Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 78
Filtrar
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38531812

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Whole blood resuscitation has reemerged as a resuscitation strategy for injured patients. However, the effect of whole blood-based resuscitation on outcomes has not been established. The primary objective of this guideline was to develop evidence-based recommendations on whether whole blood should be considered in civilian trauma patients receiving blood transfusions. METHODS: An EAST working group performed a systematic review and meta-analysis utilizing the GRADE methodology. One PICO question was developed to analyze the effect of whole blood resuscitation in the acute phase on mortality, transfusion requirements, infectious complications, and ICU length of stay. English language studies including adult civilian trauma patients comparing in-hospital whole blood to component therapy were included. Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL Plus, and Web of Science were queried. GRADEpro was used to assess quality of evidence and risk of bias. The study was registered on PROSPERO (#CRD42023451143). RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included. Most patients were severely injured and required blood transfusion, massive transfusion protocol activation, and/or a hemorrhage control procedure in the early phase of resuscitation. Mortality was assessed separately at the following intervals: early (i.e., ED, 3-, or 6-hour), 24-hour, late (i.e., 28- or 30-day), and in-hospital. On meta-analysis, whole blood was not associated with decreased mortality. Whole blood was associated with decreased 4-hour RBC (mean difference -1.82, 95% CI -3.12 to -0.52), 4-hour plasma (mean difference -1.47, 95% CI -2.94 to 0), and 24-hour RBC transfusions (mean difference -1.22, 95% CI -2.24 to -0.19) compared to component therapy. There were no differences in infectious complications or ICU length of stay between groups. CONCLUSION: We conditionally recommend WB resuscitation in adult civilian trauma patients receiving blood transfusions, recognizing that data are limited for certain populations, including women of childbearing age, and therefore this guideline may not apply to these populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Guidelines.

3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523130

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To determine the clinical impact of wound management technique on surgical site infection (SSI), hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality in emergent colorectal surgery. METHODS: A prospective observational study (2021-2023) of urgent or emergent colorectal surgery patients at 15 institutions was conducted. Pediatric patients and traumatic colorectal injuries were excluded. Patients were classified by wound closure technique: skin closed (SC), skin loosely closed (SLC), or skin open (SO). Primary outcomes were SSI, hospital LOS and in-hospital mortality rates. Multivariable regression was used to assess the effect of wound closure on outcomes after controlling for demographics, patient characteristics, ICU admission, vasopressor use, procedure details and wound class. A priori power analysis indicated that 138 patients per group were required to detect a 10% difference in mortality rates. RESULTS: In total, 557 patients were included (SC n = 262, SLC n = 124, SO n = 171). Statistically significant differences in BMI, race/ethnicity, ASA scores, EBL, ICU admission, vasopressor therapy, procedure details, and wound class were observed across groups (Table 1). Overall, average LOS was 16.9 ± 16.4 days, and rates of in-hospital mortality and SSI were 7.9% and 18.5%, respectively, with the lowest rates observed in the SC group (Table 2). After risk adjustment, SO was associated with increased risk of mortality (OR = 3.003, p = 0.028 in comparison to the SC group. SLC was associated with increased risk of superficial SSI (OR = 3.439, p = 0.014), after risk adjustment. CONCLUSION: When compared to the SC group, the SO group was associated with mortality, but comparable when considering all other outcomes, while the SLC was associated with increased superficial SSI. Complete skin closure may be a viable wound management technique in emergent colorectal surgery. STUDY TYPE: Level III Therapeutic/Care Management.

4.
Am J Surg ; 226(5): 571-577, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37291012

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data from the National Health Expenditure Accounts have shown a steady increase in healthcare cost paralleled by availability of laboratory tests. Resource utilization is a top priority for reducing health care costs. We hypothesized that routine post-operative laboratory utilization unnecessarily increases costs and healthcare system burden in acute appendicitis (AA) management. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients with uncomplicated AA 2016-2020 were identified. Clinical variables, demographics, lab usage, interventions, and costs were collected. RESULTS: A total of 3711 patients with uncomplicated AA were identified. Total costs of labs ($289,505, 99.56%) and repletions ($1287.63, 0.44%) were $290,792.63. Increased LOS was associated with lab utilization in multivariable modeling, increasing costs by $837,602 or 472.12 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population, post-operative labs resulted in increased costs without discernible impact on clinical course. Routine post-operative laboratory testing should be re-evaluated in patients with minimal comorbidities as this likely increases cost without adding value.


Assuntos
Apendicite , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Atenção à Saúde , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Comorbidade , Doença Aguda , Apendicectomia
5.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 8(1): e001047, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37188153

RESUMO

Objective: To identify the rates and possible predictors of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) among adult trauma patients. Methods: This is a retrospective review of all adult patients (18 years or older) included in the 2017 and 2018 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program Participant User File (PUF). The main outcomes were rates and predictors of AWS. Results: 1 677 351 adult patients were included in the analysis. AWS was reported in 11 056 (0.7%). The rate increased to 0.9% in patients admitted for more than 2 days and 1.1% in those admitted for more than 3 days. Patients with AWS were more likely to be male (82.7% vs. 60.7%, p<0.001), have a history of alcohol use disorder (AUD) (70.3% vs. 5.6%, p<0.001) and have a positive blood alcohol concentration (BAC) on admission (68.2% vs. 28.6%, p<0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression, history of AUD (OR 12.9, 95% CI 12.1 to 13.7), cirrhosis (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.9 to 2.3), positive toxicology screen for barbiturates (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.7), tricyclic antidepressants (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.1) or alcohol (OR 2.5, 95% CI 2.4 to 2.7), and Abbreviated Injury Scale head score of ≥3 (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6 to 1.8) were the strongest predictors for AWS. Conversely, only 2.7% of patients with a positive BAC on admission, 7.6% with a history of AUD and 4.9% with cirrhosis developed AWS. Conclusion: AWS after trauma was an uncommon occurrence in the patients in the PUF, even in higher-risk patient populations. Level of evidence: IV: retrospective study with more than one negative criterion.

6.
J Am Coll Surg ; 234(4): 419-427, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35290260

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data on duration of antibiotics in patients managed with an open abdomen (OA) due to intra-abdominal infection (IAI) are scarce. We hypothesized that patients with IAI managed with OA rather than closed abdomen (CA) would have higher rates of secondary infections (SIs) independent of the duration of the antibiotic treatment. METHODS: This was an observational, prospective, multicenter, international study of patients with IAI requiring laparotomy for source control. Demographic and antibiotic duration values were collected. Primary outcomes were SI (surgical site, bloodstream, pneumonia, urinary tract) and mortality. Statistical analysis included ANOVA, chi-square/Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Twenty-one centers contributed 752 patients. The average age was 59.6 years, 43.6% were women, and 43.9% were managed with OA. Overall mortality was 16.1%, with higher rates among OA patients (31.6% vs 4.4%, p < 0.001). OA patients had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (4.7 vs 1.8, p < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (3.6 vs 2.7, p < 0.001), and APACHE II scores (16.1 vs 9.4, p < 0.001). The mean duration of antibiotics was 6.5 days (8.0 OA vs 5.4 CA, p < 0.001). A total of 179 (23.8%) patients developed SI (33.1% OA vs 16.8% CA, p < 0.001). Longer antibiotic duration was associated with increased rates of SI: 1 to 2 days, 15.8%; 3 to 5 days, 20.4%; 6 to 14 days, 26.6%; and more than 14 days, 46.8% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IAI managed with OA had higher rates of SI and increased mortality compared with CA. A prolonged duration of antibiotics was associated with increased rates of SI. Increased antibiotic duration is not associated with improved outcomes in patients with IAI and OA.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Infecções Intra-Abdominais , Abdome/cirurgia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções Intra-Abdominais/complicações , Infecções Intra-Abdominais/etiologia , Laparotomia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
7.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 93(5): 686-694, 2022 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35293375

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A growing body of literature suggests the persistence of a counterproductive triage pattern wherein uninsured adults with major injuries presenting to nontrauma centers (NTCs) are more likely than insured adults to be transferred. Geographic differences are frequently blamed. The objective of this study was to explore geography's influence on variations in insurance transfer patterns, asking whether differences in distance and travel time by road from NTCs to the nearest level 1 or 2 trauma center alter the effect. As a secondary objective, differences in neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage were also assessed. METHODS: Adults (16-64 years) with major injuries (Injury Severity Score, >15) presenting to NTC emergency departments (EDs) were abstracted from 2007 to 2014 state inpatient/ED claims. Differences in the risk-adjusted odds of admission versus transfer were compared using mixed-effect hierarchical logistic regression and spatial analysis. RESULTS: A total of 48,283 adults presenting to 492 NTC EDs were included. Among them, risk-adjusted admission differences based on insurance status exist (e.g., private vs. uninsured odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.60 [1.45-1.76]). Spatial analysis revealed significant geographic variation ( p < 0.001). However, in contrast to expectations, the largest insurance-based discrepancies were seen in less disadvantaged NTCs located closer to larger trauma centers. Stratified analyses comparing the closest versus furthest distance, shortest versus longest travel time, and least versus most deprived populations agreed, as did sensitivity analyses restricting uninsured transfer patients to those who remained uninsured versus subsequently became insured. CONCLUSION: Adults with major injuries presenting to NTCs were less likely to be transferred if insured. The trend persisted after accounting for differences in access to care, revealing that, while significant geographic variation in the phenomenon exists, geography alone does not explain the issue. Taken together, the findings suggest that additional and potentially subjective elements to insurance-based triage disparities at NTCs are likely to exist. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiological, Level III.


Assuntos
Transferência de Pacientes , Centros de Traumatologia , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cobertura do Seguro , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Geografia
8.
J Surg Res ; 273: 192-200, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35092878

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Alcohol use remains a significant contributing factor in traumatic injuries in the United States, resulting in substantial patient morbidity and societal cost. Because of this, the American College of Surgeons Verification, Review, and Consultation Program requires the screening of 80% of trauma admissions. Multiple studies suggest that patients who use alcohol are subject to stigma by health care providers and may ultimately face legal and financial ramifications of a positive alcohol screening test. There is also evidence that sociodemographic factors may dictate drug and alcohol screening patterns among patients. Because this screening target is often not uniformly achieved among all patients presenting with injury, we sought to investigate whether there are any discrepancies in screening across sociodemographic groups. METHODS: We investigated the Trauma Quality Program Participant User File for all trauma cases admitted during 2017 and compared the rates of the serum alcohol screening test across different demographic factors, including race and ethnicity. We then performed an adjusted multivariable logistic regression to determine the odds ratio (OR) for receiving a test based on these demographic factors adjusted for hospital and clinical factors. RESULTS: There were 729,174 traumas included in the study. Of this group, 345,315 (47.4%) were screened with a serum alcohol test. Screening rates varied by injury mechanism and were highest among motorcycle crashes (66.0% of patients screened) and lowest among falls (32.8% of patients screened). Overall, Asian and Pacific Islander (52.5% screened), Black (57.7% screened), and other race (58.4% screened) had higher rates of alcohol screening than White patients (43.7% screened, P < 0.001). Similarly, Hispanic patients were screened at higher rates than non-Hispanic patients (56.4% screening versus 46.2% screening, P < 0.001). These differences persisted across nearly all injury categories. In multivariable logistic regression, Asian and Pacific Islanders were associated with the highest odds of being screened (OR 1.34, P < 0.001) followed by other race (OR 1.25, P < 0.001) in comparison to White patients. CONCLUSIONS: There are consistent and significant differences in alcohol screening rates across race and ethnicity, despite accounting for injury mechanism and comorbidities.


Assuntos
Etnicidade , Hispânico ou Latino , Povo Asiático , Hospitalização , Humanos , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Estados Unidos
9.
Emerg Radiol ; 29(2): 307-316, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34850316

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To review and analyze the clinical significance of positive acute traumatic findings seen on MRI of the cervical spine (MRCS) following a negative CT of the cervical spine (CTCS) for trauma. METHODS: We performed a sub-cohort analysis of 54 patients with negative CTCS and a positive MRCS after spine trauma from the previous multicenter study of the Research Consortium of New England Centers for Trauma (ReCONECT). Both CTCS and MRCS were independently reviewed by two emergency radiologists and two spine surgeons. The surgeons also commented on the clinical significance of the traumatic findings seen on MRCS and grouped them into unstable, potentially unstable, and stable injuries. RESULTS: Among 35 unevaluable patients, MRCS showed one unstable (hyperextension) and two potentially unstable (hyperflexion) injuries. Subtle findings were seen on CTCS in 2 of 3 patients upon careful retrospective review that would have suggested these injuries. Of 19 patients presenting with cervicalgia, 2/5 (40%) patients with neurological deficit demonstrated clinically significant findings on MRCS with predisposing factors seen on CT. None of the 14 patients with isolated cervicalgia and no neurological deficit had clinically significant findings on their MRCS. CONCLUSION: While CTCS is adequate for clearing the cervical spine in patients with isolated cervicalgia, MRCS can play a critical role in patients with neurological deficits and normal CTCS. Clinically significant traumatic findings were seen in 8.5% of unevaluable patients on MRCS, though these injuries in fact could be identified on the CT in 2 of 3 patients upon careful retrospective review.


Assuntos
Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Centros de Traumatologia
10.
Surgery ; 171(2): 305-311, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332782

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is superior to open surgery for elective colectomy, but its role in emergency colectomy remains unclear. Previous studies were small and limited by confounding because surgeons may have selected lower-risk patients for laparoscopy. We therefore studied the effect of attempting laparoscopy for emergency colectomies while adjusting for confounding using multiple techniques in a large, nationwide registry. METHODS: Using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data, we identified emergency colectomy cases from 2014 to 2018. We first compared outcomes between patients who underwent laparoscopic versus open surgery, while adjusting for baseline variables using both propensity scores and regression. Next, we performed a negative control exposure analysis. By assuming that the group that converted to open did not benefit from the attempt at laparoscopy, we used the observed benefit to bound the effect of unmeasured confounding. RESULTS: Of 21,453 patients meeting criteria, 3,867 underwent laparoscopy, of which 1,375 converted to open. In both inverse probability of treatment weighting and regression analyses, attempting laparoscopy was associated with improved 30-day mortality, overall morbidity, anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, postoperative septic shock, and length of hospital stay compared with open surgery. These effects were consistent with the lower bounds computed from the converted group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal emergencies appears to improve outcomes compared with open surgery. The benefit is observed even after adjusting for both measured and unmeasured confounding using multiple statistical approaches, thus suggesting a benefit not attributable to patient selection.


Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Pontuação de Propensão , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 91(5): 790-797, 2021 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33951027

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is being increasingly adopted to manage noncompressible torso hemorrhage, but a recent analysis of the 2015 to 2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Project (TQIP) data set showed that placement of REBOA was associated with higher rates of death, lower extremity amputation, and acute kidney injury (AKI). We expand this analysis by including the 2017 data set, quantifying the potential role of residual confounding, and distinguishing between traumatic and ischemic lower extremity amputation. METHODS: This retrospective study used the 2015 to 2017 TQIP database and included patients older than 18 years, with signs of life on arrival, who had no aortic injury and were not transferred. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusions of the aorta placed after 2 hours were excluded. We adjusted for baseline variables using propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting. A sensitivity analysis was then conducted to determine the strength of an unmeasured confounder (e.g., unmeasured shock severity/response to resuscitation) that could explain the effect on mortality. Finally, lower extremity injury patterns of patients undergoing REBOA were inspected to distinguish amputation indicated for traumatic injury from complications of REBOA placement. RESULTS: Of 1,392,482 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 187 underwent REBOA. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, all covariates were balanced. The risk difference for mortality was 0.21 (0.14-0.29) and for AKI was 0.041 (-0.007 to 0.089). For the mortality effect to be explained by an unmeasured confounder, it would need to be stronger than any observed in terms of its relationship with mortality and with REBOA placement. Eleven REBOA patients underwent lower extremity amputation; however, they all suffered severe traumatic injury to the lower extremity. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence in the TQIP data set to suggest that REBOA causes amputation, and the evidence for its effect on AKI is considerably weaker than previously reported. The increased mortality effect of REBOA is confirmed and could only be nullified by a potent confounder. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.


Assuntos
Oclusão com Balão/mortalidade , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Hemorragia/mortalidade , Ressuscitação/mortalidade , Traumatismos Torácicos/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Aorta , Oclusão com Balão/métodos , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Feminino , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/cirurgia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Ressuscitação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicações , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
12.
J Surg Res ; 266: 1-5, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33975026

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Anticoagulation (AC) is associated with worse outcomes after trauma in some but not all studies. To further investigate the effect of AC on outcomes in patients with splenic injury, we analyzed the Trauma Quality Programs Participant Use File (PUF) METHODS: The 2017 PUF was used to identify adult (18+ y) with all mechanisms and grades of splenic injury. Demographics, comorbidities, hospital course and outcomes were compared between AC and non-AC patients. RESULTS: A total of 18,749 patients were included, 622 were on AC. The AC patients were older but had comparable gender composition to non-AC patients. Injury Severity Score (18.2 versus 22.5) and rates of serious (AIS ≥ 3) injury were all lower in the AC group (P = 0.001). AC patients received fewer units of RBC (5.7 versus 8.0 units, P < 0.001) and FFP (3.9 versus 5.4 units, P < 0.001) in the first 24 h but underwent angiography at similar rates (23.6 versus 24.5%, P = 0.8). Among those who underwent angiography, patients were more likely to undergo embolization if they were on AC (89.7 versus 73.9%, P = 0.04). Rates of splenic surgery were comparable (19.3 versus 21.5%, P = 0.2) between AC versus non-AC patients. Median LOS was longer in AC patients (6.3 versus 5.6 d, P = 0.002). AC patients had a higher mortality (13.3 versus 7.0%, P = 0.001). In a multivariable binary logistic regression, AC was an independent risk factor for mortality with OR 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-1.9) CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation is associated with increased mortality in patients with splenic injury.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/mortalidade , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/etiologia , Baço/lesões , Traumatismos Abdominais/complicações , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominais/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hemorragia/mortalidade , Hemorragia/terapia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
13.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 75(10): 994-1000, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33827896

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the existence of sex-based differences in the protective effects of helmets against common injuries in bicycle trauma. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we identified patients 18 years or older in the 2017 National Trauma Database presenting after bicycle crash. Sex-disaggregated and sex-combined multivariable logistic regression models were calculated for short-term outcomes that included age, involvement with motor vehicle collision, anticoagulant use, bleeding disorder and helmet use. The sex-combined model included an interaction term for sex and helmet use. The resulting exponentiated model parameter yields an adjusted OR ratio of the effects of helmet use for females compared with males. RESULTS: In total, 18 604 patients of average age 48.1 were identified, and 18% were female. Helmet use was greater in females than males (48.0% vs 34.2%, p<0.001). Compared with helmeted males, helmeted females had greater rates of serious head injury (37.7% vs 29.9%, p<0.001) despite less injury overall. In sex-disaggregated models, helmet use reduced odds of intracranial haemorrhage and death in males (p<0.001) but not females. In sex-combined models, helmets conferred to females significantly less odds reduction for severe head injury (p=0.002), intracranial bleeding (p<0.001), skull fractures (p=0.001), cranial surgery (p=0.006) and death (p=0.017). There was no difference for cervical spine fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Bicycle helmets may offer less protection to females compared with males. The cause of this sex or gender-based difference is uncertain, but there may be intrinsic incompatibility between available helmets and female anatomy and/or sex disparity in helmet testing standards.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Dispositivos de Proteção da Cabeça , Acidentes de Trânsito , Ciclismo , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
14.
J Surg Res ; 260: 369-376, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33388533

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients on warfarin with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage often have the warfarin effects pharmacologically reversed. We compared outcomes among patients who received 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), or no reversal to assess the real-world impact of PCC on elderly patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 150 patients on preinjury warfarin. Data were manually abstracted from the electronic medical record of an academic level 1 trauma center for patients admitted between January 2013 and December 2018. Outcomes were ICH progression on follow-up computed tomography scan, mortality, need for surgical intervention, and trends in the use of reversal agents. RESULTS: Of 150 patients eligible for analysis, 41 received FFP, 60 PCC, and 49 were not reversed. On multivariable analysis, patients not reversed [OR 0.25 95% CI (0.31-0.85)] and women [OR 0.38 95% CI (0.17-0.88)] were less likely to experience progression of their initial bleed on follow-up computed tomography while subdural hemorrhage increased the risk [OR 3.69 95% CI (1.27-10.73)]. There was no difference between groups in terms of mortality or need for surgery. Over time use of reversal with PCC increased while use of FFP and not reversing warfarin declined (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Male gender and using a reversal agent were associated with progression of ICH. Choice of reversal did not impact the need for surgery, hospital length of stay, or mortality. Some ICH patients may not require warfarin reversal and may bias studies, especially retrospective studies of warfarin reversal.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Coagulação Sanguínea/uso terapêutico , Coagulantes/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia Intracraniana Traumática/terapia , Plasma , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Varfarina/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fatores de Coagulação Sanguínea/economia , Coagulantes/economia , Connecticut , Feminino , Seguimentos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hemorragia Intracraniana Traumática/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Intracraniana Traumática/economia , Hemorragia Intracraniana Traumática/mortalidade , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Centros de Traumatologia/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Ann Surg ; 272(2): 288-303, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32675542

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to answer 2 questions: first, to what degree does hospital operative volume affect mortality for adult patients undergoing 1 of 10 common emergency general surgery (EGS) operations? Second, at what hospital operative volume threshold will nearly all patients undergoing an emergency operation realize the average mortality risk? BACKGROUND: Nontrauma surgical emergencies are an underappreciated public health crisis in the United States; redefining where such emergencies are managed may improve outcomes. The field of trauma surgery established regionalized systems of care in part because studies demonstrated a clear relationship between hospital volume and survival for traumatic emergencies. Such a relationship has not been well-studied for nontrauma surgical emergencies. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all acute care hospitals in California performing nontrauma surgical emergencies. We employed a novel use of an ecological analysis with beta regression to investigate the relationship between hospital operative volume and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 425 acute care hospitals in California performed 165,123 EGS operations. Risk-adjusted mortality significantly decreased as volume increased for all 10 EGS operations (P < 0.001 for each); the relative magnitude of this inverse relationship differed substantially by procedure. Hospital operative volume thresholds were defined and varied by operation: from 75 cases over 2 years for cholecystectomy to 7 cases for umbilical hernia repair. CONCLUSIONS: Survival rates for nontrauma surgical emergencies were improved when operations were performed at higher-volume hospitals. The use of ecological analysis is widely applicable to the field of surgical outcomes research.

16.
Injury ; 51(9): 1994-1998, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32482426

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Liver and spleen injuries are the most commonly injured solid organs, the effects of anticoagulation on these injuries has not yet been well characterized. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study. RESULT: During the 4-year study period, 1254 patients, 64 (5%) on anticoagulation (AC), were admitted with liver and/or splenic injury. 58% of patients had a splenic injury, 53% had a liver injury and 11% had both. Patients on AC were older than non-AC patients (mean age 60.9 vs. 38.6 years, p < 0.001). The most common AC drug was warfarin (70%) with atrial fibrillation (47%) the most common indication for AC. There was no significant difference in AAST injury grade between AC and non-AC patients (median grade 2), but AC patients required a blood product transfusion more commonly (58 vs 40%, p = 0.007) particularly FFP (4 vs 19%, p < 0.01). Among those transfused, non-AC patients required slightly more PRBC (5.7 vs 3.8 units, p = 0.018) but similar amount of FFP (3.2 vs 3.1 units, p = 0.92). The two groups had no significant difference in the rates of initial non-operative management (50% (AC) vs 56% (non-AC), p = 0.3)) or failure of non-operative management (7 vs 4%, p = 0.16). AC patients were more likely to be managed initially with angiography (36 vs 20%, p = 0.001) while non-AC patients with surgery (24% vs 13%, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in LOS and mortality. CONCLUSION: The use of anticoagulation did not result in a difference in outcomes among patients with spleen and/or liver injuries.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Fígado , Baço , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Fígado/lesões , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New England , Estudos Retrospectivos , Baço/lesões , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia
17.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 89(1): 29-35, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32118821

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Survivors of gun violence may develop significant mental health sequelae and are at higher risk for reinjury through repeat violence. Despite this, survivors of gun violence often return to the community where they were injured with suboptimal support for their mental health, emotional recovery, and well-being. The goal of this study was to characterize the posthospitalization recovery experience of survivors of gun violence. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative research study with a community-based participatory research approach. In partnership with a community-based organization, we conducted in-depth one-on-one interviews and used snowball sampling to recruit survivors of gun violence. We applied the constant comparison method of qualitative analysis to catalogue interview transcript data by assigning conceptual codes and organizing them into a consensus list of themes. We presented the themes back to the participants and community members for confirmation. RESULTS: We conducted 20 interviews with survivors of gun violence; all were black men, aged 20 years to 51 years. Five recurring themes emerged: (1) Isolation, physical and social restriction due to fear of surroundings; (2) Protection, feeling unsafe leading to the desire to carry a gun; (3) Aggression, willingness to use a firearm in an altercation; (4) Normalization, lack of reaction driven by the ubiquity of gun violence in the community; and (5) Distrust of health care providers, a barrier to mental health treatment. CONCLUSION: Survivors of gun violence describe a disrupted sense of safety following their injury. As a result, they experience isolation, an increased need to carry a firearm, a normalization of gun violence, and barriers to mental health treatment. These maladaptive reactions suggest a mechanism for the violent recidivism seen among survivors of gun violence and offer potential targets to help this undertreated, high-risk population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management/Therapeutic V.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/psicologia , Violência com Arma de Fogo , Saúde Mental , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/psicologia , Adulto , Agressão , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Medo , Armas de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Isolamento Social , Confiança
18.
J Am Coll Surg ; 230(6): 966-973.e10, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32032720

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons maintains that surgical care in the US has not reached optimal safety and quality. This can be driven partially by higher-risk, emergency operations in geriatric patients. We therefore sought to answer 2 questions: First, to what degree does standardized postoperative mortality vary in hospitals performing nonelective operations in geriatric patients? Second, can the differences in hospital-based mortality be explained by patient-, operative-, and hospital-level characteristics among outlier institutions? STUDY DESIGN: Patients 65 years and older who underwent 1 of 8 common emergency general surgery operations were identified using the California State Inpatient Database (2010 to 2011). Expected mortality was obtained from hierarchical, Bayesian mixed-effects logistic regression models. A risk-adjusted hospital-level standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was calculated from observed-to-expected in-hospital deaths. "Outlier" hospitals had an SMR 80% CI that did not cross the mean SMR of 1.0. High-mortality (SMR >1.0) and low-mortality (SMR <1.0) outliers were compared. RESULTS: We included 24,207 patients from 107 hospitals. SMRs varied widely, from 2.3 (highest) to 0.3 (lowest). Eleven hospitals (10.3%) were poor-performing high-SMR outliers, and 10 hospitals (9.3%) were exceptional-performing low-SMR outliers. SMR was 3 times worse in the high-SMR compared with the low-SMR group (1.7 vs 0.6; p < 0.001). Patient-, operation-, and hospital-level characteristics were equivalent among outlier-hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Significant hospital variation exists in standardized mortality after common general surgery operations done emergently in older patients. More than 10% of institutions have substantial excess mortality. These findings confirm that the safety of emergency operation in geriatric patients can be significantly improved by decreasing the wide variability in mortality outcomes.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Cirurgia Geral , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , California , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
19.
Am J Surg ; 219(4): 707-710, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31109633

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal and rectus sheath hematomas can occur spontaneously. There is a lack of research about the disease progression, optimal treatment strategies and the need for surgical intervention. Our study investigated their outcomes and management. STUDY DESIGN: Adult patients admitted during a one-year period with non-traumatic retroperitoneal or rectus sheath hematomas were retrospectively identified. Biographical, hospital-course, and outcome data were extracted. RESULTS: 99 patients were included; median age was 73-years (IQR 61-80). 88 patients were on an anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent. Warfarin and intravenous heparin being the most commonly utilized agents (42% and 36.4%, respectively). All 99 patients were diagnosed by CT scan. 79 patients received some sort of blood product (79.8% PRBC, 43.4% FFP, 17% platelets), and 26 patients were in hemorrhagic shock. 17 patients underwent angiography and/or angioembolization. Neither anticoagulation in general nor any specific agent was associated with the need for blood product transfusion or angiography. 13 patients died but none were attributable to the hematoma. CONCLUSION: Both hematomas are usually self-limiting and rarely require surgical intervention. A subset may require angioembolization.


Assuntos
Hematoma/terapia , Doenças Retais/terapia , Espaço Retroperitoneal , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Transfusão de Componentes Sanguíneos/estatística & dados numéricos , Embolização Terapêutica , Feminino , Hematoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Coeficiente Internacional Normatizado , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Tempo de Protrombina , Doenças Retais/diagnóstico por imagem , Espaço Retroperitoneal/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque Hemorrágico/etiologia , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
20.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 88(3): 366-371, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31804419

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It has been theorized that a tiered, regionalized system of care for emergency general surgery (EGS) patients-akin to regional trauma systems-would translate into significant survival benefits. Yet data to support this supposition are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the potential number of lives that could be saved by regionalizing EGS care to higher-volume, lower-mortality EGS institutions. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent one of 10 common EGS operations were identified in the California Inpatient Database (2010-2011). An algorithm was constructed that "closed" lower-volume, higher-mortality hospitals and referred those patients to higher-volume, lower-mortality institutions ("closure" based on hospital EGS volume-threshold that optimized to 95% probability of survival). Primary outcome was the number of lives saved. Fifty thousand regionalization simulations were completed (5,000 for each operation) employing a bootstrap resampling method to proportionally redistribute patients. Estimates of expected deaths at the higher-volume hospitals were recalculated for every bootstrapped sample. RESULTS: Of the 165,123 patients who underwent EGS operations over the 2-year period, 17,655 (10.7%) were regionalized to a higher-volume hospital. On average, 128 (48.8%) of lower-volume hospitals were "closed," ranging from 68 (22.0%) hospital closures for appendectomy to 205 (73.2%) for small bowel resection. The simulations demonstrated that EGS regionalization would prevent 9.7% of risk-adjusted EGS deaths, significantly saving lives for every EGS operation: from 30.8 (6.5%) deaths prevented for appendectomy to 122.8 (7.9%) for colectomy. Regionalization prevented 4.6 deaths per 100 EGS patient-transfers, ranging from 1.3 for appendectomy to 8.0 for umbilical hernia repair. CONCLUSION: This simulation study provides important new insight into the concept of EGS regionalization, suggesting that 1 in 10 risk-adjusted deaths could be prevented by a structured system of EGS care. Future work should expand upon these findings using more complex discrete-event simulation models. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, level IV.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Planejamento Hospitalar/organização & administração , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Algoritmos , California , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Planejamento Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos , Humanos , Encaminhamento e Consulta
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA