Analysis of the effect of motion on highly accelerated 3D FatNavs in 3D brain images acquired at 3T.

PURPOSE: 3D FatNavs are rapid acquisitions of MRI fat-volumes within the head that can be used for retrospective motion correction for brain MRI. 3D FatNavs typically use very high acceleration factors and are reconstructed with the GRAPPA parallel imaging technique. However, the GRAPPA reconstruction is not expected to perform well on 3D FatNavs volumes in the presence of strong motion due to the mismatched calibration data acquired once at the start of the scan, leading to motion-parameter misestimation. This study aims to assess the accuracy and precision of 3D FatNav-derived motion-estimates in the presence of large changes in head position. METHODS: Rigid motion parameters were simulated and applied retrospectively to the 3D FatNav volumes from MPRAGE datasets acquired at 3T. The transformed images were then re-reconstructed using GRAPPA to simulate real motion deterioration of the fat-navigator, and used to estimate the motion applied and evaluate the tracking inaccuracy. This information was then used to estimate the residual motion after 3D FatNav-based motion correction and applied to the original MPRAGE volumes. The effect of the misestimation was assessed using an image quality metric and the evaluation scores from two observers. Quality boundaries were then estimated to assess the motion tolerance when 3D FatNavs are used. RESULTS: The GRAPPA reconstruction was shown to deteriorate for large changes in the head position, affecting the quality of 3D FatNav volumes and consequently degrading the accuracy of the motion-estimates. Based on our simulations, the estimated threshold of motion that led to a noticeable degradation in the MPRAGE image quality was up to RMS values of 3.7° and 3 mm for rotations and translations respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 3D FatNavs were shown to be able to correct for a wide range of motion levels and types. Boundaries of acceptable motion magnitudes for different levels of acceptable loss of image quality were determined.

Sensitivity of unconstrained quantitative magnetization transfer MRI to Amyloid burden in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

Magnetization transfer MRI is sensitive to semi-solid macromolecules, including amyloid beta, and has previously been used to discriminate Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients from controls. Here, we fit an unconstrained 2-pool quantitative MT (qMT) model, i.e., without constraints on the longitudinal relaxation rate R 1 s of semi-solids, and investigate the sensitivity of the estimated parameters to amyloid accumulation in preclinical subjects. We scanned 15 cognitively normal volunteers, of which 9 were amyloid positive by [18F]Florbetaben PET. A 12 min hybrid-state qMT scan with an effective resolution of 1.24 mm isotropic and whole-brain coverage was acquired to estimate the unconstrained 2-pool qMT parameters. Group comparisons and correlations with Florbetaben PET standardized uptake value ratios were analyzed at the lobar level. We find that the exchange rate and semi-solid pool's R 1 s were sensitive to the amyloid concentration, while morphometric measures of cortical thickness derived from structural MRI were not. Changes in the exchange rate are consistent with previous reports in clinical AD, while changes in R 1 s have not been reported previously as its value is typically constrained in the literature. Our results demonstrate that qMT MRI may be a promising surrogate marker of amyloid beta without the need for contrast agents or radiotracers.

Unconstrained quantitative magnetization transfer imaging: disentangling T1 of the free and semi-solid spin pools.

Since the inception of magnetization transfer (MT) imaging, it has been widely assumed that Henkelman's two spin pools have similar longitudinal relaxation times, which motivated many researchers to constrain them to each other. However, several recent publications reported a T1s of the semi-solid spin pool that is much shorter than T1f of the free pool. While these studies tailored experiments for robust proofs-of-concept, we here aim to quantify the disentangled relaxation processes on a voxel-by-voxel basis in a clinical imaging setting, i.e., with an effective resolution of 1.24mm isotropic and full brain coverage in 12min. To this end, we optimized a hybrid-state pulse sequence for mapping the parameters of an unconstrained MT model. We scanned four people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) and four healthy controls with this pulse sequence and estimated T1f≈1.84s and T1s≈0.34s in healthy white matter. Our results confirm the reports that T1s≪T1f and we argue that this finding identifies MT as an inherent driver of longitudinal relaxation in brain tissue. Moreover, we estimated a fractional size of the semi-solid spin pool of m0s≈0.212, which is larger than previously assumed. An analysis of T1f in normal-appearing white matter revealed statistically significant differences between individuals with MS and controls.

Robust retrospective motion correction of head motion using navigator-based and markerless motion tracking techniques.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the artifacts arising from different types of head motion in brain MR images and how well these artifacts can be compensated using retrospective correction based on two different motion-tracking techniques. METHODS: MPRAGE images were acquired using a 3 T MR scanner on a cohort of nine healthy participants. Subjects moved their head to generate circular motion (4 or 6 cycles/min), stepwise motion (small and large) and "simulated realistic" motion (nodding and slow diagonal motion), based on visual instructions. One MPRAGE scan without deliberate motion was always acquired as a "no motion" reference. Three dimensional fat-navigator (FatNavs) and a Tracoline markerless device (TracInnovations) were used to obtain motion estimates and images were separately reconstructed retrospectively from the raw data based on these different motion estimates. RESULTS: Image quality was recovered from both motion tracking techniques in our stepwise and slow diagonal motion scenarios in almost all cases, with the apparent visual image quality comparable to the no-motion case. FatNav-based motion correction was further improved in the case of stepwise motion using a skull masking procedure to exclude non-rigid motion of the neck from the co-registration step. In the case of circular motion, both methods struggled to correct for all motion artifacts. CONCLUSION: High image quality could be recovered in cases of stepwise and slow diagonal motion using both motion estimation techniques. The circular motion scenario led to more severe image artifacts that could not be fully compensated by the retrospective motion correction techniques used.

A quixotic view of spatial bias in modelling the distribution of species and their diversity.

Ecological processes are often spatially and temporally structured, potentially leading to autocorrelation either in environmental variables or species distribution data. Because of that, spatially-biased in-situ samples or predictors might affect the outcomes of ecological models used to infer the geographic distribution of species and diversity. There is a vast heterogeneity of methods and approaches to assess and measure spatial bias; this paper aims at addressing the spatial component of data-driven biases in species distribution modelling, and to propose potential solutions to explicitly test and account for them. Our major goal is not to propose methods to remove spatial bias from the modelling procedure, which would be impossible without proper knowledge of all the processes generating it, but rather to propose alternatives to explore and handle it. In particular, we propose and describe three main strategies that may provide a fair account of spatial bias, namely: (i) how to represent spatial bias; (ii) how to simulate null models based on virtual species for testing biogeographical and species distribution hypotheses; and (iii) how to make use of spatial bias - in particular related to sampling effort - as a leverage instead of a hindrance in species distribution modelling. We link these strategies with good practice in accounting for spatial bias in species distribution modelling.

rasterdiv-An Information Theory tailored R package for measuring ecosystem heterogeneity from space: To the origin and back.

Ecosystem heterogeneity has been widely recognized as a key ecological indicator of several ecological functions, diversity patterns and change, metapopulation dynamics, population connectivity or gene flow.In this paper, we present a new R package-rasterdiv-to calculate heterogeneity indices based on remotely sensed data. We also provide an ecological application at the landscape scale and demonstrate its power in revealing potentially hidden heterogeneity patterns.The rasterdiv package allows calculating multiple indices, robustly rooted in Information Theory, and based on reproducible open-source algorithms.