Bridging the Gap: Comparison of Outpatient Clinic and Emergency Department Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Literature shows failure of the outpatient clinic (OC) pathway after emergency department (ED) ultrasound diagnosis of symptomatic cholelithiasis (SC). We hypothesized SC to be more prevalent on final surgical pathology (FSP) in patients who successfully completed OC pathway. METHODS: This retrospective single-institution chart review compared OC and ED patients with right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain and cholelithiasis whom underwent cholecystectomy. Clinical evaluation was considered positive if RUQ pain >4 h, or + Murphy's sign. Ultrasound was positive if two of these three were present: sonographic Murphy's, wall thickness > 4 mm, or pericholecystic fluid. Results were compared with FSP. RESULTS: Six hundred-seven patients underwent cholecystectomy, 299 OC and 308 ED. OC was more likely to SC (23% versus 4.6%) (P < 0.0001) and ED acute cholecystitis (39.3% versus 4.7%). Chronic cholecystitis was the most common FSP in both OC (72%) and ED (56%) populations, of these, 73% of OC denied pain >4 h versus only 10% of ED (P < 0.001). Median time from evaluation to cholecystectomy was 14 d versus 14 h in the OC and ED respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: While chronic cholecystitis was the most common FSP in both OC and ED, the majority of OC reported RUQ pain <4 h delineating these presentations. Duration of pain should be utilized as algorithm triage. We recommend patients with pain episode <4 h should complete OC algorithm with expedited cholecystectomy within 14 d.

Learning Curve of a Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Program at a Second Institution.

BACKGROUND: Historically, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has been performed via a laparotomy, but increasingly, laparoscopic and robotic platforms are being employed for PD. Laparoscopic PD has a steep surgeon specific learning curve and programmatic elements that must be optimized. These factors may limit a surgeon who is proficient at laparoscopic PD to develop a program at another institution. We hypothesize that the learning curve for a surgeon transferring a program to a second institution is shorter than the initial laparoscopic PD learning curve for the same surgeon. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic PD for any indication at the first institution (FI) from 2012 to 2017 and the second institution (SI) from 2018 to 2021 was conducted. Standard statistical analysis was performed. The learning curve was identified using one-sided CUSUM analysis of operative times. RESULT: We identified 110 participants, 90 from the FI and 20 from the SI. More patients at the FI were diagnosed with periampullary adenocarcinoma on final pathology compared to the SI (65.6% vs 40.0%, P = .0132). FI operative times stabilized after the 25th laparoscopic PD and SI operative times stabilized after the 5th operation. No statistically significant difference was identified in postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The learning curve and average operative time of an SI laparoscopic PD program was shorter than the initial learning curve for a single surgeon with comparable outcomes. This suggests that complex minimally invasive surgical programs can be safely transferred to another high-volume institution without significant loss of progress.

Not all cholecystitis is created equal: Disparities contributing to ED presentation and failure of the outpatient algorithm.

BACKGROUND: The majority of final surgical pathology (FSP) from both emergency department (ED) and outpatient clinic (OC) patients is chronic cholecystitis. We aimed to differentiate these presentations and identify disparities associated with ED utilization and OC failure. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of single institution ED and OC cholecystectomies for cholelithiasis. Clinical presentation, FSP, demographics, and zip code poverty (ZCP) levels were evaluated. Data analysis by summary statistics, bivariate comparisons, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 299 OC and 308 ED patients, OC was more likely to be Caucasian (78% vs 46%, p < 0.0001) and insured (89% vs. 32%, p < 0.0001). 71.8% of OC with ZCP <10% had insurance versus only 32.5% in ZCP >20%. Uninsured ED OR was 13.1 (95% CI 8.7-22.9). CONCLUSION: Uninsured ED patients are vulnerable to fail the outpatient algorithm, especially when misdiagnosed by US. Clinical diagnosis of cholecystitis in this population should warrant offering of urgent cholecystectomy.

Innovative Imaging Techniques Used to Evaluate Borderline-Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

A diagnosis of pancreatic cancer carries a 5-y survival rate of less than 10%. Furthermore, the detection of pancreatic cancer occurs most often in later stages of the disease due to its location in the retroperitoneum and lack of symptoms (in most cases) until tumors become more advanced. Once diagnosed, cross-sectional imaging techniques are heavily utilized to determine the tumor stage and the potential for surgical resection. However, a major determinant of resectability is the extent of local vascular involvement of the mesenteric vessels and critical tributaries; current imaging techniques have limited capacity to accurately determine vascular involvement. Surrounding inflammation and fibrosis can be difficult to discriminate from viable tumor, making determination of the degree of vascular involvement unreliable. New innovations in fluorescence and optoacoustic imaging techniques may overcome these limitations and make determination of resectability more accurate. These imaging modalities are able to more clearly discern between viable tumor tissue and non-neoplastic inflammation or desmoplasia, allowing clinicians to more reliably characterize vascular involvement and develop individualized treatment plans for patients. This review will discuss the current imaging techniques used to diagnose pancreatic cancer, the barriers that current techniques raise to accurate staging, and novel fluorescence and optoacoustic imaging techniques that may provide more accurate clinical staging of pancreatic cancer.

Clinical diagnosis of cholecystitis in emergency department patients with cholelithiasis is indication for urgent cholecystectomy: A comparison of clinical, ultrasound, and pathologic diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Biliary pathology is a common reason for emergency department visits with discharge and outpatient follow up if sonographic evaluation does not reveal evidence of cholecystitis. This retrospective review was conducted to assess the sensitivity of clinical versus sonographic evaluation for indication of urgent cholecystectomy. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 308 patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain and cholelithiasis whom underwent cholecystectomy. The history and physical exam, laboratory values, ultrasound (US), and final surgical pathology were compared for accuracy of clinical to pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: 95.5% of our patients that presented to the ED secondary to RUQ pain with cholelithiasis had pathologic cholecystitis. Sensitivity of clinical diagnosis was superior to US findings as compared to pathologic diagnosis of cholecystitis at 96% vs 44% and 87% vs 18% for acute (AC) and chronic cholecystitis (CC) respectively. CONCLUSION: RUQ pain with known cholelithiasis lasting longer than 4 hours is sensitive for pathologic cholecystitis. This finding, even with the absence of sonographic evidence of cholecystitis, is indication for index encounter urgent cholecystectomy.