What's new in atopic eczema? An analysis of systematic reviews published in 2019. Part 2: treatment.

This review forms part of a series of annual evidence updates on atopic eczema (AE), and provides a summary of key findings from systematic reviews (SRs) published or indexed in 2019 related to AE treatment. Several SRs assessed the efficacy of topical corticosteroids (TCS), topical calcineurin inhibitors, topical phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors and topical Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway inhibitors. However, there is a lack of good-quality trials comparing topical treatment agents with TCS, which remain the standard of care for patients with AE. Most of the included trials lack meaningful comparisons as they used vehicle as a comparator. There is also lack of harmonization of outcome measures for AE across studies. Large, well-designed RCTs are needed to further determine whether any specific emollients offer superior benefit. There is evidence highlighting limited benefit of oral H1 antihistamines as 'add-on' therapy to topical treatment of eczema. Mycophenolate mofetil may have a role in patients with refractory AE. Among biologic therapies, most of the efficacy data relate to dupilumab. Furthermore, there is growing evidence for the efficacy and safety of systemic JAK/STAT pathway inhibitors, but the existing data are of low quality.

Preimplantation B-type natriuretic peptide concentration is an independent predictor of future appropriate implantable defibrillator therapies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess prospectively whether preimplantation B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and C reactive protein (CRP) concentrations predict future appropriate therapies from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary cardiac care centre. METHODS: 345 consecutive patients undergoing first time ICD implantation were prospectively studied. Serum BNP and CRP concentrations were obtained the day before ICD implantation. Patients were followed up with device interrogation to assess for appropriate shocks or antitachycardia pacing. Inappropriate therapies were excluded. Mean (SD) follow up was 13 (5) months. RESULTS: Patients had ischaemic (71%), primary dilated (17%), and valvar or other cardiomyopathies (12%). About half (52%) had ICDs implanted for primary prevention. Sixty three (18%) received appropriate ICD therapies. Serum creatinine, beta blocker, statin, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor usage did not differ between therapy and no therapy groups. By univariate comparison, ejection fraction (p = 0.048), not taking amiodarone (p = 0.033), and BNP concentration (p = 0.0003) were risk factors for ICD therapy. However, by Cox regression multivariate analysis, only BNP above the 50th centile was a significant predictor (hazard ratio 2.19, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 4.71, p = 0.040). Median BNP was 573 ng/l versus 243 ng/l in therapy and no therapy patients, respectively (p = 0.0003). More patients with BNP above the 50th centile (27% v 10%, p = 0.006) received ICD therapies. CONCLUSIONS: A single preimplantation BNP concentration determination is independently predictive of ICD therapies in patients with cardiomyopathies undergoing first time ICD implantation. CRP was not independently predictive of ICD therapies when compared with BNP.

C reactive protein concentration and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion.

BACKGROUND: To test the hypothesis that a high C reactive protein (CRP) concentration would predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardioversion in patients taking antiarrhythmic drugs. METHODS: 111 patients who underwent direct current cardioversion for symptomatic AF were enrolled. Blood was drawn for CRP determination before cardioversion on the same day. All patients were taking antiarrhythmic drugs before and after electrical cardioversion. RESULTS: After a mean follow up of 76 days, 75 patients had recurrence of AF. In univariate analysis, the median CRP concentration was significantly higher in patients with AF recurrence (3.95 mg/l v 1.81 mg/l, p = 0.002). Among the 55 patients with CRP in the upper 50th centile, 44 (80%) experienced recurrence of AF over a total follow up of 8.98 patient years, whereas among the 56 patients with CRP in the lower 50th centile, 31 (55%) experienced recurrence of AF over a total follow up of 14.3 patient years (p < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio comparing the upper 50th centile of CRP with the lower 50th centile of CRP was 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 3.2, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: CRP is independently associated with recurrence of AF after electrical cardioversion among patients taking antiarrhythmic drugs. These results suggest that inflammation may have a role in the pathogenesis of AF resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs.

Pulmonary vein antrum isolation guided by phased-array intracardiac echocardiography: A third way to do PV ablation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has emerged as an important strategy in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The two most frequently used techniques are segmental PVI and left atrial circumferential ablation. AIM: To describe and discuss pulmonary vein antrum isolation guided by phased-array intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) as an alternative approach, and to present initial results. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic AF were included. The antra (the larger circumferential area around the PVs) were isolated guided by ICE. ICE was also used to titrate the ablation energy. RESULTS: 38 patients (3 with persistent AF) were included. Of the 35 patients with paroxysmal AF, 24 are without recurrences, and in six the incidence of paroxysms was significantly reduced after one procedure and a mean follow-up of 201 days. No major complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary vein antrum isolation guided by ICE is a promising technique in AF ablation and has the potential to avoid severe complications.

Quadruple pads approach for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

This study examined the alternative of transthoracic quadruple pads shock delivery of two simultaneous 360-J shocks to convert refractory AF in patients failing standard external cardioversion. Forty-six patients (mean age 58 +/- 11 years, 23 men) with chronic AF (duration 14 +/- 17 months, range 1-60 months) were included. The left atrial diameter was 47 +/- 7 mm. The left ventricular ejection fraction was 59 +/- 11%. Antiarrhythmic drugs had failed to convert 44 (96%) of these patients. All patients underwent conventional external transthoracic cardioversion with pads applied in the antero-apical position using energy settings of 200 and 360 J, consecutively. In all patients who failed conventional cardioversion, quadruple pads were applied. Quadruple pads consisted of four pads, two in the antero-posterior position and two in a second apex-posterior position. Standard cardioversion to sinus rhythm was successful in 19 (41%) patients after use of a single 200-J shock and an additional 8 (17%) after a single 360-J shock. The total success rate was 58% after conventional cardioversion. The quadruple pads were successful in 14 (74%) of the remaining 19 patients. Four of the five patients who failed the quadruple pads approach subsequently also failed internal cardioversion. Thus, the cardioversion success rate was increased from 48% using the conventional approach to 89% using the quadruple pads approach. Quadruple pads external cardioversion is highly effective in converting chronic AF refractory to standard shock protocols to sinus rhythm. Moreover, the failure of the quadruple pads approach seems to predict poor response to internal cardioversion.

High-dose bolus lidocaine for chemical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Most drugs used for chemical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation have significant proarrhythmia risk and require close monitoring after administration. Lidocaine has few of the proarrhythmic concerns of most antiarrhythmic drugs and, at high bolus doses, prolongs the atrial refractory period well enough to be effective in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. This finding has been previously demonstrated in a dog model. We sought to confirm the animal findings in human beings with lidocaine doses of 1.5 to 2.5 mg/kg. METHODS: Twenty patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for elective cardioversion were enrolled in this study. In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study design, each patient received intravenous bolus lidocaine or saline. Patients were observed for 10 minutes after the initial bolus to assess efficacy. The second test drug was then delivered if the first was unsuccessful at cardioversion. RESULTS: All 20 patients received both lidocaine and saline placebo therapy in a crossover manner. None of the 20 patients converted to sinus rhythm with either therapy. The 95% confidence interval for effectiveness of lidocaine in this population was 0% to 14%. CONCLUSION: In this population of patients referred for elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, high-dose bolus lidocaine was ineffective in converting patients to sinus rhythm. Although this study was not sufficiently powered to rule out a low efficacy of lidocaine (<15%) or a higher efficacy in certain subgroups of atrial fibrillation, routine use of lidocaine for this indication is not warranted.