Prognostic effect of categorized tumor deposits in gastric cancer: A single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Tumor deposits are defined as all types of isolated cancer lesions without lymphocyte aggregates considered part of the lymph node. Tumor deposits have been reported as a negative prognostic factor. However, the survival significance of categorized tumor deposits is uncertain, particularly in gastric cancer. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic difference among categorized tumor deposits. METHODS: Patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer were enrolled. All tumor deposits were categorized into irregular nodule, irregular nodule star, smooth nodule, and vascular/neural invasion. There are some cases with more than 2 categorized tumor deposits. These cases were categorized as tumor deposit complex in the following analysis. We performed survival analysis between the patients with and without tumor deposits, and compared the survival among each categorized tumor deposit. RESULTS: Of 868 patients, there were 96 (11.1%) and 772 (88.9%) patients with and without tumor deposits. Vascular/neural invasion, smooth nodule, irregular nodule, irregular nodule star, and the tumor deposits complex was observed in 6 (6.3%), 15 (15.6%), 43 (44.8%), 1 (1.0%), and 31 (32.3%) patients. Patients with tumor deposits displayed poorer survival than those without; the 3-year overall survival: tumor deposits negative = 87.0%, tumor deposits positive = 53.2% (P < .001). Survival analysis revealed tumor deposits can be a prognostic risk factor (hazard ratio: 1.9854, 95% confidence interval: 1.393-2.830, P < .01). Irregular nodule and the tumor deposits complex demonstrated the worst prognosis (irregular nodule 3-year overall survival: 51.2%, tumor deposits complex 3-year overall survival: 41.9%, P = .001), whereas smooth nodule demonstrated better prognosis (smooth nodule 3-year overall survival: 80%). CONCLUSION: Tumor deposits exerted a negative survival effect in gastric cancer. Irregular nodule and the tumor deposits complex displayed a strong prognostic effect.

Clinical Complete Response of Recurrent Gastric Cancer after Third-line CPT-11 Chemotherapy.

A 75-year-old man underwent distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in September 2018. During the adjuvant chemotherapy, computed tomography (CT) revealed recurrence sites in the liver and para-aortic lymph nodes. Therefore, chemotherapy was initiated. After first-line (capecitabine with oxaliplatin) and second-line (paclitaxel with ramucirumab) treatments, nivolumab was used as third-line chemotherapy. This treatment showed a strong effect against the tumor. However, following an immune-related adverse effect (irAE) because of nivolumab, the therapy was halted. The irAE was diagnosed with central adrenal insufficiency that was controllable by oral intake of steroids. CPT-11 was started and showed a similarly strong effect to that observed for nivolumab. Eventually, the recurrent tumor lesions became too small to be detected by CT. We discontinued CPT-11 at the request of the patient. Even after discontinuation, no recurrent sites have been observed, allowing us to declare a case of clinical complete response (cCR). In conclusion, even if irAEs occur in a patient, continuing chemotherapy should be considered. However, if cCR is achieved, discontinuation of chemotherapy might be a strategic treatment option.

Late complication after gastrectomy for clinical stage I cancer: supplementary analysis of JCOG0912.

BACKGROUND: Late complications following gastric cancer surgery, including postgastrectomy syndromes, are complex problems requiring a solution. Reported risk factors for developing late complications include surgery-related factors, such as the surgical approach and the extent of resection and reconstruction. However, this has not been assessed in a prospective study with a large sample size. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications. Data from the JCOG0912 trial were used. It compared laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) to open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in clinical stage I gastric cancer patients. METHODS: This study included 881/921 patients enrolled in the JCOG0912 trial. The incidence of late complications was compared between the ODG and the LADG arms. In addition, associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications were assessed by multivariable analyses using the proportional odds model to identify relevant risk factors. RESULTS: There was no difference in the type or number of patients with late complications between the LADG and the ODG arms. The multivariable analysis for each late complication revealed that the Billroth-I reconstruction (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a lower risk of cholecystitis [odds ratio (OR) 0.187, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.039-0.905, P = 0.037] or ileus (OR 0.116, 95%CI 0.033-0.406, P < 0.001), and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a higher risk of reflux esophagitis (OR 3.348, 95% CI 1.371-8.176, P = 0.008). The surgical approach was not a risk factor for any late complications. CONCLUSION: Differences in surgical approaches did not constitute a risk for developing late complications after gastrectomy. Billroth-I reconstruction reduced the risk of ileus and cholecystitis, but pylorus-preserving gastrectomy carried a risk for reflux esophagitis.

Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer treated with 2-weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil: an exploratory analysis of the JCOG0807.

BACKGROUND: We herein investigated the association between early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer treated with 2-weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil (bDCF) using data from the JCOG0807, a phase I/II trial of bDCF as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic esophageal cancer. METHODS: ETS was defined as a percent decrease in the sum of the target lesions' longest diameter after 8 weeks, whereas DpR was defined as a percentage of the maximal tumor shrinkage during the treatment course. Multivariable analyses were conducted to identify significant prognostic variables in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS): one for ETS and covariates, and another for DpR and covariates. RESULTS: Among 53 patients, 35 patients with ETS ≥ 20% (66.0%) had longer PFS (7.5 vs. 3.4 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.26, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.14-0.49), OS (13.8 vs. 6.1 months, HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.11-0.39), and PPS (6.4 vs. 2.8 months, HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.72) than those with ETS < 20%. In addition, 37 patients with DpR ≥ 30% (69.8%) had longer PFS (7.5 vs. 2.9 months, HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.08-0.34), OS (13.8 vs. 6.0 months, HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.27), and PPS (6.8 vs. 2.8 months, HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.58) than those with DpR < 30%. Multivariable analyses revealed that each ETS and DpR was an independent factor of longer PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: ETS and DpR might be associated with clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer treated with bDCF.

Evaluating the optimal treatment strategy for early and advanced remnant gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed lymph node metastasis characteristics to investigate the optimal treatment strategy for early and advanced remnant gastric cancer (RGC). METHODS: Cases of completion gastrectomy for RGC were enrolled. The frequency of lymph node metastasis was investigated, and risk factors for metastasis were identified. The clinical significance of completion gastrectomy in early remnant gastric carcinoma cases was also examined. In advanced cases, 3-year survival was analysed to investigate the prognostic importance of lymph node dissection and splenectomy. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included. Lymphatic invasion and pathological tumour depth were identified as risk factors for lymph node metastasis. There was no metastasis in the pT1 cases. In advanced cases, the incidence of lymph node #10 and jejunal lymph node metastasis was 8.3-10.0% and 17.6%, respectively. Prognosis was found to be unrelated with splenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphatic invasion and pathological T status were identified as risk factors for LN metastasis in RGC. Additional gastrectomy after ESD might not be mandatory for early RGC cases. For advanced RGC cases, splenectomy might not improve patient prognosis, however, lymph node dissection of jejunal and #10 lymph nodes should be considered due to its high incidence of metastasis.

Assessing the Prognostic Value of Extranodal Extension in Esophageal Cancer from the Pathological Staging Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Extranodal extension (ENE) is a prognostic factor for several types of malignant tumors, including esophageal cancer. Although the prognostic value of ENE has been investigated in esophageal cancer, its clinical utility warrants further investigation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study evaluated 105 patients who underwent esophagectomy and had histologically node-positive metastasis between January 2007 and June 2017. The abilities of ENE to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, as well as Cox proportional hazard models. Subgroup analyses of ENE's prognostic value were performed according to each pathological tumor-node-metastasis category. RESULTS: Significant differences according to ENE status were observed in the Kaplan-Meier analyses of OS (p = 0.001) and DFS (p = 0.001), as well as in the Cox proportional hazards models for OS (p = 0.009) and DFS (p = 0.012). Relative to patients without ENE, patients with ENE had significantly poorer OS if they also had pT3 status, pN1 status, or pathological stage III disease. However, no significant differences were observed in the subgroup analyses of pN3 status and pathological stage IV disease. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with esophageal cancer, ENE status can predict a poor prognosis and may be useful for patient stratification. However, the prognostic value of ENE status may be limited to patients with specific pathological factors.

Impact of preoperative chemotherapy as initial treatment for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis limited to positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY1) or localized peritoneal metastasis (P1a): a multi-institutional retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis are defined as stage IV in the Japanese classification of GC. For patients with peritoneal metastasis limited to positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY1) and/or localized peritoneal metastasis (P1a), gastrectomy followed by S1 monotherapy is one of the most widely accepted therapeutic strategy in Japan. This study investigated the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy as initial treatment in GC patients with CY1 and/or P1a. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed GC patients diagnosed with CY1 and/or P1a at 34 institutions in Japan between 2008 and 2012. Selection criteria were: adenocarcinoma, no distant metastasis except CY1 or P1a, and no prior treatment. The subjects were divided into an Initial-Chemotherapy group and an Initial-Surgery group, according to the initial treatment. RESULTS: A total of 824 patients were collected and 713 eligible patients were identified for this study. As the initial treatment, 150 patients received chemotherapy (Initial-Cx), and 563 patients underwent surgery (Initial-Sx). Initial-Cx regimens were cisplatin plus S1/docetaxel plus cisplatin plus S1/others (n = 90/37/23). Both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were similar between the Initial-Cx and Initial-Sx groups (median OS 24.8 and 24.0 months, HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.87-1.3; median PFS 14.9 and 13.9 months, HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.85-1.27). The 5-year OS rates were 22.3% in the Initial-Cx group and 21.5% in the Initial-Sx group. CONCLUSIONS: Although, the preoperative chemotherapy did not show a survival benefit for GC patients with CY1 and/or P1a, initial-Cx showed favorable survival in patients who converted to P0 and CY0.

Laparoscopic mediastinal approach for retrosternal gastric conduit cancer after esophagectomy.

The prognosis of esophageal cancer has improved, but the incidence of gastric conduit cancer has increased. Gastric conduit cancer is difficult to treat because current treatment options are highly invasive; in particular, surgical procedures have high mortality and modality. Treatment through the retrosternal route usually requires sternotomy, which often causes lethal osteomyelitis. To prevent lethal complications and reduce invasiveness, we used the laparoscopic mediastinal approach. Here, we report a successful case using the laparoscopic mediastinal approach for the treatment of gastric conduit cancer through the retrosternal route. Despite a few concerns, this approach can be a treatment option for gastric conduit cancer through the retrosternal route.

Prognostic value of tumor regression grade following the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy as treatment for gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis of 14 published studies.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for advanced gastric cancer (GC) has recently been revealed. The use of tumor regression grade (TRG) has also been reported, where TRG has been positively correlated with prognosis. However, previous studies included several types of GC and treatments. The prognostic value of TRG in a specific population has not been well investigated. Therefore, a meta-analysis of studies on gastric adenocarcinomas treated with NAC that evaluate the prognostic impact of TRG on overall survival (OS) must be conducted to provide more accurate evidence. METHODS: A meta-analysis of studies reporting gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction (GC/GEJ) adenocarcinoma treated with NAC was performed. Studies that calculate the number of responders and non-responders were considered eligible. The risk ratio (RR) was obtained from the eligible studies, and a random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies, which included a total of 1660 patients, were included in the current study. The responders showed better OS (RR: 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.60, P < 0.001). All subgroup analyses (Asian vs. non-Asian populations, different TRGs, GC/GEJ vs. GC) also revealed the statistical dominance of better TRG over better OS. However, the possibility of some publication bias remained. CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, better TRG was associated with better OS. However, the histology, configuration, and location of GC varied. Hence, a more subdivided analysis is recommended to obtain more solid evidence.

A 3-Year Overall Survival Update From a Phase 2 Study of Chemoselection With DCF and Subsequent Conversion Surgery for Locally Advanced Unresectable Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: A multicenter phase 2 trial analysed chemoselection with docetaxel plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (DCF) induction chemotherapy (ICT) and subsequent conversion surgery (CS) for locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer. This study presents updated 3-year analyses to further characterize the impact of DCF-ICT followed by CS. METHODS: Esophageal cancer patients with clinical T4 disease, unresectable supraclavicular lymph node metastasis, or both were eligible for this study. The treatment starts with DCF-ICT, followed by CS if the cancer is resectable, or by concurrent chemoradiation if it is not resectable. This updated analysis presents 3-year overall survival (OS), 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), and pattern of relapse. RESULTS: The median follow-up period for the patients surviving without death was 39.3 months. The estimated 1-year OS was 66.7%, and the lower limit of the 80% confidence interval (CI) was 54.6%. The estimated 3-year OS was 46.6% (95% CI 34.2-63.5%). The OS for the patients who underwent R0 resection (n = 19) was significantly longer than for those who did not (3-year OS: 71.4% vs. 30.1%). The estimated 1-year PFS was 50.6%, and the 3-year PFS was 39.6%. The PFS for R0 was significantly longer than for non-R0 (3-year PFS: 61.3% vs 25.0%). Recurrence or progression at the primary site was observed in 31% of the non-R0 group. The rate of distant metastasis did not differ significantly between the non-R0 and R0 groups (21% vs 16%). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up evaluation confirmed that DCF chemoselection aimed at CS is feasible and promising in terms of survival for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Phase II feasibility study of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and elective lymph node irradiation for clinical stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for stage II/III esophageal cancer. Preoperative chemotherapy is also considered a standard treatment for stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in patients who undergo radical lymph node dissection. We conducted a feasibility study of preoperative CRT with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF) and elective lymph node irradiation followed by esophagectomy with radical lymph node dissection in patients with stage II/III ESCC. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage II/III, excluding T4, ESCC (International Union Against Cancer TNM classification system, 6th edition) were eligible. Chemotherapy comprised two courses of CF infusion repeated after 4-weeks. Radiation therapy was concurrently administered to the primary tumor, metastatic lymph nodes, and regional lymph nodes at a dose of 41.4 Gy. After the completion of CRT, transthoracic esophagectomy with 2-3 fields lymphadenectomy was performed. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of protocol treatment with R0 resection. RESULTS: Thirty-one eligible patients were enrolled. During CRT, the most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were leukopenia (65%), neutropenia (65%), anemia (13%), thrombocytopenia (13%), febrile neutropenia (13%), anorexia (16%), esophagitis (16%) and hyponatremia (16%). Thirty patients (96.8%) underwent surgery. One patient received palliative chemotherapy because of appearance of lung metastasis during CRT. The completion rate of protocol treatment was 93.5% (29/31). There was one treatment-related death after surgery. Pathological complete response was achieved in 42% (13/30). CONCLUSION: Preoperative CRT with CF and elective lymph node irradiation showed an acceptable toxicity and promising activity especially in ESCC.

Phase II study of chemoselection with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy and subsequent conversion surgery for locally advanced unresectable oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oesophagus is chemoradiation with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF-RT). This multicentre phase II trial assessed the safety and efficacy of chemoselection with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) induction chemotherapy (ICT) and subsequent conversion surgery (CS) for initially unresectable locally advanced SCC of the oesophagus. METHODS: Patients with clinical T4 and/or unresectable supraclavicular lymph node metastasis were eligible. Treatment started with three cycles of DCF-ICT, followed by CS if resectable, or by CF-RT if unresectable. The resectability was re-evaluated at 30-40 Gy of CF-RT, followed by CS if resectable, or by completion of 60 Gy of CF-RT. If resectable after CF-RT, CS was performed. The primary end point was 1-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: From April 2013 to July 2014, 48 patients were enrolled. CS was performed in 41.7% (n=20), including DCF-CS (n=18), DCF-CF-RT40Gy-CS (n=1), and DCF-CF-RT60Gy-CS (n=1). R0 resection was confirmed in 19 patients (39.6%). Grade ⩾3 postoperative complications included one event each of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, lung infection, wound infection, pulmonary fistula, and dysphagia; but no serious postoperative complications were observed in patients undergoing CS. Clinical complete response after CF-RT was confirmed in 4 patients (8.3%). The estimated 1-year OS was 67.9% and lower limit of 80% confidence interval was 59.7%. There was one treatment-related death in patient receiving DCF-CF-RT60Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoselection with DCF-ICT followed by CS as a multidisciplinary treatment strategy showed promising signs of tolerability and efficacy in patients with locally advanced unresectable SCC of the oesophagus.

Phase I/II trial of 2-weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil in metastatic esophageal cancer (JCOG0807).

We carried out a phase I/II trial of adding 2-weekly docetaxel to cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) therapy (2-weekly DCF regimen) in esophageal cancer patients to investigate its safety and antimetastatic activity. Patients received 2-weekly docetaxel (30 mg/m(2) [dose level (DL)1] or 40 mg/m(2) [DL2] with a 3 + 3 design in phase I, on days 1 and 15) in combination with fixed-dose CF (80 mg/m(2) cisplatin, day 1; 800 mg/m(2) fluorouracil, days 1-5) repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in phase I and central peer review-based response rate in phase II. At least 22 responders among 50 patients were required to satisfy the primary endpoint with a threshold of 35%. Sixty-two patients were enrolled in phase I and II. In phase I, 10 patients were enrolled with DLT of 0/3 at DL1 and 2/7 in DL2. Considering DLT and treatment compliance, the recommended phase II dose was determined as DL1. In phase II, the response rate was 62% (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 48-75%); median overall survival and progression-free survival were 11.1 and 5.8 months, respectively. Common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (25%), anemia (36%), hyponatremia (29%), anorexia (24%), and nausea (11%). No febrile neutropenia was observed. Pneumonitis caused treatment-related death in one patient. The 2-weekly DCF regimen showed promising antimetastatic activity and tolerability. A phase III study comparing this regimen with CF therapy is planned by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN 000001737.

Phase II feasibility study of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) as preoperative treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been investigated. We carried out a multicenter phase II feasibility study of preoperative chemotherapy with DCF for ESCC. Patients with clinical stage II/III ESCC (International Union Against Cancer TNM classification system, 6th edition) were eligible. Chemotherapy consisted of i.v. docetaxel (70-75 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (70-75 mg/m(2)) on day 1, and continuous infusion of fluorouracil (750 mg/m(2)/day) on days 1-5. Antibiotic prophylaxis on days 5-15 was mandatory. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks with a maximum of three cycles allowed. After completion of chemotherapy, esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy was carried out. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of protocol treatment. Forty-two eligible patients were enrolled. During chemotherapy, the most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (83%), anorexia (7%), and stomatitis (5%). Forty-one (98%) patients underwent surgery. The completion rate of protocol treatment was 90.5% (38/42). No treatment-related death was observed and the incidence of operative morbidity was tolerable. According to RECIST, the overall response rate after the completion of DCF was 64.3%. Pathological complete response was achieved in 17%. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 74.5% and 88.0%, respectively. Although these data are preliminary, preoperative DCF was well tolerated. Antitumor activity was highly promising and warrants further investigation. This trial was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network (no. UMIN000002396).

New method for colorectal cancer diagnosis based on SSCP analysis of DNA from exfoliated colonocytes in naturally evacuated feces.

BACKGROUND: Establishment of a sensitive, reliable and non-invasive method for the diagnosis of early-stage colorectal cancer is necessary, because colorectal cancer can be cured surgically if diagnosed early. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of using PCR-SSCP (polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism) analysis of the DNA extracted from the colonocytes isolated from naturally evacuated feces, in order to detect colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Colonocytes exfoliated into feces, retrieved from 33 patients with colorectal cancer and 63 healthy volunteers, were analyzed for the presence of mutations in their DNA. The DNA extracted from the colonocytes was examined for mutations of the APC, K-ras and p53 genes using direct sequence analysis, and also subjected to PCR-SSCP analysis. RESULTS: Genetic alterations were detected in the colonocytes isolated from the feces of 12 out of 33 patients with colorectal cancer (36.4%) by direct sequence analysis. PCR-SSCP analysis using the same DNA samples revealed abnormal signals in 18 of the 33 patients (54.5%). However, 3 and 7 among the 63 healthy volunteers were also found to have abnormal genetic alterations by direct sequence and PCR-SSCP analysis, respectively. CONCLUSION: The present study indicated the feasibility of using PCR-SSCP analysis for the detection of mutations in the DNA extracted from colonocytes isolated from naturally evacuated fecal samples.

Expression profiling of fecal colonocytes for RNA-based screening of colorectal cancer.

The early detection of colorectal cancer originating from any part of the colorectum is desirable because this cancer can be cured surgically if diagnosed early. We searched for marker genes for a fecal RNA-based colorectal cancer screening method by comparison of genome-wide expression profiles among cancerous and non-cancerous tissues, and healthy volunteer- and cancer patient-derived colonocytes from the feces, and the peripheral blood. Of 14,564 genes, only 3 (PAP, REG1A, and DPEP1) were selectable as final candidates which were expressed frequently at any stage of this cancer and were suppressed in non-cancerous tissues and also in the peripheral blood and colonocytes of healthy volunteers. Next, we directly compared fecal RNA-expression profiles between colorectal cancer patients and healthy volunteers, and found that most of the genes (92%) expressed in the colonocytes of the cancer patients were not expressed in those of the healthy volunteers. Six genes (SEPP1, RPL27A, ATP1B1, EEF1A1, SFN, and RPS11) selected randomly from 85 cancer patient-derived colonocyte-specific genes were evaluated. In total, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or focused microarray of all those 9 genes detected 18 (78%) of 23 curable colorectal cancers (Dukes stages A-C), 9 or 10 (64% or 71%) of 14 early cancers with no lymph node metastasis (Dukes stage A or B) and 4 (80%) of 5 right-sided cancers. Our extensive gene list provides other markers for fecal RNA-based colorectal cancer screening.

PCR-based assessment of the recovery rate of exfoliated colonocytes or cancer cells from fecal samples depends on the storage conditions after defecation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We recently developed a new methodology for isolating colonocytes from fecal samples. We then applied a DNA-based analysis to the isolated colonocytes to detect colorectal cancer cells originating from any part of the colorectum. The purpose of the present study was to determine how long after defecation and at what temperature the fecal samples should be stored to isolate the colonocytes successfully. METHODS: Fecal samples were collected from 6 patients with colorectal cancer and 6 healthy volunteers soon after defecation at the National Cancer Center Hospital. The fecal samples were stored at 4 degrees C, room temperature or 40 degrees C for 0, 24 or 48 hours. Colonocytes were then isolated from the fecal samples, and the DNA was purified. Finally, PCR for p53, K-ras and APC was conducted to determine whether the corresponding PCR products could be obtained. RESULTS: The colonocyte recovery rate was not reduced, when compared with the data for successful PCR amplification, if the fecal samples were kept at 4 degrees C after defecation and if the colonocytes were isolated within 48 hours after defecation. CONCLUSIONS: The present data provided important clinical knowledge regarding the storage of fecal samples for future mass screening tests.

A new method for isolating colonocytes from naturally evacuated feces and its clinical application to colorectal cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The early detection of colorectal cancer is desired because this cancer can be cured surgically if diagnosed early. The purpose of the present study was to determine the feasibility of a new methodology for isolating colonocytes from naturally evacuated feces, followed by cytology or molecular biology of the colonocytes to detect colorectal cancer originating from any part of the colorectum. METHODS: Several simulation studies were conducted to establish the optimal methods for retrieving colonocytes from any portion of feces. Colonocytes exfoliated into feces, which had been retrieved from 116 patients with colorectal cancer and 83 healthy volunteers, were analyzed. Part of the exfoliated colonocytes was examined cytologically, whereas the remainder was subjected to DNA analysis. The extracted DNA was examined for mutations of the APC, K-ras, and p53 genes using direct sequence analysis and was also subjected to microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis. RESULTS: In the DNA analysis, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 71% (82 of 116) of patients with colorectal cancer and 88% (73 of 83) of healthy volunteers. The sensitivity for Dukes A and B was 72% (44 of 61). Furthermore, the sensitivity for cancers on the right side of the colon was 57% (20 of 35). The detection rate for genetic alterations using our methodology was 86% (80 of 93) when the analysis was limited to cases in which genetic alterations were present in the cancer tissue. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a new methodology for isolating colonocytes from feces. The present study describes a promising procedure for future clinical evaluations and the early detection of colorectal cancers, including right-side colon cancer.

All pathological T4 esophageal carcinomas should be categorized as stage IV.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The prognosis of pathological T4 (pT4) esophageal carcinoma is still dismal, however, the current TNM classification categorizes some pT4 cancers (pT4M0) as stage III. The purpose of this study was to evaluate of the relevance of this classification. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and thirty-five patients who underwent esophagectomy for pathological stage III (n = 85) and IV (n = 50) esophageal tumors were enrolled in the study. The outcomes and prognostic factors for these patients were examined. After the reclassification that pT4M0 tumors were categorized as stage IV, the two survival curves were compared between new stage III and IV. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates for stage III and IV were 14.6%, 19.1%, respectively (P = 0.9). The 5-year survival rates for pT3N1M0 and pT4M0 were 21.1%, 0%, respectively (P < 0.0001). After the reclassification, the overall 5-year survival rates for new stage III and IV were 24.0%, 14.2%, respectively (P = 0.004). Curative resection (P = 0.002), radiotherapy (P = 0.001), depth of tumor invasion (pT3; P = 0.0004, pT1; P = 0.04) were the significant prognostic factors for stage III and IV carcinomas. Thirty-one (83.8%) of 37 patients with pT4 tumor had received non-curative esophagectomy. CONCLUSIONS: All pathological T4 esophageal carcinomas should be categorized as stage IV in the TNM classification.