[A Case of Advanced Gastric Cancer in Which Tumor Relapse Was Observed after Discontinuation of Nivolumab Due to Complete Response, and for Which Re-Administration Was Initiated].

A 61-year-old male was diagnosed with unresectable advanced gastric cancer(cT4b[SI; panc], N+, M0, cStage ⅣA). However he was administered S-1 plus oxaliplatin as a primary treatment and ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as a secondary treatment, the primary tumor and lymph nodes were enlarged. We judged PD and switched to the third-line treatment with nivolumab. After starting nivolumab, both the primary tumor and the lymph nodes shrank, and the PET-CT scan after 24 courses showed no FDG accumulation in the primary tumor or lymph nodes, so we judged the response as CR. The patient requested discontinuation of nivolumab, and nivolumab administration was stopped. Twenty months later after nivolumab administration was discontinued, CT scan showed re-growth of the primary tumor, and nivolumab administration was resumed. After resumption, he received 22 courses of nivolumab for 10 months with maintenance of SD.

A case in which the ileocolic vein draining into the gastrocolic trunk of Henle could be diagnosed preoperatively: a rare anatomical case report.

BACKGROUND: Numerous variations in vascular anatomy have been reported in the right colon. The ileocolic vein (ICV) generally drains directly into the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), and is an important landmark for laparoscopic surgery in right colon cancer. We present here a patient with a vascular anomaly of the ICV that was diagnosed on preoperative imaging. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old woman was diagnosed with transverse colon cancer by colonoscopy. Preoperative computed tomography scan showed that the ICV drained into the gastrocolic trunk of Henle (GCT) rather than the SMV. Single-incision laparoscopic transverse colectomy with D3 lymph node dissection was performed, dividing the middle colic vein (MCV) and preserving the right gastroepiploic vein (RGEV), anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein (ASPDV), GCT and ICV. The intraoperatively identified venous anatomy was consistent with the preoperative evaluation, and the RGEV, ASPDV and ICV were found to form the GCT. CONCLUSION: We report a rare vascular anatomical anomaly that was diagnosed preoperatively, facilitating safe and successful single-incision laparoscopic surgery with D3 lymph node dissection.

Oncological outcomes following minimally invasive surgery for pathological N2M0 colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Whether minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is safe and effective for patients with N2M0 colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare short- and long-term outcomes between MIS and open surgery (Open) groups for patients with pathological (p)N2M0 CRC, and evaluate the oncological outcomes of MIS for pN2M0 CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 125 consecutive patients with pN2M0 CRC who underwent curative surgery between 2010 and 2017, using propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 59.4 months. After PSM, we enrolled 68 patients (n = 34 in each group). The conversion rate was 9.6% for the entire patient cohort and 5.9% for the matched cohort. In colon cancer (CC), short-term outcomes were similar between groups. On the other hand, in rectal cancer (RC), estimated blood loss, rate of anastomosis leakage, and length of postsurgical stay were lower in the MIS group than the Open group. R0 resection was achieved in all patients with MIS. No surgical mortality was encountered in any group. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of 3-year local recurrence rate, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, or recurrence-free survival among the entire patient cohort or the matched cohort, regardless of the primary tumor site (CC or RC). Surgical approach (MIS vs Open) had no significant influence on survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: MIS is a safe and effective option for patients with pN2M0 CRC, with acceptable short- and long-term outcomes comparable to the open approach. MIS can be considered for patients with pN2M0 CRC.

Impact of antithrombotic agents on short-term outcomes following minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether minimally invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery under the suitable management of perioperative antithrombotic therapy (ATT) is safe and feasible in patients treated with chronic ATT. The present study aimed to assess the impact of ATT on short-term outcomes following minimally invasive CRC surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1495 consecutive patients who underwent elective minimally invasive CRC surgery between 2011 and 2021, using propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 230 patients had chronically received ATT. After propensity score matching, we enrolled 412 patients (n = 206 in each group). Before matching, significant group-dependent differences were observed in terms of sex (p < 0.01), age (p < 0.01), American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status (p < 0.01), body mass index (p < 0.01), and pathological N classification (p = 0.03). The frequencies of overall postoperative complications, bleeding events, and thromboembolic events were significantly higher in the ATT group than in the Non-ATT group (p < 0.01). After matching, no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of clinical or surgical characteristics, or in terms of the frequency of overall postoperative complications, bleeding events, thromboembolic events, length of postoperative stay, or any other postoperative complication. Multivariate analysis identified no significant risk factors for postoperative bleeding events or severe postoperative complications associated with ATT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with chronic ATT showed acceptable short-term outcomes for minimally invasive CRC surgery compared with those not receiving ATT. Minimally invasive CRC surgery appears safe and feasible under the suitable management of perioperative ATT regardless of whether the patient has a history of ATT.

Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

It remains controversial whether the advantages of robotic-assisted surgery are beneficial for rectal cancer (RC). The study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted rectal surgery (RARS) compared with those of conventional laparoscopic-assisted rectal surgery. We retrospectively analyzed 539 consecutive patients with stage I-IV RC who had undergone elective surgery between January 2010 and December 2020, using propensity score-matched analysis. After propensity score matching, we enrolled 200 patients (n = 100 in each groups). Before matching, significant group-dependent differences were observed in terms of age (p = 0.04) and body mass index (p < 0.01). After matching, clinicopathologic outcomes were similar between the groups, but estimated operative time was longer and postoperative lymphorrhea was more frequent in the RARS group. Estimated blood loss, rate of conversion to laparotomy, and incidence of anastomotic leakage or reoperation were significantly lower in the RARS group. No surgical mortality was observed in either group. No significant differences were observed in terms of positive resection margins or number of lymph nodes harvested. RARS was safe and technically feasible, and achieved acceptable short-term outcomes. The robotic technique showed some advantages in RC surgery that require validation in further studies.

Impact of prior abdominal surgery on short-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whether laparoscopic surgery after prior abdominal surgery (PAS) is safe and feasible for colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of PAS on short-term outcomes following laparoscopic CRC surgery. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis used propensity score-matched analysis to reduce the possibility of selection bias. Participants comprised 1284 consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic CRC surgery between 2010 and 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to PAS. Patients with PAS were then matched to patients without these conditions. Short-term outcomes were evaluated between groups in the overall cohort and matched cohort, and risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and severe postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, we enrolled 762 patients (n = 381 in each group). Before matching, significant group-dependent differences were observed in sex, age, primary tumor site, pathological (p) T stage, and type of procedure. No significant difference was found between groups in terms of rate of conversion to laparotomy, estimated blood loss, rate of extended resection, length of postoperative stay, and postoperative complications. After matching, estimated operative time was significantly longer in the PAS group (p = 0.01). Significant differences were found between groups in terms of reason for conversion to laparotomy. Multivariate analyses identified significant risk factors for conversion to laparotomy as pT stage ≥ 3 (odds ratio [OR] 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-5.26) and body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 (OR 3.56; 95% CI 1.07-11.7). Multivariate analyses identified rectum in the primary tumor site as the only significant risk factor for severe postoperative complications (OR 2.37; 95% CI 1.08-5.20). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic CRC surgery after PAS showed acceptable short-term outcomes compared to Non-PAS. The laparoscopic approach appears safe and feasible for CRC regardless of whether the patient has a history of PAS.

[Outcome of Hepatectomies for Non-Colorectal Liver Metastases].

We performed 16 cases of non-colorectal liver metastasis resection(19 resections)between January 2011 and December 2021. Among the 16 cases, the primary lesions were as follows: gastric cancer in 7 cases; GIST in 2 cases; and neuroendocrine tumor, renal cancer, pancreatic cancer(acinic cell carcinoma), cholangiocarcinoma, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and leiomyosarcoma in 1 case each. The median time from primary lesion resection to the diagnosis of liver metastasis was 20.6 months. In cases of neuroendocrine tumors and renal cancer, hepatectomy was performed with a preoperative diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Four cases underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy, and 10 cases underwent anatomical liver resection. Postoperative chemotherapy was performed in 8 cases. Recurrence of liver metastasis was observed in 7 cases. One case of gastric cancer and 1 case of neuroendocrine tumor underwent repeat hepatectomy. The median relapse-free survival was 13.8 months, and the median overall survival was 55.7 months.

[Metachronous Ovarian Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer at Our Hospital].

Among the cases that underwent primary tumor resection(PTR)of colorectal cancer at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2020, we examined 6 cases that involved ovarian metastasis(OM)surgery. The period from PTR to recurrence of OM was 2-28 months. Bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed in 5 cases, and unilateral oophorectomy was performed in 1. The reasons for surgery were symptom development and progressive disease. The period from recurrence of OM to OM surgery was short, that of 0-6 months. In 5 cases, peritoneal dissemination and other distant metastases were observed during OM surgery; R0 resection was performed in 2 cases. Postoperative complications associated with OM surgery were not observed. The median time required from the day of OM surgery to the resumption of chemotherapy was 33 days, and it was possible to resume chemotherapy early. The median survival time after OM surgery was approximately 11 months, which is considered to be owing to the influence of complications of peritoneal dissemination and other distant metastases.

[A Case of Surgical Resection for Solitary Lymph Node Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma].

A 77-year-old man has undergone 5 times of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)and 5 times of radiofrequency ablation(RFA)for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)since 2015. In February 2019, serum tumor marker levels extremely increased and CT scan showed a 40 mm mass in hepatoduodenal ligament. Imaging study revealed that intrahepatic lesions of HCC were well controlled and the mass was diagnosed as solitary lymph node metastasis of HCC. We performed surgical resection of the lymph node. The patient discharged 8 days after the surgery. Histopathologicaly, the tumor was diagnosed as lymph node metastasis of HCC. The patient remains free from recurrence 14 months after surgery.

Single-incision laparoscopic repair for a Morgagni hernia: A case report.

A Morgagni hernia is a rare type of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Here, a case of a Morgagni hernia repaired by SILS is presented. A 78-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with nausea and vomiting. On CT, the transverse colon and antrum of the stomach were prolapsed into the right thoracic cavity. The herniated stomach was repositioned by emergency endoscopy, and SILS repair was performed electively. Laparoscopy showed the hernial orifice, which was 75 × 50 mm in diameter, on the right side and behind the sternum. Although the transverse colon had herniated through the defect into the right diaphragm, it was easily reduced into the abdominal cavity. Composite mesh was sutured to cover the hernial orifice. No perioperative complications or hernia recurrence have been observed in the 8 months since the surgery.

Systematic review of single-port vs. multi-port surgery for rectal cancer.

The aim of the current systematic review was to compare the short-term clinical and oncological outcomes of single-port surgery (SPS) to multi-port surgery (MPS) for rectal cancer in MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane Library from January 2010 to December 2018. A total of 5 clinical controlled studies composed one randomized pilot study and four non-randomized studies with a total of 461 patients were analyzed after a systematic review. A total of 125 patients (27.1%) underwent SPS and 336 patients (72.9%) underwent MPS for rectal cancer. The rate of conversion to open surgery was lower in the SPS group compared with the MPS group (0.8 vs. 5.4%, respectively). A total of 16.8% of patients in the SPS group required an additional port to complete the operation. The morbidity rate was lower in the SPS group compared with the MPS group (28.0 vs. 39.0%, respectively). The other short-term clinical outcomes were similar in both groups. The R0 resection rate was 99.0% in the SPS group and 98.7% in the MPS group. The oncological clearance was satisfactory and similar in both groups. The current study concluded that SPS can be performed safely and provide satisfactory oncological outcomes in patients with rectal cancer. However, further studies are required to determine the role of SPS in the long-term clinical and oncological outcomes.

[A Case of Cecal Cancer Directly Invading the Duodenum with a Mobile Cecum].

A 70-year-old man showing positive results for a fecal occult blood test was admitted to a local hospital. He was suspected of double cancer in the cecum and duodenum. While performing ileocolic and segmental duodenal resections, he was diagnosed with cecal cancer invading the duodenum, following which he underwent surgical intervention. The tumor directly invaded the duodenum because of the mobile cecum. This case of duodenal invasion by cecal cancer is atypical.

Evaluation of short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 80 years old: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: It remains controversial whether the advantages of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) are beneficial in elderly patients (EP, age ≥ 80 years). The present study aimed to evaluate whether age itself is an independent risk factor for laparoscopic surgery by comparing short- and long-term outcomes between non-EP and EP groups. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 730 consecutive patients with stage I-III CRC who had undergone elective surgery between 2010 and 2017, using propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 49 months. After matching, we enrolled 228 patients. In the matched cohort, estimated operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node dissection ≥ D3, number of lymph nodes harvested < 12, conversion rate, multivisceral resection rate, postoperative complication rate, and length of postsurgical stay were similar between the two groups. Before matching, compared with the non-EP group, the EP group had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (p < 0.01), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p < 0.01), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.01), and higher frequency of local recurrence (LR) (p = 0.01); however, there was no significant difference in terms of incidence of LR or CSS between the two groups in the matched cohort. Prior to matching, multivariate analysis identified age ≥ 80 years as an independent prognostic factor for OS (p < 0.01), CSS (p < 0.01), and RFS (p = 0.01); however, after matching, age ≥ 80 years was not an independent poor prognostic factor for OS or CCS. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery offers a safe, effective option for CRC in EP aged ≥ 80 years.

Oncological outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for pathological T4 colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSES: Whether laparoscopic colectomy (LC) is safe and effective for patients with locally advanced T4 colon cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of LC and open colectomy (OC) for patients with pathological (p) T4 colon cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 151 consecutive patients with pT4M0 colon cancer who underwent curative surgery between 2010 and 2017 using a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: After propensity score-matching, we enrolled 100 patients (n = 50 in each group). Median follow-up was 43.5 months. The conversion rate to laparotomy in this study was 5.5% for the entire patient cohort and 6.0% for the matched cohort. Compared to the OC group, the LC group showed reductions in estimated blood loss and length of postsurgical stay. Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ II and all-grade complication rates were significantly lower in the LC group than in the OC group. R0 resection was achieved in all patients with LC. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of overall, cancer-specific, recurrence-free survival, or incidence of local recurrence among the entire patient cohort and matched cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The oncological outcomes were similar between the LC and OC groups. LC offers a safe, feasible option for patients with pT4 colon cancer.

Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Followed by Delayed Primary Closure for Abdominal Wounds in Patients with Lower Gastrointestinal Perforations: Multicenter Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and its application to severely contaminated wounds sustained during surgery remain to be established. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of utilizing NPWT until delayed primary closure (DPC) by assessing the infection rates in patients with lower gastrointestinal perforations. METHODS: This prospective multicenter cohort study included 56 patients that underwent abdominal surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforations in eight institutions, from February 2016 to May 2017. All patients received NPWT after surgery before attempting DPC. The extent of peritonitis was categorized according to Hinchey's classification. Patients in stages II-IV were included. RESULTS: Five patients had surgical site infections (SSIs) during NPWT and did not receive a DPC (9%). Of the 51 patients that received DPCs, 44 had no infection (91%) and 7 developed SSIs after the DPC (13.7%). For stages II, III, and IV, the SSI rates were 0%, 22.6%, and 35.7%, respectively; the median (range) times to wound healing were 15 (10-36), 19 (11-99), and 19 (10-53) days, respectively. There were no significant differences between the stages. CONCLUSIONS: NPWT followed by DPC resulted in low infection rates in each peritonitis stage. This approach appears promising as an alternative to traditional DPC alone for treating lower gastrointestinal perforations.

[A Case of Unresectable Gallbladder Cancer with Relatively Good Prognosis Treated with Upfront Surgery Followed by Systemic Chemotherapy].

A female patient in her 60s was diagnosed with advanced gallbladder cancer invading the hilar plate. Exploratory laparoscopic examination showed limited peritoneal dissemination. Despite endoscopic nasobiliary drainage, it was difficult to treat infectious cholangitis. To initiate chemotherapy, it was imperative to control the infection; hence, we chose to perform extended right hepatectomy, extrahepatic bile duct resection, lymph node dissection, and cholangiojejunostomy. We have been able to continue systemic chemotherapy for more than 2 years after surgery, and the patient did not experience infectious cholangitis. She has survived for almost 2 years and 8 months post-diagnosis.

[pCR Achievement in Two Cases Treated with XELOXIRI as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer].

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is designed to prevent disease recurrence, particularly distant recurrence, and to improve overall patient survival. We present 2 cases where pathological complete response(pCR)was obtained after administering XELOXIRI as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Case 1: The patient was a 63-year-old man diagnosed with rectal cancer(Ra, cT4aN1M0, cStage Ⅲa)and treated with 6 courses of XELOXIRI as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After systemic chemotherapy, he underwent laparoscopy-assisted low anterior resection and showed a pCR. Case 2: The patient was a 56-year-old man diagnosed with rectal cancer(Rb, cT3N3M0, cStage Ⅲb)and treated with 6 couses of XELOXIRI as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After systemic chemotherapy, he underwent low anterior resection and showed a pCR. CONCLUSION: We present 2 cases treated with XELOXIRI as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer where pCRwas achieved.

[Clinical Outcome of Radiation Therapy for Solitary Lymph Node Metastasis of Gastric Cancer].

We report the clinical course of 6 gastric cancer patients who received radiation therapy at our hospital for solitary lymph node metastasis. The site of the metastatic lymph node was the clavicle, para-aorta, para-portal vein, common hepatic artery, and diaphragm in 1, 1, 2, 1, and 1 case, respectively. Median irradiation dose was 50[range, 45-50.4]Gy, and combination chemotherapy was administered in 4 cases. The clinical outcome was complete response and partial response in 3 cases each, with no adverse events associated with radiation therapy. The median progression-free survival was 11.3 months. In summary, local treatment by radiation therapy is one of the treatment options for patients with solitary lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer.

[A Case of Colon Cancer with Peritoneal Dissemination and Liver Metastasis That Responded to Comprehensive Treatment by Perioperative Chemotherapy and Cytoreductive Surgery].

A 64-year-old man was referred to our hospital to determine the cause of fecal occult blood. Colonoscopy revealed a type Ⅱtumor located in the ascending colon. Histopathologic analysis of the tumor biopsy specimen revealed moderately differen- tiated, tubular adenocarcinoma with KRAS exon 2(G12V)mutation. FDG-PET/CT revealed high trace accumulation in the S4 of the liver and in multiple sites spread across the abdominal cavity(cT4aN1M1c2[H1, P3], cStage Ⅳc). Chemotherapy using S-1 plus oxaliplatin(SOX)with bevacizumab(Bmab)was administered. After 8 courses of SOX with Bmab, the volume of the ascending colon cancer and liver metastasis reduced, and peritoneal disseminations disappeared. We, therefore, considered that curability B resection was suitable, and performed right hemicolectomy, total omentectomy, and resection of the rectovesical peritoneum. Histopathological examination of surgical specimens revealed extensive fibrosis from the submucosa to subserosal tissue with some tubular adenocarcinoma cells(histological effect: Grade 2). For maintenance therapy, trifluri- dine/tipiracil plus Bmab was administered after cytoreduction. The patient is in remission for 26 months without recurrence. Perioperative chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery are useful for the treatment of colon cancer with diffuse peritoneal dissemination.

The safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection: Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive cases.

INTRODUCTION: Whether prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is necessary remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after LLR. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients who underwent LLR at Osaka Rosai Hospital from April 2011 to November 2018 was performed. During this period, prophylactic abdominal drainage was routinely omitted during LLR without biliary anastomosis. The primary endpoint was the frequency of additional abdominal drainage. The secondary endpoint was the rate of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients (96%) underwent partial resection or lateral segmentectomy, and 89 patients (89%) were Child-Pugh grade A. The median operative time was 102 (range, 31-274) minutes. The median blood loss was minimal (range, 0-280 ml), and blood transfusion was performed for one patient (1%). One case (1%) was converted to open surgery. Additional abdominal drainage was required for one patient (1%) with an intraabdominal abscess. Postoperative complications were seen in 5 patients (5%). High-grade complications (≥grade III according to the Clavien-Dindo classification) were seen in two patients (2%). There were no cases of reoperation or perioperative death. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 (range, 4-65) days. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic abdominal drainage could be safely omitted for selected patients and operative procedures.