An invited commentary on mentoring in infant mental health: A symposium commemorating Robert N. Emde.

This paper is based on a symposium on mentoring in infant mental health that took place at the 18th World Association for Infant Mental Health (WAIMH) conference. The symposium commemorated Robert N. Emde who was one of the founders of the field of Infant Mental Health, and devoted much of his career to mentorship. From an IMH perspective, mentoring experiences are best thought of as relationships, significant for both mentor and mentee, with positive mentoring experiences crucial for the development of IMH clinicians and researchers. The symposium participants, two pairs of mentor-mentee dyads, first gave an opening statement about what mentoring meant for them generally and personally, and then addressed three issues: the goodness of fit between mentor and mentee, "light and shadow" in mentoring relationships, and balancing old wisdom with new trends in mentoring. The paper brings the participants' views and personal experiences regarding these issues in their own words, highlighting key personal and professional issues related to mentorship from the perspectives of both mentor and mentee.

Cet article est basé sur un symposium sur le Mentorat en Santé Mentale de la Petite Enfance qui s'est tenu lors de la 18ème conférence de l'Association Mondiale pour la Santé Mentale de la Petite Enfance (World Association Infant Mental Health ­ WAIMH). Ce symposium a commémoré Robert N. Emde qui fut l'un des fondateurs du domaine de la Santé Mentale de la Petite Enfance et a consacré une large partie de sa carrière au mentorat. Du point de vue de la Santé Mentale de la Petite Enfance les expériences de mentorat sont davantage considérées comme des relations, importantes pour à la fois le et le ou la mentoré(e), avec des expériences de mentorat positives et cruciales pour le développement des cliniciens et des chercheurs IMH. Les participants au symposium, deux paires de dyades mentor­mentoré, ont d'abord fait un discours d'ouverture sur ce que le mentorat signifiait pour eux généralement et personnellement, et ont ensuite parlé de trois défis: le bon ajustement entre mentor et mentoré, « la lumière et l'ombre ¼ dans la relation de mentorat et l'équilibre de la vieille sagesse avec les nouvelles tendances dans le mentorat. Cet article récapitule les vues et les expériences personnelles des participants pour ce qui concerne ces défis, avec leurs propres mots, mettant en valeur les défis personnels et professionnels clés liés au mentorat de la perspective d'à la fois le mentor et le mentoré.

Este artículo se basa en un simposio sobre Consejería en el campo de la Salud Mental Infantil que se llevó a cabo en el Decimoctavo Congreso de la Asociación Mundial para la Salud Mental Infantil (WAIMH). El simposio fue dedicado a Robert N. Emde, uno de los fundadores del campo de Salud Mental Infantil, quien dedicó gran parte de su carrera a la consejería y guía profesional. Desde una perspectiva de IMH, la mejor interpretación de las experiencias de consejería es verlas como una significativa relación tanto para el consejero como para el aconsejado, considerando que las positivas experiencias son cruciales para el desarrollo de los profesionales clínicos e investigadores de IMH. Los participantes en el simposio, dos pares de díadas consejero­aconsejado, dieron primero una presentación de apertura sobre lo que significaba para ellos la consejería general y personalmente, para entonces abordar tres asuntos: la bondad de ajuste entre consejero y aconsejado, "Luz y Sombra" en la relación de consejería, así como el equilibrio en la consejería entre la vieja sabiduría y los nuevos acercamientos. El ensayo presenta los puntos de vista y experiencias personales de los participantes sobre estos asuntos en sus propias palabras, subrayando asuntos personales y profesionales claves relacionados con la consejería desde la perspectiva tanto del consejero como del aconsejado.

"When I think of mental healthcare, I think of no care." Mental Health Services as a Vital Component of Prenatal Care for Black Women.

PURPOSE: Black people give birth joyously despite disproportionate rates of adverse perinatal outcomes. Given that group prenatal care shows promise in mitigating these inequities, we sought to solicit the opinions of Black peripartum women on how group prenatal care could be tailored to fit their specific needs. In this study, we describe attitudes about a proposed Black group prenatal care in a single focus group of 11 Black women who receive maternal health services from Black Infant Health (BIH, a state and federal funded state-wide program for Black pregnant people with the goal to improve infant and maternal health). These data were used to design a race-conscious group prenatal care curriculum specifically for Black women at UCSF. DESCRIPTION: This study was an analysis of focus group data generated as part of a larger project focused on community involvement in Black maternal health. English speaking pregnant or recently postpartum women age 18 or older who receive services from BIH were recruited to participated in the focus group analyzed in this study. All facilitators of the focus group were Black women in order to facilitate candid conversation about racism in prenatal care. ASSESSMENT: The need for mental health care was common thread underlying all conversations about prenatal health improvements desired by our focus groups. Participants expressed the centrality of mental health access during our discussion of other themes (e.g.: ease of access, inclusion of partners, special classes for teen moms) by discussing them in terms of their relationship to mental health. Our participants' clear expression of the centrality of mental health care to their prenatal health guided our decision to focus on mental health as a necessary pillar of any group prenatal care intervention designed to mitigate perinatal healthcare disparities in this paper. Three themes related to mental health integration into group prenatal care emerged from thematic analysis of the transcripts. Participants expressed insufficient access and advocacy, and provider distrust. CONCLUSION: Evidence exists supporting group prenatal care as a tool for mitigation of perinatal health disparities among Black women. There is also a large body of data describing the disproportionate burden of mental health needs among Black women. The rich data we present here from Black women on their desire for the integration of these two needs fits well into the parallel conversation occurring in the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating desires of Black women regarding group prenatal care designed specifically for them. They expressed a strong desire for more access to mental health care providers who are racially conscious and aware of white supremacy, and nuanced opinions on the role of racial concordance in health equity.