Casting, elastic intramedullary nailing or external fixation in pediatric tibial shaft fractures: which is the most appropriate treatment? A multicenter study.

The main objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate and compare the outcomes and complications of displaced closed tibial fractures in children treated by CRC (closed reduction and casting), elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) or external fixation (EF). One hundred twenty-three consecutive children were treated for displaced closed tibia shaft fracture from July 2014 and January 2020 at two different institutions. Seventy-five of them met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study: 30 (40%) patients were treated with CRC, 33 (44%) with ESIN, and 12 with EF (16%). All clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications were registered and compared. The three groups did not differ with regard to gender, affected side, fracture site and associated fibula fracture. The age at the time of treatment in the CRC group was statistically lower than in ESIN and EF groups (8.43 ±â€…3.52 years vs. 10.39 ±â€…2.56 years vs. 11.08 ±â€…3.55 years, respectively). Immobilization time and time to partial and total weight bearing were significantly reduced in ESIN and EF groups compared to CRC group (P < 0.05). Overall, no statistically significant differences were found between the three groups regarding complication rate and clinical and radiographic outcomes between the three groups. However, in CRC group, 3 patients (10%) had secondary fracture displacement and underwent ESIN. Surgical treatment is not contraindicated in children with displaced tibia shaft fractures. EF and ESIN provide earlier mobilization and weight-bearing recovery than CRC. However, apart from that, nonoperative treatment was as efficacious as surgical treatment.

Role of proximal tibiofibular fixation in leg lengthening with the Ilizarov method in the achondroplastic patient.

The role of proximal tibiofibular joint (TFJ) transfixion during Ilizarov tibial lengthening is still debated in the literature. The aim of this study was to show that TFJ transfixion can be avoided with no impact on patient outcome. All achondroplastic patients undergoing tibia lengthening from 1999 to 2018 were included. Patients were divided in two groups: group A (11 patients) submitted to proximal TFJ transfixion and group B (22 patients) not submitted to TFJ transfixion. The results showed a statistically significant difference in proximal fibular migration (PFM) between the two groups of patients, with a mean PFM of 9.2 mm (range, 1-20 mm) and of 21 mm (range, 2.7-76 mm) in group A and in group B, respectively. We can state that PFM up to 41 mm in our series did not affect joint function and stability. There are no statistically significant differences in the other radiological parameters. Analysis of functional scores (Knee Society, Tegner-Lhysolm, Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov) did not reveal significant differences between the groups. The scores of the Achondroplasia Personal Life Experience Scale were also similar in the two groups, demonstrating a good quality of life. There are no differences between the two groups in terms of clinical-functional outcome of the knee, radiographic results, and quality of life. Transfixion of proximal TFJ may not be necessary, but it is important to avoid premature consolidation of the fibular osteotomy.

Modified Dunn procedure versus percutaneous pinning in moderate/severe stable slipped capital femoral epiphyses.

BACKGROUND: The modified Dunn procedure (MDP) has risen enthusiasm in treating slipped capital femoral epiphyses (SCFE) due to the anatomic reduction and high patients' satisfaction rates at long-term follow-up. Main aim of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of 2 cohorts with moderate to severe stable SCFE treated by MDP and in situ fixation. METHODS: Medical records were analysed to collect demographic data, comorbidities and time from slip to surgery. The collected postoperative data were: avascular necrosis (AVN); complications; progression of osteoarthritis and subsequent procedures. Southwick angles (SA), alpha angles and Klein line were measured on the preoperative x-rays, on the immediate postoperative period and at the latest follow-up. Outcomes scores were recorded by the following questionnaires: the Harris Hip Score, the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve was calculated. RESULTS: We compared 81 hips treated by MDP with 22 hips treated by in situ pinning (PS) for moderate/severe stable SCFE. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of age, BMI, comorbidities and preoperative slip angles. At the latest follow-up, postoperative anteroposterior mean slip angles were respectively 6.2 and 19.9° in MDP and PS group (p = 0.3). Slip angles in frog lateral view were 11° in the MDP group and 39.7° in the PS group (p = 0.2). MDP group achieved better correction angles on frog leg view (11° vs. 39.7°; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of AVN among both groups (19.7% MDP group vs. 31.8% PS group) (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: The MDP in treating severe stable SCFE showed the best deformities corrections in conjunction with the highest functional scores at long-term follow-up and similar rates of osteonecrosis compared to in situ fixation.

Hip morphology in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Several mechanical factors have been related to slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Main aim of this study is to investigate the acetabular coverage and acetabular version in unilateral SCFE hips in order to detect a potential pincer-type deformity as predisposing factor; second, we compared those measurements either to the contralateral, uninvolved hips either to a matched healthy control population. A total of 85 patients treated for unilateral SCFE were retrospectively reviewed. The lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and the Tönnis angle were used to assess acetabular coverage, whereas acetabular retroversion was defined by positive prominent ischial spine (PIS), cross-over sign (COS) and posterior wall sign (PWS). Angles and signs of the affected hips were compared to the contralateral hips and to a matched cohort undergoing an abdominal/pelvic computed tomography for nonorthopedic-related diseases. Affected and unaffected hips of patients with unilateral SCFE had similar morphology in terms of LCEA 28.7° vs. 28° (P = 0.4), Tönnis angle 9° vs. 9° (P = 0.1) and retroversion signs with concomitant rate of PWS and COS 57.6% vs. 50.5% (P = 0.4), PIS 56.4% vs. 49.4% (P = 0.4). Matched healthy controls vs. the affected hips showed a lower LCEA (P < 0.001) and higher Tönnis angle (P < 0.001) in conjunction with a lower incidence of acetabular retroversion: PWS and COS 40% vs. 57.6% (P = 0.01), PIS 43% vs. 56.4% (P = 0.07). A significant retroversion and increased overcoverage were observed in SCFE patients compared to matched healthy controls. In unilateral SCFE, the involved and uninvolved hips showed a substantial symmetry.

Recommendations for early diagnosis of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH): working group intersociety consensus document.

This consensus document has been prepared by a multidisciplinary group of experts (Paediatricians, Radiologists, Paediatric Orthopaedics) and it is mainly aimed at paediatricians, hospitals and primary care providers. We provide recommendations for the early diagnosis and treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) and indications on its management.

Correction of complex lower limb angular deformities with or without length discrepancy in children using the TL-HEX hexapod system: comparison of clinical and radiographical results.

The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographical results for treatment of lower limb multiaxial deformities±limb length discrepancy (LLD) of at least 2 cm with the Truelok hexapod fixator system (TL-HEX). All consecutive cases of lower limb multiaxial deformities were included. Patients were divided in two groups: group 1, lower limb angular deformity+LLD less than 2 cm, and group 2, lower limb angular deformity+LLD of at least 2 cm. Only patients with age younger than or equal to 20 years and follow-up of 6 months after removal of the external fixator were included. A total of 27 (six femur and 39 tibia treated) and 20 patients (12 femur and 19 tibia) were enrolled in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Complete correction of the deformity was achieved in 90 and 96% of the patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. There were no differences in terms of external fixator, maturation, and distraction indexes between the two groups and between different anatomical sites. Good to excellent functional results (ASAMI score) were obtained in 93% of patients in group 1 and 75% in group 2 (P=0.01). Complication rate was similar between the two groups (7.4 vs. 10%, respectively). Average follow-up after removal of the external fixator was 25.6 (range: 7.0-54.0) months. The TL-HEX external fixator system allows a predictable correction of complex lower limb deformities regardless of the presence of LLD. Although complication rate is similar between the two groups, lower functional outcomes can be expected in patients with significant preoperative LLD.