Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Nephrol ; 20(1): 72, 2019 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30823871

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Electronic health record (EHR) based chronic kidney disease (CKD) registries are central to population health strategies to improve CKD care. In 2015, Partners Healthcare System (PHS), encompassing multiple academic and community hospitals and outpatient care facilities in Massachusetts, developed an EHR-based CKD registry to identify opportunities for quality improvement, defined as improvement on both process measures and outcomes measures associated with clinical care. METHODS: Patients are included in the registry based on the following criteria: 1) two estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) results < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 separated by 90 days, including the most recent eGFR being < 60 ml/min/1.73m2; or 2) the most recent two urine protein values > 300 mg protein/g creatinine on either urine total protein/creatinine ratio or urine albumin/creatinine ratio; or 3) an EHR problem list diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD). The registry categorizes patients by CKD stage and includes rates of annual testing for eGFR and proteinuria, blood pressure control, use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), nephrotoxic medication use, hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunization, vascular access placement, transplant status, CKD progression risk; number of outpatient nephrology visits, and hospitalizations. RESULTS: The CKD registry includes 60,503 patients and has revealed several opportunities for care improvement including 1) annual proteinuria testing performed for 17% (stage 3) and 31% (stage 4) of patients; 2) ACE-I/ARB used in 41% (stage 3) and 46% (stage 4) of patients; 3) nephrotoxic medications used among 23% of stage 4 patients; and 4) 89% of stage 4 patients lack HBV immunity. For advanced CKD patients there are opportunities to improve vascular access placement, transplant referrals and outpatient nephrology contact. CONCLUSIONS: A CKD registry can identify modifiable care gaps across the spectrum of CKD care and enable population health strategy implementation. No linkage to Social Security Death Master File or US Renal Data System (USRDS) databases limits our ability to track mortality and progression to ESRD.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Idoso , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal/métodos , Testes de Função Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidade do Paciente , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão da Saúde da População , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA