Nonphysician Evaluators and Recording-Based Tools in Surgical Skill Assessment: A Feasibility Study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of nonmedically trained evaluators and image- and video-based tools in the assessment of surgical skills in a key orthopedic procedure. DESIGN: Orthopedic surgeons at varying skill levels were evaluated by their ability to repair a cadaveric bi-malleolar ankle fracture. Nonphysician viewers and expert orthopedic surgeons independently scored video recordings and fluoroscopy images of the procedure through Global Rating Scales (GRS) and procedure-specific checklist tools. Statistical analysis was used to determine if the evaluators and assessment tools were able to differentiate skill level. SETTING: An academic tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The surgical procedure was completed by 3 orthopedic residents, 3 orthopedic trauma fellows, and 4 orthopedic trauma attending surgeons. The procedure was independently evaluated by 2 orthopedic surgeons and 2 nonphysicians. RESULTS: Operating participants were stratified by ≤ or >10 bimalleolar ankle fracture cases performed alone (inexperienced, n = 5 vs experienced, n = 5). Expert surgeon viewers could effectively stratify skill group through the GRS for video and fluoroscopy analysis (p < 0.05), and the video procedure-specific checklist (p < 0.05), but not the fluoroscopy procedure-specific checklist. Nonphysician viewers generally recognized skill groupings, although with less separation than surgeon viewers. These evaluators performed the best when aided by video and fluoroscopy procedure-specific checklists. Meanwhile, breakdowns of each tool into critical zones for improvement and evaluator-independent metrics such as case experience, self-reported confidence, and surgical time also indicated some skill differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of using video recordings and fluoroscopic imaging based surgical skills assessment tools in orthopedic trauma was demonstrated. The tools highlighted in this study are applicable to both cadaver laboratory settings and live surgeries. The degree of training that is required by the evaluators and the utility of measuring surgical times of specific tasks should be the subject of future studies.

Prolonged Opioid Use Is Associated With Poor Pain Alleviation After Orthopaedic Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Severe pain after orthopaedic surgery is common and often results in chronic postsurgical pain and chronic opioid use (COU). Poor pain alleviation (PPA) after surgery is a well-described modifiable risk factor of COU. Although PPA's role in inducing COU is recognized in other areas, it is not well defined in orthopaedic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of PPA on COU in the population who underwent orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: Medical records from a large academic medical center from 2015 to 2018 were available for analysis. Patients undergoing nononcologic surgical procedures by the orthopaedic surgery service that also required at least 24 hours of hospital stay for pain control were included in the study. Surgery type, body location, basic demographics, preoperative opioid use, comorbidities, medications administered in the hospital, opioid prescription after discharge, and length of stay were recorded. COU was defined as a continued opioid prescription at ≥ 3 months, ≥ 6 months, or ≥ 9 months after surgery. PPA was defined as having a recorded pain score of eight or more, between 4 and 12 hours apart, three times during the hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 7,001 patients were identified. The overall rate of COU was 25.3% at 3 months after surgery. Charlson Comorbidity Index > 0 and PPA were statistically significant predictors of opioid use at all time points. Preoperative opioid naivety was associated with decreased COU. The type and location of surgical procedures were not associated with COU, after controlling for baseline variables. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated an overall high rate of COU. The known risk factors of COU were evident in our study population, particularly the modifiable risk factor of acute postsurgical PPA. Better management of postsurgical pain in orthopaedic patients may lead to a decrease in the rates of COU in this group.

Identification of subtle residual sacroiliac joint flexion and extension malreductions in AO/OTA 61-C1.2 (APC3) pelvic injuries after provisional anterior ring reduction.

PURPOSE: Hemipelvis reduction in the setting of AO/OTA 61-C1.2 (APC3) pelvic injuries can be challenging. A common strategy is to provisionally reduce or fix the anterior ring prior to definitive fixation of the posterior ring. In this scenario, it is difficult to assess whether residual sacroiliac joint (SIJ) widening is due to hemipelvis flexion/extension or lateral displacement. This simulation sought to identify a radiographic marker for posterior ilium flexion or extension malreduction in the setting of a reduced anterior ring. METHODS: Symphyseal and both anterior and posterior SIJ ligaments were cut in 8 cadaveric pelvis. The symphysis was reduced and wired. One centimeter of posterior flexion or extension at the SIJ was created to mimic the clinical scenario of hemipelvis flexion or extension malreduction, and a lateral compressive force was applied. SIJ widening and the direction of anterior or posterior ileal displacement relative to the contralateral joint were assessed via inlet views. SIJ widening and the direction of cranial or caudal ileal displacement were assessed using outlet views. Comparisons between flexion and extension models used Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: On outlet views, all flexed hemipelvis demonstrated caudal ileal translation at the superior SIJ, in contrast to all extended hemipelvis demonstrated cranial translation (p < 0.0005); the scenarios were easily distinguishable. Conversely, inlet imaging was unable to identify the direction of malreduction. Flexion/extension scenarios resulted in similar amounts of SIJ widening. CONCLUSION: Residual flexion and extension hemipelvis malreductions in APC3 injuries after provisional anterior fixation can be differentiated by the direction of ileal displacement at the superior SIJ on the outlet view.

Fluoroscopic images of the sacroiliac joint alone are unable to identify simulated flexion or extension malreduction of the anterior pelvic ring in AO/OTA 61-B2.3 pelvic injuries.

PURPOSE: Reduction of AO/OTA 61-B2.3 (APC2) pelvic fractures is challenging in the setting of anterior ring comminution. The anterior ring is visually much simpler to evaluate for flexion or extension hemipelvis deformity than the posterior ring, except in the setting of comminution, necessitating some other visual reference to judge hemipelvis reduction. We sought to test whether pelvic inlet and outlet fluoroscopy of the contours of the sacroiliac joint could be used in isolation to judge hemipelvis flexion or extension. METHODS: Symphyseal and anterior SIJ ligaments were cut (6 cadaveric pelvis). The symphysis was held malreduced to produce one centimeter flexion and extension deformity: 1 cm was selected to mimic a maximum clinical scenario. The SIJ was assessed using inlet and outlet fluoroscopy. The scaled width of the SIJ was assessed at the joint apertures and midjoint on both inlet and outlet views. Joint widths in flexion and extension were compared against joint widths measured on the reduced SIJ using paired t-tests. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the superior (p = 0.227, 0.675), middle (p = 0.203, 0.693), and inferior (p = 0.232, 0.961) SIJ widths between hemipelvis flexion or extension models against reduced SIJ on outlet views. There was no statistical difference in the anterior (p = 0.731, 0.662), middle (p = 0.257, 0.655), and posterior (p = 0.657, 0.363) SIJ widths between flexion or extension models against reduced SIJ on inlet views. CONCLUSION: Inspection of SIJ width on inlet and outlet fluoroscopy cannot detect up to one centimeter of hemipelvis flexion or extension malreduction in the setting of AO/OTA 61-B2.3 (APC2) pelvic fractures with complex anterior injuries.

Inpatient pain alleviation after orthopaedic trauma surgery-are we doing a good job?

PURPOSE: Poor pain alleviation (PPA) after orthopaedic surgery is known to increase recovery time, readmissions, patient dissatisfaction, and lead to chronic postsurgical pain. This study's goal was to identify the magnitude of PPA and its risk factors in the orthopaedic trauma patient population. METHODS: A single-institution's electronic medical records from 2015 to 2018 were available for retrospective analysis. Inclusion criteria included orthopaedic fracture surgery patients admitted to the hospital for 24 h or more. Collected variables included surgery type, basic demographics, comorbidities, inpatient medications, pain scores, and length of stay. PPA was defined as a pain score of ≥ 8 on at least three occasions 4-12 h apart. Associations between collected variables and PPA were derived using a multivariable logistic regression model and expressed in adjusted odds ratios. RESULTS: A total of 1663 patients underwent fracture surgeries from 2015 to 2018, and 25% of them reported PPA. Female sex, previous use of narcotics, increased ASA, increased baseline pain score, and younger age without comorbidities were identified as significant risk factors for PPA. Spine procedures were associated with increased risk of PPA, while procedures in the hip, shoulder, and knee had reduced risk. Patients experiencing PPA were less likely to receive NSAIDs compared to other pain medications. CONCLUSIONS: This study found an unacceptably high rate of PPA after fracture surgery. While the identified risk factors for PPA were all non-modifiable, our results highlight the necessity to improve application of current multimodal approaches to pain alleviation including a more personalized approach to pain alleviation.

Wearable activity data can predict functional recovery after musculoskeletal injury: Feasibility of a machine learning approach.

Delayed functional recovery after injury is associated with significant personal and socioeconomic burden. Identification of patients at risk for a prolonged recovery after a musculoskeletal injury is thus of high relevance. The aim of the current study was to show the feasibility of using a machine learning assisted model to predict functional recovery based on the pre- and immediate post injury patient activity as measured with wearable systems in trauma patients. Patients with a pre-existing wearable (smartphone and/or body-worn sensor), data availability of at least 7 days prior to their injury, and any musculoskeletal injury of the upper or lower extremity were included in this study. Patient age, sex, injured extremity, time off work and step count as activity data were recorded continuously both pre- and post-injury. Descriptive statistics were performed and a logistic regression machine learning model was used to predict the patient's functional recovery status after 6 weeks based on their pre- and post-injury activity characteristics. Overall 38 patients (7 upper extremity, 24 lower extremity, 5 pelvis, 2 combined) were included in this proof-of-concept study. The average follow-up with available wearable data was 85.4 days. Based on the activity data, a predictive model was constructed to determine the likelihood of having a recovery of at least 50 % of the pre-injury activity state by post injury week 6. Based on the individual activity by week 3 a predictive accuracy of over 80 % was achieved on an independent test set (F1=0,82; AUC=0,86; ACC=8,83). The employed model is feasible to assess the principal risk for a slower recovery based on readily available personal wearable activity data. The model has the potential to identify patients requiring additional aftercare attention early during the treatment course, thus optimizing return to the pre-injury status through focused interventions. Additional patient data is needed to adapt the model to more specifically focus on different fracture entities and patient groups.

Physiologic Motion in the Intact and Unstable Syndesmosis During Plantigrade Weightbearing in Controlled Ankle Motion Boots.

Consensus has not been reached for the optimal postoperative care after high ankle sprain and syndesmotic fixation. A potential drawback of earlier return to activity is greater instability of the ankle and fixation failure. The controlled ankle motion (CAM) boot has been an effective implementation to stabilize the leg and may aid in safe early weightbearing status. However, there is insufficient study of its effect on motion in the syndesmosis following injury. Hence, the aim of this cadaveric study was to determine the stability of the ankle with a CAM boot at 3 levels of injury: syndesmosis ligaments intact (no injury), syndesmosis ligaments cut, and syndesmosis and fibula cut. Six cadaveric legs were subjected to each level of injury and axially loaded at 1 Hz between 100 N-1.5 times body weight for 50 seconds, and axial force, axial displacement, and optical tracking data were recorded. It was found that the ankle, when protected by the CAM boot, maintained syndesmosis motion with no difference (p > .05) from the uninjured state, regardless of syndesmotic ligament and fibular injury. This finding was consistent across anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and superior-inferior axes. Overall, our study may suggest that early weightbearing with a CAM boot maintains a physiologically range of motion in the syndesmosis.

The Importance of Pragmatic Study Design to the Scholarly Influence of Surgical Hip Fracture Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Surgical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have potential drawbacks, leading some to question their role in filling the information gap in orthopaedic surgery. Pragmatism in study design was introduced to increase the clinical applicability of study results. The purpose of this study was to examine how pragmatism affects the scholarly influence of surgical RCTs. METHODS: A search for surgical hip fracture-related RCTs published between 1995 and 2015 was done. Journal impact factor, citation number, research question, significance and type of outcome, number of centers involved, and the Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 level of pragmatism score were recorded for each study. Scholarly influence was estimated by a study's inclusion into orthopaedic literature or guidelines or through the study's average yearly citation rate. RESULTS: One hundred sixty RCTs were included in the final analysis. A multivariate logistic regression identified large study sample size as the only predictor of an RCT being used in clinical guidance texts. Large sample size and multicenter RCTs were predictors of high yearly citation rates. The level of pragmatism in study design did not predict scholarly influence. CONCLUSIONS: Pragmatic design is not independently associated with increased scholarly influence; however, large study sample size was the most important study characteristic affecting scholarly influence.

"Bring Your Own Device"-A New Approach to Wearable Outcome Assessment in Trauma.

Background and Objectives: Outcome data from wearable devices are increasingly used in both research and clinics. Traditionally, a dedicated device is chosen for a given study or clinical application to collect outcome data as soon as the patient is included in a study or undergoes a procedure. The current study introduces a new measurement strategy, whereby patients' own devices are utilized, allowing for both a pre-injury baseline measure and ability to show achievable results. Materials and Methods: Patients with a pre-existing musculoskeletal injury of the upper and lower extremity were included in this exploratory, proof-of-concept study. They were followed up for a minimum of 6 weeks after injury, and their wearable outcome data (from a smartphone and/or a body-worn sensor) were continuously acquired during this period. A descriptive analysis of the screening characteristics and the observed and achievable outcome patterns was performed. Results: A total of 432 patients was continuously screened for the study, and their screening was analyzed. The highest success rate for successful inclusion was in younger patients. Forty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The most prevalent outcome was step count. Three distinctive activity data patterns were observed: patients recovering, patients with slow or no recovery, and patients needing additional measures to determine treatment outcomes. Conclusions: Measuring outcomes in trauma patients with the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) strategy is feasible. With this approach, patients were able to provide continuous activity data without any dedicated equipment given to them. The measurement technique is especially suited to particular patient groups. Our study's screening log and inclusion characteristics can help inform future studies wishing to employ the BYOD design.

Complex Orthopaedic Trauma Is Shifting Away From Level I to Non-Level I Trauma Centers: An Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.

INTRODUCTION: An increasing number of fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons are working in non-Level I centers. This study aimed to examine trends of management of complex orthopaedic trauma in Level I centers versus non-Level I centers and its potential effect on patient outcomes. METHODS: Data from the National Trauma Data Bank from 2008 to 2017 were analyzed. Non-Level I to Level I center ratios for complex fractures and complication rates, median hours to procedure for time-sensitive fractures, and uninsured/underinsured rates of Level I and non-Level I centers were recorded. RESULTS: Three hundred one thousand patients were included. A statistically significant downward trend was identified in the percent of all complex orthopaedic trauma at Level I centers and per-hospital likelihood of seeing a complex orthopaedic fracture in a Level I versus non-Level I hospital. Per-hospital complication rates were consistently lower in non-Level I hospitals after controlling for injury severity and payer mix. Time-sensitive fractures were treated earlier in non-Level I centers. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates a reduction of complex trauma treatment in Level I centers that did not translate to adverse effects on patient outcomes. Policymakers should notice this trend to ensure the continued quality of orthopaedic trauma training and maintenance of expertise in complex fracture management.

Frailty and comorbidity predict 30 day postoperative outcomes, independent of anatomical site of fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Fragility fractures are a major threat to geriatric patients. However, it is unclear whether this patient population's inherent frailty and comorbidity or the physiologic insult caused by the fracture and its surgery contribute more to undesirable patient outcomes. Hence, this study examines if frailty and comorbidity can predict 30 day postoperative outcomes while the effects of multiple fracture sites are accounted for. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients ≥ 65 years of age in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent surgical treatment between 2013 and 2017 was performed. A total of 52,497 patients were included in the final analysis, including fracture cases of the extremities, limbs, and hip. Demographics, several metrics of preoperative health, temporal variables, and fracture location were tested in bivariate analysis of 30 day postoperative mortality, length of stay in hospital, discharge outcome, and complications. Significant variables were considered for multivariate logistic regression models for each outcome. RESULTS: Frailty, comorbidity, and time to surgery were found to be the significant predictors in multivariate analysis of each 30 day postoperative outcome, independent of the effects of fracture site (p < 0.05). Examination of 30 day mortality found that American Society of Anesthesiologists Class ≥ 3 (2.30 Odds Ratio), modified Frailty Index > 0 (1.37 OR), Charleston Comorbidity Index ≥ 6 (1.63 OR), and time to surgery (1.45 OR) were especially important (all p < 0.05). Additionally, the worst outcomes were associated with fractures of the pelvis/hip and femur/knee, including 30 day mortality (5.90 and 5.12 OR, respectively; both p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The effects of the preoperative health were found to be independent of patient demographics and fracture site. Additionally, specific high-risk fracture sites are significant predictors of outcome, supporting the need to prioritize these patients. Clinical care pathways for geriatric patients may benefit from emphasis on these high-risk fractures and preoperative patient health.

Comparison of fibula strut and calcium phosphate cement augmentation of the medial buttress in 2-part proximal humerus fractures reconstruction: a biomechanical study.

PURPOSE: Augmentation strategies for surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are available to address their relatively high failure rate. The purpose of this study was to compare two medial-buttress augmentation strategies for PHF fixation. METHODS: A two-part PHF model with loss of medial buttress was created in 16 synthetic bones. The PHFs were fixed with locking plates and either calcium phosphate cement (CPC) or fibula strut (FS) augmentation. After cadaveric validations, the fixation constructs were subjected to nondestructive axial compression tests, followed by a cyclic test. Construct stiffness and angular displacement of the humerus head were recorded. RESULTS: Humeral head angular displacement was statistically greater in the CPC group than in the FS group at the applied force of 300 N and higher (p < 0.05). Axial stiffness was statistically greater in the FS fixation group than in the CPC group at initial and final phases of cyclic loading protocol (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In an osteoporotic cadaveric model of a 2-part PHF with loss of a medial buttress, locked plate constructs augmented with FS have a higher resistance to varus collapse compared to those augmented with CPC.

Usage of orthopaedic trauma registries among members of the International Orthopaedic Trauma Association: How are we doing?

Introduction: The use of national databases for orthopaedic research has increased significantly in the past decade. The purpose of this study was to report on the current state of orthopaedic trauma registries in 21 countries represented by 20 member societies of the International Orthopaedic Trauma Association (IOTA). Methods: A web-based survey was circulated to all IOTA member societies. The survey consisted of 10 questions (five open-ended and five multiple-choice). Results: Representatives from all 21 countries replied. Five countries (24%) do not currently have or plan to start a registry. One country (5%) had a registry that is now closed. Two countries (10%) are building a registry. Thirteen countries (62%) reported at least one active registry, including four countries with more than one registry. Of the 14 countries that reported the existence of a registry, there were 17 registries noted that included patients with fracture. There were seven registries dedicated to high-energy trauma and four registries that included elderly hip fractures. In addition, 9/17 representatives reported the utilization of a fracture classification and 9/17 noted some level of mandate from medical providers. All responders but one reported that data were manually entered into their registries. Conclusions: Despite the shared vision of quality control and outcome optimization, IOTA society representatives reported significant variability in the depth and format of the orthopaedic trauma registry among IOTA members. These findings represent an opportunity for collaboration across organizations in creating fracture registries. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Comparison of the Neer classification to the 2018 update of the Orthopedic Trauma Association/AO fracture classification for classifying proximal humerus fractures.

Background: The classification of fractures is necessary to ensure a reliable means of communication for clinical interaction, education and research. The Neer classification is the most commonly used classification for proximal humerus fractures. In 2018 the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) and the AO Foundation provided an update to the OTA/AO Fracture Classification Scheme addressing many of the concerns about the previous versions of the classification. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the rater reliability of the 2 classifications and if the classifications subjectively better characterized the fracture patterns. Methods: X-rays and CT scans of 24 proximal humerus fractures were given to 7 independent raters for classification according to the Neer and 2018 OTA/AO classification. Both full-forms and short-forms of the classifications were tested. The Fleiss Kappa statistic was used to assess inter-rater agreement and intra-rater consistency for the 2 classifications. For each case the raters subjectively commented on how well each classification was able to characterize the fracture pattern. Results: All raters graded the 2018 OTA/AO classification as good as or better than the Neer classification for an adequate description of the fracture patterns. The short-form 2018 OTA/AO classification had the most 4 rater and 5 rater agreement cases and the second most 6 rater agreement cases. The short-form Neer classification had the second most 4 rater and 5 rater agreement cases and the most 6 rater agreement cases. The full 2018 OTA/AO had the least 4, 5, or 6 rater agreement cases of all the classification systems. Inter-rater agreement was fair for the full and short form of both the Neer and 2018 OTA/AO classification. The full and short Neer classifications together with the short 2018 OTA/AO classification had moderate intra-rater consistency, while the full 2018 OTA/AO classification only had slight intra-rater consistency. Conclusions: The 2018 OTA/AO classification is equivalent in its short-form to the Neer classification in inter-rater reliability and intra-rater consistency; and is superior in its full form for characterizing specific fracture types. The low inter-rater reliability of the full 2018 OTA/AO classification is a concern that may need to be addressed in the future.

Wireless Measurements Using Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy to Monitor Fracture Healing.

There is an unmet need for improved, clinically relevant methods to longitudinally quantify bone healing during fracture care. Here we develop a smart bone plate to wirelessly monitor healing utilizing electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to provide real-time data on tissue composition within the fracture callus. To validate our technology, we created a 1-mm rabbit tibial defect and fixed the bone with a standard veterinary plate modified with a custom-designed housing that included two impedance sensors capable of wireless transmission. Impedance magnitude and phase measurements were transmitted every 48 h for up to 10 weeks. Bone healing was assessed by X-ray, µCT, and histology. Our results indicated the sensors successfully incorporated into the fracture callus and did not impede repair. Electrical impedance, resistance, and reactance increased steadily from weeks 3 to 7-corresponding to the transition from hematoma to cartilage to bone within the fracture gap-then plateaued as the bone began to consolidate. These three electrical readings significantly correlated with traditional measurements of bone healing and successfully distinguished between union and not-healed fractures, with the strongest relationship found with impedance magnitude. These results suggest that our EIS smart bone plate can provide continuous and highly sensitive quantitative tissue measurements throughout the course of fracture healing to better guide personalized clinical care.

Use of Wearable Technology to Measure Activity in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review.

Background: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are widely used for measurement of functional outcomes after orthopaedic trauma. However, PROMs rely on patient collaboration and suffer from various types of bias. Wearable Activity Monitors (WAMs) are increasingly used to objectify functional assessment. The objectives of this systematic review were to identify and characterise the WAMs technology and metrics currently used for orthopaedic trauma research. Methods: PubMed and Embase biomedical literature search engines were queried. Eligibility criteria included: Human clinical studies published in the English language between 2010 and 2019 involving fracture management and WAMs. Variables collected from each article included: Technology used, vendor/product, WAM body location, metrics measured, measurement time period, year of publication, study geographic location, phase of treatment studied, fractures studied, number of patients studied, sex and age of the study subjects, and study level of evidence. Six investigators reviewed the resulting papers. Descriptive statistics of variables of interest were used to analyse the data. Results: One hundred and thirty-six papers were available for analysis, showing an increasing trend of publications per year. Accelerometry followed by plantar pressure insoles were the most commonly employed technologies. The most common location for WAM placement was insoles, followed by the waist. The most commonly studied fracture type was hip fractures followed by fragility fractures in general, ankle, "lower extremity", and tibial fractures. The rehabilitation phase following surgery was the most commonly studied period. Sleep duration, activity time or step counts were the most commonly reported WAM metrics. A preferred, clinically validated WAM metric was not identified. Conclusions: WAMs have an increasing presence in the orthopaedic trauma literature. The optimal implementation of this technology and its use to understand patients' pre-injury and post-injury functions is currently insufficiently explored and represents an area that will benefit from future study. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO ID:210344. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00629-0.

Adaptation of the Centers for Disease Control Surgical Wound Classification System for Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a proposed orthopaedic-specific surgical wound classification system (SWCS) and the current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) system in a series of detailed clinical vignettes and to identify the degree of satisfaction with CDC SWCS and desire for institution of an orthopaedic-specific SWCS. METHODS: Forty-five clinical vignettes and a 5-question survey were distributed to current and past members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's Classification Committee. Respondents were asked to provide wound class for each vignette using the CDC system and orthopaedic-specific SWCS. RESULTS: The orthopaedic-specific and CDC SWCS had interclass correlations of 0.95 and 0.91, respectively. When the systems were compared, in 34% of cases, there was no grade change; in 63% of cases, the wound was graded higher using the orthopaedic-specific SWCS. When only the procedure was changed between vignettes, wound classification was infrequently affected. There was near universal dissatisfaction with the CDC SWCS and desire for an orthopaedic-specific system. CONCLUSIONS: Both the CDC SWCS and orthopaedic-specific SWCS have excellent interobserver reliability. Incorporation of orthopaedic-specific language affects wound classification. There is low satisfaction with the current CDC SWCS and a desire exists for further development and validation of an orthopaedic-specific SWCS.

Wearable technology in orthopedic trauma surgery - An AO trauma survey and review of current and future applications.

The use of wearable sensors to track activity is increasing. Therefore, a survey among AO Trauma members was conducted to provide an overview of their current utilization and determine future needs and directions. A cross sectional expert opinion survey was administered to members of AO Trauma. Respondents were surveyed concerning their experience, subspeciality, current use characteristics, as well as future needs concerning wearable technology. Three hundred and thirty-three survey sets were available for analysis (Response Rate 16.2%). 20.7% of respondents already use wearable technology as part of their clinical treatment. The most prevalent technology was accelerometry combined with smartphones (75.4%) to measure general patient activity. To facilitate the use of wearable technology in the future, the most pressing issues were cost, patient compliance and validity of results. Wearable activity monitors are currently being used in trauma surgery. Surgeons employing these technologies mostly measure simple activity or activity associated parameters. Cost was the greatest perceived barrier to implementation. Further research, especially concerning the interpretation of the outcome values obtained, is required to facilitate wearable activity monitoring as an objective patient outcome measurement tool.

Extracorporeal measurement of femoral nail length in the treatment of trochanteric hip fractures: the "box" technique.

Intramedullary nails, long and short, are widely used for fixation of trochanteric femur fractures. In theory, long nails may be able to protect the entire length of the femur from a future periprosthetic fracture, providing that the nail spans the length of the entire femoral canal. The described technique for long nail insertion calls for the use of an intramedullary guidewire and depth gauge for premeasurement of the length of the canal, as well as the use of a reamer. However, compared with short nails, this technique may add cost, operating time, and blood loss. We describe a safe technique for long nail measurement that reliably spans the length of the femur while potentially reducing surgical cost, time, and blood loss. We also describe 21 cases in which the technique was applied.