Development and Validation of a Trauma-Informed Care Communication Skills Assessment Tool.

BACKGROUND: Trauma-informed care (TIC) is growing in medical education as health care systems recognize trauma's impact on health outcomes. TIC acknowledges and responds to the effects of trauma on physical, psychological, and emotional health. As TIC trainings are developed and delivered to health care professionals across the learner continuum, curricula need evaluation beyond learner satisfaction and knowledge to better assess changes in skills. We developed the Gap Kalamazoo Communication Skills Assessment Form for Trauma-Informed Care (GKCSAF-TIC) to evaluate pediatric trainees' communication skills in TIC. We describe the development and validity evidence of the GKCSAF-TIC in assessing pediatric residents' TIC skills during standardized patient encounters. METHODS: We developed and implemented the TIC communication skills assessment tool in a one-year prospective cohort study involving pediatric residents. We conducted simulated patient encounters conducted before and after TIC training, with two pediatric faculty attendings assessing each encounter. We gathered validity evidence using Messick's framework, focusing on content, response process, internal structure, and relationship with other variables. RESULTS: We analyzed 57 standardized patient encounters with 33 pediatric interns, including 23 pre-post matched pairs. The development process and rater training supported content and response process validity. Internal consistency, measured by Cronbach's alpha, ranged from 0.93 to 0.96, while inter-rater reliability, measured by intraclass correlations, ranged from 0.80 to 0.83. There was a significant improvement in scores from pre-training to post-training (3.7/5 to 4.05/5; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The GKCSAF-TIC demonstrated strong preliminary validity and offers educators a valuable means to assess and provide formative feedback to pediatric trainees about TIC.

A new algorithm DEtectS critical Congenital Heart Disease at different altitudes: ANDES-CHD study.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal pulse oximetry screening (POS) algorithms for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) have contributed towards decreasing neonatal mortality but cannot be applied at high altitudes. New POS algorithms at high altitudes are needed. METHODS: This observational, prospective study included newborns born at different altitudes from 0 to 4380 meters above the sea level in Peru. Healthy newborns underwent neonatal preductal and postductal oximetry, echocardiography and telephonic follow-up up to 12 months of age. Newborns with CCHD underwent preductal and postductal oximetry at the time of telemedicine evaluation while located at the high-altitude hospital where they were born, and their diagnoses were confirmed with echocardiography locally or after arriving to the referral center. Two new algorithms were designed using clinically accepted neonatal oximetry cutoffs or the 5th and 10th percentiles for preductal and postductal oximetry values. RESULTS: A total of 502 healthy newborns and 15 newborns with CCHD were enrolled. Echocardiography and telephonic follow-up were completed in 227 (45%) and 330 healthy newborns (65%), respectively. The algorithm based on clinically accepted cutoffs had a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 73% and false positive rate of 27% The algorithm based on the 5th and 10th percentiles had a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 88% and false positive rate of 12%. CONCLUSIONS: Two algorithms that detect CCHD at different altitudes had adequate performance but high false positive rates.