RESUMO
A randomized, double-blind, crossover study was conducted in 10 patients to assess the effect of nifedipine versus placebo on total ischemic activity and circadian distribution of ischemic episodes. After baseline exercise treadmill testing and 48-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic ST-segment monitoring, patients received either nifedipine (mean dose, 80 mg/day) or placebo administered 4 times per day, with the initial dose taken immediately upon arising in the morning. Patients were maintained on a stable dose of each study drug for 7 days, after which they underwent repeat exercise treadmill testing and 48-hour ambulatory electrocardiography. During exercise treadmill testing, greater exercise duration was achieved by patients receiving nifedipine than by those receiving placebo (421 +/- 121 vs 353 +/- 155 seconds, respectively; p less than 0.05). Time to greater than or equal to 1 mm ST depression was significantly greater with nifedipine (282 +/- 146 seconds) than at baseline (130 +/- 72 seconds, p less than 0.003) and with placebo (150 +/- 98 seconds, p less than 0.0005). During ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, nifedipine reduced both the total number of ischemic episodes (18 vs 54 at baseline and 63 with placebo; p less than 0.02 for both) and the total duration of ischemia (260 vs 874 at baseline and 927 minutes with placebo; p less than 0.02 for both). The surge of ischemia between 06:00 and 12:00 noted at baseline and during placebo therapy was nearly abolished during nifedipine treatment. Nifedipine at this dosage, administered in this manner, is effective in reducing total ischemic activity and may prevent morning surges of ischemic episodes.
Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/tratamento farmacológico , Ritmo Circadiano/efeitos dos fármacos , Nifedipino/uso terapêutico , Angina Pectoris/fisiopatologia , Doença das Coronárias/tratamento farmacológico , Doença das Coronárias/fisiopatologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeAssuntos
Cetoconazol/uso terapêutico , Leucemia/terapia , Linfoma/terapia , Micoses/prevenção & controle , Nistatina/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Cetoconazol/farmacologia , Nistatina/farmacologia , Orofaringe/microbiologia , Especificidade da Espécie , Leveduras/efeitos dos fármacos , Leveduras/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
A prospective randomized study was undertaken in neutropenic patients to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic ketoconazole v nystatin in reducing yeast infections. Eighteen patients received 500,000 units of nystatin suspension four times daily, and 18 patients received 200 mg of ketoconazole daily. The nystatin group experienced nine local yeast infections (four thrush, three esophagitis, and two vaginitis); three patients receiving ketoconazole had thrush. No cases of disseminated candidiasis occurred in either group. Ketoconazole was better tolerated than nystatin and neither drug caused toxic effects. In addition to being nontoxic and better tolerated, ketoconazole appeared to be slightly more effective than nystatin in reducing locally severe yeast infections.