Pickleball and the Rising Incidence of Achilles Tendon Injuries in the Elderly.

BACKGROUND: With its rising popularity of pickleball, particularly in the aging population, comes concern for potential injuries that previously rarely affected this patient cohort. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends of pickleball-related Achilles tendon injuries. METHODS: A retrospective case series was performed to determine the trends associated with pickleball-related Achilles tendon injuries over the last 10 years. A database search of all Achilles tendon ruptures (ICD-10 S86.0) presenting to a large, multistate, subspecialty referral orthopaedic clinic between January 2013 and June 2023 were identified and included in the study. Pickleball-related injuries were identified via query and confirmed with manual chart review. The incidence of pickleball-related injuries, as well as patient demographics and rate of surgery was determined and compared with the total population during that time period. RESULTS: A total of 2684 patients who suffered an Achilles tendon injury between January 2013 and June 2023 were identified, with 43 patients meeting the inclusion criteria for pickleball-related Achilles tendon ruptures. The number and overall incidence of pickleball-related Achilles tendon injuries has been increasing since 2016, excluding 2020 where there was a large decrease likely due to the COVID-19 epidemic. Pickleball was associated with older age at time of injury (64.5 vs 48.6, P < .001) as well as a lower BMI (26.6 vs 29.4, P < .001). In addition, patients who sustained a pickleball-related Achilles tendon injury were more likely to undergo surgery (67.4% vs 45.4%, P = .008). CONCLUSION: The rising popularity of pickleball and its associated injuries poses a significant risk to the aging population, with Achilles tendon injuries occurring in older individuals and resulting in a higher likelihood of undergoing surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective case-series.

The Influence of Resilience on Outcomes After Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Resiliency is the ability to recover from stressful events and has been shown to correlate with patient outcomes following certain orthopaedic procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between resiliency and outcomes following TAA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing primary TAA between April 2015 and September 2022 was performed (N = 83). Data included demographics, comorbidities, complications, preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) functional scores, Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) scores, and surgical satisfaction. Patients were defined as having low resilience (LR), normal resilience (NR), or high resilience (HR) based on a BRS score of <3, 3-4.30, and >4.3, respectively. RESULTS: High resilience patients had significantly higher postoperative FAAM ADL, Sports, and Overall scores as well as a significantly greater increase from preoperative scores compared with LR and NR patients. Low resilience patients had significantly lower FAAM Sports and Overall scores compared with normal and high resilience patients. BRS scores positively correlated with postoperative FAAM scores. We found no difference in satisfaction or VAS between the 3 cohorts. Multivariate regression analysis identified BRS scores to be an independent predictor for greater changes in FAAM scores following TAA. CONCLUSION: Although functional improvements following TAA are expected, patients with higher resilience at baseline are more likely to experience greater improvements in functional outcomes following surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Use of Telehealth to Improve Office Efficiency and Health Care Access Among Patients Being Evaluated for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients being evaluated for revision total joint arthroplasty (RTJA) are often referred to tertiary care centers, which may decrease their access to adequate health care and overburden these health care systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of RTJA patient evaluation via telehealth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified a consecutive series of patients newly evaluated for a symptomatic TJA by two academic surgeons during a 1-year period. Clinical records, radiographs, and laboratory values were reviewed to determine whether the patient was indicated for RTJA. Efficiency was determined by calculating the percentage of patients who could have been adequately evaluated with telehealth. We then used the modalities required for diagnosis in each RTJA case to determine the feasibility of evaluating such patients through telehealth. RESULTS: Of the 381 patients evaluated for RTJA candidacy, 154 (40.4%) were indicated for revision surgery. All 152 patients evaluated for possible hip revision could have been evaluated and diagnosed via telehealth, demonstrating a telehealth efficiency of 100%. Of 229 patients evaluated for possible knee revision, 183 were able to be evaluated and diagnosed via telehealth. The 46 remaining patients were indicated for revision secondary to instability, which would require an in-office examination for diagnosis. The efficiency of telehealth for potential knee revision patients was 79.9%. CONCLUSION: Telehealth may be useful in evaluating patients with symptomatic TJA. It may increase the efficiency of in-office evaluations and reduce potential barriers to health care access. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].

Surprise Billing Is Common in Total Joint Arthroplasty and Negatively Impacts Patient Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) may receive unexpected medical bills. Such "surprise" bills may cause financial hardship for patients, which prompted policymakers to pass the No Surprises Act. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of surprise bills for patients undergoing TJA and the effect of surprise billing on patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a large multi-state institution. Patients completed a questionnaire regarding the incidence of surprise bills after their surgery, details of those bills, and how the bills affected their surgical satisfaction. Independent predictors for receiving a surprise bill were assessed through a multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Twelve percent of participants received at least one surprise bill after their TJA. The most common surprise bill came from the surgical facility (48%), followed by anesthesia (36%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified older age and Black race to be independent predictors of surprise billing. Furthermore, surgery occurring after the No Surprises Act bill enforcement on January 1, 2022, was found to increase a patient's likelihood of receiving a surprise bill (P=.039, effect size=0.18). Patients who received a surprise bill reported being significantly less satisfied with their surgery (P=.002, effect size=0.45). Forty-nine percent of patients with a surprise bill felt their billing negatively affected their surgical satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Surprise billing continues to occur after TJA and can negatively affect patient satisfaction. Although surgeons may be unable to limit the amount of bills patients receive postoperatively, increased communication and education regarding the perioperative billing process may prove to be beneficial for both patient satisfaction and the physician-patient relationship. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(5):283-288.].

Foot and Ankle Patient Education Materials and Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: A Comparative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of foot and ankle patient education material generated by the AI chatbots, as they compare to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS)-recommended patient education website, FootCareMD.org. METHODS: ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Bing AI were used to generate patient educational materials on 10 of the most common foot and ankle conditions. The content from these AI language model platforms was analyzed and compared with that in FootCareMD.org for accuracy of included information. Accuracy was determined for each of the 10 conditions on a basis of included information regarding background, symptoms, causes, diagnosis, treatments, surgical options, recovery procedures, and risks or preventions. RESULTS: When compared to the reference standard of the AOFAS website FootCareMD.org, the AI language model platforms consistently scored below 60% in accuracy rates in all categories of the articles analyzed. ChatGPT was found to contain an average of 46.2% of key content across all included conditions when compared to FootCareMD.org. Comparatively, Google Bard and Bing AI contained 36.5% and 28.0% of information included on FootCareMD.org, respectively (P < .005). CONCLUSION: Patient education regarding common foot and ankle conditions generated by AI language models provides limited content accuracy across all 3 AI chatbot platforms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Surprise Billing in Elective Shoulder Surgery and Its Effect on Patient Satisfaction.

Patients often receive multiple bills following surgery, which may come as a surprise to them if they are not appropriately informed or educated prior to surgery. The purpose of this study was to identify whether surprise billing occurs following shoulder rotator cuff repair and its effect on patient satisfaction. The study surveyed adult patients who underwent elective rotator cuff repair from January 2020 to October 2021. Patients were asked if they received unexpected bills after their surgery, as well as about details regarding those bills. Additionally, patients were asked about their medical insurance carrier, knowledge of the billing process prior to surgery, and how they felt the process could be improved. Finally, patients were asked how these bills and the overall billing process affected their surgical satisfaction. Of the 158 responses, 25% of the patients stated they received at least one surprise bill following their rotator cuff surgery, with 57% of these bills being greater than $1000. Patients who received surprise bills reported being significantly less satisfied with their surgery (P<.001) and felt their billing experience affected their surgical satisfaction (64% vs 9%, P<.001). One in 4 patients undergoing elective rotator cuff repair received a surprise bill following surgery. These bills were monetarily substantial and significantly affected surgical satisfaction. Although surgeons may be unable to limit the amount of bills patients receive postoperatively, increased communication and education regarding the perioperative billing process may prove to be beneficial for both patient satisfaction and the physician-patient relationship. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):123-127.].

Subscapularis tear classification implications regarding treatment and outcomes: consensus decision-making.

Background: Several classifications have been proposed for subscapularis tendon tearing (SCTs); however, there remains a poor agreement between orthopedic surgeons regarding the diagnosis and management of these lesions. Distinguishing the various tear patterns and classifying them with some prognostic significance may aid the operating surgeon in planning appropriate treatment. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to outline the current literature regarding SCT classification and treatment and conduct a survey among shoulder and elbow surgeons to identify the approaches regarding surgical decision-making for these injuries. Methods: In this systematic review, we analyzed 12 articles regarding the subscapularis tendon tear classification and implications regarding treatment plans and outcomes. In addition, 4 international experts in subscapularis repair surgery participated in the development of a questionnaire form that was distributed to 1161 ASES members. One hundred sixty five surgeons participated and chose whether they agree, disagree, or abstain for each of the 32 statements in 4 parts including indications/contraindications, treatment plan, and the factors affecting outcomes in the survey. Results: Classification criteria were extremely variable with differing recommendations and descriptions of tear morphology; most were based on tear size, associated shoulder pathology, or lesser tuberosity footprint exposure. Considering the multiple classification systems and the overall poor agreement regarding SCT management, our study found that the most widely agreed upon (more than 80%) statements included early surgery is advised for traumatic SCT, chronic degenerative SCT (without fatty infiltration) associated with acute supraspinatus tear is a candidate for repair, and rotator cuff arthropathy is a contraindication for SCT repair. Conclusion: Our study was able to identify both patient and tear characteristics that are well agreed upon among surgeons in the treatment of these injuries. Lafosse classification is generally widely accepted; however, it needs to be improved by some additions. Continued collaboration among surgeons is needed to establish an acceptable and broadly applicable classification system for the management of these injuries.