[Informed consent in radiotherapy care]. / Consentement aux soins en radiothérapie.

Obtaining consent to care requires the radiation oncologist to provide loyal information and to ensure that the patient understands it. Proof of such an approach rests with the practitioner. The French Society for Radiation Oncology (SFRO) does not recommend the signature of a consent form by the patient but recommends that the radiation oncologist be able to provide all the elements demonstrating the reality of a complete information circuit.

Indication and perspectives of radiation therapy in the setting of de-novo metastatic prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer mortality in men. Each year, approximately 10% of prostate cancers are diagnosed metastatic at initial presentation. The standard treatment option for de-novo metastatic prostate cancer is androgen deprivation therapy with novel hormonal agent or with chemotherapy. Recently, PEACE-1 trial highlighted the benefit of triplet therapy resulting in the combination of androgen deprivation therapy combined with docetaxel and abiraterone. Radiotherapy can be proposed in a curative intent or to treat local symptomatic disease. Nowadays, radiotherapy of the primary disease is only recommended for de novo low-burden/low-volume metastatic prostate cancer, as defined in the CHAARTED criteria. However, studies on stereotactic radiotherapy on oligometastases have shown that this therapeutic approach is feasible and well tolerated. Prospective research currently focuses on the benefit of intensification by combining treatment of the metastatic sites and the primary all together. The contribution of metabolic imaging to better define the target volumes and specify the oligometastatic character allows a better selection of patients. This article aims to define indications of radiotherapy and perspectives of this therapeutic option for de-novo metastatic prostate cancer.

[Interprofessional recommendations on behalf of Société française de radiothérapie oncologique for the prevention, protection and management of cyberattacks in radiation oncology]. / Prévention, protection, et gestion des cyberattaques en oncologie radiothérapie : recommandations interprofessionnelles au nom de la Société française de radiothérapie oncologique.

Cybersecurity is currently a major issue. Large hospitals are no longer the only main targets of attacks, but all healthcare organizations and establishments, without distinction of size or activities. The information system is defined as all the resources needed to collect images, store and process them with general distribution of multiple information within an organization. Systems are therefore crucial for the functioning of a medical department. Radiation oncology is one of the specialties most dependent on digital resources, for imaging, data transfer, dosimetry, treatment and so on.. Radiation oncology departments are therefore a prime target for ransomware attacks, which have increased significantly in recent years. Cybersecurity can be likened to a viral or bacterial attack. It is based on the two usual pillars of antimicrobial protection : hygiene and prophylaxis. In this article, we will detail by analogy the three classic levels of prevention of a bacillary attack: "primary prevention", which acts upstream of the infection; "secondary prevention", which acts at an early stage of its evolution; and "tertiary prevention", which acts on complications and risks of recurrence. This article is the result of an interprofessional group on behalf of SFRO, the French society of radiation oncology, with the aim of helping all teams to implement safety adapted to the specificities of a radiation oncology department in France.

RadioTransNet, Radiotherapy Translational and Preclinical Research Network: Results from the dedicated French cancer institute (INCa) call for projects.

PURPOSE: The RadioTransNet project is a French initiative structuring preclinical and translational research in radiation therapy for cancer at national level. The network's activities are organized around four chosen priorities, which are: target definition, normal tissue, combined treatments and dose modelling. The subtargets linked to these four major priorities are unlimited. They include all aspects associated with fundamental radiobiology, preclinical studies, imaging, medical physics research and transversal components clearly related to these scientific areas, such as medical oncology, radio-diagnostics, nuclear medicine and cost-effectiveness considerations. METHOD: During its first phase of activity, four workshops following the consensus conference model and based on scientific and medical state of the art in radiotherapy and radiobiology were organized on the four above-mentioned objectives to identify key points. Then a road map has been defined and served as the basis for the opening in 2022 of a dedicated call, SEQ-RTH22, proposed by the French cancer national institute (INCa). RESULTS: Four research projects submitted by RadioTransNet partners have been selected to be supported by INCa: the first by Professor Anne Laprie from Oncopole Claudius-Regaud and Inserm ToNic in Toulouse on neurocognition and health after pediatric irradiation, the second submitted by Fabien Milliat from IRSN aims to study decryption and targeting of endothelial cell-immune cells interactions to limit radiation-induced intestinal toxicity, the third project, submitted by Yolanda Prezado from institut Curie-CNRS on proton minibeam radiotherapy as a new approach to reduce toxicity, and the latest project proposed by R. de Crevoisier from centre Eugène-Marquis in Rennes on predictive multiscale models of head and neck radiotoxicity induced for optimized personalized radiation therapy. Topics of each of these projects are presented here. CONCLUSION: RadioTransNet project has been launched in 2018, supported by INCa, in order to structure and promote preclinical research in oncology radiotherapy and to favor collaboration between the actors of this research. INCa relied on RadioTransNet initiatives and activities, resulting in the opening of dedicated call for projects. Beyond its first main goals, RadioTransNet network is able to help to fund the human and technical resources necessary to conduct optimal translational and preclinical research in radiation oncology.

Comparison between the HyperArc™ technique and the CyberKnife® technique for stereotactic treatment of brain metastases.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the planimetric capacities between HyperArc™-based stereotactic radiosurgery and robotic radiosurgery system-based planning using CyberKnife® M6 for single and multiple cranial metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 51 treatment plans for cranial metastases, including 30 patients with a single lesion and 21 patients with multiple lesions, treated with the CyberKnife® M6. These treatment plans were optimized using the HyperArc™ (HA) system with the TrueBeam. The comparison of the quality of the treatment plans between the two treatment techniques (CyberKnife and HyperArc) was performed using the Eclipse treatment planning system. Dosimetric parameters were compared for target volumes and organs at risk. RESULTS: Coverage of the target volumes was equivalent between the two techniques, whereas median Paddick conformity index and median gradient index for all target volumes were 0.9 and 3.4, respectively for HyperArc plans, and 0.8 and 4.5 for CyberKnife plans (P<0.001). The median dose of gross tumor volume (GTV) for HyperArc and CyberKnife plans were 28.4 and 28.8, respectively. Total brain V18Gy and V12Gy-GTVs were 11cm3 and 20.2cm3 for HyperArc plans versus 18cm3 and 34.1cm3 for CyberKnife plans (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The HyperArc provided better brain sparing, with a significant reduction in V12Gy and V18Gy, associated with a lower gradient index, whereas the CyberKnife gave a higher median GTV dose. The HyperArc technique seems to be more appropriate for multiple cranial metastases and for large single metastatic lesions.

RadioTransNet: Preclinical research network coordinated at the SFRO and SFPM.

The RadioTransNet programme launched under the auspices of French societies for radiation oncology (SFRO) and medical physics (SFPM) was approved by the French national cancer institute (INCa) in December 2018 and is dedicated to proposing a relevant national and transversal structure for preclinical research including translational research in radiation oncology with well-defined priority areas of research. Its activities, coordinated by a scientific committee that includes radiation oncologists, medical physicists, academic biologists, are structured around several main areas, i.e.: target volume definition, interaction of radiation with normal tissues, combined treatments and modern dose calculation approaches. Four work packages have been created in these areas and are associated with other objectives pertaining to fundamental radiobiology, early implementation of new drugs in a preclinical setting, contribution of imaging in this task, research in medical physics including transversal components such as medical oncology, radiology, nuclear medicine and also cost/efficiency evaluation. All these tasks will be included in a national network that uses the complementary expertise provided by partners involved in the scheme. Calls for proposals will be selected by the scientific council to be submitted to INCa and the various academic associations to obtain funding for the human and technical resources required to conduct under optimal conditions projects in preclinical and translational research in radiation-oncology.

Prostate cancer brachytherapy: SFRO guidelines 2021.

Prostate brachytherapy techniques are described, concerning both permanent seed implant and high dose rate brachytherapy. The following guidelines are presented: brachytherapy indications, implant procedure for permanent low dose rate implants and high dose rate with source projector, as well as dose and dose-constraints objectives, immediate postoperative management, post-treatment evaluation, and long-term follow-up.

External radiotherapy for prostatic cancers.

We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on external radiotherapy of prostate cancer. External radiotherapy is intended for all localized prostate cancers, and more recently for oligometastatic prostate cancers. The irradiation techniques are detailed. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with prostate image-guided radiotherapy is the recommended technique. A total dose of 74 to 80Gy is recommended in case of standard fractionation (2Gy per fraction). Moderate hypofractionation (total dose of 60Gy at a rate of 3Gy per fraction over 4 weeks) in the prostate has become a standard of therapy. Simultaneous integrated boost techniques can be used to treat lymph node areas. Extreme hypofractionation (35 to 40Gy in five fractions) using stereotactic body radiotherapy can be considered a therapeutic option to treat exclusively the prostate. The postoperative irradiation technique, indicated mainly in case of biological recurrence and lymph node involvement, is detailed.

[Stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-spine bone oligometastatic disease]. / Radiothérapie stéréotaxique des métastases osseuses du squelette périphérique.

PURPOSE: Stereotaxic radiotherapy is performed regularly for the irradiation of non-spine bone metastases, but its place is not well understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article in stereotaxic radiotherapy of non-spine bones oligometastases presents the current scientific data relating to the indications, to virtual simulation, to the delineation of target volumes, to the total dose and fractionation, to the efficacy and tolerance. RESULTS: Oligometastatic patients are classified into 4 categories: oligorecurrences, oligometastasis, oligopersistence, oligoprogression. The prognosis will be evaluated according to the following characteristics: primary tumor, quantitative characteristics, kinetics, qualitative characteristics. The delineation of GTV includes extensions to the soft tissue and bone marrow with the aid of MRI and PET. The CTV corresponds to a margin of 2 to 5mm and the PTV to a margin of 2mm. The most widely used irradiation schemes are: 1 single fraction of 18 to 24Gy/1 fr; 24Gy/2 fr; 27 to 30Gy/3 fr; 30 to 35Gy/5 fr. Stereotaxis provides 90% local control at 1 year and good pain control. The side effects are not very marked. CONCLUSION: Stereotaxic radiotherapy is feasible, non-invasive, minimally toxic and effective with good local control and good pain relief. The main issue remains selecting the patients most likely to benefit from it.

[Stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine bone oligometastatic disease]. / Radiothérapie stéréotaxiques des métastases osseuses des lésions vertébrales.

Stereotactic radiotherapy is an ever more common technique, regardless of the location treated. However, spinal stereotactic radiotherapy requires a particular technicality in order to ensure its proper realization. There is now a large literature defining the type of imaging to be used, the dose to be delivered and the delineation of target volumes. This technique can achieve a significant local control and an interesting analgesic efficiency. However, its place in relation to conventional radiotherapy remains limited because it requires MRI imaging and a significantly longer patient management during the treatment fraction. In this context, it is currently mainly restricted to oligometastatic patients or for re-irradiations.

[RadioTransNet, the French network for preclinical research in oncological radiotherapy]. / RadioTransNet, le réseau national de radiothérapie oncologique préclinique.

The ambition of the RADIOTRANSNET network, launched by the INCa at the end of 2018, is to create a French research consortium dedicated to preclinical radiotherapy to foster scientific and clinical interactions at the interface of radiotherapy and radiobiology, and to identify research priorities dedicated to innovation in radiotherapy. The activities of the network are organized around four major axes that are target definition, normal tissue, combined treatments and dose modelling. Under the supervision of the Scientific Council, headed by a coordinator designated by the SFRO and a co-coordinator designated by the SFPM, three leaders coordinate each axis: a radiation-oncologist, a medical physicist and a biologist, who are responsible for organizing a scientific meeting based on the consensus conference methodology to identify priority issues. The selected themes will be the basis for the establishment of a strategic research agenda and a roadmap to help coordinate national basic and translational research efforts in oncological radiotherapy. This work will be published and will be transmitted to the funding institutions and bodies with the aim of opening dedicated calls to finance the necessary human and technical resources. Structuration of a preclinical research network will allow coordinating the efforts of all the actors in the field and thus promoting innovation in radiotherapy.

[Reference bases of radiotherapy under stereotaxic conditions for bronchopulmonary, hepatic, prostatic, upper aero-digestive, cerebral and bone tumors or metastases]. / Bases référentielles de la radiothérapie en conditions stéréotaxiques pour les tumeurs ou métastases bronchopulmonaires, hépatiques, prostatiques, des voies aérodigestives supérieures, cérébrales et osseuses.

Since decades, stereotactic radiotherapy has spread out worldwide. Published results are very numerous. To clarify obviousness among all the publications, this recommendation review was written. Voluntarily, authors limited analysis of international best evidence literature on malignant tumors of lung, liver, prostate, head and neck, and metastasis of bone and brain. These data could be used to advance standardization and quality improvement of treatments performed in the nationwide radiotherapy departments and can provide useful guidance for centers worldwide.

[Dosimetric comparaison between VMAT and tomotherapy with para-aortic irradiation for cervix carcinoma]. / Comparaison entre arcthérapie volumétrique modulée et tomothérapie pour le cancer du col utérin, avec irradiation lomboaortique.

PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has proven its dosimetric superiority over conformational radiotherapy for cervix cancers in terms of digestive toxicity. Volumetric modulated arctherapy (VMAT) has shown its dosimetric interest when compared to IMRT with static beams. The purpose of our study was to compare conformational radiotherapy, VMAT and tomotherapy for cervical cancers with para-aortic lymph nodes irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The dosimetric data from ten patients were compared between the three techniques, with collection of the dose received by the planning target volume, kidneys, bowel, rectum, bladder, bone marrow and spinal cord, as well as the complete dose. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in favour of VMAT and tomotherapy when compared with conformational radiotherapy for the organs at risk: intestines (V(20 Gy), V(30 Gy) and V(45 Gy)), rectum (V(30 Gy) and V(45 Gy)), bladder (V(30 Gy) and V(45 Gy)) and kidneys (V(12 Gy), Daverage, V(20 Gy)). Volumes receiving 20, 30 and 45 Gy were significantly higher in conformational radiotherapy than in VMAT and tomotherapy. There was a significant difference in favour of tomotherapy when compared with VMAT for V(12 Gy) in kidneys and V(45 Gy) in the bladder. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the interest of VMAT and tomotherapy for pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes irradiation of cervix cancer when compared with conformational radiotherapy. There was little difference between VMAT and tomotherapy, except for kidney sparing, which was better with tomotherapy and thus may be interesting for patients receiving nephrotoxic chemotherapy.

[Head and neck adaptive radiotherapy: A tool for the detection of patients requiring adaptive radiotherapy]. / Radiothérapie adaptative des cancers ORL : un outil permettant d'identifier les patients nécessitant une adaptation de leur traitement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to implement a simple dosimetric alert tool in a retrospective study for six patients suffering from head and neck cancer to detect when a patient might require an adaptive radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dosimetric tool generates a 3D cartography of two dosimetric complementary information: a dose variation tolerance map and a dose differential map. The tolerance map is calculated on the initial scanner (CTinit) using the planned dose distribution. It shows for each voxel of each delineated volume the availability for local dose variations during the course of radiotherapy without exceeding the dose threshold. The differential dose map is generated on the tomographic image CBCT (CBCTtreatment). It shows dose variations between the planned and the actual delivered dose distribution for each voxel. By comparing both maps, when a voxel presents a value superior to the corresponding dose variation tolerance, an alert is generated and the anatomical areas concerned are visually indicated to the physician. RESULTS: The application of the dosimetric tool on six patients with head and neck cancers reveals the ability of the tool to detect cases requiring a new treatment plan. Two patients whose the tumour shrinkage produced an increase of the delivered dose to the spinal cord beyond 45 Gy have been detected. CONCLUSION: The development of the dosimetric tool allows the automatic detection, with no delineation needs, of patients suffering from head and neck cancers requiring an adaptive strategy.

[Implementing new technology in radiation oncology: The French agency for nuclear safety (ASN) report]. / Conditions de mise en œuvre des « nouvelles techniques et pratiques ¼ en radiothérapie. Synthèse du rapport du groupe de travail issu du groupe permanent d'experts en radioprotection médicale de l'Autorité de sûreté nucléaire.

In August 2013, the French nuclear safety agency (ASN) requested the permanent group of experts in radiation protection in medicine (GPMED) to propose recommendations on the implementation of new technology and techniques in radiation oncology. These recommendations were finalized in February 2015 by the GPMED. In April 2015, the ASN sent a letter to the French ministry of health (DGS/DGOS), and its national health agencies (ANSM, INCa, HAS). In these letters, ASN proposed that, from the 12 recommendations made by the GPMED, an action plan should be established, whose control could be assigned to the French national cancer institute (INCa), as a pilot of the national committee for radiotherapy and that this proposal has to be considered at the next meeting of the national committee of radiotherapy.

Disentangling the multiple stressors acting on stream ecosystems to support restoration priorities.

Stream ecosystems may suffer from the effects of multiple stressors. Planning restoration actions without knowing the relative weight of each stressor might lead to disproportionately costly or ecologically meaningless measures. This is particularly relevant under the EU Water Framework Directive where economic considerations play a role in justifying exemptions from the overarching aim of the directive of achieving the good ecological status in all the EU water bodies by 2015. In this study, we correlated the status of macroinvertebrate assemblages with many environmental variables at 120 monitoring stations (surveyed in 2009-2011) in the streams of Lombardy, Italy. We used a combination of regression techniques to disentangle the effects of the different stressors. Furthermore, different profiles of ecological quality were associated with the dominant stressors. Finally, examples are given about how these study findings provide elements to identify restoration scenarios that maximize the effectiveness/cost ratio.

Implantation of fiducial markers in the liver for stereotactic body radiation therapy: Feasibility and results.

PURPOSE: Robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma requires the perilesional implant of gold fiducial markers for detection by scopy. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the implant of gold fiducial markers is still possible and, if so, with which imaging technique and with what results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study based on the implant of fiducial markers in the liver in our department for a treatment by SBRT for a hepatocellular carcinoma in 38 patients (49 lesions to treat) over a period of one year. As the first choice, it consisted of sonographic guidance and, if not possible, CT-scan guidance was used. RESULTS: The mean number of fiducial markers implanted per procedure was 2.68(±0.61) with almost exclusive sonographic guidance (36 out of 38 patients or 95% of the patients). The mean distance between the markers and the lesion was 32mm (±11mm) and that between the markers was 17mm (±7mm). CONCLUSION: SBRT is being evaluated for the treatment of liver lesions. The radiologist has an important role to play since the implant of fiducial markers in the liver is indispensable. It is almost always possible with sonographic guidance, including for lesions not accessible to microbiopsies, a treatment by radiofrequency or for lesions poorly individualisable by sonography or CT-scan.

[Nationwide implementation of stereotactic radiotherapy: the challenges of initial training and continuing professional education]. / Mise en œuvre de la radiothérapie stéréotaxique extracrânienne : enjeux de la formation initiale et continue.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a rapidly growing advanced treatment technique that delivers high radiation dose with great precision. The implementation of stereotactic body radiation therapy should be associated with a specific initial training and continuing professional education for radiation oncologists and medical physicists. The creation of a French stereotactic body radiation therapy group gathering radiation oncologists (SFRO and AFCOR) and medical physicists (SFPM) is mandatory in order to create dedicated national guidelines, prospective databases and to promote clinical trials in this field.

[Stereotactic body radiation therapy: uncertainties and margins]. / Contrôle de qualité de la chaîne de préparation et de radiothérapie stéréotaxique extracrânienne. Incertitudes et marges.

The principles governing stereotactic body radiation therapy are tight margins and large dose gradients around targets. Every step of treatment preparation and delivery must be evaluated before applying this technique in the clinic. Uncertainties remain in each of these steps: delineation, prescription with the biological equivalent dose, treatment planning, patient set-up taking into account movements, the machine accuracy. The calculation of margins to take into account uncertainties differs from conventional radiotherapy because of the delivery of few fractions and large dose gradients around the target. The quest of high accuracy is complicated by the difficulty to reach it and the lack of consensus regarding the prescription. Many schemes dose/number of fractions are described in clinical studies and there are differences in the way describing the delivered doses. While waiting for the ICRU report dedicated to this technique, it seems desirable to use the quantities proposed in ICRU Report 83 (IMRT) to report the dose distribution.