Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 42(7): e767-e771, 2022 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35671226

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: No consensus exists regarding the optimal surgical management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Treatment goals include avoiding slip progression and sequelae such as avascular necrosis (AVN). Factors associated with surgical implants merit further research. This study investigates the effect of screw thread configuration and the number of screws on surgical outcomes. METHODS: A total of 152 patients undergoing cannulated, stainless steel, in situ screw fixation of SCFE between January 2005 and April 2018 were included. Procedure laterality, screw number and thread configuration (partially threaded/fully threaded), bilateral diagnosis, Loder classification, final follow-up, patient demographics, and endocrinopathy history were analyzed. Primary outcomes were return to the operating room (ROR), AVN, hardware failure/removal, and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). RESULTS: Most patients received a single (86.2%), partially threaded (81.6%) screw; most were unilateral (67.8%) and stable (79.6%). Mean follow-up was 2.0±2.7 years, with a 15.8% rate of ROR, 5.3% exhibiting AVN, 6.6% exhibiting FAI, and 9.2% experiencing hardware failure/removal. Number of screws was the sole predictor of ROR [odds ratio (OR)=3.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-9.49]. Unstable SCFE increased the odds of AVN (OR=38.44; 95% CI: 4.35-339.50) as did older age (OR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.01-2.03). Female sex increased risk for FAI (OR=4.87, 95% CI: 1.20-19.70), and bilateral SCFE elevated risk for hardware failure/removal versus unilateral SCFE (OR=4.41, 95% CI: 1.39-14.00). Screw thread configuration had no significant effect on any outcome (for each, P ≥0.159). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of ROR, AVN, FAI, and hardware failure/removal did not differ between patients treated with partially threaded or fully threaded screws. The use of 2 screws was associated with an increased likelihood of ROR. These findings suggest that screw thread configuration has no impact on complication rates, whereas screw number may be an important consideration in SCFE fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective cohort study.


Assuntos
Impacto Femoroacetabular , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Osteonecrose , Escorregamento das Epífises Proximais do Fêmur , Parafusos Ósseos , Feminino , Impacto Femoroacetabular/cirurgia , Humanos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Osteonecrose/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escorregamento das Epífises Proximais do Fêmur/complicações , Escorregamento das Epífises Proximais do Fêmur/cirurgia
2.
JBJS Case Connect ; 11(3)2021 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37556782

RESUMO

CASE: A six-year-old Caucasian boy sustained an L4 anterior fracture dislocation with cauda equina transection at L3/L4 level with L4 vertebral body compression of the left common iliac artery after a single motor vehicle accident. He was treated with emergent open reduction and pedicle screw fixation with return of left common iliac patency. This was followed by multiple bowel resections on postadmission day 3. CONCLUSION: Anterior spinal fracture dislocations in pediatric patients are rare, caused by high-energy collisions, and are often complicated by multiple traumatic injuries, including vascular and neurological compromise that necessitate emergent intervention.

3.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 140(4): 449-455, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31392407

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the factors that influence radiation exposure during repair of supracondylar humerus fractures. METHODS: Medical records of almost 200 children with supracondylar fractures were retrospectively analyzed for variables correlated with fluoroscopy time and radiation dose as measures of radiation exposure. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in fluoroscopy time (27 vs. 22 s p = 0.345) or direct radiation dose (0.394 vs. 0.318 mSv p = 0.290) between uniplanar and biplanar C-arm use. No statistically significant differences in fluoroscopy time or radiation dose were found for surgical technique, comorbid ipsilateral fractures, preoperative neurovascular compromise, or resident participation. There was a significant 8.3 s increase in fluoroscopy time (p = 0.022) and 0.249 mSv increase in radiation dose (p = 0.020) as the fracture type increased from II to III. An increase in one pin during CRPP resulted in a statistically significant 10.4 s increase in fluoroscopy time and a 0.205 mSv increase in radiation dose. There were significant differences between the physician with the lowest fluoroscopy time and radiation dose compared with the physicians with the two highest values for both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference in direct radiation exposure or fluoroscopy time when comparing biplanar to uniplanar C-arm use, resident participation, preoperative neurovascular compromise, or for comorbid ipsilateral fractures. Both outcomes increased significantly as fracture type increased from II to III and as the number of pins used during CRPP increased. Both outcomes were significantly different between the surgeons performing CRPP.


Assuntos
Fluoroscopia , Fraturas do Úmero , Exposição à Radiação , Criança , Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Fluoroscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fixação de Fratura/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Fraturas do Úmero/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Úmero/cirurgia , Úmero/diagnóstico por imagem , Úmero/cirurgia , Exposição à Radiação/normas , Exposição à Radiação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Pediatr Rev ; 36(5): 184-95; quiz 196-7, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25934907

RESUMO

Limping is a symptom of varied diagnoses in children and adolescents and can present a difficult diagnostic challenge for primary care clinicians. A careful and systematic evaluation can shorten the long list of potential diagnoses to direct appropriate diagnostic tests to determine the cause of the problem. Trauma and infections are the most common causes of limping. Inflammatory conditions, developmental diagnoses,and overuse injuries are other causes. Although rare, malignancies such as osteosarcoma and blood cell cancers must also be considered as potential causes of limping in children and adolescents.• Limping presents a diagnostic challenge due to the number of possible causes.• On the basis of consensus, diagnostic laboratory tests that include complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate,C-reactive protein, and blood cultures should be ordered if suspicion is high for infectious etiology.• On the basis of consensus, orthopedic emergencies are vascular compromise, compartment syndrome, and open fractures.• On the basis of moderate evidence and consensus, compartment syndrome in children presents with the three "As" analgesia,anxiety, and agitation. (4)• On the basis of strong evidence and consensus, septic arthritis asa diagnosis increases with the number of Kocher criteria present(temperature >38.5°C, white blood cell count >12,000/mL[12109/L], erythrocyte sedimentation rate >40 mm/h, and inability to bear weight). (8)• On the basis of moderate evidence and consensus, laboratory studies are not always definitive for diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. (13)• On the basis of consensus, it is always important to examine the joint above and the joint below the area of the chief compliant,specifically when looking at slipped capital femoral epiphysis and Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.


Assuntos
Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha/etiologia , Fatores Etários , Artrite Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Criança , Síndromes Compartimentais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Traumáticos Cumulativos/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha/diagnóstico , Quadril , Humanos , Traumatismos da Perna/diagnóstico , Anormalidades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Sinovite/diagnóstico
5.
Instr Course Lect ; 64: 471-82, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25745930

RESUMO

Fractures of the tibial eminence and the diaphyseal tibia are common pediatric orthopaedic injuries. Although most tibial fractures can be treated nonsurgically, those that require surgical intervention may encounter specific complications. Surgical treatment of fractures of the tibial eminence may be complicated by failed fixation, knee joint stiffness, and arthrofibrosis of the knee, a complication rarely seen in children but occurring most frequently after tibial eminence injuries. Complications of healing after tibial fractures in pediatric patients are uncommon, although some tibial shaft fractures exhibit delayed union or nonunion, infection, and soft-tissue complications.


Assuntos
Diáfises/lesões , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Criança , Humanos
6.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 22(11): 730-41, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25344598

RESUMO

Fractures of the tibial eminence and of the diaphyseal tibia are common pediatric orthopaedic injuries. Although most tibial fractures can be treated nonsurgically, those that require surgical intervention may encounter specific complications. Surgical treatment of fractures of the tibial eminence may be complicated by failed fixation, knee joint stiffness, and arthrofibrosis of the knee, a complication rarely seen in children but occurring most frequently after tibial eminence injuries. Complications of healing after tibial fractures in pediatric patients are uncommon, although some tibial shaft fractures exhibit delayed union or nonunion, infection, and soft-tissue complications.


Assuntos
Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico , Criança , Diáfises/lesões , Diáfises/cirurgia , Epífises/lesões , Epífises/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Humanos , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/terapia
7.
Lab Anim (NY) ; 35(9): 49-53, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17008909

RESUMO

Research scientists and IACUC members are faced with the difficult task of balancing the necessity of using animals for experimental research and their mandate to protect the welfare of those animals used in that research. One way to reduce the number of research animals would be to reuse them, but the regulations do not specifically address this topic. To learn more about the reuse of research animals, the authors conducted an online survey of animal facilities involved in preclinical studies. Their results suggest that animal reuse is a common practice in the field.


Assuntos
Experimentação Animal/ética , Bem-Estar do Animal , Animais de Laboratório , Animais , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA