Primary clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori: the Multicentric Italian Clarithromycin Resistance Observational (MICRO) study.

BACKGROUND: Primary clarithromycin resistance markedly reduces Helicobacter pylori eradication rate following standard therapies. Prevalence of primary clarithromycin resistance in H. pylori is increasing, and three point mutations are mainly involved. AIM. To assess both the prevalence of primary clarithromycin resistance in Italy, and the distribution of the involved point mutations. METHODS: Primary clarithromycin resistance was assessed by TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction on antral biopsies of 253 consecutive, H. pylori infected patients enrolled in 13 Italian centres between January and September 2010. RESULTS: Primary clarithromycin resistance was detected in 25 (9.9%) patients, with prevalence values widely ranging from 0 to 25%. Clarithromycin resistance rate was higher in female as compared to male patients (13.4% vs. 5.3%, p=0.03), and it tended to be higher in non-ulcer dyspepsia than in peptic ulcer patients (10.6% vs. 6.9%, p=0.5), female patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia showing the highest value (15.4%). The A2143G point mutation was detected in 13 (52.0%) patients, the A2142G in 9 (34.6%), whilst a double point mutation (A2143G plus A2142G) in 3 (11.6%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: Primary clarithromycin resistance is highly variable in different Italian geographic areas. High resistance rates were observed in female and in dyspeptic patients. Among the three point mutations of clarithromycin resistance, the A2143G remains the most frequently observed.

Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions.

BACKGROUND: Adequate bowel cleansing is essential for a high-quality, effective, and safe colonoscopy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the degree of colon cleansing comparing split-dosage versus non-split-dosage intake of two different polyethylene glycol (PEG) volumes (low-volume PEG + ascorbic acid vs standard-volume PEG-electrolyte solution) and to identify predictors of poor bowel cleansing. DESIGN: Single-blind, active control, randomized study. SETTING: Tertiary-care institutions in Italy. PATIENTS: This study involved adult patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. INTERVENTION: Colonoscopy with different bowel preparation methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Degree of bowel cleansing. RESULTS: We randomized 895 patients, and 868 patients were finally included in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Overall compliance was excellent (97%) for both preparation methods. No difference in tolerability was recorded. Palatability was superior with low volume compared with high volume (acceptable or good 58% vs 51%, respectively, P < .005), independently of intake schedule. PEG plus ascorbic acid produced the same degree of cleansing as standard-volume PEG-electrolyte solution (77% vs 73.4%, respectively, within the split-dosage group and 41.7% vs 44.3%, respectively, within the non-split-dosage group). Independently of PEG volumes, the split-dosage regimen produced markedly superior cleansing results over the same-day method (good/excellent 327/435, 75.2% vs 186/433, 43.0%, P = .00001). Maximum cleansing was observed in colonoscopies performed within 8 hours from the last fluid intake versus over 8 hours from the last fluid intake (P < .001). The degree of bowel cleansing affected both cecal intubation (failed intubation 11.7% with fair/poor preparation vs 1.2% with good/excellent preparation, P = .00001) and polyp detection rates (12.2% with fair/poor vs 24.6% with good/excellent preparation, P = .001). Aborted procedures were significantly more frequent in the non-split-dosage arm (21.2% vs 6.9%, odds ratio [OR] 3.60 [2.29-5.77], P < .0001). Independent predictors of poor bowel cleansing were male sex (OR 1.45 [1.08-1.96], P = .014) and a non-split-dosage bowel preparation schedule (OR 2.08 [1.89-2.37], P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid is as effective as high-volume PEG-electrolyte solution but has superior palatability. A split-dosage schedule is the most effective bowel cleansing method. Colonoscopy should be performed within 8 hours of the last fluid intake.