Factors associated with readmission after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify factors that lead to a prolonged hospital stay or 30-day readmission after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at a single institution. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent MIS TLIF from January 1, 2016, to March 31, 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, including age, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, and body mass index, were collected along with operative details, indications, affected spinal levels, estimated blood loss, and operative duration. The effects of these data were evaluated relative to the hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: The authors identified 174 consecutive patients who underwent MIS TLIF at 1 or 2 levels from a prospectively collected database. The mean (range) patient age was 64.1 (31-81) years, 97 were women (56%), and 77 were men (44%). Of 182 levels fused, 127 were done at L4-5 (70%), 32 at L3-4 (18%), 13 at L5-S1 (7%), and 10 at L2-3 (5%). Patients underwent 166 (95%) single-level procedures and 8 (5%) 2-level procedures. The mean (range) procedural duration, defined as the time from incision to closure, was 164.6 (90-529) minutes. The mean (range) LOS was 1.8 (0-8) days. Eleven patients (6%) were readmitted within 30 days; the most frequent causes were urinary retention, constipation, and persistent or contralateral symptoms. Seventeen patients had LOS greater than 3 days. Six of those patients (35%) were identified as widows, widowers, or divorced, and 5 of them lived alone. Six patients with prolonged LOS (35%) required placement in either skilled nursing or acute inpatient rehabilitation. Regression analyses showed living alone (p = 0.04) and diabetes (p = 0.04) as predictors of readmission. Regression analyses revealed female sex (p = 0.03), diabetes (p = 0.03), and multilevel surgery (p = 0.006) as predictors of LOS > 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary retention, constipation, and persistent radicular symptoms were the leading causes of readmission within 30 days of surgery in this series, which is distinct from data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The inability to discharge a patient home for social reasons led to prolonged inpatient hospital stays. Identifying these risk factors and proactively addressing them could lower readmission rates and decrease LOS among patients undergoing MIS TLIF.

Anatomic Basis for Minimally Invasive Resection of Intradural Extramedullary Lesions in Thoracic Spine.

OBJECTIVE: Since the first resections of intradural extramedullary neoplasms, neurosurgeons have tended to preserve as much of the integrity of the spine as possible while ensuring a safe corridor to resect these lesions. A dimensional analysis of intradural lesions superimposed on a dimensional analysis of the thoracic canal would provide the anatomic basis for a minimal access approach. The authors report the results of such an analysis on a series of patients with intradural extramedullary lesions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 26 thoracic intradural extramedullary lesions managed with open or minimally invasive resection. The size of each lesion was measured in the rostrocaudal, lateral, and anteroposterior dimensions and then averaged and compared with reported dimensions of the thoracic spinal canal. RESULTS: The mean (range) dimensions of the surgically resected thoracic lesions were 18.6 mm (10-25 mm) for rostrocaudal, 13.0 mm (7-18 mm) for lateral, and 13.6 mm (9-17 mm) for anteroposterior. No patient had any evidence of thoracic canal remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic intradural extramedullary lesions become symptomatic as they approach the limits of the thoracic canal, resulting in an inherent dimensional limitation in the rostrocaudal, lateral, and anteroposterior dimensions. Displacement of the spinal cord by the lesion to one side further favors a minimally invasive unilateral approach. A paraspinal unilateral hemilaminectomy approach with a 35 × 20 mm exposure centered over the lesion offers a safe surgical corridor for resection while preserving the posterior tension band, facet complexes, and paraspinal musculature.

Prospective Evaluation of a Low-Dose Radiation Fluoroscopy Protocol for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Recent research on radiation exposure in minimally invasive surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) has led to the development of a low-dose radiation fluoroscopy protocol, with resulting reductions in fluoroscopy times and radiation exposures. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate a previously reported low-dose radiation fluoroscopy protocol for MIS TLIF. METHODS: A prospective evaluation of the low-dose radiation fluoroscopy protocol for MIS TLIF was performed for 65 consecutive patients. Total fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and operative times were prospectively analyzed for all enrolled patients. RESULTS: Sixty-five consecutive patients (43 women; 22 men) who underwent an MIS TLIF were prospectively enrolled in this study of the low-dose fluoroscopy protocol. A total of 260 pedicle screws were placed. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (range, 46-82 years). They had a mean operative time of 178.7 minutes (range, 119-247 minutes), a mean fluoroscopic time of 10.43 seconds (range, 5-24 seconds), and a mean radiation dose of 0.295 mGy × m2 (range, 0.092-0.314 mGy × m2). CONCLUSION: The combination of low-dose pulsed images and digital spot images in a low-dose protocol decreases fluoroscopy times and radiation doses in patients undergoing MIS TLIF without compromising visualization of the bony anatomy or the safety and efficiency of the procedure. The application of this low-dose protocol uncouples the otherwise linear relationship between fluoroscopy times and radiation dose. This is due primarily to the use of the digital spot technique. Equal emphasis should be placed on radiation dose and acquisition time to optimize this protocol.

Provisional ipsilateral expandable rod for disc space distraction in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: operative technique.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar disc degeneration may be so advanced and asymmetrical that transforaminal access to the interbody space is limited. The extent of collapse may compromise the capacity to restore disc height and coronal balance in minimally invasive approaches. Although a variety of distractors are available for open approaches, currently there is no feasible distractor that is functional within a minimally invasive retractor. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of a provisional ipsilateral expandable rod for use in minimally invasive surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions to optimize access to the disc space, thereby facilitating placement of an interbody spacer. METHODS: The authors report the clinical and radiographic data for 30 patients (3 open and 27 minimally invasive surgeries) with advanced degenerative disc disease in whom a provisional ipsilateral expandable rod was used to restore coronal balance and maintain disc height for interbody preparation and placement. Preoperative disc heights were measured, and the height of interbody spacer recorded. Mean restoration of disc heights was calculated. RESULTS: The provisional ipsilateral expandable rod was successfully applied in both open exposures and within a minimally invasive retractor. The mean preoperative disc height was 4.9 mm (range, 1-9 mm), the mean height of the spacer inserted was 11.1 mm (range, 8-15 mm), and the mean increase in disc height was 6.2 mm (range, 5-11 mm). CONCLUSION: A provisional ipsilateral expandable rod is feasible in either minimally invasive or open approaches. It has the capacity to maintain the disc height achieved by paddle distractors. This facilitates both the disc preparation and optimizes restoration of disc height and interbody spacer placement.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions and fluoroscopy: a low-dose protocol to minimize ionizing radiation.

OBJECT: There is an increasing awareness of radiation exposure to surgeons and the lifelong implications of such exposure. One of the main criticisms of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) is the amount of ionizing radiation required to perform the procedure. The goal in this study was to develop a protocol that would minimize the fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure needed to perform an MIS TLIF without compromising visualization of the anatomy or efficiency of the procedure. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed to review the development of a low-dose protocol for MIS TLIFs in which a combination of low-dose pulsed fluoroscopy and digital spot images was used. Total fluoroscopy time and radiation dose were reviewed for 50 patients who underwent single-level MIS TLIFs. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent single-level MIS TLIFs, resulting in the placement of 200 pedicle screws and 57 interbody spacers. There were 28 women and 22 men with an average age of 58.3 years (range 32-78 years). The mean body mass index was 26.2 kg/m(2) (range 17.1-37.6 kg/m(2)). Indications for surgery included spondylolisthesis (32 patients), degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy (12 patients), and recurrent disc herniation (6 patients). Operative levels included 7 at L3-4, 40 at L4-5, and 3 at L5-S1. The mean operative time was 177 minutes (range 139-241 minutes). The mean fluoroscopic time was 18.72 seconds (range 7-29 seconds). The mean radiation dose was 0.247 mGy*m(2) (range 0.06046-0.84054 mGy*m(2)). No revision surgery was required for any of the patients in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Altering the fluoroscopic technique to low-dose pulse images or digital spot images can dramatically decrease fluoroscopy times and radiation doses in patients undergoing MIS TLIFs, without compromising image quality, accuracy of pedicle screw placement, or efficiency of the procedure.

Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial evaluating a biosynthesized cellulose graft for repair of dural defects.

BACKGROUND: After intradural cranial surgery, a dural substitute is often required for dural closure. Although preferred, limitations of autograft include local availability and additional surgical site morbidity. Thus, allografts, xenografts, and synthetics are frequently used. OBJECTIVE: To report 6-month results of a randomized, controlled trial of a biosynthesized cellulose (BSC) composed duraplasty device compared with commercially available dural replacements. METHODS: A total of 99 patients (62 BSC; 37 control) were treated on protocol, using a 2:1 (BSC:control) blocked randomization schedule. Physical examinations were performed pre- and postoperatively within 10 days and at 1, 3, and 6 months. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed preoperatively and at 6 months. The primary study endpoint was the absence of pseudomeningocele and extracerebral fluid collection confirmed radiographically and the absence of cerebrospinal fluid fistula at 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, the primary hypothesis, noninferiority of the BSC implant compared with the control group, was confirmed (P = .0206). Overall success was achieved by 96.6% of BSC and 97.1% of control patients. No significant difference was revealed between treatment groups for surgical site infection (P = 1.0000) or wound healing assessment (P ≥ .3685) outcomes, or radiologic endpoints (P ≥ .4061). Device strength and seal quality favored BSC. CONCLUSION: This randomized, controlled trial establishes BSC as noninferior to commercially available dural replacement devices. BSC offers a hypothetical advantage concerning prion and other infectious agent exposure; superior handling qualities are evident. Longer term data are necessary to identify limitations of BSC and its potential equivalence to the gold standard of pericranium.

Biomechanics of one-level anterior cervical discectomy and plating using two screws versus four screws.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Most one-level anterior cervical plates use two screws per vertebra (four screws in total). No study has addressed whether a simplified plate using one screw per vertebra is adequate for one-level fixation. PURPOSE: To compare stability achieved by four-screw and two-screw plates after discectomy and placement of interbody spacer. STUDY DESIGN: Nondestructive multidirectional flexibility tests were performed in three independent groups of cadaveric spines to assess spinal stability after instrumentation. METHODS: Human cadaveric C4-C7 specimens were tested intact and after discectomy followed by placement of a polyetheretherketone interbody graft and an anterior plate. Rigid two-screw (n=8), semiconstrained four-screw (n=8), and rigid four-screw (n=8) plates were compared. Nonconstraining pure moments were applied under load control (maximum 1.5 Nm) to induce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, whereas vertebral motion was measured optoelectronically. Mean range of motion (ROM) was compared among groups. RESULTS: All three plates significantly reduced ROM relative to normal in all directions of loading (p<.003). Mean ROMs±standard deviation (and corresponding intergroup p value) for rigid two-screw, semiconstrained four-screw, and rigid four-screw plates, respectively, were as follows: flexion: 2.6±2.0°, 1.8±1.1°, 1.8±0.8° (p=.46); extension: 2.5±2.6°, 2.1±1.3°, 1.4±1.3° (p=.45); lateral bending: 1.8±1.0°, 1.3±1.0°, 1.1±0.5° (p=.29); axial rotation: 2.9±1.9°, 1.6±0.9°, 1.5±0.7° (p=.08). Despite a tendency for the rigid two-screw plate to allow more motion than the four-screw plates, there was no significant difference among groups during any loading mode. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of immediate postoperative cervical stability after one-level discectomy and placement of an interbody spacer, the rigid two-screw plate performed comparably to conventional rigid four-screw and semiconstrained four-screw plates. Further research on relative fatigue endurance of the different plate types is also needed.

In vitro biomechanical analysis of a new lumbar low-profile locking screw-plate construct versus a standard top-loading cantilevered pedicle screw-rod construct: technical report.

OBJECTIVE: A standard top-loading lumbar pedicle screw-rod system is compared with a pedicle screw-plate system with smaller-diameter screws, more medial entry, and lower profile to assess the relative stability, strength, and resistance to fatigue of the 2 systems. METHODS: Seven human cadaveric specimens were studied with each surgical construct. Nondestructive, nonconstraining pure moments were applied to specimens to induce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation while recording L5-S1 motion optoelectronically. After initial tests, specimens were fatigued for 10,000 cycles and retested to assess early postoperative loosening. Specimens were then loaded to failure in hyperextension. RESULTS: The standard screw-rod construct reduced range of motion to a mean of 20% of normal, whereas the screw-plate construct reduced range of motion to 13% of normal. Differences between systems were not significant in any loading mode (P > 0.06). The 14% loosening of the screw-rod system with fatigue was not significantly different from the 10% loosening observed with the screw-plate system (P > 0.15). Mean failure loads of 30 Nm for screw-rod and 37 Nm for screw-plate were also not significantly different (P = 0.38). CONCLUSION: Posterior fixation at L5-S1 using the low-profile screw-plate system offers stability, resistance to fatigue, and resistance to failure equivalent to fixation using a standard cantilevered pedicle screw-rod system.

Trajectory analysis and pullout strength of self-centering lumbar pedicle screws.

OBJECT: An experiment was performed to study the limits of the ability of screws designed to center themselves in the pedicle during insertion, and to study whether straight-ahead versus inward screw insertion trajectories differ in their resistance to pullout. METHODS: Forty-nine human cadaveric lumbar vertebrae were studied. Pedicle screws were inserted in trajectories starting 0 degrees, 10 degrees, 20 degrees, or 30 degrees from the optimal trajectory, either medially or laterally misdirected. The surgeon then inserted the screw with forward thrust but without resisting the screw's tendency to reorient its own trajectory during insertion. On the opposite pedicle, a control screw was inserted with the more standard inward-angled anatomical trajectory and insertion point. Cortical wall violation during insertion was recorded. Screws were then pulled out at a constant displacement rate while ultimate strength was recorded. RESULTS: Lateral misdirection as small as 10 degrees was likely to lead to cortical wall violation (3 of 7 violations). Conversely, medial misdirection usually resulted in safe screw insertion (1 of 21 violations for 10 degrees, 20 degrees, or 30 degrees medial misdirection). The resistance to pullout of screws inserted in a straight-ahead trajectory did not differ significantly from that of screws inserted along an inward trajectory (p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Self-tapping, self-drilling pedicle screws can redirect themselves to a much greater extent during medial than during lateral misdirection. The cortical wall is more likely to be violated laterally than medially. The strength of straight-ahead and inward trajectories was equivalent.

A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.

STUDY DESIGN: A new anchored spacer-a low-profile cervical interbody fusion cage with integrated anterior fixation-was compared biomechanically to established anterior cervical devices. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the fixation properties of the new stand-alone device and compare these properties with established fixation methods. The hypothesis is that the new device will provide stability comparable to that provided by an anterior cervical cage when supplemented with an anterior plate. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is accepted that the use of anterior cervical plating increases the chance of achieving a solid fusion. However, its use may be associated with an increase in operation time and a higher postoperative morbidity caused by a larger anterior approach and disruption of the anterior musculature. This dilemma has led to the development of a new, low profile stand-alone cervical anterior cage device with integrated screw fixation. METHODS: Twenty-four human cadaveric C4-C7 cervical spines were loaded nondestructively with pure moments in a nonconstraining testing apparatus to induce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation while angular motion was measured optoelectronically. The specimens were tested: 1. Intact (N = 24). 2. After discectomy and anterior stabilization. a. Interbody cage + locking plate (N = 8). b. Interbody cage + dynamic plate (N = 8). c. Anchored spacer (N = 8). 3. After ventral plate removal of group 2a and 2b (N = 16). RESULTS: All fixation techniques decreased range of motion (ROM) and lax zone (LZ) (P < 0.05) in all test modes compared with the intact motion segment and cage-only group. There were no significant differences between the anchored spacer and cage + locking plate or cage + dynamic plate. CONCLUSION: The anchored spacer provided a similar biomechanical stability to that of the established anterior fusion technique using an anterior plate plus cage and has a potentially lower perioperative and postoperative morbidity. These results support progression to clinical trials using the cervical anchored spacer as a stand-alone implant.

Physiology and pathophysiology of cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops: theoretical and practical aspects.

A new theoretical framework is used to analyze functions and pathophysiological processes of cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops and to demonstrate the hierarchical relationships between various loops. All hierarchical levels are built according to the same functional principle: Each loop is a neural optimal control system (NOCS) and includes a model of object behavior and an error distribution system. The latter includes dopaminergic neurons and is necessary to tune the model to a controlled object (CO). The regularities of pathophysiological processes in NOCSs are analyzed. Mechanisms of current functional neurosurgical procedures like lesioning and deep brain stimulation (DBS) of various basal ganglia structures and neurotransplantation are described based on proposed theoretical ideas. Parkinson's disease (PD) is used to exemplify clinical applications of the proposed theory. Within the proposed theoretical framework, PD must be considered as a disease of the error distribution system. The proposed theoretical views have broad fundamental and clinical applications.