Detection and function of lipopolysaccharide and its purified lipid A after treatment with auxiliary chemical substances and calcium hydroxide dressings used in root canal treatment.

AIM: To investigate the influence of auxiliary chemical substances (ACSs) and calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2 ] dressings on lipopolysaccharides (LPS)/lipid A detection and its functional ability in activating Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). METHODOLOGY: Fusobacterium nucleatum pellets were exposed to antimicrobial agents as following: (i) ACS: 5.25%, 2.5% and 1% sodium hypochlorite solutions (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) (gel and solution) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); (ii) intracanal medicament: Ca(OH)2 paste for various periods (1 h, 24 h, 7 days, 14 days and 30 days); (iii) combination of substances: (a) 2.5% NaOCl (1 h), followed by 17% EDTA (3 min) and Ca(OH)2 (7 days); (b) 2% CHX (1 h), afterwards, 17% EDTA (3 min) followed by Ca(OH)2 (7 days). Saline solution was the control. Samples were submitted to LPS isolation and lipid A purification. Lipid A peaks were assessed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrom (MALDI-TOF MS) whilst LPS bands by SDS-PAGE separation and silver staining. TLR4 activation determined LPS function activities. Statistical comparisons were carried out using one-way anova with Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests at the 5% significance level. RESULTS: Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis of control lipid A demonstrated the ion cluster at mass/charge (m/z) 1882 and an intense band in SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining of control LPS. In parallel, LPS control induced a robust TLR4 activation when compared to ACS (P ≤ .001). 5.25% NaOCl treatment led to the absence of lipid A peaks and LPS bands, whilst no changes occurred to lipid A/LPS after treatment with others ACS. Concomitantly, 5.25% NaOCl-treated LPS did not activate TLR4 (P < .0001). As for Ca(OH)2 , lipid A was not detected by MALDI-TOF nor by gel electrophoresis within 24 h. LPS treated with Ca(OH)2 was a weak TLR4 activator (P < .0001). From 24 h onwards, no significant differences were found amongst the time periods tested (P > 0.05). The addition of Ca(OH)2 for 7 days to cells treated either with 2.5% NaOCl or 2% CHX led to the absence of lipid A peaks and LPS bands, leading to a lower activation of TLR4. CONCLUSION: 5.25% NaOCl and Ca(OH)2 dressings from 24 h onwards were able to induce both, loss of lipid A peaks and no detection of LPS bands, rendering a diminished immunostimulatory activity through TLR4.

Does the Reciproc file remove root canal bacteria and endotoxins as effectively as multifile rotary systems?

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of Reciproc for the removal of cultivable bacteria and endotoxins from root canals in comparison with multifile rotary systems. METHODOLOGY: The root canals of forty human single-rooted mandibular pre-molars were contaminated with an Escherichia coli suspension for 21 days and randomly assigned to four groups according to the instrumentation system: GI - Reciproc (VDW); GII - Mtwo (VDW); GIII - ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer); and GIV -FKG Race(™) (FKG Dentaire) (n = 10 per group). Bacterial and endotoxin samples were taken with a sterile/apyrogenic paper point before (s1) and after instrumentation (s2). Culture techniques determined the colony-forming units (CFU) and the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate assay was used for endotoxin quantification. Results were submitted to paired t-test and anova. RESULTS: At s1, bacteria and endotoxins were recovered in 100% of the root canals investigated (40/40). After instrumentation, all systems were associated with a highly significant reduction of the bacterial load and endotoxin levels, respectively: GI - Reciproc (99.34% and 91.69%); GII - Mtwo (99.86% and 83.11%); GIII - ProTaper (99.93% and 78.56%) and GIV - FKG Race(™) (99.99% and 82.52%) (P < 0.001). No statistical difference were found amongst the instrumentation systems regarding bacteria and endotoxin removal (P > 0.01). CONCLUSION: The reciprocating single file, Reciproc, was as effective as the multifile rotary systems for the removal of bacteria and endotoxins from root canals.