Pharmacogenomics, Race, and Treatment Outcome in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Importance: Disparities in outcomes exist between Black and White patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with Black patients experiencing poorer prognosis compared with their White counterparts. Objective: To assess whether varying intensity of induction therapy to treat pediatric AML is associated with reduced disparities in treatment outcome by race. Design, Setting, and Participants: A comparative effectiveness analysis was conducted of 86 Black and 359 White patients with newly diagnosed AML who were enrolled in the AML02 trial from 2002 to 2008 or the AML08 trial from 2008 to 2017. Statistical analysis was conducted from July 2023 through January 2024. Interventions: Patients in AML02 were randomly assigned to receive standard low-dose cytarabine-based induction therapy or augmented high-dose cytarabine-based induction therapy, whereas patients in AML08 received high-dose cytarabine-based therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cytarabine pharmacogenomic 10-single-nucleotide variant (ACS10) scores were evaluated for association with outcome according to race and treatment arm. Results: This analysis included 86 Black patients (mean [SD] age, 8.8 [6.5] years; 54 boys [62.8%]; mean [SD] leukocyte count, 52 600 [74 000] cells/µL) and 359 White patients (mean [SD] age, 9.1 [6.2] years; 189 boys [52.6%]; mean [SD] leukocyte count, 54 500 [91 800] cells/µL); 70 individuals with other or unknown racial and ethnic backgrounds were not included. Among all patients without core binding factor AML who received standard induction therapy, Black patients had significantly worse outcomes compared with White patients (5-year event-free survival rate, 25% [95% CI, 9%-67%] compared with 56% [95% CI, 46%-70%]; P = .03). By contrast, among all patients who received augmented induction therapy, there were no differences in outcome according to race (5-year event-free survival rate, Black patients, 50% [95% CI, 38%-67%]; White patients, 48% [95% CI, 42%-55%]; P = .78). Among patients who received standard induction therapy, those with low ACS10 scores had a significantly worse 5-year event-free survival rate compared with those with high scores (42.4% [95% CI, 25.6%-59.3%] and 70.0% [95% CI, 56.6%-83.1%]; P = .004); however, among patients who received augmented induction therapy, there were no differences in 5-year event-free survival rates according to ACS10 score (low score, 60.6% [95% CI, 50.9%-70.2%] and high score, 54.8% [95% CI, 47.1%-62.5%]; P = .43). Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness study of pediatric patients with AML treated in 2 consecutive clinical trials, Black patients had worse outcomes compared with White patients after treatment with standard induction therapy, but this disparity was eliminated by treatment with augmented induction therapy. When accounting for ACS10 scores, no outcome disparities were seen between Black and White patients. Our results suggest that using pharmacogenomics parameters to tailor induction regimens for both Black and White patients may narrow the racial disparity gap in patients with AML.

Current Landscape of Genome-Wide Association Studies in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Review.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clonal hematopoietic disease that arises from chromosomal and genetic aberrations in myeloid precursor cells. AML is one of the most common types of acute leukemia in adults; however, it is relatively rare overall, comprising about 1% of all cancers. In the last decade or so, numerous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been conducted to screen between hundreds of thousands and millions of variants across many human genomes to discover genetic polymorphisms associated with a particular disease or phenotype. In oncology, GWAS has been performed in almost every commonly occurring cancer. Despite the increasing number of studies published regarding other malignancies, there is a paucity of GWAS studies for AML. In this review article, we will summarize the current status of GWAS in AML.

SAMHD1 single nucleotide polymorphisms impact outcome in children with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

Cytarabine arabinoside (Ara-C) has been the cornerstone of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy for decades. After cellular uptake, it is phosphorylated into its active triphosphate form (Ara-CTP), which primarily exerts its cytotoxic effects by inhibiting DNA synthesis in proliferating cells. Interpatient variation in the enzymes involved in the Ara-C metabolic pathway has been shown to affect intracellular abundance of Ara-CTP and, thus, its therapeutic benefit. Recently, SAMHD1 (SAM and HD domain-containing deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase 1) has emerged to play a role in Ara-CTP inactivation, development of drug resistance, and, consequently, clinical response in AML. Despite this, the impact of genetic variations in SAMHD1 on outcome in AML has not been investigated in depth. In this study, we evaluated 25 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the SAMHD1 gene for association with clinical outcome in 400 pediatric patients with newly diagnosed AML from 2 clinical trials, AML02 and AML08. Three SNPs, rs1291128, rs1291141, and rs7265241 located in the 3' region of SAMHD1 were significantly associated with at least 1 clinical outcome: minimal residual disease after induction I, event-free survival (EFS), or overall survival (OS) in the 2 cohorts. In an independent cohort of patients from the COG-AAML1031 trial (n = 854), rs7265241 A>G remained significantly associated with EFS and OS. In multivariable analysis, all the SNPs remained independent predictors of clinical outcome. These results highlight the relevance of the SAMHD1 pharmacogenomics in context of response to Ara-C in AML and warrants the need for further validation in expanded patient cohorts.

Rebooting a sports pharmacy advanced pharmacy practice experience: Utilizing medicinal chemistry as a foundational approach to get pharmacists back in the game.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To implement a sports pharmacy advanced pharmacy practice experience (SP-APPE) utilizing medicinal chemistry as a foundational approach. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: A student-pharmacist and medicinal chemistry faculty member collaborated to reboot a SP-APPE. Approached from a medicinal chemistry perspective and tailored to the infrastructure of the university, three fourth-year student-pharmacists piloted the SP-APPE (fall 2017 to fall 2018). Various performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) and supplements were investigated. Student-pharmacists evaluated general knowledge of PEDs along with the perceived value of pharmacists in sports among student-athletes, athletic personnel, and pre-APPE students. FINDINGS: By demonstrating how legitimate medications were chemically similar to substances banned by sports governing agencies, comparing chemical structures/pharmacophores of PEDs to those of various prescription drugs, and comprehending athletes' misuse of PEDs, student-pharmacists educated student-athletes and athletic personnel on pertinent topics spanning pharmacy and sports (e.g., marijuana, medication sharing, deciphering supplement labels). Laboratory analytical methods that detect PEDs and educational points regarding potential adverse health risks posed by PED usage were also reviewed. Survey participants (approximately 75%, n = 134) perceived pharmacists as valuable to student-athletes and athletic personnel. Student-pharmacists indicated that medicinal chemistry knowledge was strengthened by completing the APPE and relevant to their pharmacy careers. SUMMARY: Based on medicinal chemistry principles, the SP-APPE provided a venue for student-pharmacists to interact with athletics, assist with drug information education, and identify drugs or supplements as chemically related to those banned by sports governing agencies. Confident in medicinal chemistry concepts, student-pharmacists translated their expertise to benefit the patient/student-athlete.

How to Transition from Single-Gene Pharmacogenetic Testing to Preemptive Panel-Based Testing: A Tutorial.

There have been significant advancements in precision medicine and approaches to medication selection based on pharmacogenetic results. With the availability of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and growing awareness of genetic interindividual variability, patient demand for more precise, individually tailored drug regimens is increasing. The University of Florida (UF) Health Precision Medicine Program (PMP) was established in 2011 to improve integration of genomic data into clinical practice. In the ensuing years, the UF Health PMP has successfully implemented several single-gene tests to optimize the precision of medication prescribing across a variety of clinical settings. Most recently, the UF Health PMP launched a custom-designed pharmacogenetic panel, including pharmacogenes relevant to supportive care medications commonly prescribed to patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment, referred to as "GatorPGx." This tutorial provides guidance and information to institutions on how to transition from the implementation of single-gene pharmacogenetic testing to a preemptive panel-based testing approach. Here, we demonstrate application of the preemptive panel in the setting of an adult solid tumor oncology clinic. Importantly, the information included herein can be applied to other clinical practice settings.