Applicability of probabilistic graphical models for early detection of SARS-CoV-2 reactive antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hematological patients.

Prior studies of antibody response after full SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hematological patients have confirmed lower antibody levels compared to the general population. Serological response in hematological patients varies widely according to the disease type and its status, and the treatment given and its timing with respect to vaccination. Through probabilistic machine learning graphical models, we estimated the conditional probabilities of having detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at 3-6 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a large cohort of patients with several hematological diseases (n= 1166). Most patients received mRNA-based vaccines (97%), mainly Moderna® mRNA-1273 (74%) followed by Pfizer-BioNTech® BNT162b2 (23%). The overall antibody detection rate at 3 to 6 weeks after full vaccination for the entire cohort was 79%. Variables such as type of disease, timing of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy, age, corticosteroids therapy, vaccine type, disease status, or prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 are among the most relevant conditions influencing SARS-CoV-2-IgG-reactive antibody detection. A lower probability of having detectable antibodies was observed in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies within 6 months before vaccination (29.32%), whereas the highest probability was observed in younger patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (99.53%). The Moderna® mRNA-1273 compound provided higher probabilities of antibody detection in all scenarios. This study depicts conditional probabilities of having detectable antibodies in the whole cohort and in specific scenarios such as B cell NHL, CLL, MM, and cMPN that may impact humoral responses. These results could be useful to focus on additional preventive and/or monitoring interventions in these highly immunosuppressed hematological patients.

Evaluation of Spanish Gaucher disease patients after a 6-month imiglucerase shortage.

Recently, an acute restriction of imiglucerase has occurred as a result of viral contamination and manufacturing problems. A position statement from the European Working Group for Gaucher Disease and European Gaucher Alliance established a set of key recommendations for identifying and monitoring at-risk patients. In Spain, a profile of the shortage situation was obtained through follow-up of patients with Gaucher disease (GD) and compliance with the therapy recommendations. Here we describe a group of patients, with modified doses of imiglucerase, during the shortage. Fifty adult GD1 patients (25 males/25 females), previously on ERT, were analysed before and after the 6-month shortage. The mean age was 45.3 ± 15.3 years (range: 18-84). The mean Severity Score Index at diagnosis was 8.7 ± 3.8 (range: 3-19); 20% of patients were splenectomized; and 78% had bone disease. During the shortage, 23 patients (46%) discontinued therapy; as complications in this group only one patient suffered a bone crisis and another anaemia (Hb <10.0 g/dL). The mean reduction of haemoglobin level (-2.7%) and platelet counts (-5.4%) were non-significant. Chitotriosidase (CT) activity was increased 135% (p<0.03) and CCL18/PARC 8.2% (p<0.08) in this group. Imiglucerase was reduced by 50% in 17 patients (34%) in this group, seven patients (41.0%) suffered bone pain, three of them true bone crisis and four (23.5%) required support therapy. The mean reduction of haemoglobin (-2.8%) and platelet counts (-10.7%), CT activity was increased 48.2% (p<0.03) and no changes were observed in CCL18/PARC concentration. In both groups no significant changes in visceral size were observed. In 3 patients (6%), imiglucerase was reduced 75% and 7 patients (14%) needed to switch to another ERT (4 patients) or miglustat (3 patients) due to a restart of symptomatic disease. In Spain the 6 first months shortage of imiglucerase have produced a 20% incidence of bone pain, one case of anaemia, and a significant increase in CT activity. Fourteen percent of patients had to switch to another therapy. No significant changes in blood counts, visceral volumes and CCL18/PARC concentration were observed.

Ciprofloxacin, but not levofloxacin, affects cyclosporine blood levels in a patient with pure red blood cell aplasia.

A 38-year-old man diagnosed with pure red blood cell aplasia was undergoing treatment with cyclosporine 200 mg/day. On day 41, the cyclosporine dose was increased to 250 mg/day. On day 45, the patient was hospitalized with fever, and ciprofloxacin 200 mg IV tid was begun. The level of cyclosporine was 297 ng/mL, which obliged us to reduce cyclosporine to 200 mg/day. On day 59, ciprofloxacin was discontinued. On day 80, the patient was hospitalized with fever, and levofloxacin 500 mg/d IV was begun. The patient was continued on cyclosporine 250 mg/day. On day 90, levofloxacin was discontinued. The cyclosporine dose-to-blood level ratio was maintained constant in subsequent controls. In this patient, the substantial and sustained increase in cyclosporine blood levels after ciprofloxacin was added to the patient's therapy and the decrease in cyclosporine blood levels after the withdrawal of ciprofloxacin suggest a potential interaction. Levofloxacin therapy could be a therapeutic alternative, although pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies should be conducted.