"I Just Wanted Nothing More Than to Get in a Real Shower": Patient Experience of the Inpatient Wait for a Heart Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Patients waiting for heart transplant may be hospitalized for weeks to months before undergoing transplantation. This high-stress period is further complicated by restrictions of daily privileges including diet, rooming, access to the outdoors, and hygiene (eg, limited in ability to shower). However, there is a paucity of research on the experience of this waiting period. We sought to describe the inpatient experience among patients awaiting heart transplantation and to better understand the needs of inpatients waiting for heart transplant. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted in-depth, semistructured phone interviews with a purposeful sample of patients who received a heart transplant in the past 10 years and waited in the hospital for at least 2 weeks before surgery. Using the prior literature, the lived experience of the lead author, and input from qualitative experts, we developed an interview guide. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed in an iterative process until theoretical saturation was achieved. A 3-person coding team identified, discussed, and reconciled emergent themes. We conducted interviews with 15 patients. Overarching themes included food, hygiene, relationship with health care professionals, living environment, and stressors. Patients reported that strong bonds were formed between the patients and the staff, and the overwhelming majority only had positive comments about these relationships. However, many expressed negative comments about the experience of the food and limitations in personal hygiene. Other stressors included the unknown length of the waiting period, lack of communication about position on the transplant list, worry about family, and concerns that their life must be saved by the death of another. Many participants described that they would benefit from more interaction with recent heart transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals and care units have the opportunity to make small changes that could greatly benefit the experience of waiting for a heart transplant, as well as the experience of hospitalization more generally.

Perioperative Aspirin Use Is Associated with Bleeding Complications during Robotic Partial Nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Daily aspirin use following cardiovascular intervention is commonplace and creates concern regarding bleeding risk in patients undergoing surgery. Despite its cardio-protective role, aspirin is often discontinued 5-7 days prior to major surgery due to bleeding concerns. Single institution studies have investigated perioperative outcomes of aspirin use in robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). We sought to evaluate the outcomes of perioperative aspirin (pASA) use during RPN in a multicenter setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients undergoing RPN at 5 high volume RPN institutions. We compared perioperative outcomes of patients taking pASA (81 mg) to those not on aspirin. We analyzed the association between pASA use and perioperative transfusion. RESULTS: Of 1,565 patients undergoing RPN, 228 (14.5%) patients continued pASA and were older (62.8 vs 56.8 years, p <0.001) with higher Charlson scores (mean 3 vs 2, p <0.001). pASA was associated with increased perioperative blood transfusions (11% vs 4%, p <0.001) and major complications (10% vs 3%, p <0.001). On multivariable analysis, pASA was associated with increased transfusion risk (OR 1.94, 1.10-3.45, 95% CI). CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands, perioperative aspirin 81 mg use during RPN is reasonable and safe; however, there is a higher risk of blood transfusions and major complications. Future studies are needed to clarify the role of antiplatelet therapy in RPN patients requiring pASA for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Reducing postoperative opioid pill prescribing via a quality improvement approach.

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic has been fueled by prescribing unnecessary quantities of opioid pills for postoperative use. While evidence mounts that postoperative opioids can be reduced or eliminated, implementing such changes within various institutions can be met with many barriers to adoption. OBJECTIVE: To address excess opioid prescribing within our institutions, we applied a plan-do-study-act (PDSA)-like quality improvement strategy to assess local opioid prescribing and use, modify our institutional protocols, and assess the impacts of the change. The opioid epidemic has been fueled by prescribing unnecessary quantities of opioid pills for postoperative use. While evidence mounts that postoperative opioids can be reduced or eliminated, implementing such changes within various institutions can be met with many barriers to adoption. We describe our approach, findings, and lessons learned from our quality improvement approach. METHODS: We prospectively recorded home pain pill usage after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) at two academic institutions from July 2016 to July 2019. Patients prospectively recorded their home pain pill use on a take-home log. Other factors, including numeric pain rating scale on the day of discharge, were extracted from patient records. We analyzed our data and modified opioid prescription protocols to meet the reported use data of 80% of patients. We continued collecting data after the protocol change. We also used our prospectively collected data to assess the accuracy of a retrospective phone survey designed to measure postdischarge opioid use. Our primary outcomes were the proportion of patients taking zero opioid pills postdischarge, median pills taken after discharge and the number of excess pills prescribed but not taken. We compared these outcomes before and after protocol change. RESULTS: A total of 266 patients (193 RALP, 73 RAPN) were included. Reducing the standard number of prescribed pills did not increase the percentage of patients taking zero pills postdischarge in either group (RALP: 47% vs. 41%; RAPN 48% vs. 34%). The patients in either group reporting postoperative Day 1 pain score of 0 or 1 were much more likely to use zero postdischarge opioid pills. Our reduction in prescribing protocol resulted in an estimated reduction in excess pills from 1555 excess pills in the prior protocol to just 155 excess pills in the new protocol. CONCLUSION: Our PDSA-like approach led to an acceptable protocol revision resulting in significant reductions in excess pills released into the community. Reducing the quantity of opioids prescribed postoperatively does not increase the percentage of patients taking zero pills postdischarge. To eliminate opioid use may require no-opioid pathways. Our approach can be used in implementing zero opioid discharge plans and can be applied to opioid reduction interventions at other institutions where barriers to reduced prescribing exist.

Using Preoperative Pelvic Floor Assessment to Predict Early Return of Continence after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether pre-operative pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) parameters may predict early return of urinary continence after RP. While long-term urinary continence is eventually achieved in most patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP), predicting when patients will become continent is challenging. Prior studies aiming to predict return of post-operative continence have not evaluated patient-specific pelvic floor strength parameters. METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing RP who underwent pre-operative PFPT consultation and completed 3-month patient-reported quality of life evaluation. Trained therapists documented pelvic strength parameters. Urinary continence was defined as using 0 or 1 pad per day. We evaluated the association of PFPT parameters with urinary continence at 3 months, adjusting for other factors that could affect continence. RESULTS: 144 men met inclusion criteria. The majority of patients underwent nerve-sparing procedures and had intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. At 3 months, 90 of 144 (62.5%) were continent, while 54 of 144 (37.5%) were not. On multivariable analysis, prostate volume (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00) and pelvic floor endurance (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.23-6.17) were significantly associated with being continent at 3 months. 56 of 76 (74%) men with good pelvic floor endurance were continent at 3 months, while only 34 of 68 (50%) men with poor endurance were continent (P = .006). CONCLUSION: Pre-operative assessment of pelvic floor endurance is an objective measure that may allow more accurate prediction of early continence after radical prostatectomy. Improved patient counseling could positively impact patient satisfaction and quality of life and reduce decision regret.

Reducing Pseudoaneurysm and Urine Leak After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Results Using the Early Unclamping Technique.

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience using the early unclamping technique for robotic partial nephrectomy with particular attention to delayed complications, namely pseudoaneurysm and urine leak. We hypothesized that early hilar unclamping allows for improved control of end arteries and renorrhaphy after tumor resection, reducing overall delayed complications after partial nephrectomy with no increased risk of blood transfusion. METHODS: This single institution retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database includes patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy with early unclamping technique for presumed renal malignancy between 2009 and 2018. Patient demographics and perioperative parameters are described, particularly rates of pseudoaneurysm and urine leak. Results are compared to previously published partial nephrectomy studies using various clamping and renorrhaphy techniques. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty three patients were included in the study. Mean operative time and warm ischemia time were 186 and 14.7 minutes, respectively. Mean estimated blood loss was 242 cc. Thirty-day postoperative complication rate was 14.7%, with 88% of these Clavien I-II. Urine leak occurred in 1 patient (0.2%) undergoing a simultaneous partial nephrectomy and pyelothitotomy for partial staghorn stone. Postoperative transfusion rate was 1.33% and our pseudoaneurysm rate was 0%. CONCLUSION: The early unclamping technique for robotic partial nephrectomy is reliable and safe, with low pseudoaneurysm and urine leak rates which compare favorably to other published techniques.

Societal costs of localized renal cancer surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Hospital-related costs of renal cancer surgery have been described, but the societal costs of surgery-related lost productivity are poorly understood. We estimated the societal cost of renal cancer surgery by assessing surgery-related time off work (TOW) taken by patients and their caretakers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 413 subjects who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy enrolled in an IRB-approved prospective study received an occupational survey assessing employment status, work physicality, income, surgery-related TOW, and caretaker assistance. We excluded subjects with incomplete occupational information or metastatic disease. We estimated potential wages lost using individual income and TOW, and used logistic regression to evaluate for factors predictive of TOW > 30 days. RESULTS: Of the 219 subjects who responded, 138 were employed at time of surgery. Ninety-seven subjects returned to work, met the inclusion criteria, and were analyzed. Mean age was 54 and 56% of subjects had sedentary jobs. TOW ranged from 7 to 92 days; mean and median TOW was 35 and 33 days, respectively and 58% of subjects took > 30 days off. Mean potential wages lost for TOW was $10,152. Eighty-three percent of subjects had at least one caretaker take TOW (mean/median caretaker TOW: 11/7 days, respectively) to assist in recovery. Subjects with sedentary jobs were less likely to take > 30 days off (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.09-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Most renal cancer surgery patients take over 1 month off work. Recognizing the associated societal costs may allow better adjustment of patient expectations, and more comprehensive cost-effectiveness analyses in renal cancer care.

Clinical Use of Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice to Assess Patient Reported Prostate Cancer Quality of Life Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: EPIC-CP (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice) is a short questionnaire that comprehensively measures patient reported health related quality of life at the point of care. We evaluated the feasibility of using EPIC-CP in the routine clinical care of patients with prostate cancer without research infrastructure. We compared longitudinal patient and practitioner reported prostate cancer outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed health related quality of life outcomes in 482 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution from 2010 to 2014. EPIC-CP was administered and interpreted in routine clinical practice without research personnel. We compared practitioner documented rates of incontinence pad use and functional erections to patient reported rates using EPIC-CP. RESULTS: A total of 708 EPIC-CP questionnaires were completed. Mean urinary incontinence domain scores were significantly higher (worse) than baseline (mean ± SD 0.6 ± 0.2) 3 and 6 months after treatment (mean 3.1 ± 2.3 and 2.2 ± 2.1, respectively, each p <0.05) but they returned to baseline at 12 months (mean 1.6 ± 1.7, p >0.05). Mean sexual domain scores were significantly worse than baseline (mean 2.4 ± 2.8) at all posttreatment time points (each p <0.05). Practitioners significantly overestimated incontinence pad-free rates at 3 months (48% vs 39%) and functional erection rates at 3 months (18% vs 12%), 6 months (38% vs 23%) and 12 months (45% vs 23%, each p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: EPIC-CP is feasible to use in the routine clinical care of patients with prostate cancer without requiring a research infrastructure. Using EPIC-CP in clinical practice may help practitioners objectively assess and appropriately manage posttreatment side effects in patients with prostate cancer.