A Scoping Review of Focused Ultrasound Enhanced Drug Delivery for Across the Blood-Brain Barrier for Brain Tumors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous mechanisms of opening the blood-brain barrier (BBB) created a hypertonic environment. Focused ultrasound (FUS) has recently been introduced as a means of controlled BBB opening. Here, we performed a scoping review to assess the advances in drug delivery across the BBB for treatment of brain tumors to identify advances and literature gaps. METHODS: A review of current literature was conducted through a MEDLINE search inclusive of articles on FUS, BBB, and brain tumor barrier, including human, modeling, and animal studies written in English. Using the Rayyan platform, 2 reviewers (J.P and C.Y) identified 967 publications. 224 were chosen to review after a title screen. Ultimately 98 were reviewed. The scoping review was designed to address the following questions: (1) What FUS technology improvements have been made to augment drug delivery for brain tumors? (2) What drug delivery improvements have occurred to ensure better uptake in the target tissue for brain tumors? RESULTS: Microbubbles (MB) with FUS are used for BBB opening (BBBO) through cavitation to increase its permeability. Drug delivery into the central nervous system can be combined with MB to enhance transport of therapeutic agents to target brain tissue resulting in suppression of tumor growth and prolonging survival rate, as well as reducing systemic toxicity and degradation rate. There is accumulating evidence demonstrating that drug delivery through BBBO with FUS-MB improves drug concentrations and provides a better impact on tumor growth and survival rates, compared with drug-only treatments. CONCLUSION: Here, we review the role of FUS in BBBO. Identified gaps in the literature include impact of tumor microenvironment and extracellular space, improved understanding and control of MB and drug delivery, further work on ideal pharmacologics for delivery, and clinical use.

Questions and answers in the management of children with medulloblastoma over the time. How did we get here? A systematic review.

Introduction: Treatment of children with medulloblastoma (MB) includes surgery, radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT). Several treatment protocols and clinical trials have been developed over the time to maximize survival and minimize side effects. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in May 2023 using PubMed. We selected all clinical trials articles and multicenter studies focusing on MB. We excluded studies focusing exclusively on infants, adults, supratentorial PNETs or refractory/relapsed tumors, studies involving different tumors or different types of PNETs without differentiating survival, studies including <10 cases of MB, solely retrospective studies and those without reference to outcome and/or side effects after a defined treatment. Results: 1. The main poor-prognosis factors are: metastatic disease, anaplasia, MYC amplification, age younger than 36 months and some molecular subgroups. The postoperative residual tumor size is controversial.2. MB is a collection of diseases.3. MB is a curable disease at diagnosis, but survival is scarce upon relapse.4. Children should be treated by experienced neurosurgeons and in advanced centers.5. RT is an essential treatment for MB. It should be administered craniospinal, early and without interruptions.6. Craniospinal RT dose could be lowered in some low-risk patients, but these reductions should be done with caution to avoid relapses.7. Irradiation of the tumor area instead of the entire posterior fossa is safe enough.8. Hyperfractionated RT is not superior to conventional RT9. Both photon and proton RT are effective.10. CT increases survival, especially in high-risk patients.11. There are multiple drugs effective in MB. The combination of different drugs is appropriate management.12. CT should be administered after RT.13. The specific benefit of concomitant CT to RT is unknown.14. Intensified CT with stem cell rescue has no benefit compared to standard CT regimens.15. The efficacy of intraventricular/intrathecal CT is controversial.16. We should start to think about incorporating targeted therapies in front-line treatment.17. Survivors of MB still have significant side effects. Conclusion: Survival rates of MB improved greatly from 1940-1970, but since then the improvement has been smaller. We should consider introducing targeted therapy as front-line therapy.