Relationship between peripheral and intracoronary blood flow in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries.

Background: Coronary vasomotor dysfunction, an important underlying cause of angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA), encompassing coronary vasospasm, coronary endothelial dysfunction and/or coronary microvascular dysfunction, is clinically assessed by invasive coronary function testing (ICFT). As ICFT imposes a high burden on patients and carries risks, developing non-invasive alternatives is important. We evaluated whether coronary vasomotor dysfunction is a component of systemic microvascular endothelial and smooth muscle dysfunction, and can be detected using laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA). Methods: Forty-three consecutive ANOCA patients underwent ICFT, with intracoronary acetylcholine, adenosine, and flow measurements, to assess coronary vasomotor dysfunction. Cutaneous microvascular function was assessed using LASCA, combined with vasodilators acetylcholine, sodium-nitroprusside and insulin and using EndoPAT, by measuring the reactive hyperemia index (RHI). Results: Of the 43 included ANOCA patients (79% women, 59±9 years), 38 patients had coronary vasomotor dysfunction, including 28 with coronary vasospasm, 26 with coronary endothelial dysfunction and 18 with coronary microvascular dysfunction, with overlapping endotypes. Patients with and without coronary vasomotor dysfunction had similar peripheral flow responses to acetylcholine, insulin, and RHI. In contrast, coronary vasomotor dysfunction was associated with lower peripheral flow responses to sodium-nitroprusside (p<0.001). An absolute flow response to sodium-nitroprusside of 83.95APU resulted in 86.1% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity for coronary vasomotor dysfunction (area under the ROC curve: 0.883; p=0.006). Conclusions: This study provides evidence of a systemic vascular smooth muscle dysfunction in ANOCA patients with coronary vasomotor dysfunction, and diagnostic value of peripheral microvascular function testing as non-invasive tool for detecting coronary vasomotor dysfunction.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of Intracoronary Acetylcholine Infusion and Acetylcholine Bolus Injection Protocols During Invasive Coronary Function Testing.

Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) and coronary artery spasm (CAS) are causes of angina with no obstructive coronary arteries in patients. Both can be diagnosed by invasive coronary function testing (ICFT) using acetylcholine (ACh). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of a 3-minute ACh infusion as compared with a 1-minute ACh bolus injection protocol in testing CED and CAS. We evaluated 220 consecutive patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries who underwent ICFT using continuous Doppler flow measurements. Per protocol, 110 patients were tested using 3-minute infusion, and thereafter 110 patients using 1-minute bolus injections, because of a protocol change. CED was defined as a <50% increase in coronary blood flow or any epicardial vasoconstriction in reaction to low-dose ACh and CAS according to the Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS) criteria, both with and without T-wave abnormalities, in reaction to high dose ACh. The prevalence of CED was equal in both protocols (78% vs 79%, p = 0.869). Regarding the endotypes of CAS according to COVADIS, the equivocal endotype was diagnosed less often in the 3 vs 1-minute protocol (24% vs 44%, p = 0.004). Including T-wave abnormalities in the COVADIS criteria resulted in a similar diagnostic yield of both protocols. Hemodynamic changes from baseline to the low or high ACh doses were comparable between the protocols for each endotype. In conclusion, ICFT using 3-minute infusion or 1-minute bolus injections of ACh showed a similar diagnostic yield of CED. When using the COVADIS criteria, a difference in the equivocal diagnosis was observed. Including T-wave abnormalities as a diagnostic criterion reclassified equivocal test results into CAS and decreased this difference. For clinical practice, we recommend the inclusion of T-wave abnormalities as a diagnostic criterion for CAS and the 1-minute bolus protocol for practicality.

Post-spastic flow recovery time to document vasospasm induced ischemia during acetylcholine provocation testing.

Background: Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation is an established method for diagnosing epicardial and microvascular vasospasm in contemporary clinical practice. We hypothesize that ACh-induced vasospasm is followed by post-spastic reactive hyperemia (PSRH), which is measured as an increased flow-recovery time. Objectives: To assess flow-recovery time, indicative of ischemia, among the diagnostic endotypes that follow ACh provocation testing. Methods: Patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease on angiography who underwent ACh provocation testing were included in this analysis. Doppler flow was continuously measured during the procedure and used to determine the flow-recovery time, which was calculated as time between cessation of ACh infusion and the point of flow recovery. Results: Conventional provocation testing according to the COVADIS criteria diagnosed vasospasm in 63%(77/123), an equivocal result in 22%(27/123) and a negative result in 15%(19/123) of patients. In reaction to the highest-dose of ACh, flow-recovery time was significantly extended and similar in the epicardial, microvascular and equivocal test results compared to the negative result (all p < 0.001) indicative of PSRH. Conclusion: Flow-recovery time in patients with an equivocal result is similar to patients with vasospasm, which indicates the occurrence of myocardial ischemia and therefore, these patients may benefit from medical treatment.

Haemodynamic characterisation of different endotypes in coronary artery vasospasm in reaction to acetylcholine.

BACKGROUND: Vasoreactivity testing with high-dose acetylcholine is considered vasospasm provocation and low-dose as endothelial function testing. AIMS: To assess the changes in reaction to low- and high-dose acetylcholine in the endotypes of CAS as defined by the Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS) working group. METHODS: Changes in coronary epicardial diameter, coronary blood flow (CBF) and vascular resistance were determined at low-dose acetylcholine. RESULTS: A total of 88 ANOCA patients were included in this analysis. In the negative group (n = 14) incremental infusion of acetylcholine produced a progressive increase in CBF (p = 0.008). In reaction to low-dose acetylcholine, the epicardial vasospasm group (n = 30) is characterised by epicardial vasoconstriction that is significantly more severe compared to the microvascular vasospasm group (p = 0.004)(n = 23). The equivocal group (n = 21) is characterised by an increase in CBF and reduction in vascular resistance that are both significantly different compared to the epicardial vasospasm group (p = 0.036 and p = 0.007, respectively). High-dose acetylcholine decreased epicardial diameter and CBF significantly in the epicardial vasospasm, microvascular vasospasm and in the equivocal group (all p < 0.05. Vascular resistance increased significantly in the epicardial vasospasm group (p < 0.001) and equivocal group (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: In reaction to low-dose acetylcholine the negative and equivocal endotype has haemodynamic changes that suggest intact endothelium. In reaction to high-dose acetylcholine the epicardial vasospasm, microvascular vasospasm and equivocal endotype have hemodynamic changes that suggest VSMC-hyperreactivity. These results suggest that the equivocal endotype is a positive test comparable to microvascular vasospasm in the presence of normal endothelial function.

Presence of Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction, Coronary Vasospasm, and Adenosine-Mediated Vasodilatory Disorders in Patients With Ischemia and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.

BACKGROUND: Coronary function testing in patients with ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) commonly includes assessment of adenosine-mediated vasodilation and acetylcholine spasm provocation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of additional endothelial function testing for the diagnosis of vasomotor dysfunction in patients with INOCA. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with INOCA who underwent clinically indicated comprehensive coronary function testing. Endothelial dysfunction was defined as a <50% increase in coronary blood flow, determined by Doppler flow, and/or epicardial vasoconstriction compared to baseline, in response to low-dose acetylcholine. Coronary artery spasm (CAS) was defined as vasospastic angina or microvascular angina in response to coronary high-dose acetylcholine. An impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation was defined as a coronary flow reserve <2.5 and/or hyperemic microvascular resistance ≥2.5. RESULTS: Among all 110 patients, 79% had endothelial dysfunction, 62% had CAS, and 29% had an impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation. Endothelial dysfunction was present in 80% of patients who tested positively for CAS and/or an impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation. Endothelial function testing increases the diagnostic yield of coronary function testing that only incorporates adenosine testing and spasm provocation by 17% to 92%. Of patients with normal adenosine-mediated vasodilation and no inducible CAS, 68% had endothelial dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant endothelial dysfunction was prevalent in the vast majority of patients with INOCA with inducible CAS and/or an impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation. In patients with INOCA without inducible CAS and normal adenosine-mediated vasodilation, two-thirds had endothelial dysfunction. These results indicate the relevance to perform endothelial function testing in patients with INOCA in view of its therapeutic implication.

Individual Lesion-Level Meta-Analysis Comparing Various Doses of Intracoronary Bolus Injection of Adenosine With Intravenous Administration of Adenosine for Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous infusion of adenosine is considered standard practice for fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment but is associated with adverse side-effects and is time-consuming. Intracoronary bolus injection of adenosine is better tolerated by patients, cheaper, and less time-consuming. However, current literature remains fragmented and modestly sized regarding the equivalence of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine. We aim to investigate the relationship between intracoronary adenosine and intravenous adenosine to determine FFR. METHODS: We performed a lesion-level meta-analysis to compare intracoronary adenosine with intravenous adenosine (140 µg/kg per minute) for FFR assessment. The search was conducted in accordance to the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. Lesion-level data were obtained by contacting the respective authors or by digitization of scatterplots using custom-made software. Intracoronary adenosine dose was defined as; low: <40 µg, intermediate: 40 to 99 µg, and high: ≥100 µg. RESULTS: We collected 1972 FFR measurements (1413 lesions) comparing intracoronary with intravenous adenosine from 16 studies. There was a strong correlation (correlation coefficient =0.915; P<0.001) between intracoronary-FFR and intravenous-FFR. Mean FFR was 0.81±0.11 for intracoronary adenosine and 0.81±0.11 for intravenous adenosine (P<0.001). We documented a nonclinically relevant mean difference of 0.006 (limits of agreement: -0.066 to 0.078) between the methods. When stratified by the intracoronary adenosine dose, mean differences between intracoronary and intravenous-FFR amounted to 0.004, 0.011, or 0.000 FFR units for low-dose, intermediate-dose, and high-dose intracoronary adenosine, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study documents clinically irrelevant differences in FFR values obtained with intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine. Intracoronary adenosine hence confers a practical and patient-friendly alternative for intravenous adenosine for FFR assessment.

1-Year Outcomes of Delayed Versus Immediate Intervention in Patients With Transient ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of a delayed versus an immediate invasive approach on final infarct size and clinical outcome up to 1 year. BACKGROUND: Up to 24% of patients with acute coronary syndromes present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but show complete resolution of ST-segment elevation and symptoms before revascularization. Current guidelines do not clearly state whether these patients with transient STEMI should be treated with a STEMI-like or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome-like intervention strategy. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, 142 patients with transient STEMI were randomized 1:1 to either delayed or immediate coronary intervention. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 4 days and at 4-month follow-up to assess infarct size and myocardial function. Clinical follow-up was performed at 4 and 12 months. RESULTS: In the delayed (22.7 h) and the immediate (0.4 h) invasive groups, final infarct size as a percentage of the left ventricle was very small (0.4% [interquartile range: 0.0% to 2.5%] vs. 0.4% [interquartile range: 0.0% to 3.5%]; p = 0.79), and left ventricular function was good (mean ejection fraction 59.3 ± 6.5% vs. 59.9 ± 5.4%; p = 0.63). In addition, the overall occurrence of major adverse cardiac events, consisting of death, recurrent infarction, and target lesion revascularization, up to 1 year was low and not different between both groups (5.7% vs. 4.4%, respectively; p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: At follow-up, patients with transient STEMI have limited infarction and well-preserved myocardial function in general, and delayed or immediate revascularization has no effect on functional outcome and clinical events up to 1 year.

Continuous thermodilution to assess absolute flow and microvascular resistance: validation in humans using [15O]H2O positron emission tomography.

AIMS: Continuous thermodilution is a novel technique to quantify absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance (MVR). Notably, intracoronary infusion of saline elicits maximal hyperaemia, obviating the need for adenosine. The primary aim of this study was to validate continuous thermodilution in humans by comparing invasive measurements to [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET). As a secondary goal, absolute flow and MVR were compared between invasive measurements obtained with and without adenosine. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), [15O]H2O PET, and invasive assessment. Absolute coronary flow and MVR were measured in the left anterior descending and left circumflex artery using a dedicated infusion catheter and a temperature/pressure sensor-tipped guidewire. Invasive measurements were performed with and without adenosine. In order to compare invasive flow measurements with PET perfusion, subtending myocardial mass of the investigated vessels was derived from CCTA using the Voronoi algorithm. Invasive and non-invasive measurements of adenosine-induced hyperaemic flow and MVR showed strong correlation (r = 0.91; P < 0.001 for flow and r = 0.85; P < 0.001 for MVR) and good agreement [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.90; P < 0.001 for flow and ICC = 0.79; P < 0.001 for MVR]. Absolute flow and MVR also correlated well between measurements with and without adenosine (r = 0.97; P < 0.001 for flow and r = 0.98; P < 0.001 for MVR) and showed good agreement (ICC = 0.96; P < 0.001 for flow and ICC = 0.98; P < 0.001 for MVR). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous thermodilution is an accurate method to measure absolute coronary flow and MVR, which is evidenced by strong agreement with [15O]H2O PET derived flow and resistance. Absolute flow and MVR correlate highly between invasive measurements obtained with and without adenosine, which confirms that intracoronary infusion of room temperature saline elicits steady-state maximal hyperaemia.

Timing of revascularization in patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized clinical trial.

Aims: Patients with acute coronary syndrome who present initially with ST-elevation on the electrocardiogram but, subsequently, show complete normalization of the ST-segment and relief of symptoms before reperfusion therapy are referred to as transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and pose a therapeutic challenge. It is unclear what the optimal timing of revascularization is for these patients and whether they should be treated with a STEMI-like or a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)-like invasive approach. The aim of the study is to determine the effect of an immediate vs. a delayed invasive strategy on infarct size measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Methods and results: In a randomized clinical trial, 142 patients with transient STEMI with symptoms of any duration were randomized to an immediate (STEMI-like) [0.3 h; interquartile range (IQR) 0.2-0.7 h] or a delayed (NSTEMI-like) invasive strategy (22.7 h; IQR 18.2-27.3 h). Infarct size as percentage of the left ventricular myocardial mass measured by CMR at day four was generally small and not different between the immediate and the delayed invasive group (1.3%; IQR 0.0-3.5% vs. 1.5% IQR 0.0-4.1%, P = 0.48). By intention to treat, there was no difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as death, reinfarction, or target vessel revascularization at 30 days (2.9% vs. 2.8%, P = 1.00). However, four additional patients (5.6%) in the delayed invasive strategy required urgent intervention due to signs and symptoms of reinfarction while awaiting angiography. Conclusion: Overall, infarct size in transient STEMI is small and is not influenced by an immediate or delayed invasive strategy. In addition, short-term MACE was low and not different between the treatment groups.

[Diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension]. / Diagnostiek en behandeling van pulmonale hypertensie.

Pulmonary hypertension is defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure of more than 25 mmHg. There are many possible causes of pulmonary hypertension; pulmonary hypertension has a poor prognosis, irrespective of the underlying cause. The most frequent causes of pulmonary hypertension are left heart failure and lung disease. The diagnostic work up of pulmonary hypertension starts with investigations into left heart failure and lung disease. If these reveal no cause, ventilation perfusion scintigraphy should be carried out so that chronic thrombo-embolic pulmonary hypertension can be demonstrated or excluded. In most cases, chronic thrombo-embolic pulmonary hypertension can be treated curatively by means of pulmonary endarterectomy. If chronic thrombo-embolic pulmonary hypertension is also ruled out, then we speak of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Prostacyclins, endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, and soluble guanylyl cyclase stimulators have been shown to be effective in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. This condition should be treated at specialist centres.