Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 203(6): 1242-8, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25415701

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure the effects of use of a structured physician order entry system for trauma CT on the communication of clinical information and on coding practices and reimbursement efficiency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted between April 1, 2011, and January 14, 2013, at a level I trauma center with 59,000 annual emergency department visits. On March 29, 2012, a structured order entry system was implemented for head through pelvis trauma CT, so-called pan-scan CT. This study compared the following factors before and after implementation: communication of clinical signs and symptoms and mechanism of injury, primary International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code category, success of reimbursement, and time required for successful reimbursement for the examination. Chi-square statistics were used to compare all categoric variables before and after the intervention, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare billing cycle times. RESULTS: A total of 457 patients underwent pan-scan CT in 2734 distinct examinations. After the intervention, there was a 62% absolute increase in requisitions containing clinical signs or symptoms (from 0.4% to 63%, p<0.0001) and a 99% absolute increase in requisitions providing mechanism of injury (from 0.4% to 99%, p<0.0001). There was a 19% absolute increase in primary ICD-9-CM codes representing clinical signs or symptoms (from 2.9% to 21.8%, p<0.0001), and a 7% absolute increase in reimbursement success for examinations submitted to insurance carriers (from 83.0% to 89.7%, p<0.0001). For reimbursed studies, there was a 14.7-day reduction in mean billing cycle time (from 68.4 days to 53.7 days, p=0.008). CONCLUSION: Implementation of structured physician order entry for trauma CT was associated with significant improvement in the communication of clinical history to radiologists. The improvement was also associated with changes in coding practices, greater billing efficiency, and an increase in reimbursement success.


Assuntos
Eficiência Organizacional/economia , Honorários e Preços/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/economia , Crédito e Cobrança de Pacientes/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Boston/epidemiologia , Eficiência Organizacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Comunicação no Hospital/economia , Sistemas de Comunicação no Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças/economia , Classificação Internacional de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Crédito e Cobrança de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia
2.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 9(2): 129-36, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22305699

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess whether an integrated imaging computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system with embedded decision support for imaging can be accepted clinically. METHODS: The study was performed in a health care delivery network with an affiliated academic hospital. After pilot testing and user feedback, a Web-enabled CPOE system with embedded imaging decision support was phased into clinical use between 2000 and 2010 across outpatient, emergency department, and inpatient settings. The primary outcome measure was meaningful use, defined as the proportion of imaging studies performed with orders electronically created (EC) or electronically signed by an authorized provider. The secondary outcome measure was adoption, defined as the proportion of imaging studies that were ordered electronically, irrespective of who entered the order in the CPOE system. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to estimate trends and the significance of practice settings, examination modality, and body part to outcome measures. Chi-square statistics were used to assess differences across specialties. RESULTS: A total of 4.1 million imaging studies were performed during the study period. From 2000 to 2010, significant increases in meaningful use (for EC studies, from 0.4% to 61.9%; for electronically signed studies, from 0.4% to 92.2%; P < .005) and the adoption of CPOE (from 0.5% to 94.6%, P < .005) were observed. The use of EC studies was greatest in the emergency department and inpatient settings. Meaningful use varied across specialties; surgical subspecialties had the lowest rates of EC studies. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging CPOE with embedded decision support integrated into the IT infrastructure of the health care enterprise and clinicians' workflow can be broadly accepted clinically.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Diagnóstico por Imagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Urbanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Boston , Integração de Sistemas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA