A1 Pulley Tenderness as a Modification to Tenderness along the Flexor Sheath in Diagnosing Pyogenic Flexor Tenosynovitis.

Background: Pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis (PFT) is frequently diagnosed by physical examination according to the Kanavel signs. This study proposes a modification of the Kanavel sign "tenderness over the course of the flexor sheath" by including palpation of the A1 pulley to increase specificity for diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective review was performed over 8 months for patients in the emergency department who received a consult to hand surgery to rule out PFT. Two cohorts, nonPFT infections and PFT infections, were studied for the presence or absence of the four Kanavel signs, as well as tenderness specifically over the A1 pulley on the affected digit(s) or T1 pulley of the thumb. Results: There were a total of 33 patients in the two cohorts (21 nonPFT, 12 PFT) with statistically significant differences with regard to the presence of all the Kanavel signs. A1 pulley tenderness had the greatest odds ratio, positive predictive value, specificity, and accuracy when compared with all Kanavel signs. When used in conjunction with each Kanavel sign, there was an increase in specificity in all four signs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed increased area under the curve with A1 pulley tenderness added, indicating improved ability to classify hand infections as PFT versus nonPFT. Conclusion: Although the classic Kanavel signs have shown reliable clinical utility, this study finds that tenderness at the A1 pulley can be a useful specification of "tenderness over the course of the flexor sheath" to help with the diagnosis of PFT.

Dermal Regeneration Template and Staged Skin Grafting for Extirpative Scalp Wound Reconstruction: A 14-Year Experience.

OBJECTIVE: Dermal regeneration template and staged split-thickness skin grafting may mitigate the need for flap coverage of postoncologic scalp defects. This technique has been studied previously in small case series. We examine the effect of risk factors, surgical technique, irradiation, and dressing modalities on reconstructive outcomes in a highly comorbid patient cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: Full- and partial-thickness extirpative scalp wounds reconstructed with dermal regeneration template and staged skin grafting were reviewed over a 14-year period. Stage 1 consisted of template application following burr craniectomy in cases lacking periosteum. Stage 2 consisted of skin grafting. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was variably used to support adherence. RESULTS: In total, 102 patients were analyzed (average age 74, mean follow-up 18 months). Eighty-one percent were American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or 4. Defect size averaged 56 cm2. Average skin graft take was 94.5% in full-thickness wounds. Seven patients failed this method. Preoperative scalp irradiation was associated with major complication and delayed graft healing. Comorbidities, wound size, and burring were not associated with complication. Patients were more likely to heal with NPWT compared to bolster (hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% CI 1.01-2.77; P = .046). Time between stages was 6.6 days shorter when NPWT was applied (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Dermal template and staged skin grafting is a reliable option for postcancer scalp reconstruction in poor flap candidates. Radiotherapy is associated with adverse outcomes. Negative pressure wound therapy simplifies postoperative wound care regimens and may accelerate healing.

Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in High-Body Mass Index Patients.

BACKGROUND: The effect of body mass index (BMI) on complication rates in prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is not well established. The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates between different BMI groups in subpectoral and prepectoral reconstruction. METHODS: A single-surgeon, 4-year, retrospective review was performed of consecutive prosthetic breast reconstructions. During this time, the senior author's practice shifted from a subpectoral to prepectoral technique. Patients were stratified into BMI subgroups (<25, 25-35, and >35 kg/m2) and complication rates were analyzed. A survey was administered to blinded medical personnel and patients comparing esthetic results. RESULTS: Implant-based reconstructions were performed in 195 patients (103 subpectoral and 92 prepectoral). No significant difference in major complication rate was observed between techniques. Among patients with BMI greater than 35 kg/m2, implant exposure occurred at a significantly higher rate in the prepectoral group (P = 0.04). In patients with BMI greater than 25 kg/m2, minor asymmetry was more prevalent with prepectoral reconstruction (12.3% vs 0%; P = 0.02). Regardless of technique, the odds of reoperation increased by 7% per point increase in BMI, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07; odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.15).A total of 66 survey responses were received. Physicians rated esthetic results more positively than patients did. Patients with a BMI of less than 25 kg/m2 were rated better than other BMI groups in nearly all categories. The position of submuscular reconstruction was rated significantly better than prepectoral. CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend toward higher complication rates in prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction with increasing BMI. Nonetheless, the technique appears to be safe, with comparable clinical and cosmetic results.