Is tooth loss associated with oral health-related quality of life among young men? Findings from southern Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among young men from southern Brazil. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 518 young men aged 18-19 years enlisted for mandatory military service in the Brazilian Army in two cities of southern Brazil in 2019-2021. Participants were clinically examined regarding gingivitis, dental caries experience (caries lesions, missing and filled surfaces), and malocclusion. A questionnaire collected socioeconomic information and the Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP-14). The outcome was OHRQoL, modeled as a discrete variable. The main explanatory variable was tooth loss due to caries (0 or ≥1). Negative binomial regression analysis was used; rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. RESULTS: Tooth loss prevalence was 22.2%. Associations were detected between tooth loss and OHRQoL in the physical pain and handicap domains. Individuals with at least one missing tooth had 17% higher OHIP-14 scores in the physical pain domain (adjusted RR=1.17; 95%CI=1.01, 1.35) and 49% higher in the handicap domain (adjusted RR=1.49; 95%CI=1.03, 2.15) than those with no tooth loss. CONCLUSIONS: Tooth loss was negatively associated with OHRQoL among 18-19-year-old Brazilian Army conscripts, and this association was related to physical pain and handicap domains.

Radiographic pattern of underlying dentin lesions (ICDAS 4) in permanent teeth.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the radiographic pattern of underlying dentine shadows (UDS) in the occlusal surfaces of permanent teeth. METHODS: A total of 282 permanent posterior teeth pertaining to 91 individuals, 142 UDS and 140 non-cavitated enamel lesions (NCEL), were included for comparison. UDS was defined as shadows of discolored dentin visible through the enamel surface which may or may not show signs of localized enamel breakdown, classified as code 4 by the International Caries Detection and Assessment System group. Data collection included the application of a questionnaire, clinical examination, and bilateral bitewing radiographs. The risk for presenting radiolucency was estimated using logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Approximately 79% of UDS exhibited no radiolucency. The proportion of teeth exhibiting a radiolucency restricted to the enamel-dentin junction was 20.4% for UDS and 3.6% for NCEL (p < 0.001, chi-square test). UDS had a sixfold increased risk for exhibiting radiolucency compared with NCEL (OR = 5.78, 95% CI = 2.73-12.22, p < 0.001). Despite this finding, it is important to highlight that virtually all cases were located at the enamel-dentin junction, and only one tooth in each category of clinical status exhibited radiolucency at the outer one half of dentin. No tooth exhibited radiolucency reaching the deep dentin. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that UDS presented radiolucency in very few cases. The vast majority of lesions showed no radiolucency. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings suggest that only a small proportion of UDS would demand restorative treatment.