Empirical voriconazole therapy for febrile neutropenic patients with hematological disorders: a prospective multicenter trial in Japan.

An open-label, prospective, multicenter study was conducted between October 2006 and March 2010 to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous voriconazole (VRCZ) as empirical therapy for antibiotic-refractory febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with hematological disorders. In addition, to find the patient groups that may benefit from antifungal therapy, the definition of invasive fungal infection proposed by EORTC/MSG (2002) was assessed in this study. Plasma (1-3)-ß-D-glucan and Aspergillus PCR in blood were also measured to improve the diagnostic accuracy. A total of 103 patients (median age, 59 years), including 25 undergoing induction chemotherapies and 19 allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants, were evaluable. Sixty-nine percent of the patients achieved resolution of clinical symptoms and 31% achieved treatment success, defined as fulfilling the previously described five-part composite endpoint. Although VRCZ was discontinued in 9.7% of the patients because of adverse effects, all the patients recovered soon after discontinuation of VRCZ. The treatment success rate of VRCZ appeared to be higher in patients categorized as "not classified" compared with "possible invasive fungal disease" according to the EORTC/MSG criteria. Moreover, six "not classified" patients were positive for either plasma (1-3)-ß-D-glucan (n = 5) or Aspergillus PCR in blood (n = 2). The present study demonstrates that empirical VRCZ therapy is safe and effective in Japanese patients. Additionally, (1-3)-ß-D-glucan and Aspergillus PCR tests were expected to provide additional information on the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections.

Prospective randomized study of cefepime, panipenem, or meropenem monotherapy for patients with hematological disorders and febrile neutropenia.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of carbapenems as initial treatment for febrile neutropenia (FN), and in patients unresponsive to this initial therapy, to evaluate the efficacy of subsequent treatment with aminoglycosides (AGs) or ciprofloxacin (CPFX). FN patients were randomized to receive cefepime (CFPM, control), panipenem/betamiprom (PAPM/BP), or meropenem (MEPM). Defervescence, an outcome endpoint, was evaluated 3 days later. Patients with minimal response were given CPFX or AGs, and their responses were reevaluated on day 7. A total of 255 patients were included. The efficacies of CFPM, PAPM/BP, and MEPM were comparable. In patients unresponsive to this initial therapy, the efficacy of subsequent CPFX and AGs treatments was also similar. There was no significant between-arm difference in cumulative efficacy on days 14 and 30. Adverse reactions were infrequent and mild. In conclusion, PAPM/BP and MEPM are as useful as CFPM as initial therapy for FN, and AGs are as efficacious as CPFX in patients unresponsive to the initial therapy.

Efficacy and safety of micafungin as an empirical antifungal therapy for suspected fungal infection in neutropenic patients with hematological disorders.

This prospective multicenter study was performed to clarify the efficacy and safety of micafungin (MCFG) as an empirical antifungal therapy for suspected fungal infection in patients with hematological disorders and neutropenia. Three hundred and eighty-eight patients were enrolled; 151 patients with possible fungal infection diagnosed by radiological imaging or serological testing and 237 patients with refractory fever were included in this study. The mean dose and duration of treatment with MCFG were 154.6 mg/day and 14.0 days, respectively. The clinical response rate for patients with possible fungal infection and refractory fever was 60.1% and 65.3%, respectively. Even in persistent neutropenic patients with a neutrophil count of <500/µL throughout the MCFG treatment, the clinical response rate was 46.9%. Ninety-one drug-related adverse events (DAEs) were observed in 56 patients (14.4%) and 9 serious DAEs were observed in 6 patients (1.5%). Neither daily dose nor duration of MCFG treatment affected the incidence of DAEs. It was confirmed that MCFG has adequate clinical efficacy and is safe for the treatment of suspected fungal infections in patients with hematological disorders and neutropenia.

Efficacy and safety of micafungin, an echinocandin antifungal agent, on invasive fungal infections in patients with hematological disorders.

The study was conducted as a prospective multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of micafungin in patients with invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in hematological disorders. A total of 277 patients was registered, and 197 were assessed for clinical efficacy. The mean dosage and duration of micafungin were 170.7 mg/day and 22.0 days, respectively. The efficacy rates were 87.5% (7/8) for patients with candidiasis, 44.7% (17/38) for probable IFIs, 61.9% (39/63) for possible IFIs and 80.7% (71/88) for those who failed to respond to antibacterials. In patients with febrile neutropenia (below 500 microL), despite broad-spectrum antibacterial treatment over 2 days, 86.3% (44/51) of patients had a favourable response to micafungin. The incidence of adverse events related to micafungin was 14.1% (39/277), but most of them were mild and reversible. These data indicate the usefulness of micafungin as a novel therapeutic drug for both empirical and targeted therapy for IFIs.

Economic issues: toward a cost-effective approach to the management of febrile neutropenia in Japan.

The cost of treating neutropenic patients unexplained fever is of significant concern in Japan because of the depressed economy and the aging population. Development of a standardized treatment methodology specifically tailored to the situation in Japan will make the treatment more efficient for health care institutions, will allow for improved monitoring of practices and costs, and will result in better patient care. It is essential, however, that the welfare of the patients be the utmost priority--cost savings is not sufficient in the absence of a significant impact on morbidity and mortality.

Clinical trial of in-situ hybridization method for the rapid diagnosis of sepsis.

We evaluated the utility of in-situ hybridization (ISH) for the rapid diagnosis of sepsis. We applied this approach to polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN)-rich smears from patients with suspected bacterial infection. Positive results by ISH were obtained in the smears of 123 of 292 patients (42%), while only 32 of the 292 (11%) were positive by blood culture. These findings indicate that ISH is almost four times more sensitive than the culture method for the detection of sepsis. ISH results are obtained within 1 day, while 1 day to 2 weeks is required for the results of blood culture. Blood culture and ISH methods detected the same bacteria in two patients. ISH also successfully identified the same bacteria in blood and PMN-rich body fluid (bronchoalveolar lavage samples) in 6 patients. In 19 patients, ISH of blood detected the same bacteria as those found in subcultures from other sources (e.g., stool, sputum, nasal cavity). We discuss these results in comparison with blood culture results in terms of evaluating a rapid approach to the management of patients with sepsis.