Assessment of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 Polymorphisms in Allergic Patients with Chemical Sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Self-reported chemical sensitivity (SCS) is characterized by adverse effects due to exposure to low levels of chemical substances. The clinical manifestations of SCS are similar to the allergy, and a high percentage of individuals with both diseases have been found. Various genes, especially genes of importance to the metabolism of xenobiotic compounds, have been associated with SCS. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether allergic individuals with chemical sensitivity differed from allergic patients without chemical sensitivity with regard to the distribution of genotype and phenotype of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 polymorphisms. METHODS: A total of 180 patients were enrolled for this study. A questionnaire was employed to collect information on individual chemical sensitivity, while the Skin prick test and the PATCH test were used to verify the presence of an allergic condition against inhalants or contact allergens, respectively. For the evaluation of the CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 polymorphisms, we used a strategy based on the amplification of the entire gene coupled to direct genomic DNA sequencing analysis. RESULTS: Overall, a total of 15 different CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 haplotypes were identified in our population. If the 5 CYP2C9 and the 2 CYP2C19 identified alleles correspond to the previously described ones, 4 of the 8 CYP2D6 haplotypes, detected in the study group, present new SNPs combinations. These new suballeles were categorized as CYP2D6*2M Sa-lento Variant 1, CYP2D6*35B Salento Variant 2, CYP2D6*41 Salento Variant 3, and CYP2D6*4P Salento Variant 4 due to the presence of the key SNPs 2,850 C>T, 31G>A, 2,988 G>A, and 1,846 G>A, respectively. When the allergic individuals are divided into 2 groups according to their SCS score, we observed that the distribution of the CYP2D6 phenotypes was significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our idea is that the application of the questionnaire that we have adopted has enabled us to diagnose a degree of chemical sensitivity, which results as comorbid of the allergic disease and in which a condition of poor or intermediate metabolizes for the detrimental CYP2D6 alleles, could represent a discriminant between the chemical sensitivity and the health state.

Prospective randomized double-blind trial of racecadotril compared with loperamide in elderly people with gastroenteritis living in nursing homes.

AIM: Our aim was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of loperamide and racecadotril in elderly patients with acute diarrhea. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a randomized, prospective, double-blind, and parallel group design implemented in geriatric nursing homes in Catanzaro, Italy, from February 2008 to March 2009. Patients of both sexes were randomly allocated to receive either one tablet of racecadotril 100 mg every 8 h or two tablets of loperamide 2.0 mg followed by one tablet after each unformed stool, up to four tablets in any 24-h period. Patients were treated until recovery, defined as the production of two consecutive normal stools or no stool production for a period of 12 h. RESULTS: Normal stools were collected 36 +/- 4 h after the beginning of racecadotril and in 63 +/- 6 h from the beginning of loperamide administration (P < 0.01). The median time of abdominal pain in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population was 14 h for racecadotril and 28 h for loperamide. In the per-protocol (PP) population, the median time of abdominal pain was 14 h for racecadotril and 32 h for loperamide (P < 0.01). About the 50% of patients experienced at least one adverse event during the study: 12% in the racecadotril group and 60% in the loperamide group. The most frequently occurring adverse events were nausea and constipation. Genetic analysis did not report the presence of rapid or poor metabolizers. Pharmacoeconomic analysis performed at the end of our study documented an increase in costs in the loperamide group with respect to the racecadotril group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Racecadotril is more effective than loperamide-probably due to drug interaction with loperamide-and it is not related to pharmacogenetic susceptibility. Racecadotril is also more cost effective than loperamide.

The discovery of the potent aurora inhibitor MK-0457 (VX-680).

The identification of a novel series of Aurora kinase inhibitors and exploitation of their SAR is described. Replacement of the initial quinazoline core with a pyrimidine scaffold and modification of substituents led to a series of very potent inhibitors of cellular proliferation. MK-0457 (VX-680) has been assessed in Phase II clinical trials in patients with treatment-refractory chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) containing the T315I mutation.