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoint: development of pancreatic or peripancreatic infection within 42 days following randomization. Other endpoints: time between onset of pancreatitis and the development of pancreatic or peripancreatic infection; all-cause mortality; requirement for surgical intervention; development of nonpancreatic infections within 42 days following randomization. RESULTS: Pancreatic or peripancreatic infections developed in 18% (9 of 50) of patients in the meropenem group compared with 12% (6 of 50) in the placebo group (P = 0.401). Overall mortality rate was 20% (10 of 50) in the meropenem group and 18% (9 of 50) in the placebo group (P = 0.799). Surgical intervention was required in 26% (13 of 50) and 20% (10 of 50) of the meropenem and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.476). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups for pancreatic or peripancreatic infection, mortality, or requirement for surgical intervention, and did not support early prophylactic antimicrobial use in patients with severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Tienamicinas/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Meropeném , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Intensive Care Med ; 30(4): 724-8, 2004 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14991098

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe a nosocomial outbreak of gastric mucormycosis caused by Rhizopus microsporus var. rhizopodiformis in five adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Epidemiological surveillance study. SETTING: A 12-bed polyvalent ICU of an acute care teaching hospital in Pamplona, Spain. PATIENTS: Five patients admitted to the ICU requiring artificial ventilation, diagnosis on admission severe pneumonia in four patients and one polytrauma patient, within a 14-week period, were diagnosed with gastric mucormycosis based on microbiological and/or histopathological characteristics. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding was the presenting manifestation in 80% of patients. INTERVENTIONS: Filamentous fungi isolated at the microbiology laboratory of the hospital were examined at the national Mycology Reference Laboratory in Madrid. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Rhizopus microsporus var. rhizopodiformis growth was detected in gastric aspiration samples, environmental samples, wooden tongue depressors used to prepare oral medications (and given to patients through a nasogastric catheter), and in some tongue depressors stored in unopened boxes unexposed to the ICU environment. All depressors were purchased from the same supplier. R. microsporus was not isolated from batches purchased at different times from the same supplier and from another supplier. The outbreak terminated when contaminated tongue depressors were withdrawn from use. CONCLUSIONS: Wooden tongue depressors contaminated by R. microsporus var. rhizopodiformis used to prepare oral medications caused an outbreak of fungal gastritis with an attributable mortality of 40%. Wooden material should not be used in the hospital setting.


Assuntos
Mucormicose/microbiologia , Rhizopus/isolamento & purificação , Gastropatias/microbiologia , APACHE , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos , Estado Terminal , Surtos de Doenças , Feminino , Mucosa Gástrica/microbiologia , Mucosa Gástrica/patologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucormicose/complicações , Mucormicose/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Gastropatias/complicações , Gastropatias/epidemiologia
10.
Intensive Care Med ; 29(11): 1974-80, 2003 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14551680

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We compared two imipenem regimens for prevention of septic complications in patients with severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomized open clinical trial involving intensive care units of 14 Spanish Hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 92 patients with ANP. INTERVENTIONS: Imipenem/cilastatin was administered at 500 mg four times daily starting at the time of diagnosis of ANP, within the first 96 h from the onset of symptoms. Patients were randomized to receive antibiotic prophylaxis either for 14 days (group 1) or at least for 14 days and as long as major systemic complications of the disease persisted (group 2). RESULTS: Antibiotic was maintained in group 2 for 19.7+/-10.9 days. The incidence of infected pancreatic necrosis, pancreatic abscess, and extrapancreatic infections was 11%, 17%, and 28% in group 1 and 17.4%, 13%, and 35% in group 2 (n.s.). Pancreatic or extrapancreatic infection by Candida albicans occurred in 7% and 22% of patients. Global mortality was 18.5% (10.9% secondary to septic complications), without differences between groups. In patients with persisting systemic complications at day 14 mortality was almost always secondary to septic complications and decreased from 25% (group 1) to 8.8% (group 2) by maintaining antibiotic prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a 14-day imipenem prophylaxis, a longer antibiotic administration in patients with ANP is not associated with a reduction in the incidence of septic complications of the disease. However, prolonged imipenem administration in patients with persisting systemic complications tends to reduce mortality in ANP compared to a 14-days regimen.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Cilastatina/administração & dosagem , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Imipenem/administração & dosagem , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/complicações , Sepse/prevenção & controle , APACHE , Idoso , Causas de Morte , Combinação Imipenem e Cilastatina , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Esquema de Medicação , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Sepse/epidemiologia , Sepse/etiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Espanha/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA