First-in-Man Noninvasive Initial Diagnostic Approach of Primary CNS Lymphoma Versus Glioblastoma Using PET With 18 F-Fludarabine and l -[methyl- 11 C]Methionine.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess 18 F-fludarabine ( 18 F-FLUDA) PET/CT's ability in differentiating primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) from glioblastoma multiformes (GBMs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients harboring either PCNSL (n = 8) before any treatment, PCNSL treated using corticosteroids (PCNSLh; n = 10), or GBM (n = 13) were investigated with conventional MRI and PET/CT, using 11 C-MET and 18 F-FLUDA. The main parameters measured with each tracer were SUV T and T/N ratios for the first 30 minutes of 11 C-MET acquisition, as well as at 3 different times after 18 F-FLUDA injection. The early 18 F-FLUDA uptake within the first minute of injection was equally considered, whereas this parameter was combined with the later uptakes to obtain R FLUDA 2 and R FLUDA 3 ratios. RESULTS: No significant differences in 11 C-MET uptakes were observed among PCNSL, PCNSLh, and GBM. With 18 F-FLUDA, a clear difference in dynamic GBM uptake was observed, which decreased over time after an early maximum, as compared with that of PCNSL, which steadily increased over time, PCNSLh exhibiting intermediate values. The most discriminative parameters consisting of R FLUDA 2 and R FLUDA 3 integrated the early tracer uptake (first 60 seconds), thereby provided 100% specificity and sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: 18 F-FLUDA was shown to likely be a promising radiopharmaceutical for differentiating PCNSL from other malignancies, although a pretreatment with corticosteroids might compromise this differential diagnostic ability. The diagnostic role of 18 F-FLUDA should be further investigating, along with its potential of defining therapeutic strategies in patients with PCNSL, while assessing the treatments' effectiveness.

The last decade's experience of management of central neurocytomas: Treatment strategies and new options.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the presented work is to evaluate the last decade's experience in surgical management of central neurocytoma (CN) and elucidate on the treatment strategies and new options. METHODS: The current series consists of the remaining 125 patients (70 females and 55 males) operated on during the past decade from 2008 to 2018. Most tumors were resected through transcortical (n = 76, 61%), or transcallosal (n = 40, 32%) approaches. In 5 (4%) patients with predominantly posterior location of the tumor, non-dominant superior parietal lobule approach was utilized. Both approaches (transcortical + transcallosal) were used in 4 (3%) of cases. Seven consecutive patients with large CN underwent prophylactic intraventricular stenting to prevent hydrocephalus. RESULTS: Gross total resection was achieved in 45 patients (36%), subtotal resection (STR) in 40 (32%) cases. After surgery, 63 (50%) patients had neurocognitive problems, including disorientation, attention deficit, global amnesia, short-term memory deficits, and perceptual motor and social cognition problems. A total of 26 patients (21%) had postoperative hemorrhage in the resection bed. Obstructive hydrocephalus was noted in 25 (20%) patients. The entrapment of the occipital and/or temporal horns was observed in seven cases. None of the seven patients with prophylactic intraventricular stents required shunting. CONCLUSION: Although high rates of gross total or STR can be expected, the mortality and morbidity remain significant even in the modern neurosurgical era. Prophylactic intraventricular stenting in patients with large posteriorly located tumors with hydrocephalus may prevent ventricular entrapment and shunting. The main risk factors for recurrence are presence of residual disease and Ki-67 index over 5%. Recurrent symptomatic tumors should be treated surgically, whereas asymptomatic progression can be managed with stereotactic radiosurgery. Both treatment modalities are associated with low risk of complications and high tumor control rates.

Brain Mesh: Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: Standard electrostimulation cortical mapping includes application of electrical current to the explored areas through an electrode and marking of functional zones by means of paper tags with different symbols. This approach has several disadvantages. First, the electrode is moved randomly. It leads to overlooking of some zones, which causes mapping deficiency, and restimulation of others, which can trigger epileptic seizures. Second, the tags easily shift and close the marked structures. We describe a new simple device that provides precise cortical mapping without indicated problems and the technique to apply it. METHODS: The device is a flexible polymer mesh with square pores of a certain size. The neurosurgeon applies the mesh onto the brain cortex and sequentially stimulates it through the pores. The functional areas are labeled. Pores corresponding to the lesion are cut out, and the lesion is removed through the cutout without removing the mesh. After operation, the mesh is removed. RESULTS: Using this technique, we operated on a patient with a glioma located near the primary motor cortex. The accessible cortical area was accurately mapped, and the tumor was resected without any complications. The mesh allowed us to significantly streamline the mapping process. CONCLUSIONS: Our case illustrates that the proposed invention can be successfully used in neurosurgical operations for precise electrostimulation mapping of the brain cortex.