Development and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Two Parenteral Formulations of Albendazole Using Prodrug and Cosolvent Approaches.

Albendazole is a broad-spectrum anthelmintic drug used for parasitic infections. In addition, due to its mechanism of action, it has been studied as an anticancer agent. However, poor and highly variable bioavailability are limiting factors for its use in systemic illnesses. The present study aimed to develop two parenteral formulations of albendazole and to compare its pharmacokinetic profile with the conventional oral administration. Parenteral formulations were developed using two different approaches: a phosphonooxymethylated prodrug and cosolvents. For the albendazole prodrug, once synthetized, its solubility and hydrolysis with alkaline phosphatase were evaluated. A factorial design of experiments was used for the cosolvent formulation. Stability and hemolytic activity were assessed. A pharmacokinetic study was performed on New Zealand rabbits. Both formulations were administered intravenously, and the prodrug was also administered intramuscularly. Results were compared with those obtained after the oral administration of albendazole. A 20,000-fold and 6000-fold increase in albendazole solubility was found with the prodrug and cosolvent formulations, respectively. Both parenteral formulations displayed higher albendazole plasma concentrations for the first 2 h compared with oral administration, even when the oral dose was doubled. The absolute bioavailability of oral albendazole was 15.5% while for the intramuscular administration of the prodrug was 102.6%. Both parenteral formulations showed a significant decrease in the formation of albendazole sulfoxide (ANOVA p<0.05) and allowed greater exposure to albendazole. Albendazole cosolvent parenteral formulation could be a promising option in systemic illnesses considering its ease of preparation and superb pharmacokinetic performance.

Analysis of the effect of in vitro dissolution on the pharmacokinetics of albendazole

Abstract Albendazole is an anthelmintic drug commonly used in parenchymal neurocysticercosis and cystic echinococcosis. The aim of this study was to explore whether disparities in the dissolution profiles of albendazole products lead to significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters. Three generic products and the innovator were evaluated in vitro. Quality control tests were performed, and dissolution profiles were obtained according to the Mexican Pharmacopeia. Although all products passed the quality control tests, none of the generic products complied with the similarity factor (f 2). The product with the lowest f 2 value in respect to the reference was chosen for in vivo evaluation. The study was carried out in 12 healthy volunteers who received 400 mg of the generic or reference product according to a crossover design. No significant differences were found in Cmax and AUC for albendazole and its main metabolite, albendazole sulfoxide, between products. Two absorption peaks were observed in the pharmacokinetic profile, and a population (22%) with different absorption rates and delay time for the the second peak was found. Based on the results, due to the high variability in the absorption process the differences observed in vitro could not be observed in vivo.

Preparation and Evaluation of Mebendazole Microemulsion for Intranasal Delivery: an Alternative Approach for Glioblastoma Treatment.

Although mebendazole (MBZ) has demonstrated antitumor activity in glioblastoma models, the drug has low aqueous solubility and therefore is poorly absorbed. Considering that other strategies are needed to improve its bioavailability, the current study was aimed to develop and evaluate novel microemulsions of MBZ (MBZ-NaH ME) for intranasal administration. MBZ raw materials were characterized by FTIR, DSC, and XDP. Subsequently, the raw material that contained mainly polymorph C was selected to prepare microemulsions. Two different oleic acid (OA) systems were selected. Formulation A was composed of OA and docosahexaenoic acid (3:1% w/w), while formulation B was composed of OA and Labrafil M2125 (1:1% w/w). Sodium hyaluronate (NaH) at 0.1% was selected as a mucoadhesive agent. MBZ MEs showed a particle size of 209 nm and 145 nm, respectively, and the pH was suitable for nasal formulations (4.5-6.5). Formulation B, which showed the best solubility and rheological behavior, was selected for intranasal evaluation. The nasal toxicity study revealed no damage in the epithelium. Furthermore, formulation B improved significantly the median survival time in the orthotopic C6 rat model compared to the control group. Moreover, NIRF signal intensity revealed a decrease in tumor growth in the treated group with MBZ-MaH ME, which was confirmed by histologic examinations. Results suggest that the intranasal administration of mebendazole-loaded microemulsion might be appropriated for glioblastoma treatment. Graphical abstract.