Abacavir dosing in neonates from birth to 3 months of life: a population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation study.

BACKGROUND: No evidence-based optimal dosing guidance is available for abacavir liquid formulation use from birth. We used abacavir pharmacokinetic data from neonates and infants to determine an exact abacavir dosing strategy (mg/kg) for infants aged 0-3 months and to propose dosing by WHO weight band for neonates. METHODS: Abacavir pharmacokinetic and safety data were pooled from three completed studies (1997-2020): PACTG 321 (USA), the Tygerberg Cohort (South Africa), and IMPAACT P1106 (South Africa). PACTG 321 and the Tygerberg Cohort were performed in neonates exposed to HIV receiving a single dose of abacavir. IMPAACT P1106 included predominantly low birthweight (<2500 g) infants on antiretroviral therapy enrolled when they were younger than 3 months. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model and performed simulations to achieve abacavir exposures (area under the curve for 0-12 h) within the target range of 3·2-25·2 µg·h/mL, previously reported in older children. FINDINGS: 45 infants contributed 308 abacavir concentrations; 21 neonates were younger than 15 days. At first pharmacokinetic assessment, median postnatal age for PACTG 321 was 1 day and median bodyweight was 3·1 kg; for the Tygerberg Cohort it was 10 days and 3·3 kg; and for IMPAACT P1106 it was 73 days and 3·8 kg. Our model predicted a slow abacavir clearance of 2·51 mL/min per kg at birth, which doubled by 4 weeks of age. Therapeutic targets were achieved with exact abacavir doses of 2·0 mg/kg twice daily from 0 weeks to 4 weeks and 4·0 mg/kg twice daily from 4 weeks to 12 weeks. A fixed weight-band dosing strategy of 8 mg (for 2-3 kg), 10 mg (3-4 kg), and 12 mg (4-5 kg) abacavir twice daily achieved target exposures throughout the first 4 weeks of life without the need for dose adjustment due to age or bodyweight changes. No adverse events of grade 3 or higher were related to abacavir. INTERPRETATION: Integration of these dosing strategies into national and international guidelines for the abacavir liquid formulation will expand antiretroviral options from birth and simplify the clinical management of neonates with HIV. FUNDING: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Mental Health, and the Collaborative Initiative for Paediatric HIV Education and Research Programme.

Raltegravir versus efavirenz in antiretroviral-naive pregnant women living with HIV (NICHD P1081): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 4 trial.

BACKGROUND: Although antiretroviral regimens containing integrase inhibitors rapidly suppress HIV viral load in non-pregnant adults, few published data from randomised controlled trials have compared the safety and efficacy of any integrase inhibitor to efavirenz when initiated during pregnancy. We compared safety and efficacy of antiretroviral therapy with either raltegravir or efavirenz in late pregnancy. METHODS: An open-label, randomised controlled trial was done at 19 hospitals and clinics in Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, and the USA. Antiretroviral-naive pregnant women (20-<37 weeks gestation) living with HIV were assigned to antiretroviral regimens containing either raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) or efavirenz (600 mg each night) plus lamivudine 150 mg and zidovudine 300 mg twice daily (or approved alternative backbone regimen), using a web-based, permuted-block randomisation stratified by gestational age and backbone regimen. The primary efficacy outcome was plasma HIV viral load below 200 copies per mL at (or near) delivery. The primary efficacy analysis included all women with a viral load measurement at (or near) delivery who had viral load of at least 200 copies per mL before treatment and no genotypic resistance to any study drugs; secondary analyses eliminated these exclusion criteria. The primary safety analyses included all women who received study drug, and their infants. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01618305. FINDINGS: From Sep 5, 2013, to Dec 11, 2018, 408 women were enrolled (206 raltegravir, 202 efavirenz) and 394 delivered on-study (200 raltegravir, 194 efavirenz); 307 were included in the primary efficacy analysis (153 raltegravir, 154 efavirenz). 144 (94%) women in the raltegravir group and 129 (84%) in the efavirenz group met the primary efficacy outcome (absolute difference 10%, 95% CI 3-18; p=0·0015); the difference primarily occurred among women enrolling later in pregnancy (interaction p=0·040). Frequencies of severe or life-threatening adverse events were similar among mothers (30% in each group; 61 raltegravir, 59 efavirenz) and infants (25% in each group; 50 raltegravir, 48 efavirenz), with no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Our findings support major guidelines. The integrase inhibitor dolutegravir is currently a preferred regimen for the prevention of perinatal HIV transmission with raltegravir recommended as a preferred or alternative integrase inhibitor for pregnant women living with HIV. FUNDING: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.