Mesencephalic Locomotor Region and Presynaptic Inhibition during Anticipatory Postural Adjustments in People with Parkinson's Disease.

Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) and freezing of gait (FOG) have a loss of presynaptic inhibition (PSI) during anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) for step initiation. The mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) has connections to the reticulospinal tract that mediates inhibitory interneurons responsible for modulating PSI and APAs. Here, we hypothesized that MLR activity during step initiation would explain the loss of PSI during APAs for step initiation in FOG (freezers). Freezers (n = 34) were assessed in the ON-medication state. We assessed the beta of blood oxygenation level-dependent signal change of areas known to initiate and pace gait (e.g., MLR) during a functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol of an APA task. In addition, we assessed the PSI of the soleus muscle during APA for step initiation, and clinical (e.g., disease duration) and behavioral (e.g., FOG severity and APA amplitude for step initiation) variables. A linear multiple regression model showed that MLR activity (R2 = 0.32, p = 0.0006) and APA amplitude (R2 = 0.13, p = 0.0097) explained together 45% of the loss of PSI during step initiation in freezers. Decreased MLR activity during a simulated APA task is related to a higher loss of PSI during APA for step initiation. Deficits in central and spinal inhibitions during APA may be related to FOG pathophysiology.

Short-term resistance training with instability reduces impairment in V wave and H reflex in individuals with Parkinson's disease.

This study had two objectives: 1) to compare the effects of 3 wk of resistance training (RT) and resistance training with instability (RTI) on evoked reflex responses at rest and during maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) and 2) to determine the effectiveness of RT and RTI in moving values of evoked reflex responses of individuals with PD toward values of age-matched healthy control subjects (HCs) (z-score analysis). Ten individuals in the RT group and 10 in the RTI group performed resistance exercises twice a week for 3 wk, but only the RTI group included unstable devices. The HC group (n = 10) were assessed at pretest only. Evoked reflex responses at rest (H reflex and M wave) and during MVIC [supramaximal M-wave amplitude (Msup) and supramaximal V-wave amplitude (Vsup)] of the plantar flexors were assessed before and after the experimental protocol. From pretraining to posttraining, only RTI increased ratio of maximal H-reflex amplitude to maximal M-wave amplitude at rest (Hmax/Mmax), Msup, Vsup/Msup, and peak torque of the plantar flexors (P < 0.05). At posttraining, RTI was more effective than RT in increasing resting Hmax and Vsup and in moving these values to those observed in HCs (P < 0.05). We conclude that short-term RTI is more effective than short-term RT in modulating H-reflex excitability and in increasing efferent neural drive, approaching average values of HCs. Thus short-term RTI may cause positive changes at the spinal and supraspinal levels in individuals with PD. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Maximal H-reflex amplitude (Hmax) at rest and efferent neural drive [i.e., supramaximal V-wave amplitude (Vsup)] to skeletal muscles during maximal contraction are impaired in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Short-term resistance training with instability was more effective than short-term resistance training alone in increasing Hmax and Vsup of individuals with Parkinson's disease, reaching the average values of healthy control subjects.

Resistance training with instability is more effective than resistance training in improving spinal inhibitory mechanisms in Parkinson's disease.

This study assessed 1) the effects of 12 wk of resistance training (RT) and resistance training with instability (RTI) on presynaptic inhibition (PSI) and disynaptic reciprocal inhibition (DRI) of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD); 2) the effectiveness of RT and RTI in moving PSI and DRI values of patients toward values of age-matched healthy controls (HC; Z-score analysis); and 3) associations between PSI and DRI changes and clinical outcomes changes previously published. Thirteen patients in RT group, 13 in RTI group, and 11 in a nonexercising control group completed the trial. While RT and RTI groups performed resistance exercises twice a week for 12 wk, only the RTI group used unstable devices. The soleus H reflex was used to evaluate resting PSI and DRI before and after the experimental protocol. The HC (n = 31) was assessed at pretest only. There were significant group × time interactions for PSI (P < 0.0001) and DRI (P < 0.0001). RTI was more effective than RT in increasing the levels of PSI (P = 0.0154) and DRI (P < 0.0001) at posttraining and in moving PSI [confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.5] and DRI (CI 0.6-1.1) levels to those observed in HC. There was association between DRI and quality of life changes (r = -0.69, P = 0.008) and a strong trend toward association between PSI and postural instability changes (r = 0.60, P = 0.051) after RTI. RTI increased PSI and DRI levels more than RT, reaching the average values of the HC. Thus RTI may cause plastic changes in PSI and DRI pathways that are associated with some PD clinical outcomes. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have motor dysfunction. Spinal inhibitory mechanisms are important for modulating both supraspinal motor commands and sensory feedback at the spinal level. Resistance training with instability was more effective than resistance training in increasing the levels of presynaptic inhibition and disynaptic reciprocal inhibition of lower limb at rest of the patients with PD, reaching the average values of the healthy controls.

Resistance Training with Instability for Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

PURPOSE: This randomized controlled trial compared the effects of resistance training (RT) and RT with instability (RTI) on the timed up and go test (TUG), on-medication Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III motor subscale score (UPDRS-III), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) score, and muscle strength in the leg press exercise (one-repetition maximum) of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with moderate to severe PD were randomly assigned to a nonexercising control group (C), RT group, and RTI group. The RT and RTI groups performed progressive RT twice a week for 12 wk. However, only the RTI group used high motor complexity exercises (i.e., progressive RT with unstable devices), for example, half squat exercise on the BOSU® device. The primary outcome was mobility (TUG). The secondary outcomes were on-medication motor signs (UPDRS-III), cognitive impairment (MoCA), quality of life (PDQ-39), and muscle strength (one-repetition maximum). RESULTS: There were no differences between RTI and RT groups for any of the outcomes at posttraining (P > 0.05). However, there were differences between RTI and C groups in the TUG, MoCA, and muscle strength values at posttraining (P < 0.05). Only the RTI group improved the TUG (-1.9 s), UPDRS-III score (-4.5 score), MoCA score (6.0 score), and PDQ-39 score (-5.2 score) from pre- to posttraining (P < 0.001). Muscle strength improved for both training groups (P < 0.001). No adverse events were reported during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Both training protocols improved muscle strength, but only RTI improved the mobility, motor signs, cognitive impairment, and quality of life, likely because of the usage of high motor complexity exercises. Thus, RTI may be recommended as an innovative adjunct therapeutic intervention for patients with PD.

Comparação de inibições medulares entre indivíduos com doença de Parkinson e saudáveis / Comparison of spinal inhibitions between parkisonian and helathy individuals

O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar os níveis de inibição pré-sináptica (IPS) e inibição recíproca (IR) entre indivíduos com Doença de Parkinson e saudáveis e, a correlação entre essas inibições e a rigidez muscular e a severidade clínica de indivíduos com Doença de Parkinson (avaliadas através da Escala Unificada de Avaliação da Doença de Parkinson). Foram avaliados 11 indivíduos nos estágios 2 e 3 da doença e 13 indivíduos saudáveis pareados pela idade. A IPS foi menor em indivíduos com Doença de Parkinson (31,6%) do que em saudáveis (67,1%) (p = 0,02). A IR não diferiu entre indivíduos com Doença de Parkinson (26,9%) e saudáveis (27,6%) (p = 0,91). Adicionalmente, não foram detectadas correlações entre os níveis de IPS com a rigidez e a severidade clínica (p > 0,05). Portanto, mecanismos inibitórios não explicam totalmente a rigidez muscular e a severidade clinica da doença. Alterações entre ativação de músculos agonistas e antagonistas parecem estar relacionadas a influências supraespinhais anormais nos mecanismos espinhais decorrentes da doença...

The purposes of the present study were to compare presynaptic inhibition (PI) and disynaptic reciprocal inhibition (DRI) levels between parkinsonians and healthy individuals and to verify the correlation of such inhibitions with muscle rigidity and clinical severity (assessed by the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale). We evaluated 11 parkinsonians in stages 2 and 3 of the disease and 13 healthy individuals matched for age. The PI was significant lower in parkinsonians (31.6%) than in healthy individuals (67.1%) (p = 0.02). The DRI did not differ between parkinsonians (26.9%) and healthy individuals (27.6%) (p = 0.91). Furthermore, no significant correlation was observed between PI with muscle rigidity and clinical severity (p > 0.05). Therefore, inhibitory mechanisms do not fully explain the cause of muscle rigidity and clinical severity of parkinsonians. Changes between the activation of agonist and antagonist muscles seem to be caused by abnormal supraspinal influence on spinal mechanisms...

Avaliação da inibição recíproca em humanos durante contrações isométricas dos músculos tibial anterior e sóleo / Assessment of reciprocal inhibition in humans during isometric contractions of the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles

Os objetivos do presente trabalho foram: (1) desenvolver um método para estimar o grau de inibição recíproca (IR) entre músculos antagonistas em humanos (sóleo e tibial anterior) e (2) comparar os níveis de IR no repouso, na dorsiflexão (DF) e na flexão plantar (FP). Participaram nove sujeitos saudáveis com idade entre 20 e 30 anos, quatro homens e cinco mulheres. Os sujeitos permaneceram sentados numa cadeira com o pé direito apoiado e fixo num pedal acoplado a um torquímetro. Foi aplicado um pulso elétrico na fossa poplítea, denominado estímulo “teste”, para se obter o reflexo H (RH) do músculo sóleo. Num segundo momento, foi aplicado um estímulo “condicionante” ao redor da cabeça da fíbula, que precedia o “teste” em 1 a 3ms. A onda H do músculo sóleo foi captada por eletrodos de superfície. O estudo foi realizado com o sujeito em repouso e realizando contração isométrica dos músculos dorsiflexores e flexores plantares do tornozelo. As amplitudes pico-a-pico dos RH controle e condicionado foram utilizadas para o cálculo da IR. Os valores de IR foram: 16,41% - 8,68 no repouso; 21,94% - 5,39 na DF e 3,12% - 11,84 na FP. Foi constatada menor inibição recíproca na FP quando comparada às demais condições (p<0,05), mas não houve aumento da IR detectável, pela metodologia aplicada...

The purposes of the present study were (1) to develop a method to estimate the level of reciprocal inhibition (RI) between antagonist muscles (soleus and anterior tibial) in humans, and (2) to compare RI levels during rest, dorsiflexion (DF) and plantarflexion (PF). Nine healthy subjects (four men, five women) aged between 20 and 30 years were assessed. Each subject remained seated with his/her right foot straped to a rigid foot plate coupled to a torquemeter. An electrical pulse (“test stimulus”) was applied to the popliteal fossa (tibial nerve) to generate an H reflex from the soleus muscle. After this control situation was tested, a “conditioning stimulus” was applied near the head of the peroneal bone, preceding by 1-3 ms the test stimulus to the tibial nerve. Each subject was tested in the three conditions RE, DF and PF. In the last two cases the subject pressed or pulled on the foot plate with a constant effort. The H reflex amplitudes were measured peak-to-peak and expressed in terms of the maximum M response. The values obtained for RI were 16,41% - 8,68 at RE; 21,94% - 5,39 in DF and 3,12% - 11,84 in PF. There was a statistically significant decrease of RI during PF when compared with the other conditions (Tukey, p<0.05) but no difference between DF compared to RE...